High-risk human papillomavirus 16/18 associated with improved survival in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: There has been conflicting evidence on the independent prognostic role of human papillomavirus (HPV) status in sinonasal cancer. The objective of this study was to assess whether the survival of patients with sinonasal cancer differs based on various HPV statuses, including HPV-negative, positive for the high-risk HPV-16 and HPV-18 (HPV16/18) subtypes, and positive for other high-risk and low-risk HPV subtypes. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, data from the National Cancer Database were extracted from the years 2010-2017 for patients who had primary sinonasal cancer (N = 12,009). The outcome of interest was overall survival based on HPV tumor status. RESULTS: Study included an analytic cohort of 1070 patients with sinonasal cancer who had confirmed HPV tumor status (732 [68.4%] HPV-negative; 280 [26.2%] HPV16/18-positive; 40 [3.7%] positive for other high-risk HPV; and 18 [1.7%] positive for low-risk HPV). HPV-negative patients had the lowest all-cause survival probability at 5 years postdiagnosis (0.50). After controlling for covariates, HPV16/18-positive patients had a 37% lower mortality hazard than HPV-negative patients (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.82). Patients aged 64-72 years (crude prevalence ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86) and 73 years and older (crude prevalence ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.31-0.59) presented with lower rates of HPV16/18-positive sinonasal cancer than those aged 40-54 years. In addition, Hispanic patients had a 2.36 times higher prevalence of non-HPV16/18 sinonasal cancer than non-Hispanic White patients. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that, for patients with sinonasal cancer, HPV16/18-positive disease may confer a significant survival advantage compared with HPV-negative disease. Other high-risk and low-risk HPV subtypes have survival rates similar to the rates for HPV-negative disease. HPV status might be an important independent prognostic factor in sinonasal cancer that could be used in patient selection and clinical decisions.

Differences in Sociodemographic Correlates of Human Papillomavirus-Associated Cancer Survival in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers account for about 9% of the cancer mortality burden in the United States; however, survival differs among sociodemographic factors. We determine sociodemographic and clinical variables associated with HPV-associated cancer survival. METHODS: Data derived from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 cancer registry were analyzed for a cohort of adult patients diagnosed with a first primary HPV-associated cancer (anal, cervical, oropharyngeal, penile, vaginal, and vulvar cancers), between 2007 and 2015. Multivariable Fine and Gray proportional hazards regression models stratified by anatomic site estimated the association of sociodemographic and clinical variables and cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: A total of 77 774 adults were included (11 216 anal, 27 098 cervical, 30 451 oropharyngeal, 2221 penile, 1176 vaginal, 5612 vulvar; average age = 57.2 years). The most common HPV-associated cancer was cervical carcinoma (58%) for females and oropharyngeal (81%) for male. Among patients diagnosed with anal/rectal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), males had a higher risk of death than females. NonHispanic (NH) blacks had a higher risk of death from anal/rectal SCC, oropharyngeal SCC, and cervical carcinoma; and Hispanics had a higher risk of death from oropharyngeal SCC than NH whites. Marital status was associated with risk of death for all anatomic sites except vulvar. Compared to nonMedicaid insurance, patients with Medicaid and uninsured had higher risk of death from anal/rectal SCC, oropharyngeal SCC, and cervical carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: There exists gender (anal) and racial and insurance (anal, cervical, and oropharyngeal) disparities in relative survival. Concerted efforts are needed to increase and sustain progress made in HPV vaccine uptake among these specific patient subgroups, to reduce cancer incidence.

Human Papillomavirus-Associated Sexual Risks Among High School Students in the U.S.: Does Sexual Orientation Play a Role?

We examined the association between sexual orientation and human papillomavirus (HPV)-related risky sexual behaviors among high school students in the U.S. We used the 2015 Youth Risk Behavior Survey, a three-stage cluster sample, nationally representative, cross-sectional study. Participants were sexually active students (Grades 9-12) in public, private, and Catholic schools in 50 states and the District of Columbia (n = 5,958). Sexual orientation dimensions were: sexual self-identity (heterosexual, gay, lesbian, bisexual, and not sure) and sex of sexual contacts. HPV-associated risky sexual risk behaviors selected a priori were early sexual debut (≤ 12 or ≥ 13 years old) and number of lifetime partners (≥ 2 or ≥ 4). Separate multiple logistic regression analyses estimated association between sexual orientation and sex of sexual contacts, and HPV-associated risky sexual behaviors. Among the 5,958 high school students, a quarter had ≥ 4, and two-thirds had ≥ 2 sexual partners. Students who self-identified as bisexual (aOR = 2.43, 99% CI 1.19-4.98) or "not sure" (aOR = 4.56, 99% CI 2.54-8.17) were more likely to have sexual debut before 13 years. Similarly, students whose sexual contacts were adolescent females who had sex with females and males were more likely to have sexual debut before they turned 13 years of age (aOR = 3.46, 99% CI 1.83-6.48), or had ≥ 4 sexual partners (aOR = 2.66, 99% CI 1.74-4.08), or had ≥ 2 sexual partners (aOR = 3.09, 99% CI 1.91-5.00). In conclusion, HPV-associated risky sexual behavior is prevalent among high school students, especially sexual minorities. Interventions tailored to this population could increase HPV vaccine uptake and prevent future HPV-associated cancers and other negative outcomes.

Rising incidence of late-stage head and neck cancer in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The current study was conducted to determine whether the incidence of late-stage head and neck cancer (HNC) is decreasing and to estimate the risk of late-stage HNC diagnosis based on race and sex. METHODS: Age-adjusted incidence rates for patients aged ≥18 years with stage IV HNC were abstracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2015). Rates were stratified by race, sex, and age. Joinpoint regression estimated annual percent changes (APCs) in rates over time, and logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs). RESULTS: There were 57,118 patients with stage IV HNC in the current study cohort, with an average age of 61.9 years. From 2004 to 2015, the age-adjusted incidence rates for stage IV HNC significantly increased by 26.1% (6.11 per 100,000 person-years in 2004 to 7.70 per 100,000 person-years in 2015). White and Asian/Pacific Islander/American Indian/Alaska Native patients had significant increases in incidence (APC for white patients, 3.03 [P < .01] and APC for other races, 1.95 [P < .01]), whereas rates among black patients remained stable but were highest across racial groups. Incidence was higher among males compared with females. When restricted only to patients with stage IVC (metastatic) HNC, there remained a significant increase in incidence, especially for oropharyngeal cancer, which showed a 22.9% increase (0.21 per 100,000 person-years in 2004 vs 0.25 per 100,000 person-years in 2015). Despite a decreasing overall incidence of stage IV HNC in black patients (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.22-1.34) they, along with males (aOR, 3.95; 95% CI, 3.80-4.11), had significantly increased risks of being diagnosed with late-stage HNC. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increasing incidence of late-stage HNC in the United States, with male patients and black individuals faring the worst.

Trends in the risk and burden of second primary malignancy among survivors of smoking-related cancers in the United States.

While there are a growing number of cancer survivors, this population is at increased risk of developing second primary malignancies (SPMs). We described the incidence, most common tumor sites, and trends in burden of SPM among survivors of the most commonly diagnosed smoking-related cancers. The current study was a population-based study of patients diagnosed with a primary malignancy from the top 10 smoking-related cancer sites between 2000 and 2014 from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data. SPM risks were quantified using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and excess absolute risks (EARs) per 10,000 person-years at risk (PYR). Trends in the burden of SPM were assessed using Joinpoint regression models. A cohort of 1,608,607 patients was identified, 119,980 (7.5%) of whom developed SPM (76% of the SPMs were smoking-related). The overall SIR of developing second primary malignancies was 1.51 (95% CI, 1.50-1.52) and the EAR was 73.3 cases per 10,000 PYR compared to the general population. Survivors of head and neck cancer had the highest risk of developing a SPM (SIR = 2.06) and urinary bladder cancer had the highest excess burden (EAR = 151.4 per 10,000 PYR). The excess burden of SPM for all smoking-related cancers decreased between 2000 and 2003 (annual percentage change [APC] = -13.7%; p = 0.007) but increased slightly between 2003 and 2014 (APC = 1.6%, p = 0.032). We show that 1-in-12 survivors of smoking-related cancers developed an SPM. With the significant increase in the burden of SPM from smoking-related cancers in the last decade, clinicians should be cognizant of long-term smoking-related cancer risks among these patients as part of their survivorship care plans.

Survival differences in nasopharyngeal carcinoma among racial and ethnic minority groups in the United States: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The literature on nasopharyngeal carcinoma survival in the United States has focused mostly on Whites or Asians and not much is known about survivorship in other minority racial and ethnic groups. We aimed to determine the disease-specific survival rate and prognostic factors for nasopharyngeal carcinoma survival across the minority United States population. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) 13 database from 1992 to 2014 was queried for adult cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (n = 2549). PARTICIPANTS: Eligible cases were Blacks, Hispanics, Asians/Pacific Islanders, American Indians/Alaska Natives; White patients were excluded. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE: A multivariable competing risk survival analysis yielded hazard ratios (HR) for competing mortality and was used to identify independent prognostic factors for survival. RESULTS: Non-Hispanic American Indians/Alaska Natives consistently had the worst cause-specific survival of any group and that non-Hispanic Asians/Pacific Islanders consistently had the best survival (P < 0.001). Even after adjusting for other poor prognostic factors in the study, including older age, keratinising histology, and lack of radiation treatment, non-Hispanic American Indians/Alaska Natives had more than double hazards of death from nasopharyngeal cancer compared with non-Hispanic Asians/Pacific Islanders (aHR = 2.63, 95% CI 1.67, 4.13). CONCLUSIONS: There are disparities in nasopharyngeal carcinoma survival among racial and ethnic minority groups in the United States, with American Indians/Alaskan Natives faring worst. It is critical that future research focuses on nasopharyngeal carcinoma among this population to improve survivorship and mitigate cancer-related health disparities.

Suicide risk among cancer survivors: Head and neck versus other cancers.

BACKGROUND: Cancer survivors face psychosocial issues that increase their risk of suicide. This study examined the risk of suicide across cancer sites, with a focus on survivors of head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18-registry database (from 2000 to 2014) was queried for the top 20 cancer sites in the database, including HNC. The outcome of interest was suicide as a cause of death. The mortality rate from suicide was estimated for HNC sites and was compared with rates for 19 other cancer sites that were included in the study. Poisson regression was used to estimate adjusted rate ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for 1) HNC versus non-HNC sites (the other 19 cancer sites combined), and 2) HNC versus each individual cancer site. Models were stratified by sex, controlling for race, marital status, age, year, and stage at diagnosis. RESULTS: There were 404 suicides among 151,167 HNC survivors from 2000 to 2014, yielding a suicide rate of 63.4 suicides per 100,000 person-years. In this timeframe, there were 4493 suicides observed among 4219,097 cancer survivors in the study sample, yielding an incidence rate of 23.6 suicides per 100,000 person-years. Compared with survivors of other cancers, survivors of HNC were almost 2 times more likely to die from suicide (aRR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.77-2.19). There was a 27% increase in the risk of suicide among HNC survivors during the period from 2010 to 2014 (aRR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.16-1.38) compared with the period from 2000 to 2004. CONCLUSIONS: Although survival rates in cancer have improved because of improved treatments, the risk of death by suicide remains a problem for cancer survivors, particularly those with HNC.

Prevalence and sociodemographic factors associated with depression among hospitalized patients with head and neck cancer-Results from a national study.

OBJECTIVE: Depression is a significant problem for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). This study explored the prevalence of and sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with depression, among patients with HNC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 71 541 cases of HNC using a national dataset, the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, from 2008 to 2013. Weighted, multivariate logistic regression analysis estimated association between sociodemographic/clinical factors and tumor anatomical site with diagnosis of a major depressive disorder. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of major depressive disorder in HNC was 9.3%; highest prevalence was found in patients with laryngeal cancer (28.5%). Compared with laryngeal cancer, there were lower odds of depression among patients with oral cavity cancer (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.97) and other anatomic sites (aOR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81-0.94), except oropharyngeal cancer (aOR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.93-1.08). For every unit increase in comorbidities, odds of depression increased by 20% (aOR = 1.20; 95% CI, 1.19-1.23). Sociodemographic factors associated with increased odds of depression included being female (aOR = 1.77; 95% CI, 1.68-1.87), white (aOR = 1.75; 95% CI, 1.59-1.92), and having Medicaid (aOR = 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.19) or Medicare insurance (aOR = 1.19; 95% CI, 1.10-1.27). CONCLUSIONS: Depression odds vary depending on HNC anatomic site, and one in four patients with laryngeal cancer may be depressed. Since depression is prevalent in this survivor cohort, it is important that psychosocial assessment and intervention are integrated into mainstream clinical care for patients with HNC.

Chronic Opioid Prescribing After Common Otolaryngology Procedures in Adults.

OBJECTIVE: (1) Describe short and long-term opioid prescribing patterns and variation after common otolaryngologic procedures and (2) assess risk factors for chronic opioid use in this cohort. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Optum's deidentified Integrated Claims-Clinical data set. METHODS: An adult cohort of patients undergoing common otolaryngology procedures from 2010 to 2017 was identified. Associations between procedure and other covariates with any initial opioid prescription and continuous opioid prescriptions were assessed with multivariable modeling. Opioid use was defined as continuous if a new prescription was filled within 30 days of the previous prescription. A time-to-event analysis assessed continuous prescriptions from the index procedure to end of the last continuous opioid prescription. RESULTS: Among a cohort of 19,819 patients undergoing predominately laryngoscopy procedures (12,721, 64.2%), 2585 (13.0%) received an opioid prescription with variation in receiving a prescription, daily dose, and total initially prescribed dose varying by procedure, patient demographics, provider characteristics, and facility type. Opioids were prescribed most frequently after tonsillectomy (45.4%) and least frequently after laryngoscopy with interventions (3.9%), which persisted in the multivariable models. Overall rates of continuous use at 180 and 360 days were 0.48% and 0.27%, respectively. Among patients receiving an initial opioid prescription, maintaining continuous prescriptions was associated with tonsillectomy procedures, age (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.997 per year, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.993-0.999), opioid prescriptions 6 months preprocedure (aHR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.37-0.47), and nonotolaryngology initial prescribers (aHRs: <1, P < .05). CONCLUSION: There is substantial variation in initial prescribing practices and continuous opioid prescriptions after common Otolaryngology procedures, but the overall rate of maintaining a continuous prescription starting after these procedures is very low. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Epidemiology and Prognostic Indicators of Survival in Tongue Lymphoma.

OBJECTIVES: Lymphoma, categorized as either non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or Hodgkin's lymphoma, is the second most common malignancy in the head and neck. Primary tongue lymphoma is exceedingly rare, with only case reports or small case series in the literature. This population-based analysis is the first to report the epidemiology and prognostic factors of survival in patients with primary tongue lymphoma. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 database from the National Cancer Institute was queried for patients diagnosed between the years 2000 and 2016 with tongue lymphoma. Outcomes of interest were overall and disease-specific survival. Independent variables included age at diagnosis, sex, race, marital status, primary subsite, histologic subtype, stage, and treatment type. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Seven hundred forty patients met criteria; the male-female ratio was 1.5:1 and the mean age at diagnosis was 67.8 years. The majority of lesions localized to the base of tongue (90.0%), were histologically diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (59.5%), and presented at stage I or II (77.9%). Most early-stage lymphomas were treated with chemotherapy only (40.5%) or a combination of both chemotherapy and radiation (31.3%), while late-stage cancers were primarily treated with chemotherapy alone (68.5%). In multivariate analysis, younger age at diagnosis, female sex, married/partnered marital status, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue histologic subtype, and earlier cancer stage were found to be associated with improved survival. Chemotherapy treatment with or without radiation was also associated with better survival compared to no treatment or radiation alone, though data regarding immunotherapy was unavailable.

The "Medicare effect" on head and neck cancer diagnosis and survival.

BACKGROUND: Uninsured individuals age 55-64 experience disproportionately poor outcomes compared to their insured counterparts. Adequate coverage may prevent these delays. This study investigates a "Medicare-effect" on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was queried for persons ages 60-70 years in the United States from 2000 to 2016 with HNSCC. A "Medicare effect" was defined as an increase in incidence, reduction in advanced stage presentation, and/or decrease in cancer-specific mortality (CSM). RESULTS: Compared to their Medicaid or uninsured counterparts, patients age 65 have an increased incidence of HNSCC diagnosis, reduction in advanced stage presentation, decrease in cancer-specific mortality, and higher likelihood of receiving cancer-specific surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients age 65 with Medicare have decreased incidence of HNSCC, less hazard of late-stage diagnosis, and lower cancer-specific mortality than their Medicaid or uninsured counterparts, supporting the idea of a "Medicare effect" in HNSCC.

Factors Shifting Preference Toward Telemedicine in the Delivery of Skin Cancer Reconstruction Care.

OBJECTIVES: Identify which delivery modality for skin reconstruction care, face-to-face (FTF) in-person versus two telemedicine modalities, store-and-forward (S&F) and live video chat (LVC), is patient preferred and how cost, access, wait time, and demographics influence this preference. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: A 16-question survey querying demographics and five scenario-specific preferences questions for the delivery of skin cancer reconstruction care was created and distributed via Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), a crowdsourcing online marketplace, and in-person to Mohs micrographic surgery patients. RESULTS: 1394 MTurk and 55 in-person responses were included. While 82.1% of online respondents prefer FTF clinic visits, this decreases to 58.3% with an in-person visit cost (p < 0.01) and furthermore to a minority 43.5% with both an in-person visit cost and wait time (p < 0.01) despite 77.8% believing that usefulness to the surgeon would improve FTF. Both the MTurk and in-person cohorts demonstrated similar response patterns despite considerable demographic differences. Multivariable analyses revealed that telemedicine was preferred by MTurk respondents with Medicaid (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 1.97 [1.18-3.31]) or Medicare (1.69 [1.10-2.59]) versus private insurance, and prior skin cancer (2.01 [1.18-3.42]) and less preferred by those earning $140,000+ per year (0.49 [0.29-0.82]) compared to those earning <$20,000 per year. CONCLUSIONS: FTF visits are preferred for skin cancer reconstruction care; this shifts toward virtual care with a cost and wait time in spite of the perceived quality of care. Individuals with socioeconomic barriers to access prefer telemedicine. MTurk can be a valuable tool for behavioral research in FPRS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 133:294-301, 2023.

Association Between Antibiotic Prescribing and Time to Diagnosis of Head and Neck Cancer.

Importance: Diagnostic delay can negatively affect patient outcomes in head and neck cancer (HNC). Neck mass and other symptoms of undiagnosed HNC may be treated with antibiotics, delaying diagnosis and treatment, despite current clinical practice guidelines. Objective: To investigate temporal trends, associated factors, and time from symptom onset to antibiotic prescribing before an HNC diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data obtained from a deidentified electronic health records data set from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2018. Patients with HNC enrolled in the data set for at least 1 year before diagnosis date determined by either 1 inpatient encounter or first of 2 outpatient encounters within 6 months were included. Data analysis was conducted from May 1 to November 9, 2022. Exposure: Antibiotic prescription within 3 months before HNC diagnosis date. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was days from the first documented symptom to HNC diagnosis. Results: The cohort included 7811 patients with HNC (4151 [53.1%] men, mean [SD] age, 60.2 [15.8] years). At least 1 antibiotic was prescribed for 1219 patients (15.6%) within 3 months before HNC diagnosis. This represented an increase over the 8.9% prescribing rate during the baseline period 12 to 9 months before diagnosis. The rate of antibiotic prescribing within 3 months before diagnosis did not change significantly over time (quarterly percent change, 0.49%; 95% CI, -3.06% to 4.16%). Patients receiving an antibiotic prescription within 3 months of an HNC diagnosis had a 21.1% longer time between symptom onset and HNC diagnoses (adjusted rate ratio [ARR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.14-1.29). Compared with diagnosis by otolaryngologists, primary care/internal medicine physicians were most likely to prescribe antibiotics for patients who were diagnosed with a presenting symptom (adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.27-2.02). In patients presenting with neck mass/swelling, those presenting with other symptoms were more likely to have longer intervals from symptom onset to diagnosis (ARR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.08-1.59). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest there is an increased rate of antibiotic prescription in the 3 months before HNC diagnosis, which is associated with an increased time to diagnosis. These findings identify an area for improvement in HNC care and guidelines.

Temporal trends in oropharyngeal cancer incidence, survival, and cancer-directed surgery among elderly Americans.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses longitudinal epidemiologic trends in the oldest head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, comparing the oropharynx to other mucosal HNC sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, trends in incidence, two-year cancer specific mortality, and percent of cases recommended for and which received surgery from 2000 to 2018 in patients ages ≥85 years were assessed using Joinpoint analysis by HNC site. Trends were quantified as annual percentage change (APC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Among older adults, oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) incidence increased (APC = 1.80% [95% CI: 0.94-2.67]), while mortality decreased (APC = -2.01% [95% CI: -3.26--0.74]) from 2000 to 2018. At other mucosal HNC sites, incidence and mortality remained stable. Percentage of patients who received surgery significantly changed for oropharyngeal (APC = -15.34% from 2000 to 2005 [95% CI: -24.37 to -4.79]) and laryngeal (APC = -4.61% from 2000 to 2008 [95% CI -8.28 to -0.80]) cancers. Trends in recommendation for surgery varied by site with significant decreases at the larynx, oral cavity, and oropharynx. CONCLUSION: OPC incidence is increasing among the oldest HNC patients. An increasing proportion of HPV-associated tumors could account for associated mortality improvement. There has been a shift towards non-surgical therapy possibly due to known favorable response of HPV-associated OPC to radiation therapy and/or poor surgical candidacy in this age group. The evolving treatment approach has not been detrimental to population-level survival outcomes, but optimal treatment has yet to be established. Future studies with pathologically confirmed HPV status are needed to better understand older adult OPC burden.

Radiation-Associated Sarcoma of the Head and Neck: Incidence, Latency, and Survival.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Radiation-associated sarcomas of the head and neck (RASHN) are known but rare sequelae after radiation for squamous cell carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to characterize RASHN, estimate the risk of RASHN in head and neck squamous cell patients after therapeutic radiation, and compare their survival to that of patients with de novo sarcomas of the head and neck (dnSHN). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. METHODS: RASHN and dnSHN cases were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database to identify risk factors and calculate incidence and latency. Survival was compared between RASHN and dnSHN. RESULTS: The risk of RASHN was 20.0 per 100,000 person-years. The average latency period was 124.2 months (range 38-329). The cumulative incidence of RASHN at 20 years was 0.13%. Oral cavity and oropharynx primaries demonstrate increased risk. Five-year overall survival of RASHN was 22.4% compared to 64.5% for dnSHN. CONCLUSIONS: RASHN are confirmed to be rare. RASHN have poor overall survival and worse survival compared to dnSHN. The impact of intensity-modulated radiation therapy protocols on this risk is unknown. Modifiable risk factors of smoking and alcohol consumption continue to dwarf radiation therapy as risk factors of second primary head and neck cancers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:1034-1041, 2022.

Medical students' knowledge of HPV, HPV vaccine, and HPV-associated head and neck cancer.

On the basis of their training, medical students are considered "the best case scenario" among university students in knowledge of the human papillomavirus (HPV). We evaluated differences in knowledge of HPV, HPV vaccine, and head and neck cancer (HNC) among medical students. A previously validated questionnaire was completed by 247 medical students at a Midwestern university. Outcomes of interest were knowledge score for HPV and HPV vaccine, and HNC, derived from combining questionnaire items to form HPV knowledge and HNC scores, and analyzed using multivariate linear regression. Mean scores for HPV knowledge were 19.4 out of 26, and 7.2 out of 12 for HNC knowledge. In the final multivariate linear regression model, sex, race, and year of study were independently associated with HPV and HPV vaccine knowledge. Males had significantly lower HPV vaccine knowledge than females (ß = -1.53; 95% CI: -2.53, -0.52), as did nonwhite students (ß = -1.05; 95% CI: -2.07, -0.03). There was a gradient in HPV vaccine knowledge based on the year of study, highest among fourth year students (ß = 6.75; 95% CI: 5.17, 8.33). Results were similar for factors associated with HNC knowledge, except for sex. HNC knowledge similarly increased based on year of study, highest for fourth year students (ß = 2.50; 95% CI: 1.72, 3.29). Among medical students, gaps remain in knowledge of HPV, HPV vaccine, and HPV-linked HNC. Male medical students have significantly lower knowledge of HPV. This highlights the need to increase medical student knowledge of HPV and HPV-linked HNC.

Differential Outcomes Among Survivors of Head and Neck Cancer Belonging to Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups.

Importance: Approximately 1 in 5 new patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) in the US belong to racial and ethnic minority groups, but their survival rates are worse than White individuals. However, because most studies compare Black vs White patients, little is known about survival differences among members of racial and ethnic minority groups. Objective: To describe differential survival and identify nonclinical factors associated with stage of presentation among patients with HNC belonging to racial and ethnic minority groups. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based retrospective cohort study used data from the 2007 to 2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and included non-Hispanic Black, Asian Pacific Islander, American Indian/Alaska Native, and Hispanic patients with HNC. The data were analyzed from December 2020 to May 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were time to event measures: (HNC-specific and all-cause mortality) and stage of presentation. Covariates included nonclinical (age at diagnosis, sex, race and ethnicity, insurance status, marital status, and a composite socioeconomic status [SES]) and clinical factors (stage, cancer site, chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery). A Cox regression model was used to adjust associations of covariates with the hazard of all-cause death, and a Fine and Gray competing risks proportional hazards model was used to estimate associations of covariates with the hazard of HNC-specific death. A proportional log odds ordinal logistic regression identified which nonclinical factors were associated with stage of presentation. Results: There were 21 966 patients with HNC included in the study (mean [SD] age, 56.02 [11.16] years; 6072 women [27.6%]; 9229 [42.0%] non-Hispanic Black, 6893 [31.4%] Hispanic, 5342 [24.3%] Asian/Pacific Islander, and 502 [2.3%] American Indian/Alaska Native individuals). Black patients had highest proportion with very low SES (3482 [37.7%]) and the lowest crude 5-year overall survival (46%). After adjusting for covariates, Hispanic individuals had an 11% lower subdistribution hazard ratio (sdHR) of HNC-specific mortality (sdHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.95), 15% lower risk for Asian/Pacific Islander individuals (sdHR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93), and a trending lower risk for American Indian/Alaska Native individuals (sdHR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.71-1.01), compared with non-Hispanic Black individuals. Race, sex, insurance, marital status, and SES were consistently associated with all-cause mortality, HNC-specific mortality, and stage of presentation, with non-Hispanic Black individuals faring worse compared with individuals of other racial and ethnic minority groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study that included only patients with HNC who were members of racial and ethnic minority groups, Black patients had significantly worse outcomes that were not completely explained by stage of presentation. There may be unexplored multilevel factors that are associated with social determinants of health and disparities in HNC outcomes.

Incidence and Risk of Suicide Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer in Rural, Urban, and Metropolitan Areas.

Importance: Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) are known to be at increased risk of suicide compared with the general population, but there has been insufficient research on whether this risk differs based on patients' rural, urban, or metropolitan residence status. Objective: To evaluate whether the risk of suicide among patients with HNC differs by rural vs urban or metropolitan residence status. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study uses data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database on patients aged 18 to 74 years who received a diagnosis of HNC from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2016. Statistical analysis was conducted from November 27, 2020, to June 3, 2021. Exposures: Residence status, assessed using 2013 Rural Urban Continuum Codes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Death due to suicide was assessed by International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes (U03, X60-X84, and Y87.0) and the cause of death recode (50220). Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) of suicide, assessing the suicide risk among patients with HNC compared with the general population, were calculated. Suicide risk by residence status was compared using Fine-Gray proportional hazards regression models. Results: Data from 134 510 patients with HNC (101 142 men [75.2%]; mean [SE] age, 57.7 [10.3] years) were analyzed, and 405 suicides were identified. Metropolitan residents composed 86.6% of the sample, urban residents composed 11.7%, and rural residents composed 1.7%. The mortality rate of suicide was 59.2 per 100 000 person-years in metropolitan counties, 64.0 per 100 000 person-years in urban counties, and 126.7 per 100 000 person-years in rural counties. Compared with the general population, the risk of suicide was markedly higher among patients with HNC in metropolitan (SMR, 2.78; 95% CI, 2.49-3.09), urban (SMR, 2.84; 95% CI, 2.13-3.71), and rural (SMR, 5.47; 95% CI, 3.06-9.02) areas. In Fine-Gray competing-risk analyses that adjusted for other covariates, there was no meaningful difference in suicide risk among urban vs metropolitan residents. However, compared with rural residents, residents of urban (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29-0.94) and metropolitan counties (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94) had greatly lower risk of suicide. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that suicide risk is elevated in general among patients with HNC but is significantly higher for patients residing in rural areas. Effective suicide prevention strategies in the population of patients with HNC need to account for rural health owing to the high risk of suicide among residents with HNC in rural areas.

Survival outcomes for head and neck patients with Medicaid: A health insurance paradox.

PURPOSE: Privately insured patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) typically have better outcomes; however, differential outcome among Medicaid versus the uninsured is unclear. We aimed to describe outcome disparities among HNC patients uninsured versus on Medicaid. METHODS: A cohort of 18-64-year-old adults (n = 57 920) with index HNC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 database (2007-2015) was analyzed using Fine and Gray multivariable competing risks proportional hazards models for HNC-specific mortality. RESULTS: Medicaid (sdHR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.58, 1.72) and uninsured patients (sdHR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.46, 1.65) had significantly greater mortality hazard than non-Medicaid patients. Medicaid patients had increased HNC mortality hazard than those uninsured. CONCLUSION: Compared with those uninsured, HNC patients on Medicaid did not have superior survival, suggesting that there may be underlying mechanisms/factors inherent in this patient population that could undermine access to care benefits from being on Medicaid.