RESUMO
Objective: To investigate the current status and real performance of the detection of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion transcript levels and WT1 transcript levels in China through interlaboratory comparison. Methods: Peking University People's Hospital (PKUPH) prepared the samples for comparison. That is, the fresh RUNX1-RUNX1T1 positive (+) bone morrow nucleated cells were serially diluted with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 negative (-) nucleated cells from different patients. Totally 23 sets with 14 different samples per set were prepared. TRIzol reagent was added in each tube and thoroughly mixed with cells for homogenization. Each laboratory simultaneously tested RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and WT1 transcript levels of one set of samples by real-time quantitative PCR method. All transcript levels were reported as the percentage of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or WT1 transcript copies/ABL copies. Spearman correlation coefficient between the reported transcript levels of each participated laboratory and those of PKUPH was calculated. Results: ①RUNX1-RUNX1T1 comparison: 9 samples were (+) and 5 were (-) , the false negative and positive rates of the 20 participated laboratories were 0 (0/180) and 5% (5/100) , respectively. The reported transcript levels of all 9 positive samples were different among laboratories. The median reported transcript levels of 9 positive samples were from 0.060% to 176.7%, which covered 3.5-log. The ratios of each sample's highest to the lowest reported transcript levels were from 5.5 to 12.3 (one result which obviously deviated from other laboratories' results was not included) , 85% (17/20) of the laboratories had correlation coefficient ≥0.98. ②WT1 comparison: The median reported transcript levels of all 14 samples were from 0.17% to 67.6%, which covered 2.6-log. The ratios of each sample's highest to the lowest reported transcript levels were from 5.3-13.7, 62% (13/21) of the laboratories had correlation coefficient ≥0.98. ③ The relative relationship of the reported RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcript levels between the participants and PKUPH was not always consistent with that of WT1 transcript levels. Both RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and WT1 transcript levels from 2 and 7 laboratories were individually lower than and higher than those of PKUPH, whereas for the rest 11 laboratories, one transcript level was higher than and the other was lower than that of PKUPH. Conclusion: The reported RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and WT1 transcript levels were different among laboratories for the same sample. Most of the participated laboratories reported highly consistent result with that of PKUPH. The relationship between laboratories of the different transcript levels may not be the same.
Assuntos
Humanos , China , Subunidade alfa 2 de Fator de Ligação ao Core , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Proteína 1 Parceira de Translocação de RUNX1 , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Transcrição Gênica , Proteínas WT1RESUMO
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To retrospectively analyze the immunophenotyping, fusion gene and gene mutation of 30 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cases and to investigate the relationship between the analysis results and the clinical therapeutic effect and prognosis.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Thirty All phtients were collected from the First Hospital of Harbin, Institute of Hematology and Oncology Department of Pediatrics from August 2015 to June 2016. According to the classification of FAB standard, 27 cases were B system ALL, 3 cases were T system ALL. All patients were diagnosed by bone marrow cell morphology, immunophenotype, cytogenetics and molecular biology detetions, the differentiation antigens on membrane surface and in cytoplasm of ALL cells, and 43 kinds of fusion gene qualitative screening(BCR-ABL, AML1-ETO, PML-RARα and so on) were qualitative screened and ALL gene mutations(IKZF1, TP53, PAX5, JAK1, JAK2, CRLF2, PHF6, NOTCH1, FBXW7, PTEN)were detected by next generation sequencing(NGS).</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>(1) Among 30 ALL patients, the incidence of B-ALL(90.00%) was higher than that of T-ALL(10.00%). (2) 27 cases of B-ALL expressed CD19, CD22, CD10, CD34 and so on. CD19 and CD22 were the most diagnostic antigens of B-ALL. (3) 3 cases of T-ALL mainly expressed cCD3, CD7, CD10, cTDT and so on; cCD3 and CD7 were the most diagnostic antigens of T-ALL. (4) The quantitative screening of 30 cases of ALL 43 fusion genes found BCR-ABL,TEL-AML1 and E2A-PBX1, MLL-AF6, MLL-AF4, and SIL-TAL1 fusion gene was positive in 1 case each; NGS detection of gane mutations associated with ALL showed that: 3 cases of B-ALL found that TP53 mutation occured 3 casas of B-ALL, TET2 I1762V mutations in 1 cases, 3 patients (2 cases of T-ALL, 1 cases of B-ALL) showed NOTCH1 gene mutation. After a cycle of treatment, the efficacy of adult B-ALL treatment (28.57%) was significantly lower than that of child B-ALL (95.00%), and the survival rate of child B-ALL was significantly better than that of adult B-ALL until July 10, 2017, and the differences were significant.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The immunophenotype technology of leukemia and molecular biology has an important guiding role in the diagnosis of leukemia, selection of treatment plan and evaluation of curative effect, and it is the complement of bone marrow cell morphology diagnosis.</p>
Assuntos
Humanos , Imunofenotipagem , Proteínas de Fusão Oncogênica , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células T Precursoras , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To detect the mutations of AML/MDS- related genes by using next generation sequencing (NGS), to analyze the mutation levels of each genes in the AML/MDS and the sensitivity of NGS, and to evaluate the feasibility of gene mutations for monitoring the MRD and predicating the progression of diseases.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The specimens were collected from primary AML (68 cases) and MDS (57 cases) patients from August 2015 to June 2016 in the Harbin Institute of Hematology and Oncology. The mutations of 22 related genes were detected by using AML/MDS-NGS chips.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>TET2 gene showed the highest mutation rate in AML (55.9%) and MDS (56.1%). The gene mutations were as follows: CEBPA (11.8%), DNMT3A (7.4%), C-KIT (7.4%) and FLT3-ITD (7.4%) in AML, and U2AF1 (10.5%) and SRSF2 (10.5%) in MDS. All the genes had specific mutation sites except TP53 and CEBPA. The mutations of FLT3, C-KIT and CEBPA became negative in the 5 AML patients in remission when compared with those at primary attack, but the mutation rate of TET2 gene was not obviously changed, whereas the mutation rate of the 5 MDS patients was not significantly changed. The new gene mutations appeared in 3 MDS patients with disease progression, but the mutation rate was not changed significantly in the disease progression. The gene mutation rate still has not been changed significantly even after remission.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Both AML and MDS have their own specific mutated genes and sites. Some gene mutations, such as CEBPA, can be used as an effective indicator to monitoring MRD in AML patients, but those only used for the evaluation of the disease progression and prognosis in MDS patients.</p>