Iodixanol versus iopromide in cancer patients: Evidence from a randomized clinical trial.

To assess the safety profile of iso-osmolar contrast medium (CM) versus low osmolar CM in cancer patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >60 ml/min. In this multicenter, blind trial of patients seeking a chest-abdomen-pelvis contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) with iodated CM, participants were centrally randomized to iodixanol or iopromide. Contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) at 24 and/or 72 hr were our primary outcomes. We further considered irreversible CIN, average eGFR percentage variation (%Δ), and adverse events (AEs). Overall, 607 patients were enrolled. Among them, 497 eligible patients were randomized to iodixanol (N: 247) or iopromide (N: 250). No differences emerged by descriptive characteristics. Seven and 3 CIN at 24 hr (p = 0.34) and 8 and 2 CIN at 72 hr (p = 0.11) occurred in the iopromide and iodixanol group, respectively. Within the subgroup of individual patients who developed CIN (N: 17), the event rate was higher in the iopromide arm (p = 0.045). No cases of permanent CIN or significant differences in terms of AEs or GFR %Δ were observed. Our results suggest a more favorable safety profile of iodixanol versus iopromide. Adequately sized trials with similar design are warranted to confirm our findings and clarify the underlying biological mechanisms.

Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: performance in patients with prostate-specific antigen values between 2.5 and 10 ng/mL.

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), in the detection of prostate cancer, including morphologic sequences (mMRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and MR spectroscopy (MRS). Combined morphological and functional MRI scoring systems was used for urological­radiological work-up of patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value ≤ 10 ng/mL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 136 of 200 consecutive patients with PSA values between 2.5 and 4 ng/mL and an abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE), or patients with PSA values between 4 and 10 ng/mL, independently from DRE. Each patient provided informed consent to undergo at serum free/total PSA ratio (f/t PSA) assay, mMRI, MRS, DWI, and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) biopsy. The MRI datasets were scored singularly; then mMRI and DWI, mMRI and MRS data were combined in a coupled score, and finally mMRI, DWI, and MRS data were combined in a single score (cMRI score). RESULTS: Scores were correlated to negative biopsies and significant/insignificant Gleason score biopsies. Receiver-operator-characteristic curve and McNemar tests were performed. Cancer was diagnosed in 18% of patients. The cMRI score showed: (i) the highest sensitivity (0.84) and negative predictive value (0.93); (ii) a significant correlation with Gleason score; and (iii) a statistically different median value between significant and insignificant Gleason score. CONCLUSION: The cMRI score could identify patients with a PSA≤10 ng/mL who will have a negative work-up, for its high negative predictive value, and patients at high risk for significant prostate cancer because of its correlation with the Gleason score