Accelerate postoperative management after scoliosis surgery in healthy and impaired children: intravenous opioid therapy versus epidural therapy.

PURPOSE: Postoperative pain is a major concern following scoliosis surgery. CEA (continuous epidural analgesia) is established in postoperative pain therapy as well as intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of both methods. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 175 children between 8 and 18 years who were subject to posterior scoliosis correction and fusion. Two main cohorts were formed: CEA with local anesthetic and opioids, and IV-PCA with opioids. Both groups further comprised two sub-cohorts: those who were mentally and/or physically healthy (H; n = 93 vs. n = 30) and those who were impaired (I; n = 26 vs. n = 26). The outcome parameters were the demand for pain medication, parameters of mobilization, and the presence of adverse reactions. RESULTS: Healthy children who received CEA started mobilization 1 day earlier than children with IV-PCA (p = 0.002). First postsurgical defecation was seen earlier in all children who received CEA in both groups (H; Day 4 vs. Day 5, p = 0.011, I; Day 3 vs. Day 5, p = 0.044). Healthy children who received CEA were discharged from hospital 4 days earlier than their IV-PCA counterparts (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference in postoperative nausea nor in vomiting was identified between groups. Transient neurological irritations were seen in 9.7% of the patients in the CEA group. CONCLUSIONS: CEA provides appropriate pain management after scoliosis surgery, regardless of the patient's mental status. It allows earlier postoperative defecation for all patients , as well as shorter hospitalization and an earlier mobilization for healthy patients.

Relevant incidence of cervical arthritis in patients with erosive seropositive rheumatoid arthritis even today.

OBJECTIVES: This paper aims to investigate adherence to, and outcome of, radiographic screening of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for cervical involvement, given the availability of state of the art disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) and biological therapies. METHODS: Cervical screening results and clinical information were obtained from the charts of 395 consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis who attended an academic rheumatology outpatient clinic in a 3-month interval. This sample was combined with eight patients who underwent C1-C2 fusion at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. RESULTS: Reports on cervical spine x-ray films were not found in the charts of 67 patients (17 %), including 21 (8 %) of the 257 patients with a disease duration of ≥5 years. Nevertheless, 17 (7%) of these 257 patients had an increased atlantodental distance. An additional 4 RA patients of the Department of Orthopaedics were added for a total of 21 patients with cervical arthritis, 13 of whom had no cervical symptoms. All 21 patients with cervical arthritis had erosive peripheral arthritis with at least 10 years of disease duration, and were positive for rheumatoid factor. Almost half of these patients were not under adequate DMARD therapy when cervical instability was diagnosed, and none were on biological response modifiers. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for cervical arthritis is still of importance, especially in patients with erosive seropositive disease. In view of the documented incidence, adherence to screening protocols was disappointing.

Impact of customized add-on nighttime bracing in full-time brace treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Bracing is an accepted standard therapy for idiopathic scoliosis at Cobb angle ranges between 25° and 40°. However, it is unclear, if a specifically tailored regimen of daytime and nighttime braces (= double brace) yields superior results compared to the standard treatment (single brace for day and night). METHODS: One-hundred-fifteen patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) were assessed before initiation of bracing treatment and at the final follow-up 2 years after deposition of the brace. They were divided into two groups: double-brace group (n = 66, 4 male, 62 female, age 13.1 ± 1.9 (mean ± SD), primary curvature thoracic n = 35, lumbar n = 31) and single-brace group (n = 49, 8 male, 41 female, age 14.1 ± 1.9, primary curvature thoracic n = 18, lumbar n = 31). Each patient underwent clinical and radiological examinations and Cobb angles were measured. RESULTS: Both therapy regimens succeeded to either stop progression or improve scoliosis in over 85% of cases. The nighttime brace showed a significantly higher primary correction than the daytime brace. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in treatment success in the 2-year follow-up (p = 0.58). CONCLUSION: It seems to be sufficient to treat idiopathic scoliosis with one well-tailored brace for day- and nighttime.

The assessment of the postoperative spinal alignment: MRI adds up on accuracy.

INTRODUCTION: The sagittal profile of conventionally and surgically treated scoliotic spines is usually analyzed via lateral views of whole-spine X-rays in an upright position. Due to a more hypokyphotic configuration of scoliotic spines, the view onto the upper thoracic vertebrae is often difficult. We investigated whether additional supine MRI measurement supports valid kyphosis angle measurement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with either short (n = 10, Halm-Zielke, VDS) or long spondylodesis (n = 10, dorsoventral) were assessed 5 years after surgery with standing radiographs and supine whole-spine MRI. RESULTS: Up to 90% of the upper thoracic vertebrae were invisible on radiographs, whereas MRI allowed visibility of almost many vertebrae. No significant difference in thoracal kyphosis angles could be observed in the comparison of X-ray and MRI data. CONCLUSION: Thoracal kyphosis measurement of postoperative spines in MRI is a valid diagnostic tool with reliability comparable to that of X-ray. These results cannot be transferred to lumbar lordosis measurement and transferred only partly to coronal COBB angle measurement.

Selenoprotein N muscular dystrophy: differential diagnosis for early-onset limited mobility of the spine.

Early spinal rigidity is a nonspecific feature reported in diseases such as neuromuscular and central movement disorders. We present a male patient with rigid spine muscular dystrophy caused by newly identified compound heterozygote mutations of the selenoprotein N gene and discuss this disease as a possible differential diagnosis for early-onset reduced spine mobility. Rigid spine muscular dystrophy is a rare myopathy presenting in childhood with a typical combination of stable or slowly progressive mild to moderate muscle weakness, limitation in flexion of the spine, and progressive restrictive ventilatory disorder. The clinical features of our patient include early-onset rigidity of his spine, scoliosis, mild muscular weakness predominantly of neck and trunk flexors, and restrictive ventilatory disorder. Biopsy of the biceps muscle revealed nonspecific myopathic changes, and molecular analysis confirmed the diagnosis of rigid spine muscular dystrophy. Thus, neuromuscular diseases such as muscular dystrophy must be considered in all patients presenting with early spinal rigidity, and genetic determination is a possible way to determine the diagnosis.

Thoracal flat back is a risk factor for lumbar disc degeneration after scoliosis surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar segments below fused scoliotic spines are thought to be exposed to extraordinary stress. Although positive sagittal imbalance has come into focus, reports about factors influencing the outcome of these segments remain inconclusive. PURPOSE: Our study aimed at identifying spinal risk factors for the development of lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) in surgically treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective comparative prognostic study (Level III) was conducted. Thirty-three patients were seen at an average follow-up of 7.5 years after either isolated selective anterior (n=18) or long combined anterior-posterior fusion (n=15) for AIS. OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported Scoliosis Research Society 22 questionnaire, physical examination including the detection of segmental pain and unspecific back pain, preoperative and postoperative whole-spine standing radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging were obtained. METHODS: Radiographic evaluation included the measurement of regional, coronal, and sagittal curve parameters and the assessment of spinal balance. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation was done for preoperative and postoperative lumbar discs, according to the classification of Pfirrmann. RESULTS: Patients with low DDD (Pfirrmann grading <3) had a significantly higher thoracal kyphosis angle (mean 28°) than patients with advanced DDD (mean 15°). There was a trend toward a more flat-type lumbar lordosis in patients with severe DDD. Positive sagittal imbalance was associated with advanced DDD. Follow-up coronal parameters, trunk imbalance, instrumentation length, and lowest instrumented vertebra selection had no influence on DDD. Specific segmental pain could be attributed to a significantly higher coronal trunk imbalance (21 vs. 11 mm). CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes thoracal flat back as a risk factor for lumbar DDD after spinal fusion and supports the pathogenetic role of positive sagittal imbalance in this process.

Operative management of a non-traumatic cervico-thoracic spondylolisthesis: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: In contrast to spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine, non-traumatic cervico-thoracic spondylolisthesis is a very rare lesion. Even minor changes in the displacement of the vertebrae or the cord can lead to cervical myelopathy and paralysis. Since only a few cases have been well-documented, there is currently no clear preference between operative techniques. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the case of a 63-year-old Caucasian man with a 13 mm spondylolisthesis between C7 and T1. Within a few months, a progressive cervical myelopathy developed as he began to suffer pain and loss of function of his digits and was no longer able to walk unassisted. In an interdisciplinary collaboration between neurological and orthopedic surgeons, a ventral-dorsal-ventral approach was performed on one vertebral section. The ventral removal of the intervertebral disc was followed by laminectomy and dorsal instrumentation. A new application technique was established by inserting bicortical screws into the transverse processes of T2 and T3. The structure was subsequently stabilized by the ventral insertion of a Harms basket. The procedure was successful as it halted progression of the myelopathy. The patient demonstrated improved sensitivity and recovered the ability to walk unassisted. He has now been able to walk unassisted for two years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: This paper describes a successful treatment for a very rare case of cervico-thoracic spondylolisthesis. The technique of inserting bicortical screws into the transverse processes is a fast, safe and successful method that does not require the use of intraoperative radiographs for placement of the bicortical screws into the transverse processes.