Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Food Prot ; 72(6): 1272-8, 2009 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19610339

RESUMO

A significant portion (15 to 20%) of beef in the United States is produced in small beef processing plants that harvest fewer than 1000 cattle per day. However, there are little data on the prevalence and levels of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella in these processing plants. To address this lack of data, hides (n=1995) and carcasses (n=1995) of cattle at seven small processing plants located across the United States were analyzed for E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella. Across all plants, hide prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella was 71 and 91%, respectively. Twelve percent of hides had E. coli O157:H7 at enumerable levels (> or =40 CFU/100 cm2), while 36% of hides had Salmonella at enumerable levels. Across all plants, the prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 on preevisceration carcasses was 33%, with 2% at an enumerable level (> or = 0.8 CFU/ 100 cm2). Across all plants, Salmonella prevalence on preevisceration carcasses was 58%, with 8% at an enumerable level. Significant plant-to-plant variations in levels and prevalence of pathogens on carcasses were detected. Reduced levels of pathogens on carcasses were noted among small processors that had incorporated a hide-directed intervention. The results obtained are comparable to those observed previously for larger processors, showing that smaller beef processors face and address the same challenges as do larger beef processors.


Assuntos
Matadouros/estatística & dados numéricos , Bovinos/microbiologia , Escherichia coli O157/isolamento & purificação , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Indústria de Processamento de Alimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Salmonella/isolamento & purificação , Matadouros/normas , Animais , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Indústria de Processamento de Alimentos/normas , Cabelo/microbiologia , Carne/microbiologia , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Obstet Gynecol ; 102(4): 835-42, 2003 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14551015

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the efficacy of sumatriptan 50-mg and 100-mg tablets in menstrually associated migraine when treatment is administered during the mild pain phase. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-attack study was conducted. Menstrually associated migraine was defined as any migraine beginning on or between day -2 and day 4, with day 1 = first day of flow. Patients had at least a 1-year history of migraine as defined by International Headache Society criteria and reported regularly occurring menstrually associated migraines typically having a mild pain phase. Patients treated attacks within 1 hour of the onset of pain but only if the pain was mild at onset and while the pain was still mild. RESULTS: In the 349 women with menstrually associated migraine, sumatriptan was significantly more effective than placebo: 61% and 51% of patients who used sumatriptan 100 mg and 50 mg, respectively, were pain-free 2 hours after treatment compared with 29% of patients who used placebo (P <.001 for both comparisons). At 2 hours, 51% and 45% of patients who used sumatriptan 100 mg and 50 mg were free of pain and associated symptoms (photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, vomiting) compared with 25% of placebo patients (P <.001 for both comparisons). Adverse events were low for sumatriptan 100 and 50 mg, and both doses were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Sumatriptan 50-mg and 100-mg tablets are generally well tolerated and effective in providing pain-free relief and relief of the associated symptoms of menstrually associated migraine when administered in the mild pain phase.


Assuntos
Ciclo Menstrual , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Agonistas do Receptor de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Sumatriptana/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/patologia , Medição da Dor , Agonistas do Receptor de Serotonina/administração & dosagem , Agonistas do Receptor de Serotonina/efeitos adversos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Sumatriptana/administração & dosagem , Sumatriptana/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Neurology ; 82(7): 573-81, 2014 Feb 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24453078

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We present the first study to explore safety and efficacy of the human CD20 monoclonal antibody ofatumumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients received 2 ofatumumab infusions (100 mg, 300 mg, or 700 mg) or placebo 2 weeks apart. At week 24, patients received alternate treatment. Safety and efficacy were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were randomized (ofatumumab/placebo, n = 26; placebo/ofatumumab, n = 12) and analyzed; 36 completed the study. Two patients in the 300-mg group withdrew from the study because of adverse events. No unexpected safety signals emerged. Infusion-related reactions were common on the first infusion day but not observed on the second infusion day. None of the patients developed human anti-human antibodies. Ofatumumab was associated with profound selective reduction of B cells as measured by CD19(+) expression. New brain MRI lesion activity was suppressed (>99%) in the first 24 weeks after ofatumumab administration (all doses), with statistically significant reductions (p < 0.001) favoring ofatumumab found in new T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions, total enhancing T1 lesions, and new and/or enlarging T2 lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Ofatumumab (up to 700 mg) given 2 weeks apart was not associated with any unexpected safety concerns and was well tolerated in patients with RRMS. MRI data suggest a clinically meaningful effect of ofatumumab for all doses studied. Results warrant further exploration of ofatumumab in RRMS. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that in patients with RRMS, ofatumumab compared with placebo does not increase the number of serious adverse events and decreases the number of new MRI lesions.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Antígenos CD20/administração & dosagem , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/tratamento farmacológico , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/imunologia , Adulto , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Antígenos CD19/biossíntese , Antígenos CD19/imunologia , Antígenos CD20/efeitos adversos , Antígenos CD20/imunologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/sangue , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Pain ; 10(6): 654-60, 2009 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19409858

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of GW406381, an investigational selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor with both peripheral and central actions, in 209 patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). Patients were randomly assigned to GW406381 25 mg or 50 mg or placebo treatments for 3 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the change in average daily pain intensity score from baseline to the last week of treatment. Both doses of GW406381 produced greater reduction in pain score than placebo, but the treatment difference did not reach statistical significance. It was possible that the 3-week duration was too short, as there was a tendency for increasing separation from placebo over time that did not appear to reach maximum effect by the end of the study for either GW406381 treatment group. Overall, GW406381 was well tolerated in this elderly population. PERSPECTIVE: To our knowledge, this is the first report of a randomized, controlled clinical trial of a selective or nonselective COX inhibitor in neuropathic pain. The results of this study were inconclusive regarding the clinical relevance of the role of COX-2 in modulation of the symptoms of PHN.


Assuntos
Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase 2/uso terapêutico , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/tratamento farmacológico , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Piridazinas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase 2/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase 2/efeitos adversos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Pirazóis/administração & dosagem , Pirazóis/efeitos adversos , Piridazinas/administração & dosagem , Piridazinas/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Headache ; 47(7): 1037-49, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17635595

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In a pilot study, naratriptan was significantly more effective than placebo in preventing menstrually related migraine (MRM) when given as 1 mg twice daily for 5 days beginning 2 days before the predicted onset of MRM for up to 4 menstrual cycles. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of naratriptan for short-term prevention of MRM in 2 large, identically designed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies. METHODS: MRM was defined as any migraine beginning during the perimenstrual period (PMP). By definition, the PMP consisted of Days -2, -1, 1, 2, 3, and 4, with Day 1 being the first day of menstrual flow. Adult women were eligible if they reported a history of MRM, had regular menstrual cycles, and could predict within 2 days both the onset of menstrual flow and MRM. The studies comprised a baseline phase and a treatment phase. During the baseline phase, patients prophylactically treated their first PMP after the screening visit with single-blind placebo. Patients who documented an MRM while receiving placebo were eligible for the treatment phase. During the treatment phase, patients were randomized to receive either naratriptan 1 mg twice daily or placebo beginning 3 days before the predicted onset of MRM for a total of 6 days for 4 PMPs or 6 months, whichever occurred sooner. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean percentage of treated PMPs without MRM per patient. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the percentage of patients who were free of MRM during all treated PMPs, the median number of days with MRM over 4 PMPs, and patient satisfaction. Safety and tolerability measures included adverse events, standard clinical laboratory tests, and vital signs. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population was 287 in Study 1 (149 in the naratriptan group and 138 in the placebo group) and 346 in Study 2 (173 in each treatment group). Approximately 20% of randomized patients in each treatment group in Study 1 and 10% in each treatment group in Study 2 withdrew prematurely from the studies over the 4-month treatment period. The mean percentage of PMPs without MRM per patient was 38% and 34% among naratriptan-treated patients treating at least 1 PMP compared with 29% and 24% among placebo-treated patients in each respective study (P < .05 naratriptan vs placebo for both studies). Efficacy of naratriptan did not vary as a function of age, use of oral contraceptives, or use of migraine prophylaxis. More patients who had received naratriptan reported attacks posttreatment compared to patients who had received placebo. Among patients treating at least 1 PMP, the percentage of patients with no MRM in any treated PMP was significantly (P < .05) higher in the naratriptan group (11%; 19/173) than the placebo group (3%; 6 of 173) in Study 2. There were no differences in the percentages of patients with no MRM in any treated PMP in Study 1. The number of MRM days per patient across 4 PMPs was significantly lower in the naratriptan group than in the placebo group in both studies (median 5.0 days vs 6.5 days in Study 1 [P= .005] and 5.3 days vs 6.0 days in Study 2 [P= .018]). Significantly more patients receiving naratriptan were satisfied with the ability of naratriptan to control MRM either by preventing their occurrence or reducing their severity or duration compared with patients receiving placebo. No single drug-related adverse event was reported by more than 2% of patients in a treatment group in either study, and no serious drug-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Naratriptan 1 mg twice daily for 6 days per month is effective and well tolerated when used for short-term prevention of MRM. More patients receiving naratriptan than placebo were satisfied with treatment. The observed increase in posttreatment attacks needs further study.


Assuntos
Menstruação/fisiologia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/etiologia , Piperidinas/uso terapêutico , Agonistas do Receptor de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Triptaminas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Piperidinas/efeitos adversos , Placebos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Segurança , Agonistas do Receptor de Serotonina/efeitos adversos , Triptaminas/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa