Real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: impact on nosocomial transmission and costs.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on nosocomial transmission and costs. DESIGN: Monthly MRSA detection rates were measured from April 1, 2000, through December 31, 2005. Time series analysis was used to identify changes in MRSA detection rates, and decision analysis was used to compare the costs of detection by PCR and by culture.Setting. A 1,200-bed, tertiary care hospital in Canada. PATIENTS: Admitted patients at high risk for MRSA colonization. MRSA detection using culture-based screening was compared with a commercial PCR assay. RESULTS: The mean monthly incidence of nosocomial MRSA colonization or infection was 0.37 cases per 1,000 patient-days. The time-series model indicated an insignificant decrease of 0.14 cases per 1,000 patient-days per month (95% confidence interval, -0.18 to 0.46) after the introduction of PCR detection (P=.39). The mean interval from a reported positive result until contact precautions were initiated decreased from 3.8 to 1.6 days (P<.001). However, the cost of MRSA control increased from Can$605,034 to Can$771,609. Of 290 PCR-positive patients, 120 (41.4%) were placed under contact precautions unnecessarily because of low specificity of the PCR assay used in the study; these patients contributed 37% of the increased cost. The modeling study predicted that the cost per patient would be higher with detection by PCR (Can$96) than by culture (Can$67). CONCLUSION: Detection of MRSA by the PCR assay evaluated in this study was more costly than detection by culture for reducing MRSA transmission in our hospital. The cost benefit of screening by PCR varies according to incidences of MRSA colonization and infection, the predictive values of the assay used, and rates of compliance with infection control measures.

Impact and cost of infection control measures to reduce nosocomial transmission of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing organisms in a non-outbreak setting.

We evaluated the impact of infection control interventions to reduce nosocomial extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) transmission in a non-outbreak setting. This study was conducted at a tertiary 1200-bed hospital in Canada. The incidence of ESBLs was based on recovery of clinical isolates and assessed prospectively from 1999 to 2005. The incidence increased significantly from 0.28 to 0.67 per 1000 admissions during this period (P<0.001), reflecting an increase in the regional ESBL incidence from 1.32 to 9.28 per 100 000 population (P<0.001). Despite this increase, nosocomial ESBL rates increased only marginally, suggesting that infection control measures had an impact on nosocomial transmission. Infection control measures consisted of isolating all ESBL patients, as well as implementing the use of contact precautions for those with a high risk for transmission. The cost of these measures was CN$138 046.00 per year and CN$3191.83 per case admitted. A combination of control measures including active surveillance cultures, contact precautions for all colonized or infected patients and antimicrobial stewardship is required to significantly reduce the incidence of ESBLs.

Clinical and epidemiological significance of enterococci intrinsically resistant to vancomycin (possessing the vanC genotype)

Constitutive low-level vancomycin resistance is found intrinsically in certain enterococcal species and is encoded by vanC ligase genes. These intrinsically vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) will be referred to as VANC VRE. A prospective study to determine the clinical and epidemiologic significance of VANC VRE was conducted. VANC VRE were recovered from the stools of 34 of 601 (5.7%) patients, a rate similar to that obtained for the stools of 100 outpatients in the community (5%). VANC VRE were also isolated from the nonstool specimens of 9 of 538 patients (1.7%), including two patients with bacteremia. No VRE of the vanA or vanB genotypes were detected in nonstool specimens. Eighty-two hospital contacts of the first 23 patients found to be colonized or infected with VANC VRE were screened, and 6 contacts were found to be gastrointestinal carriers of VANC VRE. However, typing of isolates from these 6 contacts by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis with SmaI showed the isolates to be unique and different from those recovered from the index patients. In fact, all VANC VRE isolates from different patients in this study were unique. A case-control study with patients who were negative when screened for VANC VRE as controls failed to identify any risk factor associated with colonization or infection with this organism. VANC VRE were infrequently recovered from clinical specimens but were occasionally found as part of the normal stool flora. Since no transmission between patients was documented, additional isolation procedures may not be necessary for patients colonized or infected with VANC VRE.