Racial and sex disparities in inpatient outcomes of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a medical emergency that requires immediate surgical intervention. The aim of this analysis was to identify the sex- and race-specific disparities that exist in outcomes of patients hospitalized with this condition in the United States using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to identify targets for improvement and support of specific patient populations. METHODS: In this descriptive, retrospective study, we analyzed the patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of ruptured AAA between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020, using the NIS database. We compared demographics, comorbidities, and in-hospital outcomes in AAA patients, and compared these results between different racial groups and sexes. RESULTS: A total of 22,395 patients with ruptured AAA were included for analysis. Of these, 16,125 patients (72.0%) were male, and 6270 were female (28.0%). The majority of patients (18,655 [83.3%]) identified as Caucasian, with the remaining patients identifying as African American (1555 [6.9%]), Hispanic (1095 [4.9%]), Asian or Pacific Islander (470 [2.1%]), or Native American (80 [0.5%]). Females had a higher risk of mortality than males (OR, 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-1.96; P < .001) and were less likely to undergo endovascular aortic repair (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.81; P < .001) or fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.91; P = .007). Relative to Caucasian race, patients who identified as African American had a lower risk of inpatient mortality (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.37-0.68; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study of the NIS database from 2016 to 2020, females were less likely to undergo endovascular intervention and more likely to die during their initial hospitalization. African American patients had lower rates in-hospital mortality than Caucasian patients, despite a higher burden of comorbidities. Future studies are needed to elucidate the potential factors affecting racial and sex disparities in ruptured AAA outcomes, including screening practices, rupture risk stratification, and more personalized guidelines for both elective and emergent intervention.

Comparison between the outcomes of transfemoral access and transfemoral access with adjunct upper extremity access in patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair: A pilot systematic review and meta-analysis.

Endovascular aortic repair is an emerging novel intervention for the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. It is crucial to compare the effectiveness of different access sites, such as transfemoral access (TFA) and upper extremity access (UEA). An electronic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases. The primary endpoint was the incidence of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), while the secondary endpoints included technical success, access-site complications, mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), spinal cord ischemia, among others. Forest plots were constructed for the pooled analysis of data using the random-effects model in Review Manager, version 5.4. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Our findings in 9403 study participants (6228 in the TFA group and 3175 in the UEA group) indicate that TFA is associated with a lower risk of stroke/TIA [RR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.40-0.75; p = 0.0002], MI [RR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.38-0.69; p < 0.0001], spinal cord ischemia [RR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.32-0.53, p < 0.00001], and shortens fluoroscopy time [SMD: -0.62; 95% CI: -1.00 to -0.24; p = 0.001]. Moreover, TFA required less contrast agent [SMD: -0.33; 95% CI: -0.61 to -0.06; p = 0.02], contributing to its appeal. However, no significant differences emerged in technical success [p = 0.23], 30-day mortality [p = 0.48], ICU stay duration [p = 0.09], or overall hospital stay length [p = 0.22]. Patients with TFA had a lower risk of stroke, MI, and spinal cord ischemia, shorter fluoroscopy time, and lower use of contrast agents. Future large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm and strengthen these findings.

Systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with increased risk of mortality and acute kidney injury in patients with COVID-19 hospitalization: Insights from a National Inpatient Sample analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted global health, especially for patients with chronic diseases that may compromise the immune system. This study investigates the association between systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and COVID-19 outcomes. METHODS: Data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) were analyzed to create a retrospective cohort of COVID-19 hospitalizations, comparing patients with and without SLE. Propensity-score matched analysis was conducted to assess the association between SLE and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 hospitalizations. RESULTS: The study included over a million COVID-19 hospitalizations, with approximately 0.5% having a secondary diagnosis of SLE. The SLE-COVID hospitalizations were predominantly female and younger, with a median age of 57.2, while the non-SLE-COVID group had a median age of 64.8 years. Comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal failure, liver disease, and others were more prevalent in the SLE-COVID group. Patients with SLE and COVID-19 had a significantly higher incidence of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis than those without SLE. In-hospital mortality was higher in the SLE group, particularly in the 18-44 year age group (6.15% vs 2.47%, p = .022). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 patients with SLE are at an increased mortality risk, especially in the younger age group, and a higher incidence of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis. The elevated risk of adverse outcomes underscores the vulnerability of SLE patients to COVID-19. These findings emphasize the importance of special precautions and patient education for individuals with SLE to mitigate the risks associated with COVID-19.

Emerging trends and demographic disparities in anal cancer mortality across the United States census regions: An analysis of National Center for Health Statistics mortality data.

AIMS: Anal cancer, despite its rarity, is a matter of serious concern in the United States, with an uptrend in recent years and marked racial disparities in mortality rates. The aim of this work was to investigate anal cancer mortality trends and sex race disparities in the United States from 1999 to 2020. METHOD: This is a retrospective study using data from the CDC WONDER database (1999-2020). We investigated deaths attributed to anal cancer, identified by the ICD-10 code C21.1, and excluded individuals aged 14 years and under. The Mann-Kendall trend test was used to investigate temporal trends and a t-test was used to compare continuous variables. RESULTS: Both male and female age-adjusted mortality attributed to anal cancer increased significantly during the study period across all subgroups, including race (Black and White), US Census region (Northeast, Midwest, South and West) and age (15-64 and ≥65 years) (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). For each subgroup, women demonstrated significantly higher rates of mortality than men, except in the Black population, where Black men had higher rates than Black women (0.40 vs. 0.29, p < 0.001). Additionally, Black men had significantly higher mean mortality rates than White men (0.40 vs. 0.27, p < 0.001). The highest rates of anal cancer mortality were among geriatric individuals, especially women aged ≥65 years, at 1.18 per 100 000. CONCLUSION: The rise in anal cancer mortality and racial and sex disparities present a significant challenge for healthcare providers and policy makers. Further studies are required to devise evidence-based strategies to effectively tackle this challenge.

Impact of pneumothorax on mortality, morbidity, and hospital resource utilization in COVID-19 patients: a propensity matched analysis of nationwide inpatient sample database.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous pneumothorax (PTX) is more prevalent among COVID-19 patients than other critically ill patients, but studies on this are limited. This study compared clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes among COVID-19 patients with concomitant PTX to provide insight into how PTX affects health care utilization and complications, which informs clinical decisions and healthcare resource allocation. METHODS: The 2020 Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used analyze patient demographics and outcomes, including age, race, sex, insurance status, median income, length of hospital stay, mortality rate, hospitalization costs, comorbidities, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressor support. Propensity score matching was employed for additional analysis. RESULTS: Among 1,572,815 COVID-19 patients, 1.41% had PTX. These patients incurred significantly higher hospitalization costs ($435,508 vs. $96,668, p < 0.001) and longer stays (23.6 days vs. 8.6 days, p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was substantially elevated for PTX patients (65.8% vs. 14.4%, p < 0.001), with an adjusted odds ratio of 14.3 (95% CI 12.7-16.2). Additionally, these patients were more likely to require vasopressors (16.6% vs. 3.3%), mechanical circulatory support (3.5% vs. 0.3%), hemodialysis (16.6% vs. 5.6%), invasive mechanical ventilation (76.9% vs. 15.1%), non-invasive mechanical ventilation (19.1% vs. 5.8%), tracheostomy (13.3% vs. 1.1%), and chest tube placement (59.8% vs. 0.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the severe impact of PTX on COVID-19 patients, characterized by higher mortality, more complications, and increased resource utilization. Also, being Hispanic, male, or obese increased the risk of developing concomitant PTX with COVID-19.

COVID-19 and acute pancreatitis clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients in the United States: A propensity matched analysis of national inpatient sample.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatitis is one of the leading causes of gastrointestinal-related hospitalization, with significant morbidity and mortality. SARS-COV-2 virus can access the pancreas via angiotensin-converting enzymes and can cause direct and indirect injury to the pancreatic parenchyma. The objective of this study to understand clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 with and without pancreatitis utilizing National Inpatient Sample database. METHODS: We utilized the United States National Inpatient Sample database to study clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection (a total of 1,659,040 hospitalized patients with 10,075 (0.6 %) with pancreatitis) between January 1 to December 31, 2020, along with propensity matching. RESULTS: While after propensity matching, we did not find a statistical difference in in-hospital mortality amongst COVID-19 patients with pancreatitis compared to COVID-19 patients without pancreatitis (13.2 % vs 10.3 %, adjusted odds ratio: 0.7 [95 % CI 0.5-1], p = 0.11). Patients with COVID-19 and pancreatitis had more episodes of septic shock, higher incidence of acute kidney injury and acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis. We also found an increased prevalence of NASH cirrhosis, alcohol liver cirrhosis, and a lesser incidence of pulmonary embolisms in the COVID-19 with pancreatitis cohort. CONCLUSION: Worse in-hospital outcomes, including increased incidence of septic shock, acute kidney injury, and acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection and pancreatitis, emphasize the need for more research to understand the effect of COVID-19 disease in hospitalized patients with pancreatitis and in the role of vaccination to improve long term outcome in this patient population.

Acute Pancreatitis and Myocardial Infarction: A Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis can rarely present with electrocardiographic changes that imitate myocardial ischemia. Even rarer is for acute pancreatitis to present with ST segment elevation in contiguous leads, suggestive of an acute coronary syndrome. In this comprehensive review article, we highlight diagnostic challenges and examine possible pathophysiological causes as seen through 34 total cases in which acute pancreatitis has been found to mimic an acute myocardial infarction. SUMMARY: It has been shown that regardless of the severity of acute pancreatitis, it can be associated with myocardial injury of varying presentation. Thus far, there have been 34 total cases where acute pancreatitis presented with electrocardiographic changes consistent with acute myocardial infarction without true coronary artery thrombosis. An inferior wall ST-elevation myocardial infarction pattern was the most frequently demonstrated. Many hypotheses have been proposed as to the mechanism of injury including decreased coronary perfusion, direct myocyte damage by pancreatic proteolytic enzymes, indirect parasympathetic injury, electrolyte derangements, and coronary vasospasms. Given the complexity of the clinical presentation, thorough subjective and objective evaluation can be vital in guiding to diagnosis and possibly more invasive testing. KEY MESSAGES: It is imperative that clinicians are aware that acute pancreatitis can mimic an acute myocardial infarction. Although we have started to better understand the pathological mechanisms for this phenomenon, further research focused on specific molecular target areas is needed.

National trends and disparities in statin use for ischemic heart disease from 2006 to 2018: Insights from National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

BACKGROUND: Statins are a cornerstone guideline-directed medical therapy for secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease (IHD). However, recent temporal trends and disparities in statin utilization for IHD have not been well characterized. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included data from outpatient adult visits with IHD from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) between January 2006 and December 2018. We examined the trends and predictors of statin utilization in outpatient adult visits with IHD. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2018, we identified a total of 542,704,112 weighted adult ambulatory visits with IHD and of those 46.6% were using or prescribed statin. Middle age (50-74 years) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-2.13 P < .001) and old age (≥75 years) (aOR = 1.66, CI 1.26-2.19, P < .001) compared to young age (18-49 years), and male sex (aOR = 1.35, CI 1.23-1.48, P < .001) were associated with greater likelihood of statin utilization, whereas visits with non-Hispanic (NH) Black patients (aOR = 0.75, CI 0.61-0.91, P = .005) and Hispanic patients (aOR = 0.74, CI 0.60-0.92, P = .006) were associated with decreased likelihood of statin utilization compared to NH White patient visits. Compared with private insurance, statin utilization was nominally lower in Medicare (aOR = 0.91, CI 0.80-1.02, P = .112), Medicaid (aOR = 0.78, CI 0.59-1.02, P = .072) and self-pay/no charge (aOR = 0.72, CI 0.48-1.09, P = .122) visits, however did not reach statistical significance. There was no significant uptake in statin utilization from 2006 (44.1%) to 2018 (46.2%) (P = .549). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial gaps remain in statin utilization for patients with IHD, with no significant improvement in use between 2006 and 2018. Persistent disparities in statin prescription remain, with the largest treatment gaps among younger patients, women, and racial/ethnic minorities (NH Blacks and Hispanics).

Neurological Complications Among Native Americans with COVID-19: Our Experience at a Tertiary Care Academic Hospital in the U.S.

OBJECTIVE: To study the central nervous system (CNS) complications in patients with COVID-19 infection especially among Native American population in the current pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome virus (COVID-19). METHODS: Patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection at University of New Mexico hospital (UNMH) were screened for development of neurological complications during Feb 01 to April 29, 2020 via retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Total of 90 hospitalized patients were screened. Out of seven patients, majority were Native Americans females, and developed neurological complications including subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), Intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH), Ischemic stroke (IS) and seizure. All 7 patients required Intensive care unit (ICU) level of care. Patients who developed CNS complications other than seizure were females in the younger age group (4 patients, 38-58 years) with poor outcome. Out of 7, three developed subarachnoid hemorrhage, two developed ischemic infarction, and four developed seizure. Two patients with hemorrhagic complication expired during the course of hospitalization. All three patients with seizure were discharged to home. CONCLUSION: Patients with serious CNS complications secondary to COVID-19 infection were observed to be Native Americans. Patients who developed hemorrhagic or ischemic events were observed to have poor outcomes as compared to patients who developed seizures.

Management of Acquired Amegakaryocytic Thrombocytopenia and Severe Coronary Artery Disease.

Amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia is a rare haematologic disorder characterised by a profound reduction in platelet production due to the near absence of megakaryocytes, leading to severe thrombocytopenia. This report elucidates the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges encountered in managing such rare haematological conditions alongside significant cardiovascular disease. We detail the case of a patient who presented with chest pain and was diagnosed with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Subsequent investigations revealed severe thrombocytopenia and underlying triple vessel disease, complicating immediate surgical intervention. Initial management strategies aimed at treating presumed immune thrombocytopenia proved ineffective. A definitive diagnosis of amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia was established following a bone marrow biopsy. Despite treatment adjustments, including the administration of thrombopoietin agonists and immunosuppression, platelet counts improved but did not reach levels safe for coronary artery bypass grafting. This case underscores the importance of diagnosis and treatment of systemic disorders prior treatment of cardiac disease. It also demonstrates the importance of interdisciplinary cooperation in the treatment of a complex patient case. LEARNING POINTS: Amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia is a rare cause of thrombocytopenia that can co-occur with cardiac conditions.The diagnosis of amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia can be difficult as it can be mistaken for immune mediated thrombocytopenia, but distinction is critical as treatments differ.Modern patient care frequently requires collaboration between different subspecialities.

VEXAS syndrome unveiled: a multidimensional journey from clinical presentation to management.

An 83-year-old man with a history of monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance, macrocytic anemia, and cytopenias presented with hemorrhagic bullae on his left hand, alongside intermittent fevers and joint pain. Laboratory findings indicated anemia, elevated mean corpuscular volume, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and a high C-reactive protein level. A biopsy of the bullae showed neutrophilic dermatosis, and computed tomography scans of the thorax revealed lung opacities and mediastinal lymphadenopathy, suggesting neutrophilic alveolitis. Bone marrow examination found hypercellularity with myeloid and histiocytic hyperplasia, vacuolated precursors, and 3% blasts of an immature myelomonocytic lineage. Genetic testing uncovered a UBA1 mutation at an 81% allele frequency, confirming a diagnosis of VEXAS syndrome. Treatment commenced with prednisone, initiated at 60 mg daily and tapered to 10 mg, with tocilizumab considered for future symptom management. This regimen has successfully maintained remission, as observed in follow-up appointments. This case highlights the diagnostic complexity and effective management of VEXAS syndrome, underscoring the importance of genetic testing in guiding treatment decisions.

VEXAS syndrome, initially identified in 2020, is a rare disease characterized by overlapping hematologic and rheumatologic conditions, primarily affecting middle-aged to older men.Our case presents a unique instance of VEXAS syndrome, featuring inflammatory symptoms alongside pancytopenia and a history of monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance, highlighting the diverse clinical spectrum of this condition.The diagnosis was confirmed through bone marrow biopsy revealing vacuoles in myeloid precursors and a UBA1 mutation, reaffirming the diagnostic criteria outlined for VEXAS syndrome.Management challenges persist, with current treatment options limited to glucocorticoids for symptomatic relief, underscoring the need for further research into targeted therapies such as ruxolitinib to improve patient outcomes.

Assessing 30-day readmissions and outcomes in acute heart failure patients with concurrent COVID-19: A nationwide study during the 2020 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Acute heart failure (HF) is a significant cause of readmission and mortality, particularly within 30 days post-discharge. The interplay between COVID-19 and HF is still being studied. METHODS: This retrospective study utilized The National Readmission Database to examine outcomes and predictors among patients with COVID-19 and concomitant acute HF between January 1, 2020, and November 31, 2020. 53,336 index hospitalizations and 8,158 readmissions were included. The primary outcome was the 30-day all-cause readmission rate. Predictor variables included patient demographics, medical comorbidities and discharge disposition. RESULTS: The primary outcome was 21.2 %. COVID-19 infection was the most predominant all-cause reason for acute HF readmission (24.7 %). Hypertensive heart disease with chronic kidney disease was the most prevalent cardiac cause (7.7 %). Mortality rate during index hospitalization was significantly higher compared to readmission. CONCLUSIONS: The highlighted prevalent complications, comorbidities, and demographics driving readmissions offer valuable insights to improve outcomes in this population.

The impact of chronic total occlusion in non-infarct related arteries on patient outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI superimposed with cardiogenic shock: A pilot systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is defined as a near-total blockage of a coronary artery and often occurs in arteries that are not directly responsible for the event, known as non-infarct-related arteries (NIRA). Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complication of ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) that carries significant mortality. We performed a meta-analysis to find an association between mortality in patients undergoing PCI for STEMI that have superimposed CS, with the presence of CTO in the NIRA. MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar and clinicaltrials.gov from inception till October 2023 to retrieve studies that compare the presence of CTO with the absence of CTO in NIRA in STEMI with CS patients undergoing PCI. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality and the secondary endpoints were risk of all-cause mortality (ACM) and repeat myocardial infarction (MI). Forest plots were generated using the random effects model by pooling odds ratios (ORs) with a 95 % confidence interval. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: 5 observational studies with a total of 5186 patients (1031 with CTO in NIRA and 4155 with no CTO in NIRA) were included. The presence of CTO in NIRA was associated with higher odds of 30-day mortality [OR: 3.10; 95 % CI: 1.52, 6.32; p < 0.002], and ACM [OR: 2.37; 95 % CI: 1.83, 3.08; p < 0.00001]. The odds of repeat MI were comparable between the two groups [OR: 1.61, 95 % CI: 0.03, 74.36, p = 0.81]. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of CTO in the NIRA serves as an independent indicator of unfavorable clinical outcomes including increased risk of 30-day mortality and all-cause mortality. The risk of repeat MI was comparable between the two groups. Large-scale, multicenter trials are warranted to identify the most effective management approach for these patients.

The Intersectionality of Race and Gender in Palliative Care Services Utilization Among Critically-Ill Necrotizing Pancreatitis Patients: Analysis of a Large Nationwide Database in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) is a severe form of pancreatitis that often necessitates intensive care and can result in significant morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to investigate racial and gender disparities in palliative care (PC) utilization among mechanically-ventilated patients with NP. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020, we investigated 84 335 patients with NP requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, and the utilization of PC services and their disparities based on gender and race. To adjust for potential confounding factors, we employed multivariable logistic regression, ensuring that our findings account for various influencing variables and provide a robust analysis of the data. RESULTS: Among the patients studied, 15.4% utilized PC consultations. Notably, female patients were 12% more likely to utilize PC than their male counterparts (OR 1.1, 95% CI: 1.003-1.2; P = .008). Racial disparities were pronounced: African Americans (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.9, P < .001), Hispanic (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.9, P = .001), and Asian or Pacific Islander patients (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.97; P = .03) had significantly lower odds of utilizing PC compared to White patients. The cohort utilizing PC had a higher in-hospital mortality rate (74.7% vs 24.8%; OR 8.2, 95% CI 7.7-9.2) but a shorter mean hospital stays and lower associated costs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate significant racial and gender disparities in the utilization of PC for intubated patients with NP, with lower utilization among males and minority populations. These findings emphasize the urgent requirement for comprehensive changes in healthcare protocols.

Outcomes of COVID-19 and Influenza in Cerebral Palsy Patients Hospitalized in the United States: Comparative Study of a Nationwide Database.

Patients with cerebral palsy (CP) are particularly vulnerable to respiratory infections, yet comparative outcomes between COVID-19 and influenza in this population remain underexplored. Using the National Inpatient Sample from 2020-2021, we performed a retrospective analysis of hospital data for adults with CP diagnosed with either COVID-19 or influenza. The study aimed to compare the outcomes of these infections to provide insights into their impact on this vulnerable population. We assessed in-hospital mortality, complications, length of stay (LOS), hospitalization costs, and discharge dispositions. Multivariable logistic regression and propensity score matching were used to adjust for confounders, enhancing the analytical rigor of our study. The study cohort comprised 12,025 patients-10,560 with COVID-19 and 1465 with influenza. COVID-19 patients with CP had a higher in-hospital mortality rate (10.8% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.001), with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.2 (95% CI: 1.6-6.4). They also experienced an extended LOS by an average of 2.7 days. COVID-19 substantially increases the health burden for hospitalized CP patients compared to influenza, as evidenced by higher mortality rates, longer hospital stays, and increased costs. These findings highlight the urgent need for tailored strategies to effectively manage and reduce the impact of COVID-19 on this high-risk group.

Outcomes of COVID-19 Disease in Comparison with Influenza in Renal Transplant Recipients: Results from a Large Nationwide Research Network in the United States.

COVID-19 infection has worse outcomes in immunocompromised individuals. This includes those with diabetes mellitus, cancer, chronic autoimmune diseases requiring immunomodulatory therapy, and solid-organ transplant recipients on chronic immunosuppression. Using the National Inpatient Sample Database, this study retrospectively compared 14,915 renal transplant recipients who were hospitalized with either COVID-19 or Influenza virus infection in the US at any point between 1st January 2020 and 31st December 2020. We found that compared to renal transplant recipients with influenza infection, recipients with COVID-19 infection were more likely to require mechanical ventilation and vasopressor support and develop acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis. COVID-19 patients also had significantly longer length of hospital stay. Renal transplant recipients with COVID-19 had significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to recipients with influenza infection (14.09% vs 2.61%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 9.73 [95% CI (5.74-16.52)], P < .001). Our study clearly demonstrates the severe outcomes of high mortality and morbidity in renal transplant recipients with COVID-19. Further research should be undertaken to focus on the key areas noted to reduce morbidity and mortality in this population.

Trends in utilisation of palliative care services in COVID-19 patients and their impact on hospital resources in the USA: insights from the national inpatient sample.

OBJECTIVES: Poor prognosis and lack of effective therapeutic options have made palliative care an integral part of the management of severe COVID-19. However, clinical studies on the role of palliative care in severe COVID-19 patients are lacking. The objective of our study was to evaluate the utility of palliative care in intubated COVID-19 patients and its impact on in-hospital outcomes. METHODS: Rate of palliative care consult, patient-level variables (age, sex, race, income, insurance type), hospital-level variables (region, type, size) and in-hospital outcome variables (mortality, cost, disposition, complications) were recorded. RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed 263 855 intubated COVID-19 patients using National Inpatient Sample database from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020. 65 325 (24.8%) patients received palliative care consult. Factors associated with an increased rate of palliative care consults included: female gender (p<0.001), older age (p<0.001), Caucasian race (p<0.001), high household income (p<0.001), Medicare insurance (p<0.001), admission to large-teaching hospitals (p<0.001), patients with underlying comorbidities, development of in-hospital complications and the need for intensive care procedures. Patients receiving palliative consults had shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) (p<0.001) and no difference in hospitalisation cost (p=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Palliative care utilisation rate in intubated COVID-19 patients was reflective of disease severity and disparities in healthcare access. Palliative care may help reduce hospital LOS. Our findings also highlight importance of improving access to palliative care services and its integration into the multidisciplinary management of severe COVID-19 patients.

Venous thromboembolism and cannabis consumption, outcomes among hospitalized patients in the United States: A nationwide analysis.

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) carries significant clinical implications, and with the rise in cannabis consumption, its potential influence on VTE outcomes warrants investigation. Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2016-2019), we analyzed 2,217,184 hospitalized VTE patients. Among these, 1.8 % (38,810) reported cannabis use. We compared demographics, comorbidities, in-hospital outcomes, and quality metrics between cannabis users and non-users with VTE. Cannabis users were chiefly younger males (average age 45 in cannabis users vs. 62 in non-cannabis users) from lower-income brackets. Notably, 5.4 % discharged against medical advice. Although in-hospital mortality was initially lower for cannabis users (2.8 % vs. 5.1 %, OR 0.6, 95 % CI 0.69-0.94, p = 0.008), this difference became non-significant post-propensity-score matching (aOR 0.9, 95% CI 0.72-1.10, p = 0.3). Non-users faced higher in-hospital complications, a trend that persisted post-PSM. Among cannabis users, key mortality predictors were peripheral vascular disease, acute kidney injury, vasopressor use, cardiogenic shock, myocardial infarction, invasive ventilation, and surgical embolectomy. Cannabis users also had a shorter hospital stay (4.2 vs. 5.4 days) and slightly reduced costs ($27,472.95 vs. $31,660.75). The significantly younger age of VTE patients who use cannabis, coupled with the considerable proportion discharging against medical advice, underscores the urgency for tailored care interventions. Additional research is vital to comprehensively understand the interplay between cannabis consumption and VTE outcomes.

Outcomes of COVID-19-Associated Hospitalizations in Geriatric Patients with Dementia in the United States: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Previous studies have convincingly demonstrated the negative impact of dementia on overall health outcomes. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is burgeoning evidence suggesting a possible association between dementia and adverse outcomes, however the relationship has not been conclusively established. We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 816,960 hospitalized COVID-19 patients aged 65 or older from the 2020 national inpatient sample. The cohort was bifurcated into patients with dementia (n = 180,845) and those without (n = 636,115). Multivariate regression and propensity score matched analyses (PSM) assessed in-hospital mortality and complications. We observed that COVID-19 patients with dementia had a notably higher risk of in-hospital mortality (23.1% vs. 18.6%; aOR = 1.2 [95% CI 1.1-1.2]). This elevated risk persisted even after PSM. Interestingly, dementia patients had a reduced risk of several acute in-hospital complications, including liver failure and sudden cardiac arrest. Nevertheless, they had longer hospital stays and lower total hospital charges. Our findings conclusively demonstrate that dementia patients face a heightened risk of mortality when hospitalized with COVID-19 but are less likely to experience certain complications. This complexity underscores the urgent need for individualized care strategies for this vulnerable group.

Trends in Surgical Critical Care Fellowship Match: An Analysis of National Resident Matching Program Data.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical Critical Care (SCC) fellowship applications are made through March-July the year prior to the fellowship, while the match process takes place through the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). There is paucity of high quality data on matching trends in SCC fellowship in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all applicants in the SCC match over a period of fifteen years (2009-2023). Publicly published data about the SCC fellowship match were retrieved from the NRMP online portal. Mann Kendall trend test was used to obtain a Tau statistic and p-values for temporal trends over time. Chi-square test was used to investigate association between categorical variables. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2023, the number of SCC fellowship positions increased from 143 to 340 (138% increase) while the number of applicants rose from 95 to 289 (204% increase). The overall match rate for applicants significantly rose from 89.5% to 93.4% (7.7% increase; t = 0.600, p = 0.002). The percentage of positions filled also increased from 59.4% in 2009 to 79.4% in 2023. The match rate over the past five years (2019-2023) was 90.8%. US-MD applicants had a significantly higher 94.8% match rate throughout the study period than non-US MD applicants (94.8% vs. 87.3%, p<0.001). While the match rate for US-MD applicants has stayed consistent from 2009 to 2023 (τ = 0.371, p = 0.054), the match rate for non-US-MD applicants increased from 77.3% in 2009 to 86.9% in 2023 (τ = 0.771, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: SCC fellowship continues to grow with more positions and applicants. Match rates into SCC fellowships have increased over the past fifteen years, primarily helping non-US MDs match successfully.