Colchicine for Left Ventricular Infarct Size Reduction in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study Protocol - The COVERT-MI Study.

Inflammatory processes have been identified as key mediators of ischemia-reperfusion injury in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). They add damage to the myocardium and are associated with clinical adverse events (heart failure and cardiovascular death) and poor myocardial recovery. Colchicine is a well-known alkaloid with potent anti-inflammatory properties. In a proof-of-concept phase II trial, colchicine has been associated with a significant 50% reduction of infarct size (assessed by creatine kinase levels) in comparison to placebo in acute STEMI patients referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). The Colchicine in STEMI Patients Study (COVERT-MI) is an ongoing confirmative prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial testing whether a short course oral treatment with colchicine versus placebo decreases myocardial injury in patients presenting with STEMI referred for PPCI. Adult patients, with a first STEMI episode and an initial TIMI flow ≤1, referred for PPCI, will be randomized (n = 194) in a 1:1 ratio to receive an oral bolus of colchicine of 2 mg followed by 0.5 mg b.i.d. treatment during 5 days or matching placebo. The primary endpoint will be the reduction in infarct size as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance at 5 ± 2 days between both groups. The main secondary endpoints will be tested between groups in hierarchical order with left ventricular ejection fraction at 5 days, microvascular obstruction presence at 5 days, and absolute adverse left ventricular remodeling between 5 days and 3 months. This academic study is being financed by a grant from the French Ministry of Health (PHRCN-16-0357). Results from this study will contribute to a better understanding of the complex pathophysiology underlying myocardial injury after STEMI. The present study describes the rationale, design, and methods of the trial.

Age and benefit of early coronary angiography after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients presenting with shockable rhythm: Insights from the Sudden Death Expertise Center registry.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the association between provision of post-resuscitation care and prognosis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in elderly patients. Previous studies have suggested futility after 65 years of age. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the association of early coronary angiogram (CAG) followed if necessary by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with favorable outcome after OHCA among elderly patients, compared to younger patients. METHODS: Using a large French registry, we included all OHCA patients with an initial shockable rhythm, transported to hospital from 2011 to 2015. Favorable outcome was defined as hospital discharge with Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1 or 2. and were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression. Subgroup analyses were performed according to age groups: <65, 65-75 and >75 years. RESULTS: Among 1502 included patients, 31% were older than 65 and 12% older than 75 years. An early CAG was performed in 79%, 88% and 76% of patients below 65, between 65 and 75 and above 75, respectively (P = 0.002). The rate of patients discharged with CPC1 or 2 was 42% below 65, 38% between 65 and 75 and 24% above 75 (P < 0.001). Among the whole population, early CAG (OR = 6.4, 95% CI = 3.9-10.5, P < 0.001) was associated with favorable outcome. In subgroups analysis, CAG was associated with favorable outcome among patients <65 and 65-75. In patients >75, there was a trend towards a favorable outcome (OR2.9, 95CI = 0.9-9.1). CONCLUSIONS: In a large registry of OHCA survivors, the early CAG use was associated with a better prognosis. This benefit was persistent up to 75 years of age, suggesting that age alone should not guide the decision for early invasive strategy.

Slow response to clopidogrel predicts low response.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the speed of response to clopidogrel loading predicts the final degree of response. BACKGROUND: Fast inhibition of platelet aggregation is important in the setting of acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention, but its association with the final degree of inhibition is not well established. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of the ALBION study; early kinetic profiles of adenosine diphosphate 20 micromol/l maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) and DeltaMPA (with baseline sample as reference) were studied at 8 time points within the 24 h after clopidogrel loading (300, 600, or 900 mg) in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients. Low response was defined as DeltaMPA <10% over the first 24 h, fast response as DeltaMPA > or =10% at 1 h or before loading (the others being slow responders), and high post-treatment platelet reactivity as MPA > or =56.56% (fourth quartile). Inflammatory markers (PAC-1 and P-selectin) and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) were also evaluated according to onset of action. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of patients were slow responders. Noncurrent smoking and body mass index > or =25 kg/m(2) were associated with slower and lower responses. High post-treatment platelet reactivity was more frequent in slow responders (28% vs. 14%, p < 0.0001). There was a clopidogrel dose-effect relationship on DeltaMPA, with a trend toward faster onset of platelet inhibition in the 900-mg loading dose group. Slow responders had a slower and lower decrease in PAC-1 and P-selectin and higher VASP index at 6 h (76.5% vs. 66.4%, p = 0.019) and 24 h (70.3% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Slow response to clopidogrel, within the first hour of administration, is a reliable marker of low response at 24 h and high post-treatment platelet reactivity.

A randomized comparison of high clopidogrel loading doses in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: the ALBION (Assessment of the Best Loading Dose of Clopidogrel to Blunt Platelet Activation, Inflammation and Ongoing Necrosis) trial.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the antiplatelet effects of three clopidogrel loading doses (LDs). BACKGROUND: Administration of a 300-mg clopidogrel LD is beneficial in situations requiring rapid platelet inhibition. Whether higher LDs can provide further benefits remains unknown. METHODS: Patients (n = 103) with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes were randomized to receive a 300-mg, 600-mg, or 900-mg clopidogrel LD, given on top of other standard therapy (including acetylsalicylic acid). The main outcome measure was inhibition of adenosine diphosphate-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA); inhibition of platelet activation, inflammatory markers, troponin I release, and major adverse cardiac events also were evaluated; all measures were blindly evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with the 300-mg LD, greater doses were associated with significantly greater platelet inhibition, with dose-effect relationships observed for onset of action, maximal plateau, 24-h areas under the curves of IPA, and rates of low IPA (<10% at 6 h), using 20 micromol/l major adverse cardiac events. A significant dose-response was also observed for the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein index, a measure of P2Y(12) receptor inhibition. Similar but nonsignificant trends were observed for troponin release and major adverse cardiac events. Bleeding rates were similar in each group. CONCLUSIONS: In low-to-moderate risk patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, clopidogrel LDs >300 mg provide a faster onset of action, a higher IPA plateau, and greater reductions in platelet activation during the first 24 h. A 900-mg LD may induce a greater antiplatelet effect than 600 mg, when compared with the standard 300-mg regimen. These findings require further clinical confirmation.