Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 49(11): 467-73, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24823927

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Alternative drug therapies are needed for the treatment of portal hypertension. The aim of this randomized study was to evaluate and compare the effects of carvedilol and nebivolol on the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) response in the patients with liver cirrhosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 20 cirrhotic patients were randomized into 2 groups and treated with carvedilol (n=10) or nebivolol (n=10). HVPG was measured at baseline, 60 minutes after the administration of carvedilol (25 mg) or nebivolol (5 mg), and after 14 days of carvedilol (25 mg) or nebivolol (5 mg) administered daily. RESULTS. Carvedilol significantly reduced HVPG from 22.2 mm Hg (SD, 4.4) to 15.2 mm Hg (SD, 3.7) after 60 minutes and to 16.4 mm Hg (SD, 2.9) after 14 days (P<0.01). Nebivolol reduced HVPG from 19.7 mm Hg (SD, 2.5) to 15.7 mm Hg (SD, 2.6) and 16.7 mm Hg (SD, 3.2), respectively (P<0.02). Carvedilol effectively decreased HVPG in a greater proportion of the patients after an acute probe (88% vs. 57%) and after 14 days of the treatment (88% vs. 28%, P<0.05) in comparison with nebivolol. CONCLUSION: Carvedilol and nebivolol reduce HVPG in cirrhotic patients; however, the effect of carvedilol on the HVPG reduction might be superior to that of nebivolol, especially after 14 days of treatment.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Benzopiranos/uso terapêutico , Carbazóis/uso terapêutico , Etanolaminas/uso terapêutico , Hipertensão Portal/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão Portal/etiologia , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Pressão na Veia Porta/efeitos dos fármacos , Propanolaminas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Anti-Hipertensivos/administração & dosagem , Benzopiranos/administração & dosagem , Carbazóis/administração & dosagem , Carvedilol , Etanolaminas/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nebivolol , Propanolaminas/administração & dosagem
2.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 45(1): 8-13, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19223700

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: The aim of present study was to evaluate relationships between degree of portal hypertension, severity of the disease, and bleeding status in patients with liver cirrhosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All study patients with liver cirrhosis underwent hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements, endoscopy, clinical and biochemical evaluation. Liver function was evaluated according to Child-Turcotte-Pugh (Child's) scoring system. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis (presence of severe ascites, acute variceal bleeding occurring within 14 days, hepatorenal syndrome, cardiopulmonary disorders, transaminase levels >10 times higher the upper normal limit), active alcohol intake, use of antiviral therapy and/or beta-blockers were excluded from the study. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight patients with liver cirrhosis (male/female, 67/61; mean age, 53.8+/-12.7 years) were included into the study. Etiology of cirrhosis was viral hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, cryptogenic and miscellaneous reasons in 57, 49, 14, and 8 patients, respectively. Child's stages A, B, and C of liver cirrhosis were established in 28 (21.9%), 70 (54.9%), and 30 (23.4%) patients, respectively. The mean hepatic venous pressure gradient significantly differed among patients with different Child's classes: 13.8+/-5.3 mm Hg, 17.3+/-4.6 mm Hg, and 17.7+/-5.05 mm Hg in Child's A, B, and C classes, respectively (P=0.003). The mean hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with grade I, II, and III varices was 14.8+/-4.5, 16.1+/-4.3, and 19.3+/-4.7 mm Hg, respectively (P=0.0001). Since nonbleeders had both small and large esophageal varices, patients with large varices were analyzed separately. The mean hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with large (grade II and III) varices was significantly higher than that in patients with small (grade I) varices (17.8+/-4.8 mm Hg vs 14.6+/-4.8 mm Hg, P=0.007). Thirty-four (26.6%) patients had a history of previous variceal bleeding; all of them had large (20.6% - grade II, and 79.4% - grade III) varices. In patients with large varices, the mean hepatic venous pressure gradient was significantly higher in bleeders than in nonbleeders (18.7+/-4.7 mm Hg vs 15.9+/-4.7 mm Hg, P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic venous pressure gradient correlates with severity of liver disease, size of varices, and bleeding status. Among cirrhotics with large esophageal varices, bleeders have a significantly higher hepatic venous pressure gradient than nonbleeders. Hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement is useful in clinical practice selecting cirrhotic patients at the highest risk of variceal bleeding and guiding to specific therapy.


Assuntos
Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Cirrose Hepática/diagnóstico , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/complicações , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/diagnóstico , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Humanos , Hipertensão Portal/etiologia , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Cirrose Hepática/etiologia , Cirrose Hepática/fisiopatologia , Testes de Função Hepática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Pressão na Veia Porta , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa