RESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess perioperative blood loss following prostatic artery embolization (PAE) before surgery in patients undergoing simple prostatectomy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was used to identify 63 patients (mean age, 65.3 ± 8.0 years) with prostatic hypertrophy and severe lower urinary tract symptoms who underwent prostatectomy from September 2014 to December 2019, 18 (28.5%) of whom underwent PAE before surgery. Demographic data, pertinent laboratory results, procedural or operative information, hospital course details, and pathology reports were obtained. A 2:1 propensity scoreâmatching analysis was performed to compare intraoperative blood loss in patients who underwent prostatectomy alone with intraoperative blood loss in those who first underwent bilateral PAE before surgery. RESULTS: Sixteen (89%) of the 18 patients underwent bilateral PAE before surgery. Thirty-two patients who underwent prostatectomy without embolization before surgery were selected for the 2:1 propensity scoreâmatched analysis based on age, race, surgery type, prostate gland size, and comorbidities. The mean estimated blood loss (EBL) for prostatectomy alone was 545 ± 380 mL (mean ± standard deviation). There was a statistically significant reduction in the EBL for patients who underwent bilateral PAE (303 ± 227 mL, P < .01). The operative time was also significantly decreased for patients who underwent PAE before surgery (P < .05). For patients who underwent PAE, there were no complications related to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral PAE before surgery appears to be safe and may be effective in reducing perioperative bleeding and operative time.
Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica , Hiperplasia Prostática , Idoso , Artérias , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pontuação de Propensão , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the predictive power of arterial injury detected on contrast-enhanced CT (trauma CT (tCT)) imaging obtained prior to selective angiography for treatment of patients with traumatic abdominal and pelvic injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent angiography after undergoing contrast-enhanced CT imaging for the evaluation/treatment of traumatic injuries to the abdomen and pelvis between March 2014 and September 2018. Data collection included demographics, pertinent history and physical findings, CT and angiography findings, treatment information, and outcomes. RESULTS: Eighty-nine (63 males, mean age = 45.8 ± 20.5 years) patients that were found to have 102 traumatic injuries on tCT and subsequently underwent angiography met inclusion criteria for this study. Sixty-four injuries demonstrated evidence of traumatic vascular injury on initial tCT. A negative tCT was able to predict subsequent negative angiography in 83% of cases (negative predictive power = 83%). The ability of tCT to rule out a positive finding on subsequent angiography was also 83% (sensitivity = 83%). The average systolic blood pressure and hemoglobin concentration at the time of tCT were higher in patients who had positive tCT than in patients with negative tCT (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). The average time to angiography was greater in patients whom had subsequent negative angiography than the patients who had subsequent positive angiography (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced CT imaging may be able to help stratify patients who may have subsequent negative angiograms. Hemodynamic factors may affect sensitivity of tCT. Shorter time to angiography may increase the chance of identifying the injury on subsequent angiography.
Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico por imagem , Angiografia , Pelve/irrigação sanguínea , Pelve/lesões , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Meios de Contraste , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pelve/diagnóstico por imagem , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
PURPOSE: To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis on the safety and efficacy of endovascular therapy in the treatment of the two most common etiologies of vasculogenic erectile dysfunction (ED): veno-occlusive dysfunction (VOD) and arterial insufficiency (AI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases were searched for published English literature regarding endovascular ED treatments. Case series (n ≥ 3) were included. Multiple data points were obtained, including demographic data, etiology, diagnosis method, imaging studies, treatment approach, technical success, clinical success, complications, and follow-up. RESULTS: Sixteen relevant articles were obtained and a total of 212 patients with VOD and 162 with AI were identified. The VOD cohort were treated either percutaneously (60.4%; n = 128) or after surgical exposure of the deep dorsal vein (33.5%, n = 71), or it was unspecified (6.1%; n = 13). The most common embolic used was n-butyl cyanoacrylate (51.9%; n = 109). Meta-analysis found an overall clinical success rate of 59.8% in VOD patients. Complications occurred in 5.2% of patients (n = 11), with 9 considered to be mild and 2 considered to be severe. The AI cohort contained 162 patients most commonly treated via stenting of the internal pudendal artery (40.1%; n = 65). Meta-analysis found an overall clinical success rate of 63.2% in AI patients. Complications occurred in 4.9% of patients (n = 8), with 4 considered to be mild and 4 considered to be severe. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular therapy for medically refractory ED is safe and may provide a treatment alternative to more invasive surgical management; however, conclusions are limited by the heterogeneity of clinical success definitions among the included studies.
Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Impotência Vasculogênica/terapia , Ereção Peniana , Pênis/irrigação sanguínea , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/terapia , Adulto , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Impotência Vasculogênica/diagnóstico por imagem , Impotência Vasculogênica/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/fisiopatologia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the endovascular use of ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH) copolymer (Onyx; ev3 Endovascular, Inc, Plymouth, Minnesota) for the treatment of acute peripheral nonneurologic hemorrhage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched for articles published in English from 1946 to August 2014 describing patients treated for hemorrhage with EVOH copolymer outside of its usual neurovascular applications. Additional cases were collected from the bibliographies of relevant articles. Full-text articles were obtained. Demographic data, clinical presentation, underlying etiology, culprit vessel, endovascular treatment, outcomes, and follow-up times were obtained. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 19 relevant articles. Cases of 131 patients (87 men, 44 women; mean age, 61 y ± 19.2) describing the treatment of 151 lesions were reviewed. The most common categories of arterial lesions were gastrointestinal (n = 53) and bronchial (n = 40) in origin. In 14 cases, EVOH copolymer was employed after failure or rebleeding following the use of a different embolic agent. Average follow-up time was 12.0 months. EVOH copolymer was the sole embolic agent used in 105 patients. Rebleeding after treatment with EVOH copolymer occurred in 10 patients. There were 2 technical failures. One patient died of multiorgan failure in the setting of persistent hemoptysis. Complications included 2 nerve injuries and 2 minor strokes. CONCLUSIONS: Embolization of acute hemorrhage in the peripheral vasculature was safe and effective with EVOH copolymer.
Assuntos
Dimetil Sulfóxido/administração & dosagem , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Hemorragia/terapia , Polivinil/administração & dosagem , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Dimetil Sulfóxido/efeitos adversos , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Embolização Terapêutica/mortalidade , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Hemorragia/diagnóstico , Hemorragia/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polivinil/efeitos adversos , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) with Jones tube placement is usually performed as a primary procedure for severe stenosis or obstruction of both upper and lower canaliculi of the lacrimal drainage pathway, or occasionally, after unsuccessful dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Jones tube obstruction is quite common, and often requires removal of the obstructed tube and replacement or exchange of the tube in the operating room. This procedure is typically performed under general anesthesia, and is associated with the risks of general anesthesia, a significant investment of time, and the cost of the operating suite. Recently, there has been a movement toward in-office procedures in otolaryngology and ophthalmology due to greater patient satisfaction and savings in time and money for patients and physicians. In this report, we describe a novel in-office method to exchange an obstructed Jones tube that provides the aforementioned benefits while preserving patient comfort. No similar case has been previously reported in the literature.
Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Dacriocistorinostomia , Dacriocistorinostomia/instrumentação , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Dacriocistorinostomia/efeitos adversos , Falha de Equipamento , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Obstrução dos Ductos Lacrimais/diagnóstico , Visita a Consultório Médico , Reoperação/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap (PNSF) represents a successful option for reconstruction of large skull base defects after expanded endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA). This vascularized flap can be harvested early or late in the operation depending on the anticipation of high-flow CSF leaks. Each harvesting technique (early vs. late) is associated with different advantages and disadvantages. In this study, we evaluate our experience with early harvesting of the PNSF for repair of large skull base defects after EEA. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed at a tertiary care medical center on patients who underwent early PNSF harvesting during reconstruction of intraoperative high-flow CSF leaks after EEA between December 2008 and March 2012. Demographic data, repair materials, surgical approach, and incidence of PNSF usage were collected. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. In 86 procedures (98.9%), the PNSF harvested at the beginning of the operation was used. In 1 case (1.1%), the PNSF was not used because a high-flow intraoperative CSF leak was not encountered. This patient had recurrence of intradural disease 8months later, and the previously elevated PNSF was subsequent used after tumor resection. CONCLUSION: Based on our data, a high-flow CSF leak and need for a PNSF can be accurately anticipated in patients undergoing EEA for skull base lesions. Because of the advantages of early harvesting of the PNSF and the high preoperative predictive value of CSF leak anticipations, this technique represents a feasible harvesting practice for EEA surgeries.
Assuntos
Rinorreia de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Base do Crânio/cirurgia , Base do Crânio/cirurgia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano , Criança , Endoscopia , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/irrigação sanguínea , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto JovemRESUMO
This study aimed to assess the safety of complex inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval techniques through a systematic review of published literature. Using PubMed, a systematic review was conducted in line with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines to identify articles published through April 2020 that reported on complex IVC filter retrieval techniques in >5 patients. Case reports, review papers, and studies that did not report on primary outcomes or variables of interest were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment scale. Pooled success and complication rates were calculated for the overall number of complex retrieval attempts as well as for each filter type and each complex retrieval method. Sixteen fair-quality and three good-quality studies met the inclusion criteria, with 758 patients (428 female) who had undergone 770 advanced retrieval attempts. The mean age of the patients was 46.5 ± 7.1 years (range: 14.1-90), and the mean dwell time was 602.5 ± 388.6 days (range: 5-7336). Regarding filters, 92.6% (702/758) were retrievable and 7.4% (56/758) were permanent. Indications for complex retrieval included the failure of standard retrieval (89.2%; 676/758) and tilting or embedding in the caval wall (53.8%; 408/758); 92.6% (713/770) of the advanced retrieval attempts were successful. The pooled success rate was 92.0% (602/654) for retrievable filters and 96.4% (53/55) for permanent filters (P = 0.422). Only 2.8% (21/758) of patients experienced major complications, and the major complication rate was not significantly associated with filter type (P = 0.183). Advanced techniques for IVC filter retrieval appear safe for the retrieval of retrievable filters and certain permanent filters, with a low short-term major complication rate. Further studies on complex retrieval techniques used to remove permanent filters should be conducted to clarify their safety with respect to filter type.
Assuntos
Embolia Pulmonar , Filtros de Veia Cava , Humanos , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Filtros de Veia Cava/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Veia Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagem , Veia Cava Inferior/cirurgia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Embolia Pulmonar/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Extended endoscopic endonasal approaches have allowed for a minimally invasive solution for removal of a variety of ventral skull base lesions, including intradural tumors. Depending on the location of the pathological entity, various types of surgical corridors are used, such as transcribriform, transplanum transtuberculum, transsellar, transclival, and transodontoid approaches. Often, a large skull base dural defect with a high-flow CSF leak is created after endoscopic skull base surgery. Successful reconstruction of the cranial base defect is paramount to separate the intracranial contents from the paranasal sinus contents and to prevent postoperative CSF leakage. The vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap (PNSF) has become the workhorse for cranial base reconstruction after endoscopic skull base surgery, dramatically reducing the rate of postoperative CSF leakage since its implementation. In this report, the authors review the surgical technique and describe the operative nuances and lessons learned for successful multilayered PNSF reconstruction of cranial base defects with high-flow CSF leaks created after endoscopic skull base surgery. The authors specifically highlight important surgical pearls that are critical for successful PNSF reconstruction, including target-specific flap design and harvesting, pedicle preservation, preparation of bony defect and graft site to optimize flap adherence, multilayered closure technique, maximization of the reach of the flap, final flap positioning, and proper bolstering and buttressing of the PNSF to prevent flap dehiscence. Using this technique in 93 patients, the authors' overall postoperative CSF leak rate was 3.2%. An illustrative intraoperative video demonstrating the reconstruction technique is also presented.
Assuntos
Rinorreia de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/cirurgia , Endoscopia/métodos , Septo Nasal/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Base do Crânio/cirurgia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano , Rinorreia de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/etiologia , Endoscopia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Septo Nasal/patologiaAssuntos
Aneurisma/terapia , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Veia Porta , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagem , Angiografia Digital , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Flebografia/métodos , Veia Porta/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of Angioplasty and Stent Placement for the treatment of Portal Vein Stenosis in Liver Transplant Recipients by performing a systematic review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PubMed Database was extensively searched for articles describing Portal Vein Stenosis (PVS) as a complication in Liver Transplant (LT) patients. The initial database search yielded 488 unique records published in the PubMed Database, 19 of which were deemed to meet the inclusion criteria. Outcomes were separated into 2 groups (Group A included patients with primary angioplasty, Group B included patients with primary stent placement), and further subdivided into Adult and Pediatric populations. RESULTS: Group A included a total of 282 LT patients with portal vein stenosis. The population was predominantly pediatric (n = 243). Group B included a total of 111 LT patients with portal vein stenosis. This population was predominantly adult (n = 66). Technical success was significantly higher in both Group B pediatric (100%) and adults (97%) compared to Group A (69.5%) and (66.7%) respectively. Re-stenosis rates were significantly lower in Group B pediatric group compared to Group A (2.3% vs 29.7%, χ2 = 13.9; p < 0.001). Overall major (3.1%) and minor complications rates (1.5%) were low. CONCLUSION: Primary stent placement appears to have higher technical success in both populations and lower re-stenosis rates for treatment of PVS in pediatric populations.
Assuntos
Angioplastia , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Veia Porta , Doenças Vasculares/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Angioplastia/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia/instrumentação , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Constrição Patológica , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Veia Porta/diagnóstico por imagem , Veia Porta/fisiopatologia , Recidiva , Stents , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Doenças Vasculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Vasculares/etiologia , Doenças Vasculares/fisiopatologia , Grau de Desobstrução VascularRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of percutaneous ablative therapy for the treatment for osteoid osteomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed database, Web of Science, and SCOPUS were searched from their inception until November 2019 for articles describing osteoid osteoma. Demographic data, success rates, pre- and post-procedure VAS scores, and complications were recorded. A random-effects meta-analyses of the VAS pain score at various time points were calculated. RESULTS: For radiofrequency ablation, VAS scores for pain at pre-procedure, 24-48 h, and 3-6 months yielded cumulative pain scores of 7.64 +/- 0.175, 0.78 +/- 0.186, and 0.02 +/- 0.0196, respectively. For cryoablation, VAS scores at pre-procedure, 24-48 h, and 3-6 months yielded cumulative pain scores of 8.46 +/- 0.549, 0.975 +/- 0.66, and 0.112 +/- 0.08, respectively. For laser ablation, VAS scores at pre-procedure and 24-48 h yielded cumulative pain scores of 4.94 +/- 1.42, and 0.506 +/- 0.268, respectively. For microwave ablation, VAS scores at pre-procedure, 24-48 h, and 3-6 months yielded cumulative pain scores of 6.14 +/- 1.07, 1.636 +/- 1.215, and 0 +/- 0.0, respectively. All ablation methods resulted in significant immediate and lasting pain reduction (p < 0.001). Technical and clinical success rates and major complications for RFA, microwave ablation, laser ablation, and cryoablation did not differ significantly. Overall recurrence of bone pain at the same site occurred in 4.06% of all patients an average of 11 months post-procedure. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous ablative therapies are safe and result in significant and lasting pain reduction as demonstrated through visual analog scale pain scores.
Assuntos
Técnicas de Ablação/métodos , Neoplasias Ósseas/cirurgia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Osteoma Osteoide/cirurgia , HumanosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes following trans-arterial embolization of hypervascular appendicular bony tumors in patients undergoing orthopedic resection by performing a systematic review including data from the authors' institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2008 to August 2018, 73 patients (59 males, mean age 58.1 years) with musculoskeletal tumors presented for embolization for preoperative devascularization prior to orthopedic surgery. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify demographic, procedural and surgical data. A systematic review of the Pubmed, Medline, and Web of Science databases was performed to identify studies in which pre-operative embolization was performed of appendicular MSK tumors, and with measurements of estimated blood loss. All the variables listed above were recorded. A patient level analysis was performed to determine average estimated blood loss. RESULTS: 58 patients (47 men, 11 women, range 21-84 years) were included in our institutional analysis. The median EBL was 500 mL (range 100-3000). There was no difference in EBL between RCC (719.6 ± 626.1) and non-RCC groups (855.6 ± 657.5); p = 0.44. The median intra-operative transfusion requirement was 1.0 unit (range 0-8 ± 2.06). From 1984 to 2015, 9 studies were identified that provided data for a total of 118 patients (46 males, 42 females, range 10-82 years). The mean and median post-surgical EBL across all patients was 976.9 ± 78.5 (SE) and 725 mL (range 10-7000), respectively. There were no complications related to non-target embolization. CONCLUSION: Preoperative trans-arterial embolization of hypervascular MSK neoplasms appears to be safe and effective in minimizing peri- and post-operative bleeding while keeping transfusion requirements low.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas , Embolização Terapêutica , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Neoplasias Ósseas/terapia , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Estudos Retrospectivos , Coluna Vertebral , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative renal artery embolization of renal cell carcinoma in reducing intraoperative blood loss during subsequent partial nephrectomy through a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for articles published from 1970 to 2018 describing patients with renal cell carcinoma who underwent partial nephrectomy with and without preoperative embolization of the tumor. Demographic data, procedural techniques, and surgical outcomes were obtained when available. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to determine estimated blood loss in both groups of patients. RESULTS: The literature search identified 14 relevant articles for systematic review, of which 4 articles provided sufficient data to be included in the meta-analysis. 270 patients (173 males, 97 females) underwent partial nephrectomy for RCC, of whom 222 received pre-operative embolization. There were 48 patients in our cohort that underwent partial nephrectomy for RCC without preoperative embolization. Random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated a significant difference between EBL in patients undergoing RAE prior to partial nephrectomy vs partial nephrectomy without preoperative embolization, with EBL of 154.0 ± 22.6 mL (n = 222) and 353.4 ± 69.6 mL (n = 478), respectively (p < 0.0001). Major complications occurred in 4.9% of patients undergoing pre-operative embolization followed by partial nephrectomy, whereas major complications occurred in 10.9% of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy without embolization (p = 0.01). Minor complications occurred in 5.8% of patients undergoing embolization and partial nephrectomy and in 19.0% of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy without embolization (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Renal artery embolization prior to surgical resection of renal cell carcinoma is safe and significantly reduces intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Embolização Terapêutica , Neoplasias Renais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Masculino , Nefrectomia , Artéria Renal , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the current readability levels for online Internet-Based Patient Education Materials (IPEMs) related to treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia, including transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and prostate artery embolization (PAE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Google search engine we identified 40 IPEMs pertaining to TURP and PAE. Readability analysis was performed using the following algorithms: Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Formula (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), and the Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook (GFOG). Scores are categorized by difficulty (FRES) and grade level (FKGL, SMOG, GFOG). RESULTS: Only 7.5% (3/40) websites met the United States Department of Health and Human Services recommendation of a sixth grade or lower comprehension levels, with FRES scores in the "fairly easy" category. Comparison of TURP to PAE groups showed that TURP readability scores with respect FRES and FKGL were significantly easier to read. According to SMOG and GFOG analysis there was no difference between the two groups by grade level, which demonstrated an average at the 12th grade reading level. Subgroup analysis of IPEM type, categorized as Health Networks (12), University Hospitals (14), Clinical Practices (6), and Miscellaneous (8), found no difference in reading level across all scoring systems. CONCLUSION: Currently available IPEMs pertaining to benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment options are written at a level that is too difficult for the average American to understand. Physicians and health networks should take United States Department of Health and Human Services recommendations into consideration when designing IPEMs to optimize accessibility of health information to improve patient compliance and outcomes.
Assuntos
Hiperplasia Prostática , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Compreensão , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Leitura , Estados UnidosRESUMO
PURPOSE: In this systematic review, we report the safety and efficacy of embolization for treating hemarthrosis in patients with bleeding diatheses with or without a history of prior arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A structured search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS databases of patients undergoing embolization for hemarthrosis. Demographic data, clinical history, angiographic findings, interventions, and outcomes were extracted and tabulated. RESULTS: The search identified 97 unique titles of which 15 were deemed relevant comprising 78 patients with coagulopathies undergoing 93 embolization procedures. Mean follow-up time was 29 months (range 3-116.5). In the 29 patients who underwent arthroplasty prior to embolization for hemarthrosis, there were 11 bleeding recurrences (37.9%). Of these patients who experienced recurrences, 10 underwent repeat embolization as coagulation factor replacement was not sufficient to address the re-bleeding. In the 49 patients with bleeding diatheses who underwent embolization for hemarthrosis with no history of prior arthroplasty, there were 11 recurrences (22.4%) and 4 of these patients underwent repeat embolization with favorable results. There were four major procedure-related complications. CONCLUSION: Transarterial embolization is safe and effective in addressing recurrent hemarthrosis in patients with bleeding diatheses with or without a history of arthroplasty of the affected joint.
Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Hemartrose/complicações , Hemartrose/terapia , Transtornos Hemorrágicos/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of transradial approach (TRA) for endovascular management of traumatic bleeding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed at a single level 1 trauma institution from August 2018 to July 2019. Patients presented to the interventional radiology department who were intended to be treating using TRA for the management of trauma-induced bleeding were selected. Demographics, indication for embolization, embolization site, preprocedural labs, hemodynamic stability, technical success, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Transradial approach was attempted in 29 (74.4%) of the 39 patients identified by operators who prefer TRA. Four patients received treatment using TRA on 2 separate occasions, for a total of 33 procedures completed with a technical success of 97% (32/33). Transradial approach was safely completed in 9 patients (27.3%) with preprocedural hemodynamically unstable status. For the 10 patients who received treatment via a transfemoral approach (TFA), traumatic disfiguration of the left upper extremity, preexisting arterial lines placed by the trauma team, and external iliac artery injuries requiring covered stent placement were the most common indications for TFA over TRA. There were no procedural or access site-related complications. CONCLUSION: Transradial approach for the endovascular management of bleeding in a trauma setting is safe and effective with a high technical success rate and no complications.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Periférico , Embolização Terapêutica , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Hemorragia/terapia , Artéria Radial , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Embolização Terapêutica/instrumentação , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Hemodinâmica , Hemorragia/diagnóstico , Hemorragia/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New Jersey , Punções , Artéria Radial/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia Intervencionista , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents , Centros de Traumatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/fisiopatologia , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Filtros de Veia Cava , Veia Cava Inferior , Idoso , Remoção de Dispositivo/instrumentação , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Flebografia , Radiografia Intervencionista , Resultado do Tratamento , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular , Veia Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of ultrasound guidance gastric access for percutaneous retrograde transabdominal gastrostomy (G)-tube placement. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients undergoing 31 percutaneous retrograde transabdominal G-tube placements utilizing ultrasound-guided gastric accesses were retrospectively identified. RESULTS: All patients had successful placement of G tubes with ultrasound-guided gastric access. There were no cases of aspiration or peritonitis. Average fluoroscopy time was 2.7 ± 1.4 min and average radiation dose was 220 ± 202 µGym2. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided access for gastrostomy placement is safe and feasible and can be performed with minimal fluoroscopy times resulting in low patient and operator radiation dose.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of retrieval of inferior vena cava filters (IVCF) temporarily placed in a suprarenal position. METHODS: Retrieval of IVCF placed in a suprarenal position was performed in 13 patients (5 men and 8 women; mean age: 45.1 ± 13.8 years) between July 2006 and May 2018 using either a loop snare technique or endobronchial forceps. Electronic medical records were reviewed for patient demographics and procedural information. RESULTS: Inferior vena cava filters retrieved included Option Elite (n = 9, 69%) and Günther Tulip (n = 4, 31%). Caval thrombosis was not detected in any patients on pre- or postretrieval cavogram. Eleven suprarenal IVCF (84%) were retrieved during the first retrieval attempt after a median indwelling time of 1.8 months (range, 0.03-12.10 months). Retrieval was initially unsuccessful in 2 (16%) patients with Option Elite filters, but both were successfully removed on second attempt using endobronchial forceps. Thirteen suprarenal IVCF (100%) were ultimately retrieved. CONCLUSION: Endovascular retrieval of IVCF temporarily placed in a suprarenal position is safe and efficacious.