Predictive Value of Retinal Morphology for Visual Acuity Outcomes of Different Ranibizumab Treatment Regimens for Neovascular AMD.

PURPOSE: To establish the predictive value of defined retinal morphologic parameters on visual outcomes and re-treatment needs in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) receiving ranibizumab treatment. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of a prospective, 12-month, multicenter, phase IIIb trial. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred fifty-three treatment-naïve patients with nAMD. METHODS: Available data from 319 treatment-naïve patients receiving ranibizumab 0.3 mg monthly (frequent regimen; n = 102) or ranibizumab 0.3 or 0.5 mg quarterly (pooled 0.3/0.5 mg = infrequent regimen; n = 217) were analyzed to assess the correlations between baseline retinal morphologic parameters and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change (structure-function correlations). The BCVA was measured at monthly visits. Optical coherence tomography scans were acquired monthly for quantitative measures of the central retinal thickness and qualitative assessment of retinal morphologic features. Assessed morphologic parameters included intraretinal cystoid fluid (IRC), subretinal fluid (SRF), pigment epithelial detachment, and vitreomacular interface configuration classification comprising vitreomacular adhesion and posterior vitreous detachment (PVD). An analysis of covariance was conducted to evaluate the impact of retinal morphologic features on BCVA change at month 12. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in BCVA from baseline to month 12 compared between frequent and infrequent treatment arms. RESULTS: Relevant predictive factors for BCVA change at month 12 were baseline SRF (P = 0.05), PVD (P = 0.03), IRC (P = 0.05), treatment frequency (P < 0.01), and BCVA (P < 0.01). The presence of both SRF and PVD at baseline was associated with similar BCVA gains regardless of treatment frequency (mean difference in BCVA gains at month 12 of +2.6 letters in favor of infrequent treatment). Subretinal fluid was present in 71% of patients, and PVD was present in 64% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with both SRF and PVD at baseline, similar BCVA outcomes were observed regardless of treatment frequency. These patients may require less frequent treatments compared with patients without SRF, without PVD, or without either who may require more frequent injections for maintenance of vision. This finding may have implications in clinical practice by helping to tailor an individualized re-treatment interval in nAMD patients.

Morphology and Visual Acuity in Aflibercept and Ranibizumab Therapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the VIEW Trials.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept and ranibizumab on the exudative activity of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and to correlate morphologic findings with visual acuity (VA) outcomes. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the prospective VIEW trials. PARTICIPANTS: Data of 1815 patients randomized to 0.5 mg ranibizumab every 4 weeks (Q4wks), 2 mg aflibercept Q4wks, or 2 mg aflibercept every 8 weeks (Q8wks). METHODS: Standardized OCT evaluation was performed by masked reading centers for the presence of intraretinal cystoid fluid (IRC), subretinal fluid (SRF), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED). Rates of feature resolution were compared between drugs and regimen. Associations between morphologic features and VA were analyzed using multivariate modeling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Resolution rates of IRC, SRF, and PED, and associations between morphology and VA. RESULTS: At baseline, the proportions of eyes with IRC, SRF, and PED were balanced between the aflibercept and ranibizumab groups. At week 12, IRC resolved in 50% of eyes with both agents. Subretinal fluid resolved in 70% of pooled aflibercept-treated eyes and in 59% of ranibizumab-treated eyes, and PED resolved in 29% and 24% of pooled aflibercept-treated eyes and ranibizumab-treated eyes, respectively. At week 52, IRC resolved in 57% (aflibercept Q4wks), 50% (aflibercept Q8wks), and 52% (ranibizumab) of patients; SRF resolved in 75% (both aflibercept Q4wks/Q8wks) and 66% (ranibizumab) of patients; and PED resolved in 40% (aflibercept Q4wks), 34% (aflibercept Q8wks), and 28% (ranibizumab) of patients. During fixed dosing (weeks 12-52) all exudative features showed synchronized fluctuations after treatment-free visits in the Q8wks aflibercept regimen. During pro re nata dosing (weeks 52-96), greater proportions of patients showed recurrent fluid in all treatment arms. Presence of IRC was generally associated with lower VA at baseline, which translated into poorer final VA outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Fluid resolution in all compartments was consistently greater for aflibercept Q4wks than for aflibercept Q8wks and ranibizumab. At week 52, Q8wks aflibercept-treated eyes were, on average, as dry as or drier than with ranibizumab despite the extended treatment interval. Independent of agent or regimen, preexisting morphologic features of the retina at baseline markedly influenced VA outcomes.

Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema: 148-Week Results from the VISTA and VIVID Studies.

PURPOSE: To compare efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) with macular laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema (DME) over 3 years. DESIGN: Two similarly designed phase 3 trials: VISTADME and VIVIDDME. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (eyes; n = 872) with central-involved DME. METHODS: Eyes received IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8), or laser control. From week 24, if rescue treatment criteria were met, IAI patients received active laser, and laser control patients received IAI 2q8. From week 100, laser control patients who had not received IAI rescue treatment received IAI as needed per retreatment criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 52. We report the 148-week results. RESULTS: Mean BCVA gain from baseline to week 148 with IAI 2q4, IAI 2q8, and laser control was 10.4, 10.5, and 1.4 letters (P < 0.0001) in VISTA and 10.3, 11.7, and 1.6 letters (P < 0.0001) in VIVID, respectively. The proportion of eyes that gained ≥15 letters from baseline at week 148 was 42.9%, 35.8%, and 13.6% (P < 0.0001) in VISTA and 41.2%, 42.2%, and 18.9% (P < 0.0001) in VIVID, respectively. Greater proportions of eyes treated with IAI 2q4 and IAI 2q8 versus those treated with laser control had an improvement of ≥2 steps in the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score in both VISTA (29.9% and 34.4% vs. 20.1% [P = 0.0350, IAI 2q4; P = 0.0052, IAI 2q8]) and VIVID (44.3% and 47.8% vs. 17.4% [P < 0.0001 for both]). In an integrated safety analysis, the most frequent ocular serious adverse event was cataract (3.1%, 2.1%, 0.3% for 2q4, 2q8, and control). CONCLUSIONS: Visual improvements observed with both IAI regimens (over laser control) at weeks 52 and 100 were maintained at week 148, with similar overall efficacy in the IAI 2q4 and IAI 2q8 groups. Treatment with IAI also had positive effects on the DRSS score. Over 148 weeks, the incidence of adverse events was consistent with the known safety profile of IAI.

Pigment epithelial detachment followed by retinal cystoid degeneration leads to vision loss in treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: Intravitreal antiangiogenic therapy is the major therapeutic breakthrough in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is the leading diagnostic tool, but solid criteria for optimal therapeutic outcomes are lacking. A comprehensive analysis of structure/function correlations using Food and Drug Administration- and European Medicines Agency-approved substances and fixed and flexible regimens was performed. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of a prospective, randomized multicenter clinical trial including 189 study sites. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1240 patients with active neovascular AMD. METHODS: Participants received intravitreal ranibizumab or aflibercept. A fixed regimen was used for 48 weeks followed by a flexible regimen until week 96. At monthly intervals, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured and retinal morphology was assessed by standardized OCT, including intraretinal cysts (IRCs), subretinal fluid (SRF), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED), presenting with a width ≥400 µm or a height of ≥200 µm. Results were correlated for each regimen, feature, and time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The BCVA outcomes in relation to retinal pathomorphology based on noninferiority for all treatment arms. RESULTS: In neovascular AMD, only IRC at baseline and persistent through week 12 had a negative impact on BCVA. With therapeutic intervention, exudative features such as IRC and SRF resolved rapidly in 74% of eyes, whereas PED responded only slowly with 38%. Independent of the type of regimen, fixed or flexible, retinal morphology correlated tightly with visual function. Intraretinal cysts consistently showed the lowest BCVA gains with either regimen or substance. With the switch from a fixed to a flexible pro re nata (PRN) regimen, progressive visual loss occurred exclusively in the group with primary PED presenting as the hallmark of neovascular activity and was induced by secondary formation of IRC in the neurosensory retina. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy in neovascular AMD is strongly determined by morphologic features. The subretinal pigment epithelium lesion underlying PED appears to be the primary indicator for progressive disease activity, whereas secondary cystoid degeneration is the most relevant imaging marker for visual function. Clinically, PED emerged as trigger for consecutive vision loss in PRN treatment.

Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema: 100-Week Results From the VISTA and VIVID Studies.

PURPOSE: To compare efficacy and safety of 2 dosing regimens of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) with macular laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Two similarly designed, randomized, phase 3 trials, VISTA(DME) and VIVID(DME). PARTICIPANTS: Patients (eyes; n=872) with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus who had DME with central involvement. METHODS: Eyes received IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8), or laser control. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 52. This report presents the 100-week results including mean change from baseline in BCVA, proportion of eyes that gained ≥15 letters, and proportion of eyes with a ≥2-step improvement in the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score. RESULTS: Mean BCVA gain from baseline to week 100 with IAI 2q4, IAI 2q8, and laser control was 11.5, 11.1, and 0.9 letters (P < 0.0001) in VISTA and 11.4, 9.4, and 0.7 letters (P < 0.0001) in VIVID, respectively. The proportion of eyes that gained ≥15 letters from baseline at week 100 was 38.3%, 33.1%, and 13.0% (P < 0.0001) in VISTA and 38.2%, 31.1%, and 12.1% (P ≤ 0.0001) in VIVID. The proportion of eyes that lost ≥15 letters at week 100 was 3.2%, 0.7%, and 9.7% (P ≤ 0.0220) in VISTA and 2.2%, 1.5%, and 12.9% (P ≤ 0.0008) in VIVID. Significantly more eyes in the IAI 2q4 and 2q8 groups versus those in the laser control group had a ≥2 step improvement in the DRSS score in both VISTA (37.0% and 37.1% vs. 15.6%; P < 0.0001) and VIVID (29.3% and 32.6% vs. 8.2%; P ≤ 0.0004). In an integrated safety analysis, the most frequent serious ocular adverse event was cataract (2.4%, 1.0%, and 0.3% for 2q4, 2q8, and control). CONCLUSIONS: In both VISTA and VIVID, the 52-week visual and anatomic superiority of IAI over laser control was sustained through week 100, with similar efficacy in the 2q4 and 2q8 groups. Safety in these studies was consistent with the known safety profile of IAI.

Morphologic parameters relevant for visual outcome during anti-angiogenic therapy of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To identify the effects of anti-angiogenic therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in respect to morphologic type and time course and to identify prognostic factors for visual outcome on the basis of standardized optical coherence tomography (OCT) analysis. DESIGN: Subanalysis of a prospective, 12-month, multicenter, phase IIIb trial (Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab in Patients with Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration [EXCITE]). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 353 treatment-naïve patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) receiving quarterly or monthly ranibizumab therapy. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive 0.3 mg quarterly, 0.5 mg quarterly, or 0.3 mg monthly doses of ranibizumab. Treatment comprised a loading phase of 3 consecutive monthly injections followed by a 9-month maintenance phase of monthly or quarterly injections. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol, and retinal morphology was assessed by Stratus OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). Imaging data were evaluated by certified examiners of the Vienna Reading Center using a standardized protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The BCVA was measured using ETDRS charts and retinal morphology was assessed by OCT. RESULTS: During the loading phase, there was a significant correlation between a reduction in central retinal thickness and an increase in BCVA (P < 0.001), which decreased during the maintenance phase in all treatment arms. The proportion of patients showing retinal morphologic changes, such as intraretinal cysts (IRCs), subretinal fluid (SRF), and pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs), decreased significantly in all groups (P < 0.001), more intensively in the 0.5 mg quarterly than in both 0.3 mg groups. Intraretinal cysts resolved most rapidly followed by SRF, whereas PED decreased at a slower rate and intensity. Patients with IRC at baseline had lower BCVA levels that remained lower over the entire study period, whereas recurrence of IRC during follow-up showed no additional negative effect on function. Baseline SRF had no effect on visual recovery; however, recurrence of SRF during follow-up showed a tendency for an additional negative effect on function (P = 0.06). Baseline PED showed a negative influence on visual outcome only in combination with IRC and SRF. CONCLUSIONS: There is a distinct response pattern and time course of morphologic parameters associated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in neovascular AMD. Specific alterations, such as IRC, SRF, and PED, as baseline or follow-up features are significantly influencing the potential for visual gain.

Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection for Macular Edema Resulting from Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: One-Year Results of the Phase 3 GALILEO Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injections for treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). DESIGN: A randomized, multicenter, double-masked phase 3 study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 177 treatment-naive patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO were randomized in a 3:2 ratio. METHODS: Patients received either 2-mg intravitreal aflibercept or sham injections every 4 weeks for 20 weeks. From week 24 to 48, the aflibercept group received aflibercept as needed (pro re nata [PRN]), and the sham group continued receiving sham injections. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients who gained 15 letters or more in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 24. This study reports week 52 results including the proportion of patients who gained 15 letters or more in BCVA and the mean change from baseline BCVA and central retinal thickness. Efficacy end points at week 52 were all exploratory. RESULTS: At week 52, the mean percentage of patients gaining 15 letters or more was 60.2% in the aflibercept group and 32.4% in the sham group (P = 0.0004). Aflibercept patients, compared with sham patients, had a significantly higher mean improvement in BCVA (+16.9 letters vs. +3.8 letters, respectively) and reduction in central retinal thickness (-423.5 µm vs. -219.3 µm, respectively) at week 52 (P < 0.0001 for both). Aflibercept patients received a mean of 2.5 injections (standard deviation, 1.7 injections) during PRN dosing. The most common ocular adverse events in the aflibercept group were related to the injection procedure or the underlying disease, and included macular edema (33.7%), increased intraocular pressure (17.3%), and eye pain (14.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with intravitreal aflibercept provided significant functional and anatomic benefits after 52 weeks as compared with sham. The improvements achieved after 6 monthly doses at week 24 largely were maintained until week 52 with as-needed dosing. Intravitreal aflibercept generally was well tolerated.

Intravitreal aflibercept injection for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: ninety-six-week results of the VIEW studies.

PURPOSE: To determine efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) during a second year of variable dosing after a first-year fixed-dosing period. DESIGN: Two randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, phase 3 trials. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand four hundred fifty-seven patients with neovascular AMD. METHODS: From baseline to week 52, patients received 0.5 mg intravitreal ranibizumab every 4 weeks (Rq4), 2 mg aflibercept every 4 weeks (2q4), 0.5 mg aflibercept every 4 weeks (0.5q4), or 2 mg aflibercept every 8 weeks (2q8) after 3 monthly injections. During weeks 52 through 96, patients received their original dosing assignment using an as-needed regimen with defined retreatment criteria and mandatory dosing at least every 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of eyes at week 96 that maintained best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; lost <15 letters from baseline); change from baseline in BCVA. RESULTS: Proportions of eyes maintaining BCVA across treatments were 94.4% to 96.1% at week 52 and 91.5% to 92.4% at week 96. Mean BCVA gains were 8.3 to 9.3 letters at week 52 and 6.6 to 7.9 letters at week 96. Proportions of eyes without retinal fluid decreased from week 52 (60.3% to 72.4%) to week 96 (44.6% to 54.4%), and more 2q4 eyes were without fluid at weeks 52 and 96 than Rq4 eyes (difference of 10.4% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 4.9-15.9] and 9.0% [95% CI, 3.0-15.1]). Patients received on average 16.5, 16.0, 16.2, and 11.2 injections over 96 weeks and 4.7, 4.1, 4.6, and 4.2 injections during weeks 52 through 96 in the Rq4, 2q4, 0.5q4, and 2q8 groups, respectively. The number of injections during weeks 52 through 96 was lower in the 2q4 and 2q8 groups versus the Rq4 group (differences of -0.64 [95% CI, -0.89 to -0.40] and -0.55 [95% CI, -0.79 to -0.30]; P < 0.0001, post hoc analysis). Incidences of Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration-defined arterial thromboembolic events were similar across groups (2.4% to 3.8%) from baseline to week 96. CONCLUSIONS: All aflibercept and ranibizumab groups were equally effective in improving BCVA and preventing BCVA loss at 96 weeks. The 2q8 aflibercept group was similar to ranibizumab in visual acuity outcomes during 96 weeks, but with an average of 5 fewer injections. Small losses at 96 weeks in the visual and anatomic gains seen at 52 weeks in all arms were in the range of losses commonly observed with variable dosing.

Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema.

PURPOSE: A head-to-head comparison was performed between vascular endothelial growth factor blockade and laser for treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Two similarly designed, double-masked, randomized, phase 3 trials, VISTA(DME) and VIVID(DME). PARTICIPANTS: We included 872 patients (eyes) with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus who presented with DME with central involvement. METHODS: Eyes received either intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 initial monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at week 52. Secondary efficacy endpoints at week 52 included the proportion of eyes that gained ≥ 15 letters from baseline and the mean change from baseline in central retinal thickness as determined by optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: Mean BCVA gains from baseline to week 52 in the IAI 2q4 and 2q8 groups versus the laser group were 12.5 and 10.7 versus 0.2 letters (P < 0.0001) in VISTA, and 10.5 and 10.7 versus 1.2 letters (P < 0.0001) in VIVID. The corresponding proportions of eyes gaining ≥ 15 letters were 41.6% and 31.1% versus 7.8% (P < 0.0001) in VISTA, and 32.4% and 33.3% versus 9.1% (P < 0.0001) in VIVID. Similarly, mean reductions in central retinal thickness were 185.9 and 183.1 versus 73.3 µm (P < 0.0001) in VISTA, and 195.0 and 192.4 versus 66.2 µm (P < 0.0001) in VIVID. Overall incidences of ocular and nonocular adverse events and serious adverse events, including the Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboration-defined arterial thromboembolic events and vascular deaths, were similar across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: At week 52, IAI demonstrated significant superiority in functional and anatomic endpoints over laser, with similar efficacy in the 2q4 and 2q8 groups despite the extended dosing interval in the 2q8 group. In general, IAI was well-tolerated.

Differential diagnosis of macular edema of different pathophysiologic origins by spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

PURPOSE: To develop a classification approach based solely on spectral domain optical coherence tomography to differentiate macular edema (ME) of different disease entities and to determine underlying pathology. METHODS: A cross-sectional study including 153 participants: 27 with Irvine-Gass, 31 with uveitic ME, 24 with ME after branch retinal vein occlusion, 13 with central retinal vein occlusion, 44 with diabetic ME, and 14 controls. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography was graded according to a standardized reading protocol. Grading characteristics were: ME pattern in the central line (horizontal/vertical) and in volume scans, distribution of cysts in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid, morphologic features, and quantitative parameters such as individual layer thickness. The parameters in a best-fitting multivariate model were evaluated for reliability to predict the underlying pathology using a leave-one-out crossover-validation analysis. To evaluate clinical reliability, two masked clinicians graded spectral domain optical coherence tomography images according to the assessed parameters. RESULTS: The best-fitting multivariate model revealed that microfoci, ME pattern in vertical line scan, and foveal retinal nerve fiber layer thickness are the best indicators of the underlying pathology of ME. Classification accuracy of this model was 96%, mean cross-validated test classification accuracy was 84% (r² = 0.95, P < 0.0001). Clinical relevance was examined with 2 independent readers, yielding classification accuracies of 86% in both cases. CONCLUSION: Macular edema demonstrates characteristic patterns, morphologic features, and layer thicknesses dependent on the underlying disease process. Diagnostic recognition of these features may allow clinical and automated disease identification based primarily on spectral domain optical coherence tomography analysis.

Two-year safety and efficacy of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in diabetic macular edema: interim analysis of the RESTORE extension study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 2-year safety and efficacy of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Twenty-four-month, open-label, multicenter, Phase IIIb extension study. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty of 303 patients with visual impairment due to DME who completed the RESTORE core study and entered the extension. METHODS: All patients were eligible to receive ranibizumab 0.5 mg pro re nata (PRN) from month 12 (end of core study) to month 36 based on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) stability and disease progression retreatment criteria. Patients were also eligible to receive laser PRN according to Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study guidelines. A preplanned interim analysis was performed at month 24, stratifying by treatment groups as in the RESTORE core study and referred to as prior ranibizumab, ranibizumab plus laser, or laser groups in the extension. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of ocular and nonocular adverse events (AEs) and mean change in BCVA. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty patients (92%) completed the month 24 visit. Over 2 years, the most frequent ocular serious AE (SAE) and AE were cataract (2.1%) and eye pain (14.6%), respectively. The main nonocular AEs were nasopharyngitis (18.8%) and hypertension (10.4%). There were no cases of endophthalmitis, and the incidences of nonocular SAEs were low. Of the patients entering the extension, 4 deaths were reported in the second year, none of which were related to study drug or procedure. Mean BCVA gain, central retinal thickness (CRT) decrease, and National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) composite score observed at month 12 were maintained at month 24 (prior ranibizumab: +7.9 letters, -140.6 µm, and 5.6, respectively; prior ranibizumab plus laser: +6.7 letters, -133.0 µm, and 5.8, respectively), with an average of 3.9 (prior ranibizumab) and 3.5 ranibizumab injections (prior ranibizumab plus laser). In patients treated with laser alone in the core study, the mean BCVA, CRT, and NEI VFQ-25 composite score improved from month 12 to month 24 (+5.4 letters, -126.6 µm, and 4.3, respectively), with an average of 4.1 ranibizumab injections. CONCLUSIONS: Ranibizumab 0.5 mg administered according to prespecified visual stability and disease progression criteria was well tolerated, with no new safety concerns identified over 2 years. Overall, an average of 3.8 ranibizumab injections was sufficient to maintain (prior ranibizumab) or improve (prior laser) BCVA, CRT, and NEI VFQ-25 outcomes through the second year. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Influence of the vitreomacular interface on outcomes of ranibizumab therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of the vitreomacular interface (VMI) on the functional and anatomic efficacy of ranibizumab therapy in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Subanalysis of a prospective, 12-month, multicenter, phase IIIb trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 353 treatment-naïve patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) receiving quarterly or monthly ranibizumab therapy. METHODS: On monthly optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan sets, the VMI configuration was graded by a certified reading center into one of the following conditions: continuous posterior vitreoretinal attachment (PVA), vitreomacular adhesion (VMA), partial vitreous detachment without vitreomacular contact, or complete posterior vitreous detachment (PVD). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) measurements were performed at monthly intervals. Analysis included patients with a minimum of 10 OCT examinations, including baseline and month 12 (n = 251). After integration of the VMI configuration over 12 months, patients were divided into one of the following categories: PVD (n = 162), release of vitreomacular contact (RELEASE; n = 48), VMA (n = 37), or PVA (n = 4). General estimation equation analyses were applied to test for noninferiority of quarterly versus monthly treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The BCVA and CRT changes at month 12. RESULTS: Mean BCVA changes in letters were +4.7 (PVD), +3.2 (RELEASE), and -0.2 (VMA) in the quarterly regimen and +4.9 (PVD), +12.7 (RELEASE), and +7.5 (VMA) in the monthly regimen. No difference in therapeutic efficiency between monthly and quarterly intervention was found in eyes with PVD, and quarterly treatment was noninferior to monthly treatment (P = 0.001). However, monthly treatment was superior to quarterly treatment in the RELEASE (P = 0.008) and VMA (P = 0.043) groups. Mean CRT changes were -98 and -96 µm (PVD), -117 and -136 µm (RELEASE), and -93 and -87 µm (VMA) in the monthly and quarterly regimens, respectively, without statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The configuration of the VMI seems to have an important effect on visual outcomes and need for retreatment. In patients with PVD, a lower treatment frequency may be feasible, whereas patients with RELEASE or VMA may benefit from intensive retreatment. These findings may serve as a basis for individualized treatment decisions in anti-angiogenic therapy of neovascular AMD and perhaps other indications.

Therapeutic interventions for macular diseases show characteristic effects on near and distance visual function.

PURPOSE: To compare therapy-induced reading and distance visual acuity (dVA) increases in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and uveitis-associated cystoid macular edema. METHODS: This longitudinal study included 68 treatment-naive eyes: 39 subfoveal nAMD eyes with disrupted photoreceptor layers treated with monthly ranibizumab and 29 uveitis-associated cystoid macular edema eyes with intact photoreceptor layer treated with 1 triamcinolone injection. Patients were examined with high-definition optical coherence tomography, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study dVA (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), reading acuity (logRADscore), and maximum reading speed (words per minute) over 3 months of therapy. RESULTS: In uveitis-associated cystoid macular edema, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution and logRADscore improved 1 day post treatment, from 0.49 ± 0.28 to 0.39 ± 0.3 (P = 0.018) and 0.71 ± 0.53 to 0.56 ± 0.49 (P = 0.012), respectively. In nAMD, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution improved 1 week after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy from 0.59 ± 0.29 to 0.49 ± 0.24 (P = 0.002), with no change in logRADscore. One month after treatment, logRADscore improved from 1.09 ± 0.65 to 0.90 ± 0.60 (P = 0.002). In uveitis-associated cystoid macular edema, the recovery course of reading and dVA was comparable, and in nAMD, reading acuity recovery was delayed. Irrespective of disease, a small reduction in dVA resulted in a larger reading acuity decrease. CONCLUSION: Cystoid macular edema resolution was associated with rapid synchronous reading and dVA improvement, whereas nAMD was followed by faster recovery of distance than reading acuity. In both conditions, reading acuity expressed by critical angular resolution was more suppressed by active disease and recovered relatively more than distance acuity. These discrepancies indicate that reading acuity might be a more sensitive measure for vision decrease in macular diseases than dVA. Reading acuity seems to be an important adjunct assessing intravitreal therapy efficacy.

Morphologic and functional evaluations during development, resolution, and relapse of uveitis-associated cystoid macular edema.

OBJECTIVES: To describe progression and resolution of uveitis-associated cystoid macular edema (uvCME) using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and find predictive factors for successful intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) therapy. METHODS: Twenty-nine eyes with treatment-naive uvCME were examined before and at 5 scheduled visits within 3 months after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide administration. Distribution, resolution, relapse, and development of uvCME were evaluated using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography to describe morphology, progression, and relapse according to a standardized reading protocol. Applying repeated measures analysis of variance, morphologic findings were evaluated as predictive factors of the treatment outcome. RESULTS: At baseline, 89.3% presented with focal CME; 65.6% had outer nuclear/Henley's layer and inner nuclear layer cysts. Following intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide administration, cysts of outer nuclear/Henley's layer diminished before those of inner nuclear layer (P = 0.0004). Small-pointed subretinal detachment (SRD) resolution synchronized with inner nuclear layer cyst extinction, whereas dome-shaped SRD resolution lagged behind (P = 0.014). Relapses of CME appeared in 71.4% of eyes with parafoveal inner nuclear layer cysts. Cysts of outer nuclear/Henley's layer were present in an additional 28.6%. None of the eyes developed SRD during CME relapse. The main effect variables "SRD" and "absence of epiretinal membrane" were associated with greater best-corrected visual acuity improvement (P = 0.05 and P = 0.047), whereas the side effect variables "CME duration", "age," and "uveitis location" had no additional effect on best-corrected visual acuity. Baseline SRD predicted a relapse-free clinical course within the observational period (P = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Different morphologic patterns in uvCME may represent different stages in uvCME progression, and initial morphologic appearance can be linked to the clinical prognosis after the treatment.

Verteporfin plus ranibizumab for choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: twelve-month MONT BLANC study results.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of same-day verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) and intravitreal ranibizumab combination treatment versus ranibizumab monotherapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, double-masked, randomized, active-controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: We included 255 patients with all types of active subfoveal choroidal neovascularization. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to as-needed (pro re nata; PRN) combination (standard-fluence verteporfin 6 mg/m(2) PDT and ranibizumab 0.5 mg) or PRN ranibizumab monotherapy (sham infusion [5% dextrose] PDT and ranibizumab 0.5 mg). Patients received 3 consecutive monthly injections followed by PRN retreatments based on protocol-specific retreatment criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to month 12, and the proportion of patients with treatment-free interval ≥3 months at any timepoint after month 2. RESULTS: The mean change in BCVA at month 12 was +2.5 and +4.4 letters in the combination and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = 0.0048; difference: -1.9 letters [95% confidence interval, -5.76 to 1.86], for having achieved noninferiority with a margin of 7 letters). The proportion of patients with a treatment-free interval of ≥3 months at any timepoint after month 2 was high, but did not show a clinically relevant difference between the treatment groups. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the mean number of ranibizumab retreatments after month 2 (1.9 and 2.2 with combination and monotherapy, respectively [P = 0.1373]). The time to first ranibizumab retreatment after month 2 was delayed by 34 days (about 1 monthly visit) with combination (month 6) versus monotherapy (month 5). At month 12, mean ± standard error central retinal thickness decreased by 115.3±9.04 µm in the combination group and 107.7±11.02 µm in the monotherapy group. The mean number of verteporfin/sham PDT treatments was comparable in the 2 groups (combination, 1.7; monotherapy, 1.9). The safety profiles of the 2 groups were comparable, with a low incidence of ocular serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The combination PRN treatment regimen with verteporfin PDT and ranibizumab was effective in achieving BCVA gain comparable with ranibizumab monotherapy; however, the study did not show benefits with respect to reducing the number of ranibizumab retreatment over 12 months. The combination therapy was well tolerated.

Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration.

OBJECTIVE: Two similarly designed, phase-3 studies (VEGF Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet AMD [VIEW 1, VIEW 2]) of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) compared monthly and every-2-month dosing of intravitreal aflibercept injection (VEGF Trap-Eye; Regeneron, Tarrytown, NY, and Bayer HealthCare, Berlin, Germany) with monthly ranibizumab. DESIGN: Double-masked, multicenter, parallel-group, active-controlled, randomized trials. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 2419) with active, subfoveal, choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesions (or juxtafoveal lesions with leakage affecting the fovea) secondary to AMD. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to intravitreal aflibercept 0.5 mg monthly (0.5q4), 2 mg monthly (2q4), 2 mg every 2 months after 3 initial monthly doses (2q8), or ranibizumab 0.5 mg monthly (Rq4). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was noninferiority (margin of 10%) of the aflibercept regimens to ranibizumab in the proportion of patients maintaining vision at week 52 (losing <15 letters on Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] chart). Other key end points included change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and anatomic measures. RESULTS: All aflibercept groups were noninferior and clinically equivalent to monthly ranibizumab for the primary end point (the 2q4, 0.5q4, and 2q8 regimens were 95.1%, 95.9%, and 95.1%, respectively, for VIEW 1, and 95.6%, 96.3%, and 95.6%, respectively, for VIEW 2, whereas monthly ranibizumab was 94.4% in both studies). In a prespecified integrated analysis of the 2 studies, all aflibercept regimens were within 0.5 letters of the reference ranibizumab for mean change in BCVA; all aflibercept regimens also produced similar improvements in anatomic measures. Ocular and systemic adverse events were similar across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal aflibercept dosed monthly or every 2 months after 3 initial monthly doses produced similar efficacy and safety outcomes as monthly ranibizumab. These studies demonstrate that aflibercept is an effective treatment for AMD, with the every-2-month regimen offering the potential to reduce the risk from monthly intravitreal injections and the burden of monthly monitoring. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Influence of vitreomacular adhesion on the development of exudative age-related macular degeneration: 4-year results of a longitudinal study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) on development of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in eyes with age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: In a prospective study, patients with Age-Related Eye Disease Study Category IV age-related macular degeneration underwent standardized examinations, including optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography every 3 months for 4 years. Vitreomacular adhesion was evaluated using time- and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Development of CNV was detected using fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography. Incidences of CNV were compared concerning the presence or absence of VMA. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were available for follow-up according to protocol. Vitreomacular adhesion was present at baseline in 18% (9 of 49) and absent in 82% (40 of 49) of patients. Thirty-seven percent of patients (18 of 49) developed exudative changes during the observation period. In patients with preexisting VMA, de novo development of CNV occurred in 33% (3 of 9). In patients without VMA, 38% developed CNV (15 of 40). Mean interval from baseline to disease progression was 20 ± 19 months in patients with VMA and 22 ± 13 months in patients without VMA. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding rate of CNV development or time to disease progression (P = 0.64). CONCLUSION: No significant influence of VMA on the development of exudative age-related macular degeneration could be found during a 4-year prospective observation of a high-risk cohort.

A systematic comparison of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence in patients with geographic atrophy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in providing reliable and reproducible parameters for grading geographic atrophy (GA) compared with fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images acquired by confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (cSLO). DESIGN: Prospective observational study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 81 eyes of 42 patients with GA. METHODS: Patients with atrophic age-related macular degeneration (AMD) were enrolled on the basis of total GA lesion size ranging from 0.5 to 7 disc areas and best-corrected visual acuity of at least 20/200. A novel combined cSLO-SD-OCT system (Spectralis HRA-OCT, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) was used to grade foveal involvement and to manually measure disease extent at the level of the outer neurosensory layers and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) at the site of GA lesions. Two readers of the Vienna Reading Center graded all obtained volume stacks (20×20 degrees), and the results were correlated to FAF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Choroidal signal enhancements and alterations of the RPE, external limiting membrane (ELM), and outer plexiform layer by SD-OCT. These parameters were compared with the lesion measured with severely decreased FAF. RESULTS: Foveal involvement or sparing was definitely identified in 75 of 81 eyes based on SD-OCT by both graders (inter-grader agreement: κ=0.6, P < 0.01). In FAF, inter-grader agreement regarding foveal involvement was lower (48/81 eyes, inter-grader agreement: κ=0.3, P < 0.01). Severely decreased FAF was measured over a mean area of 8.97 mm(2) for grader 1 (G1) and 9.54 mm(2) for grader 2 (G2), consistent with the mean SD-OCT quantification of the sub-RPE choroidal signal enhancement (8.9 mm(2) [G1] -9.4 mm(2) [G2]) and ELM loss with 8.7 mm(2) (G1) -10.2 mm(2) (G2). In contrast, complete morphologic absence of the RPE layer by SD-OCT was significantly smaller than the GA size in FAF (R(2)=0.400). Inter-reader agreement was highest regarding complete choroidal signal enhancement (0.98) and ELM loss (0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Absence of FAF in GA lesions is consistent with morphologic RPE loss or advanced RPE disruption and is associated with alterations of the outer retinal layers as identified by SD-OCT. Lesion size is precisely determinable by SD-OCT, and foveal involvement is more accurate by SD-OCT than by FAF.

The RESTORE study: ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy for diabetic macular edema.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate superiority of ranibizumab 0.5 mg monotherapy or combined with laser over laser alone based on mean average change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over 12 months in diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: A 12-month, randomized, double-masked, multicenter, laser-controlled phase III study. PARTICIPANTS: We included 345 patients aged ≥18 years, with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus and visual impairment due to DME. METHODS: Patients were randomized to ranibizumab + sham laser (n = 116), ranibizumab + laser (n = 118), or sham injections + laser (n = 111). Ranibizumab/sham was given for 3 months then pro re nata (PRN); laser/sham laser was given at baseline then PRN (patients had scheduled monthly visits). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean average change in BCVA from baseline to month 1 through 12 and safety. RESULTS: Ranibizumab alone and combined with laser were superior to laser monotherapy in improving mean average change in BCVA letter score from baseline to month 1 through 12 (+6.1 and +5.9 vs +0.8; both P<0.0001). At month 12, a significantly greater proportion of patients had a BCVA letter score ≥15 and BCVA letter score level >73 (20/40 Snellen equivalent) with ranibizumab (22.6% and 53%, respectively) and ranibizumab + laser (22.9% and 44.9%) versus laser (8.2% and 23.6%). The mean central retinal thickness was significantly reduced from baseline with ranibizumab (-118.7 µm) and ranibizumab + laser (-128.3 µm) versus laser (-61.3 µm; both P<0.001). Health-related quality of life, assessed through National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), improved significantly from baseline with ranibizumab alone and combined with laser (P<0.05 for composite score and vision-related subscales) versus laser. Patients received ∼7 (mean) ranibizumab/sham injections over 12 months. No endophthalmitis cases occurred. Increased intraocular pressure was reported for 1 patient each in the ranibizumab arms. Ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser was not associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Ranibizumab monotherapy and combined with laser provided superior visual acuity gain over standard laser in patients with visual impairment due to DME. Visual acuity gains were associated with significant gains in VFQ-25 scores. At 1 year, no differences were detected between the ranibizumab and ranibizumab + laser arms. Ranibizumab monotherapy and combined with laser had a safety profile in DME similar to that in age-related macular degeneration.

Efficacy and safety of monthly versus quarterly ranibizumab treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: the EXCITE study.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate noninferiority of a quarterly treatment regimen to a monthly regimen of ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: A 12-month, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, phase IIIb study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with primary or recurrent subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD (353 patients), with predominantly classic, minimally classic, or occult (no classic component) lesions. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to 0.3 mg quarterly, 0.5 mg quarterly, or 0.3 mg monthly doses of ranibizumab. Treatment comprised of a loading phase (3 consecutive monthly injections) followed by a 9-month maintenance phase (either monthly or quarterly injection). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) from baseline to month 12 and the incidence of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: In the per-protocol population (293 patients), BCVA, measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study-like charts, increased from baseline to month 12 by 4.9, 3.8, and 8.3 letters in the 0.3 mg quarterly (104 patients), 0.5 mg quarterly (88 patients), and 0.3 mg monthly (101 patients) dosing groups, respectively. Similar results were observed in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (353 patients). The mean decrease in CRT from baseline to month 12 in the ITT population was -96.0 µm in 0.3 mg quarterly, -105.6 µm in 0.5 mg quarterly, and -105.3 µm in 0.3 mg monthly group. The most frequent ocular AEs were conjunctival hemorrhage (17.6%, pooled quarterly groups; 10.4%, monthly group) and eye pain (15.1%, pooled quarterly groups; 20.9%, monthly group). There were 9 ocular serious AEs and 3 deaths; 1 death was suspected to be study related (cerebral hemorrhage; 0.5 mg quarterly group). The incidences of key arteriothromboembolic events were low. CONCLUSIONS: After 3 initial monthly ranibizumab injections, both monthly (0.3 mg) and quarterly (0.3 mg/0.5 mg) ranibizumab treatments maintained BCVA in patients with CNV secondary to AMD. At month 12, BCVA gain in the monthly regimen was higher than that of the quarterly regimens. The noninferiority of a quarterly regimen was not achieved with reference to 5.0 letters. The safety profile was similar to that reported in prior ranibizumab studies.