The anterolateral complex of the knee: a pictorial essay.

Injuries to the anterolateral complex of the knee can result in increased rotatory knee instability. However, to diagnose and treat patients with persistent instability properly, surgeons need to understand the multifactorial genesis as well as the complex anatomy of the anterolateral aspect of the knee in its entirety. While recent research focused primarily on one structure (anterolateral ligament-ALL), the purpose of this pictorial essay is to provide a detailed layer-by-layer description of the anterolateral complex of the knee, consisting of the iliotibial band with its superficial, middle, deep, and capsulo-osseous layer as well as the anterolateral joint capsule. This may help surgeons to not only understand the anatomy of this particular part of the knee, but may also provide guidance when performing extra-articular procedures in patients with rotatory knee instability. Level of evidence V.

Increased lateral tibial posterior slope is related to tibial tunnel widening after primary ACL reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine the influence of femoral and tibial bone morphology on the amount of femoral and tibial tunnel widening after primary anatomic ACL reconstruction. It was hypothesized that tibial and femoral bone morphology would be significantly correlated with tunnel widening after anatomic ACL reconstruction. METHODS: Forty-nine consecutive patients (mean age 21.8 ± 8.1 years) who underwent primary single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft were enrolled. Two blinded observers measured the bone morphology of tibia and femur including, medial and lateral tibial posterior slope, medial and lateral tibial plateau width, medial and lateral femoral condyle width, femoral notch width, and bicondylar width on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Tibial and femoral tunnel width at three points (aperture, mid-section, and exit) were measured on standard anteroposterior radiograph from 1 week and 1 year postoperatively (mean 12.5 ± 2 months). Tunnel width measurements at each point were compared between 1 week and 1 year to calculate percent of tunnel widening over time. Multivariable linear regression was used to analyze correlations between bone morphology and tunnel widening. RESULT: Increase in lateral tibial posterior slope was the only independent bony morphology characteristics that was significantly correlated with an increased tibial tunnel exit widening (R = 0.58). For every degree increase in lateral tibial posterior slope, a 3.2% increase in tibial tunnel exit width was predicted (p = 0.003). Excellent inter-observer and intra-observer reliability were determined for the measurements (ICC = 0.91 and 0.88, respectively). CONCLUSION: Increased lateral tibial posterior slope is an important preoperative anatomic factor that may predict tunnel widening at the tibial tunnel exit. In regard to clinical relevance, the results of this study suggest that lateral tibial posterior slope be measured preoperatively. In patients with increased lateral tibial posterior slope, more rigid graft fixation and a more conservative physical therapy regiment may be preferred. Level of evidence IV.

Post-traumatic Total Hip Arthroplasty After Acetabular Fractures: Benefits of the Hardinge Approach.

Post-traumatic arthritis is a common sequelae after undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of acetabular fractures. This often necessitates conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) to help alleviate pain and improve function for these patients. Unfortunately, dislocation rates for post-traumatic THA have been alarmingly high especially when the posterior approach has been used. In the setting of prior soft tissue disruption, the theoretical risk of dislocation is even greater. Conversely, the lateral or the abductor-split approach (Hardinge) is associated with decreased dislocation rates. In this retrospective case series, we evaluated the dislocation rate of the Hardinge approach on patients who underwent THA after developing post-traumatic arthritis after acetabulum ORIF. All patients who matched CPT code 27132 (Repair, Revision, and/or Reconstruction Procedures on the Pelvis and Hip Joint), from January 2009 to December 2019, and treated by the senior author, were pulled from the electronic medical record at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Thirty-one of the resultant 110 were treated with THA for post-traumatic arthrosis through a lateral, abductor-splitting Hardinge approach and met the inclusion criteria for further study. Our case series involves 31 patients who underwent post-traumatic THA through a Hardinge approach: the mean age at the time of index acetabular ORIF is 48.5 years, the mean age at the time of THA is 53.5 years, and the mean interval between ORIF and ultimate THA was five years. The mean length of follow-up after THA was 22.4 months. Overall, patients did well with an all-cause revision rate of 9.7%, with no revision performed for loosening of either the acetabular or femoral component. One patient developed an infection. No patient in our group sustained a dislocation, and all implants were stable without evidence of radiographic loosening at the final follow-up. This study found satisfactory results with patients undergoing THA via lateral or abductor split approach (Hardinge) for post-traumatic arthritis after acetabular ORIF. The use of a Hardinge approach for post-traumatic reconstruction of the hip may be protective against dislocation without increasing baseline risks in this difficult patient population.

High Tibial Osteotomy for Varus Deformity of the Knee.

High tibial osteotomy is a powerful technique to treat symptomatic varus deformity of the knee and is successful when properly indicated and performed. Indications include varus deformity with medial compartment osteoarthritis, cartilage or meniscus pathology. Several techniques exist to correct symptomatic varus malalignment along with concomitant procedures to restore cartilage or meniscus injuries. Evidence supporting high tibial osteotomy for symptomatic medial compartment pathology exists, which provides a durable solution for joint preservation. This review will discuss the indications, techniques, and outcomes for high tibial osteotomies used in the treatment of symptomatic varus deformity of the knee.

High variability of tibial slope measurement methods in daily clinical practice: Comparisons between measurements on lateral radiograph, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: Tibial slope measurements are important in guiding clinical decisions in the field of orthopedic surgery. However, there are multiple techniques across different medical imaging modalities and little is known about its impact on result and validity of the measurement. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare tibial slope measurements from lateral radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scans in order to better assess the clinical significance of measured tibial slope values. METHODS: Twenty patients with complete medical imaging (lateral radiographs, MRI, CT scans) undergoing anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery were included. The tibial slope of the medial and lateral plateau were measured and compared using the methods of Dejour et al. and Utzschneider et al. on lateral radiographs, by Hudek et al. and Hashemi et al. on MRI and CT scans, and by Zhang et al. on three-dimensional reconstructions of CT scans. RESULTS: Mean differences up to 5.4 ± 2.8° (P < 0.05) and 4.9 ± 2.6° (P < 0.05) between different measurement methods were found for the medial and lateral tibial slope, respectively. Depending on how the tibial shaft axis was defined, significant differences between the respective measurement methods and a relevant degree of variability were identified. Pearson correlation coefficients between the measurement methods varied distinctly from moderate to strong correlations. CONCLUSIONS: Tibial slope measurements have a high degree of variability and inaccuracy between imaging modalities and different measurement methods. Care must be taken when deciding on indications based on individual modality measurements.