Incidence and predictors of infections in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies: A monocentric retrospective cohort study.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent the cornerstone of the current treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the occurrence of concomitant infections might hamper success. All consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who started ICIs as a first- or second-line therapy from January 1, 2017 to June 30, 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. The occurrence of infectious events during ICIs was correlated with clinical characteristics, including previous Cytotoxic Chemotherapy (CC), occurrence of immune-related-adverse-events (irAEs). A total of 211 patients were included, 46 (22%) females, with a median (q1-q3) age of 69 (62-76) years. Overall, 85 patients (40%) received ICIs as a first treatment line and 126 (60%) as a second line; 40 patients (19%) had at least one infection during ICIs, and 17 (8%) more than one. Notably, autoimmune diseases (P < .005), neutropenia (P = .001) or infections during previous CC (P = .001), irAEs (P = .006), or steroid therapy for irAEs (P < .001) were associated with infection development. By multivariate Cox-regression, autoimmune diseases (aHR = 6.27; 95%CI = 2.38-16.48; P < .001) and steroid therapy for irAEs (aHR = 2.65; 95%CI = 1.27-5.52; P < .009) were associated with a higher risk of infection during ICIs. Interestingly, autoimmune diseases were confirmed as risk factors in patients treated with ICIs as a first line, while previous infections were the only independent predictor of infections in patients treated with ICIs as a second line. Patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs with concurrent autoimmune disease, receiving steroid therapy for management of irAEs, or having a history of previous infections during CC should be actively monitored for the risk of developing infectious complications.

Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of Candida parapsilosis bloodstream isolates: Health Care Associated Infections in a teaching Hospital in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Candidemia is the most common healthcare associated invasive fungal infection. Over the last few decades, candidemia caused by Candida species other than Candida albicans, particularly the Candida parapsilosis complex, has emerged worldwide. The aims of this study were: to analyze the genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of C. parapsilosis strains isolated from blood cultures and the environment in a hospital in southern Italy, to study the possible source of infection and to correlate the isolated strains. METHODS: From April to October 2022, cases of candidemia due to C. parapsilosis in patients admitted to a hospital in the Apulia region were investigated. However, 119 environmental samples from the intensive care unit were collected for identification of the likely environmental reservoir of infection. Routine antifungal (amphotericin B, anidulafungin, fluconazole) susceptibility was performed on all isolates. Whole genome sequencing was performed to study the genotypic correlation of the isolates. Biofilm biomass and metabolic activity were also quantified for all isolates. RESULTS: A total of 43 C. parapsilosis isolates were cultured from the bloodstream of each patient in different departments, and seven surface samples were positive for C. parapsilosis. Most of the isolated yeasts (41/50; 85 %) were resistant to fluconazole and were genetically related to each other, suggesting an ongoing clonal outbreak of this pathogen. The fluconazole-susceptible isolates produced significantly more biofilm than did the resistant isolates. Metabolic activity was also higher for fluconazole-susceptible than resistant isolates. CONCLUSION: Cross-transmission of the microorganisms is suggested by the phenotypic similarity and genetic correlation between clinical and environmental strains observed in our study.

Real life experience on the use of Remdesivir in patients admitted to COVID-19 in two referral Italian hospital: a propensity score matched analysis.

Remdesivir (RDV) was the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medication for COVID-19, with discordant data on efficacy in reducing mortality risk and disease progression. In the context of a dynamic and rapidly changing pandemic landscape, the utilization of real-world evidence is of utmost importance. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of RDV on patients who have been admitted to two university referral hospitals in Italy due to COVID-19. All patients older than 18 years and hospitalized at two different universities (Bari and Palermo) were enrolled in this study. To minimize the effect of potential confounders, we used propensity score matching with one case (Remdesivir) and one control that never experienced this kind of intervention during hospitalization. Mortality was the primary outcome of our investigation, and it was recorded using death certificates and/or medical records. Severe COVID-19 was defined as admission to the intensive care unit or a qSOFAscore ≥ 2 or CURB65scores ≥ 3. After using propensity score matching, 365 patients taking Remdesivir and 365 controls were included. No significant differences emerged between the two groups in terms of mean age and percentage of females, while patients taking Remdesivir were less frequently active smokers (p < 0.0001). Moreover, the patients taking Remdesivir were less frequently vaccinated against COVID-19. All the other clinical, radiological, and pharmacological parameters were balanced between the two groups. The use of Remdesivir in our cohort was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality during the follow-up period (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.37-0.86; p = 0.007). Moreover, RDV was associated with a significantly lower incidence of non-invasive ventilation (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.20-0.36). Furthermore, in the 365 patients taking Remdesivir, we observed two cases of mild renal failure requiring a reduction in the dosage of Remdesivir and two cases in which the physicians decided to interrupt Remdesivir for bradycardia and for QT elongation. Our study suggests that the use of Remdesivir in hospitalized COVID-19 patients is a safe therapy associated with improved clinical outcomes, including halving of mortality and with a reduction of around 75% of the risk of invasive ventilation. In a constantly changing COVID-19 scenario, ongoing research is necessary to tailor treatment decisions based on the latest scientific evidence and optimize patient outcomes.