Assessment of high-dose acetylcysteine in acute high-risk paracetamol (acetaminophen) ingestion.

BACKGROUND: Prompt acetylcysteine treatment with standard doses (300 mg/kg over 21 h in divided doses) is almost universally effective in preventing hepatotoxicity after paracetamol (acetaminophen) overdose. However, hepatotoxicity is reported despite early treatment when paracetamol concentrations exceed 300 mg/L (1,985 µmol/L) at 4 h. Prior studies evaluating high-dose acetylcysteine to treat high-risk ingestions have shown mixed results. We compared outcomes in patients with high-risk ingestions receiving standard or high-dose acetylcysteine. METHODS: Records from a single poison center were reviewed from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2022. We included cases of acute paracetamol ingestion treated with intravenous acetylcysteine with an initial paracetamol concentration above the "300 mg/L" (1,985 µmol/L) line on the Rumack-Matthew nomogram. We compared standard and high-dose acetylcysteine groups by odds ratios and multivariable logistic regression. We defined hepatotoxicity as aminotransferase activity >1,000 U/L. RESULTS: We included 190 cases. Fifty-six percent received standard-dose acetylcysteine while 44% received high-dose acetylcysteine. Treatment within 8 h yielded no difference in hepatotoxicity between groups (odds ratio 1.67, 95% CI 0.067-42.3). Among patients treated after 8 h, hepatoxicity was more common in the high-dose group (odds ratio 3.39, 95% CI 1.25-9.2) though odds of liver failure were similar (odds ratio 2.78, 95% CI 0.89-8.69). Eighty-eight percent of patients with hepatotoxicity had elevated aminotransferase activity at presentation. No patient died or received a liver transplant. DISCUSSION: Rates of hepatotoxicity were low in patients treated within 8 h regardless of acetylcysteine dose. Unexpectedly, high-dose acetylcysteine treatment was associated with an increased odds of hepatoxicity in those treated after 8 h, but most had abnormal aminotransferase activities at presentation and there was no difference in rates of liver failure. Limitations include the use of retrospective, voluntarily reported poison center data. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt treatment with acetylcysteine, regardless of dose, prevented hepatotoxicity in high-risk paracetamol ingestion.

Biomarkers of systemic inflammation provide additional prognostic stratification in cancers of unknown primary.

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers of systemic inflammation have been shown to predict outcomes in patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP). We sought to validate these findings in patients with confirmed CUP (cCUP) and explore their role alongside existing clinicopathological prognostic categories. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CUP oncologist from across the United Kingdom were invited to include patients with cCUP referred to their local CUP multidisciplinary team. Patient demographics, clinical, pathological and outcome data were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: Data were available for 548 patients from four CUP services. 23% (n = 124) of patients met clinicopathological criteria for favourable-risk cCUP. On multivariate analysis c-reactive protein (CRP) (p < 0.001) and the Scottish Inflammatory Prognostic Score (SIPS: combining albumin and neutrophil count) (p < 0.001) were independently predictive of survival. CRP and SIPS effectively stratified survival in patients with both favourable-risk and poor-risk cCUP based on clinicopathological features. CONCLUSIONS: Biomarkers of systemic inflammation are reliable prognostic factors in patients with cCUP, regardless of clinicopathological subgroup. We recommend that CRP or SIPS are incorporated into routine clinical assessments of patients with cCUP as a tool to aid investigation and/or treatment decision-making across all groups. Established clinicopathological factors can then be used to inform management pathways and specific systemic anticancer therapy selection.