Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Durable Polymer Cobalt-Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk: A Patient-Level Stratified Analysis From Four Postapproval Studies.

BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate long-term adverse events in HBR patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent implantation. METHODS: We analyzed stratified data from 4 all-comers postapproval registries. Patients with at least 1 of the following criteria were categorized as HBR: age ≥75 years, history of major bleeding (MB), history of stroke, chronic oral anticoagulant use, chronic kidney disease, anemia, or thrombocytopenia. Additionally, in a separate analysis, patients were categorized according to the recently published Academic Research Consortium HBR criteria. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for time-to-event analyses. Coronary thrombotic events (CTE) included myocardial infarction or definite/probable stent thrombosis. MB was defined according to the TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) or GUSTO (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries) scales. Impact of CTE and MB on subsequent risk of mortality was assessed using multivariable Cox regression with MB and CTE included as time-updated covariates. RESULTS: Of the total 10 502 patients included, 3507 (33%) were identified as HBR. Compared with non-HBR patients, those at HBR had more comorbidities, higher lesion complexity, and a higher risk of 4-year mortality (Hazard Ratio [HR] 4.38 [95% CI, 3.76-5.11]). Results were qualitatively similar when using Academic Research Consortium criteria to define HBR. Risk of mortality was increased after CTE (HR 5.02 [95% CI, 3.93-6.41]), as well as after MB (HR 4.92 [95% CI, 3.82-6.35]). Of note, this effect was consistent across the spectrum of bleeding risk (P-interaction test 0.97 and 0.06, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the non-HBR population, HBR patients experienced worse 4-year outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent. Both CTE and MB had a significant impact on subsequent risk of mortality irrespective of bleeding risk.

Comparative influence of bleeding and ischemic risk factors on diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting stents.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of ischemic and bleeding risk factors on long-term clinical outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with everolimus-eluting stents. BACKGROUND: Second-generation drug-eluting stents have substantially improved outcomes after PCI in the general population; however, DM patients continue to experience high rates of ischemic and bleeding complications. METHODS: DM patients from the pooled XIENCE V registry were divided into high or low bleeding and ischemic risk groups (HBR, LBR, HIR, and LIR) based on established bleeding (age ≥ 75 years; chronic kidney disease; anemia; prior stroke; oral anticoagulation; thrombocytopenia; prior major bleeding) and ischemic (acute coronary syndrome; prior myocardial infarction [MI]; ≥3 stents implanted; ≥3 vessels treated; ≥3 lesions treated; stent length > 60 mm; bifurcation treated with ≥2 stents; chronic total occlusion) risk factors. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiac death, MI, or stent thrombosis) and major bleeding at 4-year follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 3,704 DM patients were divided into four groups (21.5% LBR/LIR; 39.0% LBR/HIR; 15.6% HBR/LIR; 23.9% HBR/HIR). Compared with LBR/LIR patients, those at HBR/HIR and HBR/LIR had a significantly higher risk of MACE (HR (95% CI) 2.7 (1.9-3.9) and 2.2 (1.5-3.2), respectively) and major bleeding (2.7 (1.6-4.8) and 2.6 (1.4-4.7), respectively), while LBR/HIR patients did not. CONCLUSIONS: Among DM patients undergoing PCI, presence of bleeding risk factors was associated with a higher risk of both ischemic and bleeding events, whereas commonly used features of ischemic risk did not impact long-term clinical outcomes.

Impact of renal function in high bleeding risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a patient-level stratified analysis from four post-approval studies.

Data on ischemic and bleeding outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the association between CKD and ischemic and bleeding outcomes in HBR patients who underwent PCI. Among 10,502 patients in the four post-approval registries evaluating patients undergoing PCI, 2,300 patients presented with at least one major or two minor ARC-HBR criteria. CKD was defined as eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. These HBR patients were divided into 3 groups: eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 defined as severe CKD (N = 221), eGFR 30- < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 defined as moderate CKD (N = 970), eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 defined as no CKD (N = 1,109). The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis, and the safety endpoint was major bleeding up to 4-year follow-up. HBR patients with CKD were more often female and had higher rates of comorbidities compared to those without CKD. Reduced renal function was associated with higher rates of the primary endpoint (severe CKD vs. moderate CKD vs. no CKD: 30.2% vs. 12.5% vs. 9.1%, P < 0.01) as well as major bleeding (10.3% vs. 8.9% vs. 6.4%, P = 0.03). After adjustment, severe CKD and moderate CKD in HBR patients remained independent predictors for the primary endpoint (HR [95%CI] 2.84 [1.94-4.16], P < 0.01, 1.48 [1.10-2.00], P < 0.01) compared to those with no CKD. However, decreased renal function was no longer significantly associated with major bleeding after adjustment. In conclusions, in HBR patients undergoing PCI, CKD has an important impact on major ischemic events after PCI.

Intervention in coronary bifurcation lesions: Staying on top of the proximal optimization technique (POT).

Proximal optimization technique (POT) restores the stent to the fractal geometry of coronary bifurcations and is the final step when using two-stent strategy. Optimal positioning of balloon during final POT is vital to achieve best results without side branch compromise. In vitro studies provide valuable insights to define procedural strategies and help achieve best outcomes for coronary bifurcation lesions.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Clinical expert opinion and consensus statement for Asia.

OBJECTIVES: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment of patient with aortic valve stenosis is unknown and there is uncertainty on the optimal strategies in managing these patients. METHODS: This study is supported and endorsed by the Asia Pacific Society of Interventional Cardiology. Due to the inability to have face to face discussions during the pandemic, an online survey was performed by inviting key opinion leaders (cardiac surgeon/interventional cardiologist/echocardiologist) in the field of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in Asia to participate. The answers to a series of questions pertaining to the impact of COVID-19 on TAVI were collected and analyzed. These led subsequently to an expert consensus recommendation on the conduct of TAVI during the pandemic. RESULTS: The COVID-19 pandemic had resulted in a 25% (10-80) reduction of case volume and 53% of operators required triaging to manage their patients with severe aortic stenosis. The two most important parameters used to triage were symptoms and valve area. Periprocedural changes included the introduction of teleconsultation, preprocedure COVID-19 testing, optimization of protests, and catheterization laboratory set up. In addition, length of stay was reduced from a mean of 4.4 to 4 days. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted on the delivery of TAVI services to patients in Asia. This expert recommendation on best practices may be a useful guide to help TAVI teams during this period until a COVID-19 vaccine becomes widely available.

A novel self-expanding transcatheter heart valve: Shaping the story beyond accuracy.

As transcatheter aortic valve implantation expands to low risk patients, the key to prolonged survival would be large effective orifice area with extremely low rates of paravalvular leak and permanent pacemaker implantation. New transcatheter valve technologies look promising to enable this, ACURATE neo is one such device. The results of ongoing trials with ACURATE neo and ACURATE neo2 are keenly awaited.

Chronic total occlusion or non-chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Do myocytes really care?

Chronic total occlusions subtend a more extensive perfusion defect size compared to non-chronic total occlusion lesions. Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO PCI) results in significant improvement in myocardial blood flow and reduction in perfusion defect size. Improvement in hyperemic myocardial blood Flow (MBF), coronary flow reserve (CFR) and perfusion defect size is comparable in CTO and hemodynamically significant non-CTO PCI.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Protect the kidneys to protect the patient.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) seems superior to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for intermediate-term outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis and moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (CKD). Intermediate-term mortality and the major adverse cardiac and renal event increase if the renal function worsens soon after TAVR or SAVR. Patient's demographic profile, comorbid conditions, and procedural characteristics influence the clinical outcomes emphasizing the need for careful risk assessment in deciding TAVR versus SAVR in CKD patient.

Paclitaxel-Eluting versus Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents in Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: The choice of drug-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been debated. Previous studies comparing paclitaxel-eluting stents with stents eluting rapamycin (now called sirolimus) or its analogues (everolimus or zotarolimus) have produced contradictory results, ranging from equivalence between stent types to superiority of everolimus-eluting stents. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1830 patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease who were undergoing PCI to receive either a paclitaxel-eluting stent or an everolimus-eluting stent. We used a noninferiority trial design with a noninferiority margin of 4 percentage points for the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval of the risk difference. The primary end point was target-vessel failure, which was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization at the 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: At 1 year, paclitaxel-eluting stents did not meet the criterion for noninferiority to everolimus-eluting stents with respect to the primary end point (rate of target-vessel failure, 5.6% vs. 2.9%; risk difference, 2.7 percentage points [95% confidence interval, 0.8 to 4.5]; relative risk, 1.89 [95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 2.99]; P=0.38 for noninferiority). There was a significantly higher 1-year rate in the paclitaxel-eluting stent group than in the everolimus-eluting stent group of target-vessel failure (P=0.005), spontaneous myocardial infarction (3.2% vs. 1.2%, P=0.004), stent thrombosis (2.1% vs. 0.4%, P=0.002), target-vessel revascularization (3.4% vs. 1.2%, P=0.002), and target-lesion revascularization (3.4% vs. 1.2%, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease undergoing PCI, paclitaxel-eluting stents were not shown to be noninferior to everolimus-eluting stents, and they resulted in higher rates of target-vessel failure, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target-vessel revascularization at 1 year. (Funded by Boston Scientific; TUXEDO-India Clinical Trials Registry-India number, CTRI/2011/06/001830).

BioResorbable scaffolds: Out of sight but not out of mind.

The article highlights the results of a new novel BioResorbable Scaffold in "real world" practice Based on this, further design iterations could be reviewed for next generation BRS Larger and longer-term trials would be needed to define the safety and effectiveness of new BRS in daily clinical practice.

Venous access closure: From A to Z.

Points to increasing need for achieving safe and secure closure of femoral venous access site after large caliber venous sheath for after structural interventions. Emphasizes the role of a simple, easy to learn "Z-stitch" for achieving femoral vein hemostasis leading to early ambulation. Cautions and advocates the use of multiple complimentary techniques for venous access closure after extreme large bore devices.

BVS for bifurcation lesions: To Do or Not to Do Is No more the question!

Presents the intermediate term results of BVS in bifurcation lesions from a large database. Emphasizes the optimal technique of BVS implantation in this lesion subset which may influence outcomes. Prospective, large, protocol driven registries would define the role of BVS in bifurcation lesion.

Salvage of side branch by provisional "TAP technique" using Absorb™ bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for bifurcation lesions: first case reports with technical considerations.

Recent technological developments have led to the development of Absorb™ bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) [Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, USA] for percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The BVS is now approved for use in many countries but experience in bifurcation lesions is limited and largely unreported and concerns still exist about its use across major side branches. We report for the first time, the successful use of the "T and Protrusion" (TAP) technique of deploying BVS into the side branch (SB) through the struts of main branch (MB) BVS to salvage a suboptimal result and threatened closure of a SB in three cases when treating bifurcation lesions with a planned single BVS strategy. The TAP technique was successful in all cases and there were no complications. All patients continue to do well at short-term follow-up. This case report provides information regarding the feasibility as well as technical and procedural insights when using BVS for bifurcation lesions.