Rare case of Proteus mirabilis native mitral valve endocarditis in an immunocompromised patient.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial infective endocarditis caused by Proteus mirabilis is rare and there are few cases in the literature. The natural history and treatment of this disease is not as clear but presumed to be associated with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI). CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old female with a history of rheumatoid arthritis, factor V Leiden hypercoagulability, and prior saddle pulmonary embolism presented to the emergency department following a mechanical fall. Computed Tomography showed evidence of acute/subacute splenic emboli. Complicated UTI was likely secondary to a ureteral stone. Blood and urine cultures also grew out P. mirabilis. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed a mobile echogenic density on the anterior mitral valve (MV) leaflet consistent with a vegetation. The patient underwent MV replacement, and P. mirabilis was isolated from the surgically removed valve. CONCLUSIONS: We hypothesize that the patient's immunocompromised status following steroid and Janus Kinase inhibitor usage for rheumatoid arthritis contributed to Gram-negative bacteremia following P. mirabilis UTI, ultimately seeding the native MV. Additional studies with larger numbers of Proteus endocarditis cases are needed to investigate an association between immunosuppression and Proteus species endocarditis.

Can a collaborative subspecialty antimicrobial stewardship intervention have lasting effects?

OBJECTIVE: We previously demonstrated the benefit of direct, daily collaboration between infectious disease (ID) and critical care practitioners (CCP) on guideline adherence and antibiotic use in the medical intensive care unit (MICU). In this post-intervention review, we sought to establish whether the effect on antibiotic use and guideline adherence was sustainable. DESIGN: A retrospective review of 87 patients, admitted to the 24-bed MICU, was done 3 (n = 45) and 6 months (n = 42) after the intervention. MEASUREMENTS: Data included demographics, severity indicators, admitting pathology, infectious diagnosis, clinical outcomes [mechanical ventilation days (MVD) and MICU length of stay (LOS), antibiotic days of therapy (DOT), in-hospital mortality], and antibiotic appropriateness based on current guidelines. RESULTS: In the 3-month (3-PI) and 6-month post-intervention (6-PI), there were no significant differences in the APACHE II score, MVD, LOS, DOT, or total antibiotic use at 3 (p = 0.59) and 6-PI (p = 0.87). There was no change in the mean use of extended-spectrum penicillins, cephalosporin, and carbapenems. While there were significant differences in vancomycin usage at 3-PI [3.1 DOT vs. 4.3 DOT (p = 0.007)], this finding was not seen after 6 months [3.1 DOT vs. 3.4 DOT (p = 0.08)]. When compared to the intervention period, the inappropriateness of antibiotic use at 3 (p = 1.00) and 6-PI (p = 0.30) did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in either total antibiotic use or inappropriate antibiotic use at the 6-PI time period. Continuous, daily, direct collaboration between ID and CCP, once implemented, can have lasting effects even at 6 months after the interaction has been discontinued.

Risk of redocumenting penicillin allergy in a cohort of patients with negative penicillin skin tests.

BACKGROUND: Even though electronic documentation of allergies is critical to patient safety, inaccuracies in documentation can potentiate serious problems. Prior studies have not evaluated factors associated with redocumenting penicillin allergy in the medical record despite a proven tolerance with a penicillin skin test (PST). OBJECTIVE: Assess the prevalence of reinstating inaccurate allergy information and associated factors thereof. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective observational study from August 1, 2012 to July 31, 2013 of patients who previously had a negative PST. We reviewed records from the hospital, long-term care facilities (LTCF), and primary doctors' offices. SETTING: Vidant Health, a system of 10 hospitals in North Carolina. SUBJECTS: Patients with proven penicillin tolerance rehospitalized within a year period from the PST. MEASUREMENTS: We gauged hospital reappearances, penicillin allergy redocumentation, residence, antimicrobial use, and presence of dementia or altered mentation. RESULTS: Of the 150 patients with negative PST, 55 (37%) revisited a Vidant system hospital within a 1-year period, of whom 21 were LTCF residents. Twenty (36%) of the 55 patients had penicillin allergy redocumented without apparent reason. Factors associated with penicillin allergy redocumentation included age >65 years (P = 0.011), LTCF residence (P = 0.0001), acutely altered mentation (P < 0.0001), and dementia (P < 0.0001). Penicillin allergy was still listed in all 21 (100%) of the LTCF records. CONCLUSIONS: At our hospital system, penicillin allergies are often redocumented into the medical record despite proven tolerance. The benefits of PST may be limited by inadequately removing the allergy from different electronic/paper hospital, LTCF, primary physician, and community pharmacy records.