Are Dental Procedures Associated With Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis?

BACKGROUND: Dental procedures can lead to bacteremia and have been considered a potential risk factor for pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO). However, data on the association between dental procedures and PVO are limited. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) After controlling for relevant confounding variables, are dental procedures associated with an increased risk of PVO? (2) Does antibiotic prophylaxis before dental procedures effectively decrease the risk of PVO? METHODS: A case-crossover study was conducted to investigate the association between dental procedures and PVO using a Japanese claims database. The advantage of this study design is that confounding factors that do not vary over time are automatically adjusted for, because cases act as their own controls. From April 2014 to September 2021, the database included 8414 patients who were hospitalized for PVO. Of these, 50% (4182 of 8414) were excluded because they had not undergone any dental procedures before the index date, a further 0.1% (10 of 8414) were excluded because they were younger than 18 years at the index date, and a further 7% (623 of 8414) were excluded because they did not have at least 20 weeks of continuous enrollment before the index date, leaving 43% (3599 of 8414) eligible for analysis here. The mean age was 77 ± 11 years, and 55% (1985 of 3599) were men. Sixty-five percent (2356 of 3599) of patients had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, and 42% (1519 of 3599) of patients had a diagnosis of osteoporosis. We compared the frequency of dental procedures between a 4-week hazard period before the admission date for PVO and two control periods, 9 to 12 weeks and 17 to 20 weeks before the admission date for PVO, within individuals. We calculated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals using conditional logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Comparing the hazard and matched control periods within individuals demonstrated that dental procedures were not associated with an increased risk of PVO (OR 0.81 [95% CI 0.72 to 0.92]; p < 0.001). Additional analysis stratified by antibiotic prophylaxis use showed that antibiotic prophylaxis was not associated with a lower OR of developing PVO after dental procedures (with antibiotic prophylaxis: OR 1.11 [95% CI 0.93 to 1.32]; p < 0.26, without antibiotic prophylaxis: OR 0.72 [95% CI 0.63 to 0.83]; p < 0.001). Our sensitivity analyses, in which the exposure assessment interval was extended from 4 to 8 or 12 weeks and exposure was stratified by whether the dental procedure was invasive, demonstrated results that were consistent with our main analysis. CONCLUSION: Dental procedures were not associated with an increased risk of subsequent PVO in this case-crossover study. The effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis was not demonstrated in the additional analysis that categorized exposure according to the use of antibiotic prophylaxis. Our results suggest that the association between dental procedures and PVO may have been overestimated. Maintaining good oral hygiene may be important in preventing the development of PVO. The indications for antibiotic prophylaxis before dental procedures should be reconsidered in view of the potential risk of adverse drug reactions to antibiotic prophylaxis and the emergence of drug-resistant pathogens. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings and assess the role of antibiotic prophylaxis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Investigating sagittal spinopelvic alignment and equivalent stress on the femoral head in patients with rapidly destructive coxarthrosis.

PURPOSE: Rapidly destructive coxarthrosis (RDC) is a rare syndrome of unknown etiology. This study evaluated sagittal spinopelvic alignment (SSPA) in patients with RDC and compared it with that in patients with hip osteoarthritis (HOA). In addition, finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to investigate the distribution of stress on the femoral head in RDC versus HOA. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who had undergone primary total hip arthroplasty for RDC (n = 33) and HOA (n = 99; age- and sex-matched to patients with RDC) at three hospitals from June 2014 to September 2020. Preoperative SSPA parameters and inflammatory blood markers were compared between the two groups. FEA on the computed tomography data was performed for four patients from each group with similar pelvic tilt (PT) and lateral center-edge angle (LCEA). The distribution of Drucker-Prager equivalent stress was assessed at the loaded area of the femoral head. RESULTS: Patients with RDC had significantly higher PT, lower sacral slope, decreased lumbar lordosis (LL), higher sagittal vertical axis, and higher pelvic incidence minus LL than patients with HOA, indicating sagittal spinal imbalance. Blood test revealed patients with RDC had higher levels of inflammation markers than patients with HOA. FEA revealed no statistically significant difference in the degree of stress concentration or the maximum equivalent stress between the two groups when PT and LCEA were comparable. CONCLUSION: Patients with RDC tend to have sagittally imbalanced spine. Decreased acetabular coverage of the femoral head may heighten mechanical load of the hip joint in patients with RDC.

Feasibility of total and partial uncinectomy during anterior cervical approach: MRI-based analysis of 176 patients regarding vertebral artery location.

PURPOSE: To determine the technical feasibility of uncinate process (UP) resection (uncinectomy) during anterior cervical approach with risk-avoidance of vertebral artery (VA) injury. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-six magnetic resonance imaging images with cervical spondylosis were evaluated. The diameter between UP and VA (UP-VA distance), the presence of a fat plane, and the VA's anterior-posterior position relative to UP (anterior[A], middle[M], posterior[P]) at C3-4 to C6-7 segments were investigated. Subsequently, easy-to-use classifications were developed according to the feasibility of total and partial uncinectomy. Total uncinectomy: easy (distance: > 2 mm); moderate (distance: ≤ 2 and fat plane: +); advanced (no fat plane). Partial uncinectomy: easy (distance: > 2 mm and P, A, or M position); moderate (distance: ≤ 2; fat plane: + and P position), and advanced (no fat plane and P position). RESULTS: UP-VA distance of C5-6 on the right side (left/right: 0.41/0.31 mm) was the smallest. The ratio of no fat plane of C5-6 (46.6%/49.4%) was the highest. C5-6 had a high rate of P position (7.4%/8.5%) while C6-7 had a high rate of A position (19.3%/18.2%). More than 90% individuals were classified as easy for partial uncinectomy at any vertebral segment (C3-7), while more than 30% were classified as advanced at C4-7 with the highest rate at C5-6 for total uncinectomy. CONCLUSION: When performing uncinectomy during the anterior cervical approach, the C5-6 segment may be at the greatest risk of VA injury. Hence, preoperative MR images should be thoroughly evaluated to avoid VA injury.

Minimally invasive LLIF surgery to decrease the occurrence of adjacent-segment disease compared to conventional open TLIF.

PURPOSE: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (Mis-LLIF) can establish indirect decompression by lifting the vertebra with a large intervertebral cage, which causes less damage to the posterior elements. Thus, Mis-LLIF is expected to reduce the incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD). The aim of the study was to compare the occurrence of ASD between Mis-LLIF and conventional open transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF). METHODS: A total of 156 patients (TLIF group = 88, Mis-LLIF group = 68) who underwent single-level lumbar interbody fusion (L2/3, L3/4, or L4/5) at a single institution between 2003 and 2018 with minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of symptomatic ASD requiring reoperation (S-ASD) and radiological adjacent segment degeneration (R-ASD) 2 years postoperatively were investigated between 51 paired patients from both groups who were propensity score (PS) matched by demographic and baseline clinical data. The effect of characteristics arising from differences in surgical methods between Mis-LLIF and TLIF, such as the amount of distraction of the index fused level (∆H), on S-ASD and R-ASD was also examined. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the incidence of S-ASD between the Mis-LLIF and TLIF groups (adjusted OR 1.3; 95% CI 0.41-3.9). There was no significant difference in the incidence of R-ASD between the Mis-LLIF and TLIF groups both at the cranial (adjusted OR 1.0; 95% CI 0.22-4.5) and caudal level (adjusted OR 1.5; 95% CI 0.44-5.3). On the other hand, ∆H was significantly higher in the Mis-LLIF group than in the TLIF group (3.6 mm vs. 1.7 mm, respectively, P < 0.0001), and was extracted as a significant independent risk factor for S-ASD (adjusted HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.1-6.3) and R-ASD at the cranial side (adjusted HR 6.4; 95% CI 1.7-24) in multivariable analysis with PS adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of R-ASD or S-ASD was not significantly reduced in the Mis-LLIF group compared to the TLIF group, with greater ∆H potentially being a contributing factor. Using a thin cage in both TLIF and Mis-LLIF may decrease the occurrence of ASD.

Risk of further surgery after decompression in patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis extending to the lumbar segments: focus on the number of residual lumbar/lumbosacral and sacroiliac mobile segments.

PURPOSE: Patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) that extends to the lumbar segments (L-DISH) have a high risk of further surgery after lumbar decompression. However, few studies have focused on the ankylosis status of the residual caudal segments, including the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). We hypothesized that patients with more ankylosed segments beside the operated level, including the SIJ, would be at a higher risk of further surgery. METHODS: A total of 79 patients with L-DISH who underwent decompression surgery for lumbar stenosis at a single academic institution between 2007 and 2021 were enrolled. The baseline demographics and radiological findings by CT imaging focusing on the ankylosing condition of the residual lumbar segments and SIJ were collected. Cox proportional hazard analysis was conducted to investigate the risk factors for further surgery after lumbar decompression. RESULTS: The rate of further surgery was 37.9% during an average of 48.8 months of follow-up. Cox proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that the presence of fewer than three segments of non-operated mobile caudal segments was an independent predictor for further surgery (including both the same and adjacent levels) after lumbar decompression (adjusted hazard ratio 2.53, 95%CI [1.12-5.70]). CONCLUSIONS: L-DISH patients with fewer than three mobile caudal segments besides index decompression levels are at a high risk of further surgery. Ankylosis status of the residual lumbar segments and SIJ should be thoroughly evaluated using CT during preoperative planning.

CT-based analysis of sagittal and coronal lumbar endplate morphology: multivariate analysis of factors associated with endplate depth.

PURPOSE: Lumbar endplate morphology varies in individuals; thus, custom-made implants are sometimes more useful than standardized implants. This study aimed to analyze endplate morphology and factors associated with endplate depth using computed tomography (CT) in a non-symptomatic population. METHODS: In total, 118 lumbar CT images of non-symptomatic individuals without severe degenerative change (aged 20-79 years) were retrospectively reviewed. The following radiographic parameters were measured in each lumbar vertebral segment (T12-S1) to determine endplate depth: superior/inferior endplate depth in the midsagittal and midcoronal planes, disk angle, and height. The relationship between baseline demographics (age, sex, body mass index [BMI], Hounsfield unit of the L1 vertebral body, and pelvic incidence [PI]) and endplate depth was analyzed. RESULTS: Toward the caudal level, the superior endplate depth increased, sagittal inferior depth decreased, and coronal inferior depth increased. Multivariate analysis revealed that endplate depth was significantly associated with age (p < 0.001), while inferior endplate depth was associated with PI (p = 0.01). Superior endplate depth was associated with female sex (sagittal: p = 0.005, coronal: p = 0.002). Endplate depth, except for the inferior coronal region, was associated with low BMI (sagittal superior: p = 0.005; coronal superior and sagittal inferior: p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Endplate depths tend to be larger toward the caudal level, particularly in the superior endplate. Surgeons should thoroughly evaluate the preoperative CT image because various endplate morphologies require attention to cage shape when performing lumbar interbody fusion, especially in patients who are older, are female, have low BMI, and have large PI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

Recurrence rate after posterior percutaneous screw fixation without anterior debridement for pyogenic spondylitis compared with conservative treatment: a propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) posterior fixation without anterior debridement for pyogenic spondylitis can improve patient quality of life compared with conservative treatment. However, data on the risk of recurrence after PPS posterior fixation compared with conservative treatment is lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the recurrence rate of pyogenic spondylitis after PPS posterior fixation without anterior debridement and conservative treatment. METHODS: The study was conducted under a retrospective cohort design in patients hospitalized for pyogenic spondylitis between January 2016 and December 2020 at 10 affiliated institutions. We used propensity score matching to adjust for confounding factors, including patient demographics, radiographic findings, and isolated microorganisms. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for recurrence of pyogenic spondylitis during the follow-up period in the matched cohort. RESULTS: 148 patients (41 in the PPS group and 107 in the conservative group) were included. After propensity score matching, 37 patients were retained in each group. PPS posterior fixation without anterior debridement was not associated with an increased risk of recurrence compared with conservative treatment with orthosis (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.18-3.59; P = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: In this multi-center retrospective cohort study of adults hospitalized for pyogenic spondylitis, we found no association in the incidence of recurrence between PPS posterior fixation without anterior debridement and conservative treatment.

Association of two-staged surgery with systemic perioperative complications in lateral lumbar interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity: a propensity score-weighted study.

PURPOSE: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery carries a higher risk of perioperative systemic complications. However, evidence for the effect of planned two-staged surgery on the incidence of perioperative systemic complications is scarce. Here, we evaluated the effect of two-staged surgery on perioperative complications following ASD surgery using lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). METHODS: The study was conducted under a retrospective multi-center cohort design. Data on 293 consecutive ASD patients (107 in the two-staged group and 186 in the one-day group) receiving corrective surgery using LLIF between 2012 and 2021 were collected. Clinical outcomes included occurrence of perioperative systemic complications, reoperation, and intraoperative complications, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion, and length of hospital stay. The analysis was conducted using propensity score (PS)-stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting to adjust for confounding factors. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in a PS-weighted cohort. RESULTS: In this cohort, 19 (18.4%) patients in the two-staged group and 43 (23.1%) patients in the one-day group experienced any systemic perioperative complication within 30 days following ASD surgery. In the PS-weighted cohort, compared with the patients undergoing one-day surgery, no association with the risk of systemic perioperative complications was seen in patients undergoing two-staged surgery (PS-weighted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.37-1.63; p = 0.51). CONCLUSION: Our study suggested that two-staged surgery was not associated with risk for perioperative systemic complications following ASD surgery using LLIF.

Reoperation Rates of Microendoscopic Discectomy Compared With Conventional Open Lumbar Discectomy: A Large-database Study.

BACKGROUND: Microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation has been shown to be as effective as traditional microdiscectomy or open discectomy in terms of clinical outcomes such as pain relief, and it is less invasive. Nevertheless, the reoperation rate for microendoscopic discectomy compared with microdiscectomy or open discectomy remains unclear, possibly due to difficulties in conducting follow-up of sufficient duration and in obtaining information about reoperation in other facilities. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the rate of reoperation after microendoscopic discectomy for primary lumbar disc herniation on a large scale at a median of 4 years postoperatively? (2) Is there any difference in revision rate at a median of 4 years and within 90 days postoperatively based on surgical method? METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, comparative study of adult patients who underwent microendoscopic discectomy or microdiscectomy or open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation from April 2008 to October 2017 and who were followed until October 2020 using a commercially available administrative claims database from JMDC Inc. This claims-based database provided information on individual patients collected across multiple hospitals, which improved the accuracy of postoperative reoperation rates. We included 3961 patients who received microendoscopic discectomy or microdiscectomy or open discectomy between April 2008 and October 2017 in the JMDC claims database. After applying exclusion criteria, 50% (1968 of 3961) of patients were eligible for this study. Propensity score-weighted analyses were conducted in 646 patients in the microendoscopic discectomy group and in 1322 in the microdiscectomy or open discectomy group, with a median (IQR) of 4 years (3 to 6) of follow-up in both groups. Mean patient age was 42 ± 12 years in the microendoscopic discectomy group and 43 ± 12 years in the microdiscectomy or open discectomy group. Males accounted for 78% (505 of 646) of patients in the microendoscopic discectomy group and 79% (1050 of 1322) of patients in microdiscectomy or open discectomy group. The proportion of patients with diabetes mellitus in the microendoscopic discectomy group (10% [64 of 646]) was less than in the microdiscectomy or open discectomy group (15% [195 of 1322]). The primary outcome was Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from any type of additional lumbar spine surgery at a median of 4 years after the index surgery. The secondary outcome was survival probability using the Kaplan-Meier method with endpoints of any type of reoperation within 90 days after the index surgery. To determine which procedure had the higher revision rate, we conducted propensity score overlap weighting analysis, which controlled for potential confounding variables such as age, sex, comorbidities, and type of hospital as well as Cox proportional hazard models to estimate HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The 5-year cumulative reoperation rate was 12% (95% CI 9% to 15%) in the microendoscopic discectomy group and 7% (95% CI 6% to 9%) in the microdiscectomy or open discectomy group. After controlling for potentially confounding variables like age, sex, and diabetes mellitus, the microendoscopic discectomy group had a higher reoperation risk than the microdiscectomy or open discectomy group (weighted HR 1.57 [95% CI 1.14 to 2.16]; p = 0.004). Within 90 days of the index surgery, after controlling for potentially confounding variables like age, sex, and diabetes mellitus, we found no difference between the microendoscopic discectomy group and microdiscectomy or open discectomy group in terms of risk of reoperation (weighted HR 1.38 [95% CI 0.68 to 2.79]; p = 0.38). CONCLUSION: Given the higher reoperation risk with microendoscopic discectomy compared with microdiscectomy or open discectomy at a median of 4 years of follow-up, surgeons should select microdiscectomy or open discectomy, despite the current popularity of microendoscopic discectomy. The revision risk of microendoscopic discectomy compared with microdiscectomy or open discectomy in the long term remains unclear. Future large, prospective, multicenter cohort studies with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm the association between microendoscopic discectomy and risk of reoperation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level Ⅲ, therapeutic study.

Predictors of the need for rib resection in minimally invasive retroperitoneal approach for oblique lateral interbody fusion at upper lumbar spine (L1-2 and L2-3).

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify factors that can predict the need for rib resection in a minimally invasive, oblique retroperitoneal approach for upper lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF at L1-3) using modern tubular retractors. METHODS: Eighty-six patients, who underwent L1-2 and/or L2-3 OLIF at a single institution, were included. Decision for rib resection was made through intraoperative fluoroscopic view (true lateral view of the desired level). Patients were divided into two groups according to rib resection (rib resection and non-rib resection groups). Baseline demographics, surgical and radiographic data, including coronal/sagittal spinopelvic parameters and perioperative complications, were compared between the groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors predicting the need for rib resection. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 31 patients in the rib resection group and 55 patients in the non-rib resection group. There was no significant inter-group difference in terms of the baseline demographics. A total of 79% patients undergoing the two-level (both L1-2 and L2-3) procedures were rib-resected, while 81.6% of the patients undergoing the L2-3 level alone were not rib-resected. Endplate injuries occurred more commonly in the non-rib resection group (3% vs. 14%). Pleural laceration was observed in 6% of the patients in the rib resection group. The mean T10-L2 kyphosis was larger in the rib resection group than in the non-rib resection group (14.9° vs. 6.6°, P = 0.031). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the following independent predictors of the need for rib resection: an L1-2 inclusive procedure; T10-L2 kyphosis > 15.9°; and the apex of the coronal curve located above L2. CONCLUSION: The need for rib resection should be expected when performing L1-2 inclusive procedure. Even in the L2-3 alone case, aggressive decision-making for intraoperative rib resection might be required for an appropriate tubular retractor position, especially for patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis and apex vertebra of the major coronal curve located above L2.

Low hounsfield unit values at sagittal section on computed tomography predicts vertebral fracture following short spinal fusion.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative identification of osteoporosis during spine surgery is of critical importance. Additionally, the Hounsfield units (HU) measured using computed tomography (CT) have gained considerable attention. This study aimed to propose a more accurate and convenient screening method for predicting vertebral fractures after spinal fusion in elderly patients by analyzing the HU value of different range of interests of thoracolumbar spine. METHODS: Our sample pool for analysis consisted of 137 elderly female patients aged >70 years who underwent one- or two-level spinal fusion surgery with a diagnosis of adult degenerative lumbar disease. The HU values of the anterior 1/3 of the vertebral bodies based on sagittal plane and those of vertebral bodies based on axial plane at T11-L5 were measured using the perioperative CT. The incidence of postoperative vertebral fractures with respect to the HU value was investigated. RESULTS: Vertebral fractures were identified in 16 patients during the mean follow-up period of 3.8 years. While no significant association was found between HU value of L1 vertebral body or minimum HU value from axial plane and the incidence of the postoperative vertebral fracture, the minimum vertebral HU value of the anterior 1/3 of vertebral body from sagittal plane was associated with the incidence of the postoperative vertebral fracture. Patients with a minimum anterior 1/3 vertebral HU value of <80 had a higher incidence of postoperative vertebral fractures. The adjacent vertebral fractures occurred at the level of the vertebra with the lowest HU value, with a high probability. The existence of the vertebra with a minimum HU value of <80 within two levels of upper instrumented vertebrae was a risk factor for adjacent vertebral fracture. CONCLUSION: HU measurement of the anterior 1/3 of vertebral body predicts the risk of vertebral fracture after short spinal fusion surgery.

Wrong-level spine surgery: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Wrong-level spine surgery is a rare but serious complication of spinal surgery that increases patient harm and legal risks. Although such surgeries have been reported by many spine surgeons, they have not been adequately investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the causes and preventive measures for wrong-level spine surgeries. METHODS: This study analyzed cases of wrong-level spine surgeries from 10 medical centers. Factors such as age, sex, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis, surgical details, surgeon's experience, anatomical variations, responses, and causes of the wrong-level spine surgeries were studied. The methods used by the surgeons to confirm the surgical level were also surveyed using a questionnaire for each surgical procedure and site. RESULTS: Eighteen cases (13 men and 5 women; mean age, 61.2 years; mean body mass index, 24.5 kg/m2) of wrong-level spine surgeries were evaluated in the study. Two cases involved emergency surgeries, three involved newly introduced procedures, and five showed anatomical variations. Wrong-level spine surgeries occurred more frequently in patients who underwent posterior thoracic surgery than in those who underwent other techniques (p < 0.01). Twenty-two spinal surgeons described the methods used to confirm the levels preoperatively and intraoperatively. In posterior thoracic laminectomies, half of the surgeons used preoperative markers to confirm the surgical level and did not perform intraoperative fluoroscopy. In posterior thoracic fusion, all surgeons confirmed the level using fluoroscopy preoperatively and intraoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Wrong-level spine surgeries occurred more frequently in posterior thoracic surgeries. The thoracic spine lacks the anatomical characteristics observed in the cervical and lumbar spine. The large drop in the spinous process can make it challenging for surgeons to determine the positional relationship between the spinous process and the vertebral body. Moreover, unfamiliarity with the technique and anatomical variations were also risk factors for wrong-level spine surgeries.

Acute non-traumatic spinal subarachnoid hematomas: A report of five cases and a systematic review of literature.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of evidence on spinal subarachnoid hematomas because of the rarity of their spontaneous development and difficulty in diagnosis. The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics and outcomes of surgically confirmed acute non-traumatic spinal subarachnoid hematomas from a multicenter surgical database and conduct a systematic review of existing literature. METHODS: Five surgically confirmed cases of acute non-traumatic spinal subarachnoid hematomas were identified from our multicenter database with 22 cases from a systematic review of existing literature. RESULTS: The mean age of the 27 patients was 59 years. The length of the hematoma was longer than five vertebrae in 70% of the patients, most commonly distributed in the thoracic spine; 63% of all cases were idiopathic, 30% were under anticoagulant therapy, and the remaining 7% presented with coagulation abnormalities. As many as 70% of the patients showed some improvement in neurological symptoms after surgery during a mean follow-up period of 14 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study elucidated the characteristics of acute non-traumatic spinal subarachnoid hematomas in patients who were surgically confirmed. Most patients were middle-aged, complained of back pain, and had the hematoma located in the thoracic spine. Seventy percent of the patients in this study had some improvement in their neurological status, most likely due to surgical decompression and hematoma evacuation.

Neurological severity evaluation using magnetic resonance imaging in acute spontaneous spinal epidural haematomas.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to elucidate the severity of neurological deficits in a large series of patients with acute spontaneous spinal epidural haematoma (SSEH) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: We included 57 patients treated for acute SSEH at 11 institutions and retrospectively analysed their demographic and MRI data upon admission. We investigated MRI findings, such as the haematoma length and canal occupation ratio (COR). The neurological severity of SSEH was assessed based on the American Spinal Injury Association score on admission. RESULTS: Of the 57 patients, 35 (61%) presented with severe paralysis. The MRI analysis showed that SSEH was often located in the cervical spine, dorsal to the spinal cord, and spread over more than three vertebrae. No differences in age, sex, and aetiology were found between patients with and without severe paralysis. The hypo-intensity layer encircling the haematoma, intra-haematoma heterogeneity, and increased CORs were observed more frequently in the severe paralysis group. Furthermore, pathological examination of a dissected haematoma from one patient with a hypo-intensity layer revealed a collagen layer around the haematoma, and patients with intra-haematoma heterogeneity were more likely to have a bleeding predisposition. CONCLUSIONS: In this large series of patients with SSEH, we identified some MRI features associated with severe paralysis, such as the hypo-intensity layer, intra-haematoma heterogeneity, and increased COR. Accordingly, patients with these MRI characteristics should be considered for early surgical intervention.

Surgeons lack of agreement on determining preoperative radiographic and clinical shoulder balance in adolescent and adult idiopathic scoliosis patients.

PURPOSE: Preoperative shoulder balance is an important factor in determining the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV). In adolescent and adult idiopathic scoliosis (AIS/AdIS) patients, we studied the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of spinal surgeons' assessment of preoperative shoulder balance using X-rays (XR) and anterior/posterior photographs. METHODS: An observational review of a prospective multicenter database (AIS Lenke Type 1/5/6) and prospective single-institution database (AdIS) was conducted. Ten spine surgeons reviewed AIS cases; 12 spine surgeons reviewed AdIS cases. Surgeons rated the higher shoulder: left/right/same/unsure. Reliability was calculated using Fleiss' kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Among 145 Type 1 AIS cases, intraobserver reliability was moderate-to-substantial: XR (κ = 0.59), anterior photographs (κ = 0.68), posterior photographs (k = 0.65). Interobserver reliability was fair to moderate for XR (κ = 0.31), anterior photographs (κ = 0.20), and posterior photographs (κ = 0.30). Among 52 Type 5/6 AIS cases, intraobserver reliability was substantial: XR (κ = 0.70), anterior photographs (κ = 0.76), posterior photographs (κ = 0.71). Interobserver reliability was fair to moderate for XR (κ = 0.49), anterior photographs (κ = 0.47), and posterior photographs (κ = 0.36). Among 66 AdIS cases, intraobserver reliability was substantial: XR (κ = 0.68), anterior photographs (κ = 0.67), posterior photographs (κ = 0.69). Interobserver reliability was moderate for XR (κ = 0.45), anterior photographs (κ = 0.43), posterior photographs (κ = 0.49). Within Type 1 AIS patients, attendings had better intraobserver reliabilities compared to fellows using X-rays (κ = 0.61 vs. 0.53), yet no effect of surgeon experience was seen with clinical photographs. CONCLUSION: Though surgeons' ability to agree with themselves was moderate to substantial, surgeons' ability to agree with each other was fair to moderate. Combined measures to assess preoperative shoulder balance are needed for UIV selection.

Rigid reconstruction with periacetabular multiple screws after the resection of malignant pelvic tumours involving the sacroiliac joint.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the pelvic ring after the resection of pelvic tumours involving the sacroiliac joint is challenging. Although pedicle screw and rod system reconstructions are commonly performed, failure at the early stage has been reported. Surgical procedures Reconstruction involving two or more strong anchor screws (iliac, ischial, and pubis screws) into the residual pelvis, connecting with at least two rods with minimal bending to the residual lumbosacral vertebra and contralateral pelvis. METHODS: The above reconstruction was performed for six malignant bone and soft-tissue pelvic tumours requiring Enneking type I + IV resection. A double-barreled free non-vascularized fibular graft was used in all patients, except for one. Patients were followed up for a mean period of 51 months (range, 9 to 96 months), and peri-operative complications, implant failure within the follow-up period, and the clinical results of surgery were investigated. RESULTS: The mean age of four females and two males at the initial surgery was 37.2 years. One patient developed a deep wound infection. Two patients died due to metastasis of the tumor. All patients were able to walk on their own within 12 weeks of surgery. There was no implant failure, except in two patients with contralateral lumbosacral rod fracture three and four years after surgery, for which one patient required rod replacement. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of implant failure, particularly around the resection site, was low, which may be attributed to multiple periacetabular screws and rods with minimal bending. Our rigid reconstruction method enables the rapid resumption of walking.

Letter to the Editor concerning "Impact of spinal alignment and stiffness on impingement after total hip arthroplasty: a radiographic study of pre­ and post­operative spinopelvic alignment" by Hagiwara S, et al. (Eur Spine J. 2020; doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06589-z).

PURPOSE: Dislocation is one of the remaining challenges after total hip arthroplasty. The spinopelvic mobility is considered to be the key to solve this problem and is of interest both to arthroplasty and spine surgeons. The purpose of this letter is to discuss the spinopelvic mobility and spinal stiffness described in the paper titled "Impact of spinal alignment and stiffness on impingement after total hip arthroplasty: a radiographic study of pre­ and post­operative spinopelvic alignment." by Hagiwara S, et al. METHODS: Examining the consistency between this paper and previously published papers on spinopelvic mobility. RESULTS: In this article, radiographic clearance of anterior impingement was defined as adding of femoral shaft angle and sacral slope (SS), and that of posterior impingement as adding SS and femoral shaft angle subtracting 90º in the sitting position. The impingement itself and other factors for dislocation including implant design, implant orientation, extra-prosthetic impingement and their mobilities are not considered in this parameter, and it is better if the validity of this parameter is shown. The term "rigid spine" and "spinal stiffness" are used in the manuscript. When THA candidates are evaluated, they are categorized according to the flexibility and/or sagittal balance. It would be better if the definition was described in the text and the clearance for impingement was shown to be affected by spinal stiffness. CONCLUSION: The conclusions and titles are overstated from the results, but this paper is highly valuable in reminding spinal surgeons of the importance of spinopelvic alignment and mobility in THA.

Cervical spinal computed tomography utilizing model-based iterative reconstruction reduces radiation to an equivalent of three cervical X-rays.

PURPOSE: To evaluate radiation dose and image quality of cervical spinal computed tomography scanned with low-radiation dose (LD-CT) utilizing model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). METHODS: We retrospectively examined 14 patients (65.5 ± 13.9 years) who underwent both standard-radiation-dose CT (SD-CT) reconstructed with hybrid iterative reconstruction and LD-CT of cervical spine. The radiation dose, objective image quality indicator, which includes signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise, and subjective image quality score of the anatomical landmarks in the SD-CT and LD-CT were statistically compared. In addition, the measurement errors of the length of C3 vertebrae (height, anteroposterior length, inner and outer pedicle diameters) between SD-CT and LD-CT were analyzed. RESULTS: Radiation dose of LD-CT was reduced to one-sixth of the dose of SD-CT. The objective image quality indicator of LD-CT was significantly better than that of SD-CT. The subjective image quality of LD-CT was relatively worse than that of SD-CT but generally graded as clinically accepted or higher. There was no remarkable difference between SD-CT and LD-CT in the measurement value of height and anteroposterior length. Inner pedicle diameter was significantly (0.21 ± 0.13 mm) smaller, and outer pedicle diameter was (0.24 ± 0.14 mm) larger on LD-CT than on SD-CT. CONCLUSION: Cervical spinal LD-CT that utilized MBIR enabled radical decrease in radiation dose and provided sufficient image quality for clinical use. This scanning protocol can be a good alternative for protecting patients from exposure to unnecessary radiation, especially when a patient requires multiple CT scans.

Inter-spinous process distance: a novel parameter predicting segmental lordosis during posterior cervical spine deformity surgery.

PURPOSE: To investigate the normative value of distance between the spinous processes (inter-spinous process distance, ISPD), correlations between patients' demographics and ISPD, and determine cutoff ISPD values that result in segmental lordosis in posterior cervical-thoracic arthrodesis with instrumentation. METHODS: We reviewed patients with visible lower cervical and cervicothoracic spinous processes (C5-T2) on dynamic X-rays. Radiographic measurements included segmental Cobb angles (S-Cobb) and ISPD, defined as the distance between midpoints of the spinous processes. Correlations between patient demographics and ISPD were evaluated. In addition, the cutoff ISPD values that predict segmental lordosis (S-Cobb < 0°) were determined using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and linear regression model. RESULTS: We evaluated a total of 153 films on 51 patients. The mean ISPDs in neutral position were 16.0, 20.7, 23.2, and 26.0 mm at C5/6, C6/7, C7/T1, and T1/T2, respectively There were no or only weak correlations between ISPD and age, race, height, body weight, and BMI. We observed significant difference between male and female ISPDs at C7/T1 and T1/T2 (P < 0.05). The ISPDs had moderate/strong correlations with S-Cobb at each segment (- 0.450 ≤ r ≤ - 0.705). Based on the ROC curves, the following cutoff values of ISPD provided 100% positive predictive value for segmental lordosis: < 10 mm at C5-6; < 15 mm at each level from C6 to T2. CONCLUSION: ISPD is a simple and useful parameter that correlates with the segmental Cobb angle. During posterior cervical deformity surgery, surgeons can intraoperatively predict adequate segmental lordosis by utilizing the vertebral level specific cutoff values of ISPD. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.