Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Pulm Med ; 21(1): 61, 2021 Feb 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33607978

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inflammation caused by chronic lung disease in childhood may lead to delayed heart rate recovery (HRR) however, there is lack of evidence on HRR in this population. The aim was to assess HRR after functional capacity testing in asthmatic children and adolescents and to compare with severity and disease control. METHOD: This was a study secondary to a randomized control trial. The modified shuttle test (MST) was performed to assess functional capacity and HRR. This is an externally cadenced test in which the distance walked is the outcome. HRR was assessed after MST and was defined as HR at exercise peak minus HR in the second minute after the end of exercise. Asthma control was assessed by the Asthma Control Test (ACT). Data normality was tested by Shapiro Wilk and the comparison between groups was made by Student's t test or Mann Whitney test for numerical variables, and by Chi-square test for categorical variables. Statistical significance was considered when p < 0.05. SPSS version 20 was used in the analyzes. RESULTS: The sample included 77 patients diagnosed with asthma (asthma group - AG) who were regularly treated for asthma. Control group (CG) consisted of 44 volunteers considered healthy, matched in age and gender to AG. The median age of CG was 12 (10-14) years and in AG 11 (9-13 years) being classified as mild to moderate asthmatic, and 57% of the sample had controlled asthma by ACT. Distance walked in the CG was 952 ± 286 m and AG 799 ± 313 m, p = 0.001. HRR was more efficient in CG (79 ± 15 bpm) compared to AG (69 ± 12 bpm), p = 0.001. The mild (69 ± 12 beats) and severe (72 ± 15 beats) AG presented worse HRR compared to control group (79 ± 15 bpm), p < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Asthmatic children and adolescents have delayed HRR after modified Shuttle test compared to their peers, suggesting that asthma leads to autonomic nervous system imbalance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in Clinical Trials under number NCT02383069 and approved by the Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE Research Ethics Committee, protocol number 738192/2014.


Assuntos
Asma/fisiopatologia , Teste de Esforço , Tolerância ao Exercício/fisiologia , Frequência Cardíaca/fisiologia , Adolescente , Asma/diagnóstico , Brasil , Criança , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Masculino , Espirometria , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Fisioter. Pesqui. (Online) ; 28(3): 299-307, 2021. tab, graf
Artigo em Português | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1350773

RESUMO

RESUMO O objetivo desta revisão sistemática foi identificar as barreiras e facilitadores para a implementação da mobilização precoce em unidades de terapia intensiva pediátrica. Realizou-se uma busca sistemática baseada em estudos que abordassem barreiras e/ou facilitadores para mobilização precoce em crianças e adolescentes. Foram incluídos estudos publicados até junho de 2019 nas bases de dados MEDLINE®, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, Cochrane Library, Scientific Electronic Library Online. A seleção e a avaliação da qualidade metodológica foram realizadas por dois revisores independentes. Dados que pudessem ser identificados como barreiras e/ou facilitadores foram extraídos para análise. Foram encontrados 358 registros nas bases de dados, dos quais foram incluídos 13 artigos. Foram citadas 18 barreiras, sendo as mais citadas o número insuficiente de profissionais, e insegurança da equipe. Dos 11 facilitadores citados, os mais frequentes foram treinamento/educação da equipe multidisciplinar e a instituição de diretriz/consenso. Existem muitas barreiras a serem quebradas para que a mobilização precoce seja efetiva, porém alguns facilitadores já são conhecidos e podem ser implementados, tornando viável a sua implementação para a população pediátrica.


RESUMEN El propósito de esta revisión sistemática fue identificar barreras y facilitadores para aplicar la movilización temprana en las unidades de cuidados intensivos pediátrica. Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de estudios que abordaron barreras y/o facilitadores para la movilización temprana en niños y adolescentes. Se incluyeron estudios publicados hasta junio de 2019 en las bases de datos MEDLINE®, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud, Cochrane Library y Scientific Electronic Library Online. La selección y evaluación de la calidad metodológica fue realizada por dos revisores independientes. Los datos que se han identificado como barreras y/o facilitadores se extrajeron para su análisis. De los 358 registros encontrados en las bases de datos, se incluyeron 13 artículos. Se mencionaron 18 barreras, y las más citadas fueron el número insuficiente de profesionales y la inseguridad del equipo. De los 11 facilitadores mencionados, los más frecuentes fueron la formación/educación del equipo multidisciplinario y el establecimiento de lineamientos/consensos. Hay muchas barreras que romper para que la movilización temprana sea efectiva, pero algunos facilitadores ya son conocidos y pueden ser aplicados, haciendo su aplicación factible a la población pediátrica.


ABSTRACT This systematic review aimed to identify barriers and facilitators for the implementation of early mobilization in pediatric intensive care units. A systematic search was carried out based on studies that addressed barriers and/or facilitators for early mobilization in children and adolescents. Studies published until June 2019 in the MEDLINE®, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Latin American & Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Cochrane Library, and Scientific Electronic Library Online databases were included. Selection and assessment of methodological quality were performed by two independent reviewers. Data that could be identified as barriers and/or facilitators were extracted for analysis. 358 records were found in the databases, of which 13 articles were included. 18 barriers were cited; the most cited ones were the insufficient number of professionals and team's insecurity. Of the 11 mentioned facilitators, the most frequent were training/education of the multidisciplinary team and the establishment of guidelines/consensus. There are many barriers to be broken for early mobilization to be effective, but some facilitators are already known and can be implemented, making their implementation feasible for the pediatric population.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa