Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Braz J Urol ; 50(2): 178-191, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38386788

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The increasing adoption of robotic-assisted cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD), despite its complexity, prompts a detailed comparison with extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD). Our study at a single institution investigates perioperative outcomes and identifies risk factors impacting the success of these surgical approaches. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 174 patients who underwent robotic-assisted cystectomy at the University of Louisville from June 2016 to August 2021 were reviewed. The cohort was divided into two groups based on the urinary diversion method: 30 patients underwent ECUD and 144 underwent ICUD. Data on demographics, complication rates, length of hospital stay, and readmission rates were meticulously collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Operative times were comparable between the ICUD and ECUD groups. However, the ICUD group had a significantly lower intraoperative transfusion rate (0.5 vs. 1.0, p=0.02) and shorter hospital stay (7.8 vs. 12.3 days, p<0.001). Factors such as male sex, smoking history, diabetes mellitus, intravesical therapy, higher ASA, and ACCI scores were associated with increased Clavien-Dindo Grade 3 or higher complications. Age over 70 was the sole factor linked to a higher 90-day readmission rate, with no specific characteristics influencing the 30-day rate. CONCLUSION: Robotic cystectomy with ICUD results in shorter hospitalizations and lower intraoperative transfusion rates compared to ECUD, without differences in operative time, high-grade postoperative complications, or readmission rates. These findings can inform clinical decision-making, highlighting ICUD as a potentially more favorable option in appropriate settings.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Derivação Urinária , Humanos , Masculino , Cistectomia/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Derivação Urinária/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco
2.
Cureus ; 16(1): e52933, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38406067

RESUMO

This case report presents a rare case of adult cryptorchidism, found incidentally in a 25-year-old gentleman who initially presented with abdominal and suprapubic pain and was successfully treated with staged orchidopexy. To our knowledge, to date, our case is the first published instance of bilateral cryptorchidism in an adult presenting with nonspecific suprapubic pain. Cryptorchidism is the most common genital abnormality in newborn boys, and due to its association with an increased risk of infertility and malignancy, current management involves surgical correction with orchidopexy by 12 to 18 months of life. Adult presentation of cryptorchidism is very unusual due to early intervention; therefore, bilateral cryptorchidism is even more rare. As a result, current guidelines do not address proper management for adult cryptorchidism. Therefore, after performing a thorough review of the literature on contemporary guidelines for cryptorchidism management, we aim to highlight our approach to management in this rare case of adult bilateral cryptorchidism. We suggest bilateral orchiectomy as the safest option, if the patient is amendable, or bilateral orchiopexy with long-term follow-up for testicular cancer. Although the American Urological Association guidelines recommend orchiectomy for postpubertal cryptorchid children, currently, no explicit guidelines exist for the preferred method of managing adult cryptorchidism. Due to the increased risk of infertility and testicular cancer with cryptorchidism, orchiectomy instead of orchiopexy may be the preferred surgical approach in some instances. Still, in the case of bilateral cryptorchidism, orchiectomy may not always be the most viable solution, making orchiopexy with long-term follow-up for testicular cancer the best option, such as in our case.

3.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 50(2): 178-191, Mar.-Apr. 2024. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1558059

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Introduction: The increasing adoption of robotic-assisted cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD), despite its complexity, prompts a detailed comparison with extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD). Our study at a single institution investigates perioperative outcomes and identifies risk factors impacting the success of these surgical approaches. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, 174 patients who underwent robotic-assisted cystectomy at the University of Louisville from June 2016 to August 2021 were reviewed. The cohort was divided into two groups based on the urinary diversion method: 30 patients underwent ECUD and 144 underwent ICUD. Data on demographics, complication rates, length of hospital stay, and readmission rates were meticulously collected and analyzed. Results: Operative times were comparable between the ICUD and ECUD groups. However, the ICUD group had a significantly lower intraoperative transfusion rate (0.5 vs. 1.0, p=0.02) and shorter hospital stay (7.8 vs. 12.3 days, p<0.001). Factors such as male sex, smoking history, diabetes mellitus, intravesical therapy, higher ASA, and ACCI scores were associated with increased Clavien-Dindo Grade 3 or higher complications. Age over 70 was the sole factor linked to a higher 90-day readmission rate, with no specific characteristics influencing the 30-day rate. Conclusion: Robotic cystectomy with ICUD results in shorter hospitalizations and lower intraoperative transfusion rates compared to ECUD, without differences in operative time, high-grade postoperative complications, or readmission rates. These findings can inform clinical decision-making, highlighting ICUD as a potentially more favorable option in appropriate settings.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa