Leukocyte and plasma activation profiles in chronically transfused patients with a history of allergic reactions.

BACKGROUND: Allergic transfusion reactions are drawbacks to the benefits of transfusion. Classically, allergic transfusion reactions depend on histamine release from mast cells or basophils, but other leukocyte subsets may also be important. Thus, we propose to better define the exact leukocyte subsets involved in allergic transfusion reactions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The overall objective of the current study was to compare the activation of specific peripheral blood leukocyte subsets (monocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils, and basophils) in a cohort of 13 patients who received chronic transfusions and had a history of allergic transfusion reactions compared with a control group of patients who received chronic transfusions and had no history of allergic transfusion reactions. Leukocyte subsets were analyzed by flow cytometry at baseline and after red blood cell transfusion, and cytokine levels in platelet-free plasma collected at the same time points were measured by Luminex assay. RESULTS: Flow cytometry and cytokine profiles before and after transfusion did not differ significantly between patients who did and did not have a history of allergic transfusion reactions (p > 0.05). However, post-transfusion samples from both groups showed a decrease in CD63 expression in basophils, monocytes, and eosinophils and a decrease in CD45 expression in all leukocyte subsets compared with pretransfusion samples. Interleukin 10 levels increased after transfusion in the group with a history of allergic transfusion reactions (p = 0.0469), and RANTES (regulated upon activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted) was significantly decreased post-transfusion in all patients (p = 0.0122). CONCLUSION: None of the leukocyte subsets from patients who had a history of allergic transfusion reactions significantly increased in activation either before or after transfusion. All leukocyte subsets from patients who did and did not have a history of allergic transfusion reactions decreased in their activation profile upon transfusion challenge.

A silk-based encapsulation platform for pancreatic islet transplantation improves islet function in vivo.

The success of pancreatic islet (PI) transplantation is challenged by PI functional damage during the peritransplantation period. A silk-based encapsulation platform including mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) was evaluated for islet cell delivery in vivo. Islet equivalents (IEQs) were transplanted into the epididymal fat pads of mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Three PI combinations were tested: (A) co-encapsulated in silk with MSCs; (b) encapsulated in silk alone; or (c) pelleted. Blood glucose levels were monitored and intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) was performed upon return to euglycaemia. Grafts were removed for histology and cytokine content analysis. Mice with PI grafts in silk showed a prompt return to euglycaemia. IPGTT was significantly improved with PI in silk with MSCs, compared to PI in silk alone or pelleted. Both Th1 and Th2 cytokines were increased in PI grafts in silk, but Th1 cytokines were decreased significantly with PI and MSC co-encapsulation. Histological analysis showed osteogenesis and chondrogenesis in the silk grafts containing MSCs. Future studies will evaluate MSC stability and function in vivo and improve silk biocompatibility for applications in islet transplantation. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Unraveling the Mesenchymal Stromal Cells' Paracrine Immunomodulatory Effects.

In the last 10 years, the role of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in modulating inflammatory and immune responses has been characterized using both in vitro studies and in vivo models of immune disorders. Mesenchymal stromal cell immunomodulatory properties have been linked to various paracrine factors which expression varies depending on the pathologic condition to which the MSCs are exposed. These factors may directly impact key cells of the adaptive immune system, such as T cells. Indeed, coculturing MSCs with T cells in a mixed lymphocyte reaction assay inhibits T-cell proliferation through the secretion of immunomodulatory cytokines. However, in a context of inflammation, MSCs may secrete paracrine factors that influence other immune cell subpopulations such as dendritic cells and macrophages and polarize them toward a tolerogenic phenotype. In vivo, these same immunomodulatory factors are shown to be increased in the serum of animal models presenting with inflammatory diseases treated with MSC administration. In light of the results from these landmark studies, we review the main MSC secreted factors identified to play a role in modulating inflammatory immune responses either in vitro or in vivo, and we assess the impact of these factors on the therapeutic applications of MSC-based cell therapies in immune diseases.