Proactive Metabolite Testing in Patients on Thiopurine May Yield Long-Term Clinical Benefits in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: The thiopurine medications are well established in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). There is significant variation in levels of toxic and therapeutic metabolites. Current data from small or short-term studies support therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in assessing azathioprine (AZA) and 6-mercaptopurine (6MP). TDM of thiopurines involves measurement and interpretation of metabolites 6-TGN and 6-MMPR. AIMS: This study aimed to assess long-cterm outcomes of patients on thiopurines following therapeutic drug monitoring. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective observational study of outcomes post thiopurine TDM was conducted. Demographics, disease characteristics, physician global assessment, IBD therapy at baseline TDM and again at 12 months were collected. Clinical outcomes were analyzed according to TDM result, and indication for TDM including proactive and other indications. RESULTS: The study included 541 patients. Only 39% of patients had appropriate dosing of thiopurines. AZA/6MP TDM informed a management change in 61.9%, and enabled 88.8% of the cohort to continue AZA/6MP following TDM. At 12 months following TDM the majority (74.1%) of the cohort remained on AZA/6MP. Clinical remission was higher at 12-months following thiopurines TDM (68%) compared to baseline (37%), including proactive TDM. Post TDM, 13.0% of patients were identified as shunters and commenced on thiopurine-allopurinol co-therapy. CONCLUSION: Thiopurine TDM resulted in a change in management for the majority of patients. Post TDM significantly more patients were in remission. TDM allowed the identification of non-adherence and shunters who, without intervention, would not reach therapeutic drug levels. Proactive TDM allowed identification and management of inappropriate dosing, and was associated with increased levels of clinical remission.

Development and Feasibility of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Qualitative Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is becoming an important part of ulcerative colitis (UC) management because of the increasing complexity of available treatment choices and their trade-offs. The use of decision aids (DA) may be effective in increasing patients' participation in UC management but their uptake has been limited due to high attrition rates and lack of a participatory approach to their design and implementation. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study is to explore the perspectives of Australian patients and their clinicians regarding the feasibility and acceptability of myAID, a web-based DA, in informing treatment decisions in UC. The secondary aim is to use the findings of this pilot study to inform the design of a cluster randomized clinical trial (CRCT) to assess the efficacy of the DA compared with usual care. METHODS: myAID, a DA was designed and developed using a participatory approach by a multidisciplinary team of clinicians, patients, and nonmedical volunteers. A qualitative pilot study to evaluate the DA, involving patients with UC facing new treatment decisions and inflammatory bowel disease clinicians, was undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients with UC and 15 clinicians provided feedback on myAID. Themes explored included the following: Acceptability and usability of myAID-myAID was found to be acceptable by the majority of clinicians as a tool to facilitate SDM, uptake was thought to vary depending on clinicians' approaches to patient education and practice, potential to overcome time restrictions associated with outpatient clinics was identified, presentation of unbiased information enabling patients to digest information at their own pace was noted, and potential to provoke anxiety among patients with a new diagnosis or mild disease was raised; Perceived role and usefulness of myAID-discordance was observed between patients who prioritized voicing preferences and clinicians who prioritized treatment adherence, and myAID facilitated early discussion of medical versus surgical treatment options; Target population and timing of use-greatest benefit was perceived at the time of initiating or changing treatment and following commencement of immunosuppressive therapy; and Potential concerns and areas for improvement-some perceived that use of myAID may precipitate anxiety by increasing decisional conflict and impact the therapeutic relationship between patient and the clinician and may increase resource requirements. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings suggest that patients and clinicians consider myAID as a feasible and acceptable tool to facilitate SDM for UC management. These pilot data have informed a participatory approach to the design of a CRCT, which will evaluate the clinical efficacy of myAID compared with usual care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12617001246370; http://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12617001246370.

Crohn's Colitis Care (CCCare): bespoke cloud-based clinical management software for inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to evidence-based management is variable in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which leads to worse patient outcomes and higher healthcare utilization. Solutions include electronic systems to enhance care, but these have often been limited by lack of clinician design input, poor usability, and low perceived value. A cloud-based IBD-specific clinical management software - 'Crohn's Colitis Care' (CCCare) was developed by Australia and New Zealand Inflammatory Bowel Disease Consortium clinicians and software developers to improve this. METHODS: CCCare captures patient-reported disease activity and medical assessment, medication monitoring, cancer screening, preventative health, and facilitates communication with the IBD team and referring doctor. De-identified longitudinal data are stored separately in a clinical quality registry for research. CCCare was tested for feasibility and usability in routine clinical settings at two large Australian hospitals. Users' experience was evaluated with System Usability Scale (SUS). Value to clinicians and patients was assessed by qualitative feedback. Security was assessed by penetration testing. RESULTS: Users (n = 13; doctors, nurses, patients) reported good usability and learnability (mean SUS score 75 (range 50-95), sub-scores were 77 (50-94) and 68 (38-100), respectively). Patients reported better communication with clinical team and greater ability to track disease. Clinicians highlighted structured management plans, medication adherence, and centralised data repository as positive features. Penetration testing was passed successfully. CONCLUSIONS: Initial evaluation demonstrates CCCare is usable, secure, and valued in clinical use. It is designed to measure outcomes of clinical care, including efficacy, quality, cost, and complications for individuals, and to audit these at hospital and national level.

Ulcerative Colitis Narrative findings: Australian survey data comparing patient and physician disease management views.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The Global Ulcerative Colitis (UC) Narrative Survey aimed to evaluate the impact of UC, perceptions of UC burden, and management approaches. Here, we present data from patients and physicians in Australia. METHODS: Surveys, fielded by The Harris Poll, were completed by 215 patients with UC and 90 physicians, between August 2017 and February 2018. Surveys included questions on disease characteristics, impact on life, communication with physicians, and patient knowledge of UC. Results are presented descriptively from all respondents (with no imputation for missing data). RESULTS: Based on medication history, 84% of patients had moderate to severe UC. Diagnostic delay was on average 1.9 (SD 5.0) years and 48% of patients had waited ≥1 year for diagnosis. Nearly two-thirds (65%) of patients considered themselves to be in remission, with 97% also reporting a flare in the past year. The majority (92%) of patients were satisfied with their UC medication and, if their treatment made them feel "good enough," many (75%) would not consider an alternative. Most (90%) patients were satisfied with communication with their physician; however, only 48% felt comfortable raising emotional concerns. Both patients and physicians desired more time during routine appointments. Patients had gaps in their knowledge of UC, which physicians mostly recognized. CONCLUSIONS: The Australian survey results highlighted the diagnostic delay and burden of UC patients' experience, gaps in patients' knowledge of UC, and challenges in patient-physician communication. Compared with the overall Global UC Narrative Survey, patients in Australia reported a high burden of disease.

The effect of a nurse-led advice line and virtual clinic on inflammatory bowel disease service delivery: an Australian study.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective cohort study investigated the economic impact of implementing a nurse-led inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) advice-line and virtual clinic on the Australian healthcare system. The advice line is a telephone and email service managed by IBD specialist nurses. The virtual clinic is a planned, formal communication between the gastroenterologist and the specialist IBD nurse the result of which is communicated to the patient electronically. METHODS: Advice line telephone calls and virtual clinic consultations registered between 1 June 2015 and 1 June 2016 were reviewed and analyzed in terms of outcome: avoidance of general practitioner (GP) consultation, IBD outpatient consultation, emergency department (ED) presentation, or hospital admission. Cost-benefit analysis was conducted to estimate financial savings. RESULTS: During the study period, 220 calls were received through the advice line and 1017 virtual clinic consultations occurred. The advice line resulted in the avoidance of 53 GP visits, 159 IBD outpatient department visits, six ED presentations, and one hospital admission. The virtual clinic resulted in the avoidance of four GP visits, 954 IBD outpatient department visits, and 58 ED presentations. This led to an estimated annual cost saving of AUD 169 376.80, with the annual costs incurred estimated to be $58 713. Thus, the annual net benefit of implementing the advice line and the virtual clinic was estimated to be $110 663.80. CONCLUSION: Specialized-IBD-nurse-led advice line and virtual clinic improves IBD patients' access to services and reduces healthcare costs. This highlights the importance of a proactive multidisciplinary approach in optimizing the care of patients with IBD.

Prospective single-blinded single-center randomized controlled trial of Prep Kit-C and Moviprep: Does underlying inflammatory bowel disease impact tolerability and efficacy?

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy remains the gold standard for detection of colonic disease. An optimal evaluation depends on adequate bowel cleansing. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), require frequent endoscopic assessment for both activity and dysplasia assessment. Two commonly used bowel preparations in Australia are Prep Kit-C (Pc) and Moviprep (Mp). Little is known about tolerability, efficacy and safety of split protocols of Mp and Pc in both IBD and non-IBD patients. AIM: To primary aim was to compare the tolerability, efficacy and safety of split protocols of Mp and Pc in patients having a colonoscopy. The secondary aim was to compare the efficacy, tolerability and safety of either preparation in patients with or without IBD. METHODS: Patients were randomized to Pc or Mp bowel preparation. Patients completed a questionnaire to assess tolerability. Efficacy was assessed using the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Score. Serum electrolytes and renal function were collected one week prior to colonoscopy and on the day of colonoscopy. RESULTS: Of 338 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of 168 patients randomized to Mp and 170 to Pc. The efficacy of bowel preparation (mean Ottawa Bowel Preparation Score) was similar between Mp (5.4 ± 2.4) and Pc (5.1 ± 2.1) (P = 0.3). Mean tolerability scores were similar in Mp (11.84 ± 5.4) and Pc (10.99 ± 5.2; P = 0.17). 125 patients had IBD (73 had Crohn's Disease and 52 had Ulcerative colitis). Sixty-four IBD patients were allocated to Mp and 61 to Pc. In non-IBD patients, 104 were allocated to Mp and 109 to Pc. The mean tolerability score in the IBD group was lower than the non-IBD group (mean tolerability scores: IBD: 10.3 ± 5.1 and non-IBD: 12.0 ± 5.3; P = 0.01). IBD patients described more abdominal pain with Mp when compared with Pc; (Mp: 5.7 ± 4.4 vs Pc: 3.6 ± 2.6, P = 0.046). Serum magnesium level increased with Pc compared with Mp in all patients (mean increase in mmol/L: Mp: 0.03 ± 0.117 and Pc: 0.11 ± 0.106; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In this study, the efficacy, tolerability and safety of Mp and Pc were similar in all patients. However, patients with IBD reported lower tolerability with both preparations. Specifically, IBD patients had more abdominal pain with Mp. These results should be considered when recommending bowel preparation especially to IBD patients.

A Web-Based Decision Aid (myAID) to Enhance Quality of Life, Empowerment, Decision Making, and Disease Control for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) often face complex treatment decisions. Although shared decision making (SDM) is considered important, tools to facilitate this are currently lacking for UC. A recent pilot study of a novel Web-based decision aid (DA), my Actively Informed Decision (myAID), has suggested its acceptability and feasibility for informing treatment decisions and facilitating SDM in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the study protocol of the myAID study to assess the clinical impact of systematic implementation of myAID in routine UC management. METHODS: The myAID study is a multicenter, cluster randomized controlled trial (CRCT) involving 22 Australian sites that will assess the clinical efficacy of routine use of myAID (intervention) against usual care without access to myAID (control) for UC patients. Participating sites (clusters) will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio between the 2 arms. Patients making a new treatment decision beyond 5-aminosalicylate agents will be eligible to participate. Patients allocated to the intervention arm will view myAID at the time of recruitment and have free access to it throughout the study period. The effect of the myAID intervention will be assessed using the results of serial Web-based questionnaires and fecal calprotectin at baseline, 2 months, 6 months, and 12 months. A Web-based questionnaire within 2-4 weeks of referral will determine early change in quality of decision making and anxiety (both arms) and intervention acceptability (intervention arm only). RESULTS: Study recruitment and funding began in October 2016, and recruitment will continue through 2020, for a minimum of 300 study participants at baseline at the current projection. The primary outcome will be health-related quality of life (Assessment of Quality of Life-8D), and secondary outcomes will include patient empowerment, quality of decision making, anxiety, work productivity and activity impairment, and disease activity. In addition, we aim to determine the predictors of UC treatment decisions and outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of implementing myAID in routine practice. Feedback obtained about myAID will be used to determine areas for improvement and barriers to its implementation. Completion of data collection and publication of study results are anticipated in 2021. CONCLUSIONS: myAID is a novel Web-based DA designed to facilitate SDM in UC management. The results of this CRCT will contribute new evidence to the literature in comparing outcomes between patients who routinely access such decision support intervention versus those who do not, across multiple large inflammatory bowel disease centers as well as community-based private practices in Australia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12617001246370 http://anzctr.org.au/Trial/ Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12617001246370. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/15994.

Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Are More Concerned About Complications of Their Disease than Side Effects of Medications.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are often fearful about medication side effects and how the disease will affect their future. Our aim was to better understand what aspects of UC, and UC management, are most concerning to patients, and how they would like to be informed about treatment options. METHODS: A Web-based survey was sent to UC patients throughout the United States and Australia. In addition to standard closed-response questions, audio clips were embedded in the survey and respondents showed their strength of agreement or disagreement using moment-to-moment affect-trace methodology. Standard quantitative analysis was used for the survey results, and cluster analysis was performed on the affect-trace responses. RESULTS: A total of 460 patients with UC (370 patients from the United States and 90 patients from Australia) responded to the survey. Of them, 53% of the respondents were women, with a mean age of 49 (range 19-81) years. Most patients (87%) wanted to share treatment decision making with their doctors. The majority, 98%, wanted more than just a basic understanding of their disease. Patients were most concerned about the risk of colorectal cancer (37%), and the possible need for an ileostomy (29%). Only 14% of patients indicated that side effects from medications were their biggest concern. On affect-trace analysis, the most divergence in opinion centered on the appropriate timing for colectomy. CONCLUSIONS: To facilitate informed treatment decisions for UC patients, in addition to reviewing the benefits and risks of medications, it is also important to discuss the best strategies for decreasing the risk of colectomy and colorectal cancer.