OCT proves that vitreomacular adhesion is significantly more likely to develop vision-threatening retinal complications than vitreomacular separation.

BACKGROUND: SD-OCT is becoming commonplace in everyday practice. Vitreomacular adhesions (VMAs) are being more routinely diagnosed. Predictive studies to the natural course of VMA are thus clinically significant. Spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) was presently utilized to analyze the incidence of floaters, the complete vitreomacular separation or VMA, the VMA complication, the vitreomacular angle (VMAng), and the complication mechanism. METHODS: Monthly SD-OCT was performed on patients with/without symptomatic floaters. OCT allowed VMA and vitreomacular separation to be compared. The incidence was assessed applying one-tailed Fisher's exact tests. The VMAngs between the inner retina and posterior hyaloid were measured, and the complication mechanism was studied using OCT image. For macular hole (MH), pre- and/or post-operative best corrected visual acuities (BCVAs; LogMAR), refractions and photoreceptor conditions were also evaluated. RESULTS: Totally, 124 eyes were included; there were 116 eyes with VMA and 8 eyes with vitreomacular separation. Considering the percentages over 124 eyes, floaters were present in 14.5% of enrolled eyes (=18/124), consisting of 12.9% of eyes with VMA (16/124) and 1.6% of eyes with vitreomacular separation (2/124). Moreover, there were twelve eyes (9.7%) with VMA-associated vision-threatening complications, including MH (n = 8; 6.5%), retinal detachment (RD; n = 2; 1.6%), vitreomacular traction (VMT; n = 1; 0.8%) and macular pucker (MP; n = 1; 0.8%). Eyes with initial VMA had a significantly greater possibility of complications than eyes with initial vitreomacular separation (p = 0.03). Among these eyes with MH (n = 8), the pre-operative BCVA (LogMAR) was 1.1 ± 0.5, which was insignificantly (p = 0.35) improved to 0.8 ± 0.7 post-operatively. The VMAng of VMA eyes with MHs was 24.2 ± 24.9° (n = 8). The critical VMAng was 13.3°. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of eyes with VMA or vitreomacular separation had floaters. Moreover, the use of SD-OCT could identify vision-threatening sequelae, namely MH, RD, MP and VMT, and this was significantly more frequent in eyes with VMA than in eyes with complete vitreomacular separation. Therefore, SD-OCT might be a useful way of identifying either identity, and evaluating VMA-associated complications. Whether VMA eyes with MH (n = 8) that have a VMAng greater than critical VMAng have a greater likelihood of tangential traction and subsequent MH needs further investigation.

Dendrobium nobile Lindley and its bibenzyl component moscatilin are able to protect retinal cells from ischemia/hypoxia by dowregulating placental growth factor and upregulating Norrie disease protein.

BACKGROUND: Presumably, progression of developmental retinal vascular disorders is mainly driven by persistent ischemia/hypoxia. An investigation into vision-threatening retinal ischemia remains important. Our aim was to evaluate, in relation to retinal ischemia, protective effects and mechanisms of Dendrobium nobile Lindley (DNL) and its bibenzyl component moscatilin. The therapeutic mechanisms included evaluations of levels of placental growth factor (PLGF) and Norrie disease protein (NDP). METHODS: An oxygen glucose deprivation (OGD) model involved cells cultured in DMEM containing 1% O2, 94% N2 and 0 g/L glucose. High intraocular pressure (HIOP)-induced retinal ischemia was created by increasing IOP to 120 mmHg for 60 min in Wistar rats. The methods included electroretinogram (ERG), histopathology, MTT assay and biochemistry. RESULTS: When compared with cells cultured in DMEM containing DMSO (DMSO+DMEM), cells subjected to OGD and pre-administrated with DMSO (DMSO+OGD) showed a significant reduction in the cell viability and NDP expression. Moreover, cells that received OGD and 1 h pre-administration of 0.1 µM moscatilin (Pre-OGD Mos 0.1 µM) showed a significant counteraction of the OGD-induced decreased cell viability. Furthermore, compared with the DMSO+OGD group (44.54 ± 3.15%), there was significant elevated NDP levels in the Pre-OGD Mos 0.1 µM group (108.38 ± 29.33%). Additionally, there were significant ischemic alterations, namely reduced ERG b-wave, less numerous retinal ganglion cells, decreased inner retinal thickness, and reduced/enhanced amacrine's ChAT/Müller's GFAP or vimentin immunolabelings. Moreover, there were significantly increased protein levels of HIF-1α, VEGF, PKM2, RBP2 and, particularly, PLGF (pg/ml; Sham vs. Vehicle: 15.11 ± 1.58 vs. 39.53 ± 5.25). These ischemic effects were significantly altered when 1.0 g/Kg/day DNL (DNL1.0 + I/R or I/R+ DNL1.0) was applied before and/or after ischemia, but not vehicle (Vehicle+I/R). Of novelty and significance, the DNL1.0 action mechanism appears to be similar to that of the anti-PLGF Eylea [PLGF (pg/ml); DNL1.0 vs. Eylea+I/R: 19.93 ± 2.24 vs. 6.44 ± 0.60]. CONCLUSIONS: DNL and moscatilin are able to protect against retinal ischemic/hypoxic changes respectively by downregulating PLGF and upregulating NDP. Progression of developmental retinal vascular disorders such as Norrie disease due to persistent ischemia/hypoxia might be thus prevented.

Dry Eye: The Effect of Chi-Ju-Di-Huang-Wan Plus Si Wu Tang and the Underlying Mechanism.

Objectives: In this pilot study, the effect of 970 mg Chi-Ju-Di-Huang-Wan (CJDHW) plus 30 mg four-substance decoction (Si Wu Tang; CJDHWSWT) was evaluated, in terms of its ability to alleviate dry eye symptoms and its therapeutic mechanism. Methods: This double-masked prospective investigation has recruited dry eye patients who have been randomly selected into two groups, namely treatment (n = 15) versus nontreatment (n = 15). In the treatment group, a daily oral intake of CJDHWSWT plus eye drops systane ultra was given for 90 consecutive days. In the nontreatment group, only defined eye drops were prescribed. The examinations included Schirmer's test, fluorescein-stained superficial punctate keratitis (SPK), artificial tear consumption, tear vascular endothelium growth factor (VEGF) level, and ocular surface disease index. The drug safety tests included liver and kidney functions, and complete blood counts. The candidates were observed during the screening visit and the following three monthly follow-ups. The data were analyzed by unpaired Student's t-test. Results: Compared to no significance in the nontreatment group, CJDHWSWT significantly (p = 0.03) increased the tear secretion after 3 months of intake. Furthermore, in contrast to no significance in the treatment group, there were significant alterations, including (i) increased fluorescein-stained SPK areas (p = 0.03); (ii) increased artificial tear instillation amount (p = 0.03); (iii) elevated tear VEGF protein levels (p = 0.03) in the nontreatment group; and (iv) significant improvement in clinically relevant phenomenon (e.g., reading limit and uncomfortable feeling in windy conditions), after treatment of artificial tear plus oral intake of CJDHWSWT. As shown by the post-treatment normal defined laboratory data, there were no adverse drug effects. Conclusions: This study has supported that CJDHWSWT is safe and effective in relieving dry eye's clinically relevant symptoms/phenomena. CJDHWSWT avoided the tear VEGF upregulation probably induced by dry eye-associated hypoxia/ischemia.