Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Am J Surg ; 219(3): 530-534, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31761300

RESUMO

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal protocol applied towards perioperative patient care. ERAS programs are implemented by a multidisciplinary team centered around the patient, incorporating outpatient clinical staff, preoperative nurses, anesthesiologists, operative nurses, postoperative recovery staff, floor inpatient nurses, dieticians, physical therapists, social workers, and surgeons. Initial studies on perioperative care measures focused on cardiac surgery. Subsequently, the development of the ERAS Study Group in 2001 focused on colorectal surgery and postoperative outcome measures. Today, ERAS protocols have been implemented across many surgical subspecialties including: bariatric, breast, plastic, cardiac, colorectal, esophageal, head and neck, hepatic, gynecologic, neurosurgical, orthopedic, pancreatic, thoracic, and urologic surgery. The goal of ERAS programs is to promote rapid recovery as quantified by decreasing the length of hospital stay, complications, and cost of specific surgical interventions. In the setting of the opioid crisis in America, there is also an increasing focus on minimizing perioperative narcotic use. The purpose of this review is to compare ERAS protocols across surgical subspecialties, focusing on quantified metrics of improvement, and to provide a clear and concise summary of the literature in regards to current ERAS practices and success rates.


Assuntos
Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Am J Surg ; 220(4): 1004-1009, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32248948

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prior efforts evaluating obesity as a risk factor for postoperative complications following proctectomy have been limited by sample size and uniform outcome classification. METHODS: The ACS NSQIP was queried for patients with non-metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent elective proctectomy. After stratification by BMI classification, multivariable modeling was used to identify the effect of BMI class on adjusted risk of 30-day outcomes controlling for patient, procedure, and tumor factors. RESULTS: Of 2241 patients identified, 33.4% had a normal BMI, 33.5% were overweight, 21.1% were obese, and 12.0% were morbidly obese. Increased risk of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) was observed in obese (OR 2.42, 95%CI:[1.36-4.29]) and morbidly obese (OR 3.29, 95%CI:[1.77-6.11]) patients when compared to normal BMI. Morbid obesity was associated with increased risk of any complication (OR 1.44, 95%CI:[1.05-1.96]). BMI class was not associated with risk adjusted odds of anastomotic leak. CONCLUSIONS: Morbid obesity is independently associated with an increased composite odds risk of short-term morbidity following elective proctectomy for cancer primarily due to increased risk of superficial SSI.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Obesidade/complicações , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Protectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Medição de Risco/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/complicações , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Neoplasias Retais/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Surgery ; 166(3): 336-341, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31235244

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive colectomy is associated with improved length of stay and decreased postoperative morbidity. Little is known regarding the impact of prolonged operative time on the benefits afforded by minimally invasive colectomy. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program procedure targeted colectomy dataset was queried to identify elective right and left colectomies performed between 2011 and 2017. Multivariable modeling was used to compare rates of composite 30-day death or serious morbidity, overall morbidity, mortality, anastomotic leak, surgical site infection, and length of stay for prolonged minimally invasive cases to those for average duration open cases. RESULTS: A total of 16,602 right colectomies and 36,557 left colectomies were identified. Median operative times for open and minimally invasive right colectomies were 107 min and 129 min (P < .01), while that for open left colectomies was 128 min and 156 min for minimally invasive left colectomies (P < .01). Cohorts were stratified by quartiles of operative time with the highest (fourth) quartile defined as a prolonged operating time. When compared with an average duration open colectomy, prolonged minimally invasive right colectomies and left colectomies were associated with decreased risk-adjusted rates of overall morbidity, surgical site infection, and with lesser lengths of stay (P < .05). Prolonged minimally invasive left colectomies were also associated with improved rates of composite 30-day death or serious morbidity relative to average open left colectomies (odds ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.79). CONCLUSION: Prolonged operating times of an minimally invasive approach do not obviate the benefits of an minimally invasive approach to colectomy.


Assuntos
Colectomia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Duração da Cirurgia , Idoso , Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Colectomia/métodos , Colectomia/normas , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/normas , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
4.
Am Surg ; 85(2): 136-141, 2019 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30819288

RESUMO

Anastomotic leak after lower gastrointestinal surgery is a complication with potential for high morbidity, mortality, and increased costs. A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent lower gastrointestinal surgery between June 2009 and June 2013. Fifty-seven variables were included in our analysis and their association with postoperative anastomotic leak was examined. Nine hundred fifty-two patients underwent 983 lower gastrointestinal anastomoses with an overall leak rate in this series of 6 per cent. Type of intestinal anastomosis created (P < 0.00005), operative indication (P < 0.015), operation performed (P < 0.014), intraoperative blood transfusion (P < 0.017), and intraoperative surgical drain placement (P < 0.022) were all predictive of anastomotic leak. Anastomotic leak rate increased by 1.3 times for every additional hour in the operating room after three hours. Both increasing operation time and intraoperative blood transfusions were associated with an increased rate of anastomotic leak. When operative time extends beyond three hours or in those cases were blood transfusions are given, surgeons should consider taking steps to minimize the risks of a potential anastomotic leak.


Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Transfusão de Sangue , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Enteropatias/cirurgia , Cuidados Intraoperatórios , Duração da Cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Enteropatias/patologia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
5.
J Am Coll Surg ; 196(6): 880-6, 2003 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12788424

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The rarity of retrorectal cysts and their nonspecific clinical presentations often lead to misdiagnoses and inappropriate operations. In recent years, several such patients have been referred to our institutions for evaluation and treatment of misdiagnosed retrorectal cysts. A review of these patients is presented. STUDY DESIGN: Medical records of the colorectal surgery divisions at two institutions were reviewed. Patients found to have previously misdiagnosed retrorectal cysts were identified. Preliminary diagnoses, radiologic examinations, operative procedures, and final diagnoses were obtained. RESULTS: Seven patients with retrorectal cysts who had been misdiagnosed before referral were identified. These patients had been treated for fistulae in ano, pilonidal cysts, perianal abscesses; psychogenic, lower back, posttraumatic, or postpartum pain, and proctalgia fugax before the correct diagnosis was made. Patients underwent an average of 4.1 operative procedures. Physical examination in combination with CT scanning made the correct diagnosis in all patients. All patients underwent successful resection through a parasacrococcygeal approach, and six of seven did not require coccygectomy. The resected tumors included four hamartomas, two epidermoid cysts, and one enteric duplication cyst. CONCLUSIONS: Retrorectal cysts are a rare entity that can be difficult to diagnose without a high index of clinical suspicion. A history of multiple unsuccessful procedures should alert the clinician to the diagnosis of retrorectal cyst. Once suspected, the correct diagnosis can be made with physical examination and a CT scan before a definitive surgical procedure.


Assuntos
Cisto Epidérmico/diagnóstico , Hamartoma/diagnóstico , Doenças Raras/diagnóstico , Doenças Retais/diagnóstico , Abscesso/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Erros de Diagnóstico , Cisto Epidérmico/complicações , Cisto Epidérmico/cirurgia , Feminino , Fissura Anal/diagnóstico , Hamartoma/complicações , Hamartoma/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Anamnese , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/etiologia , Exame Físico , Seio Pilonidal , Doenças Raras/complicações , Doenças Raras/cirurgia , Doenças Retais/complicações , Doenças Retais/cirurgia , Fístula Retal/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Am Surg ; 70(2): 151-6; discussion 156, 2004 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15011919

RESUMO

Chronic steroid treatment is known to delay wound healing; however, there are no trials examining stapled intestinal anastomoses in subjects chronically treated with steroids. The current study compares mechanically stapled to manually sutured intestinal anastomoses in a steroid-treated porcine model. Twenty adult male pigs were treated with daily prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg IM) for 14 days. The pigs were divided between hand-sewn and stapled groups. All pigs underwent a laparotomy with construction of a jejunojejunostomy, an ileocecostomy, and a colocolostomy. Pigs were sacrificed on postoperative day 4. Bursting pressure, collagen content, and inflammatory scores were used to evaluate each anastomosis. Bursting pressure was greater for the hand-sewn group at the jejunojejunostomies only (1.52 vs 0.79 psi; P < 0.001). The collagen content and microscopic inflammatory scores were not significantly different at any location. The mean gross inflammatory score was greater for the hand-sewn colocolostomies only (5.20 vs 4.00; P < 0.01). Stapled ileocecostomies and colocolostomies appear to heal as well as hand-sewn anastomoses. This may not be true of the jejunojejunostomies as evidenced by the decreased bursting pressures. These data may provide evidence in support of the use of stapled anastomoses in steroid-treated patients.


Assuntos
Enterostomia/métodos , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Prednisolona/uso terapêutico , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/prevenção & controle , Suturas , Animais , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Prednisolona/efeitos adversos , Suínos
7.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 45(12): 1579-87, 2002 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12473879

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Primary repair of penetrating colon injuries is an appealing management option; however, uncertainty about its safety persists. This study was conducted to compare the morbidity and mortality of primary repair with fecal diversion in the management of penetrating colon injuries by use of a meta-analysis of randomized, prospective trials. METHODS: We searched for prospective, randomized trials in MEDLINE (1966 to November 2001), the Cochrane Library, and EMBase using the terms colon, penetrating, injury, colostomy, prospective, and randomized. Studies were included if they were randomized, controlled trials that compared the outcomes of primary repair with fecal diversion in the management of penetrating colon injuries. Five studies were included. Reviewers performed data extraction independently. Outcomes evaluated from each trial included mortality, total complications, infectious complications, intra-abdominal infections, wound complications, penetrating abdominal trauma index, and length of stay. Peto odds ratios for combined effect were calculated with a 95 percent confidence interval for each outcome. Heterogeneity was also assessed for each outcome. RESULTS: The penetrating abdominal trauma index of included subjects did not differ significantly between studies. Mortality was not significantly different between groups (odds ratio, 1.70; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.51-5.66). However, total complications (odds ratio, 0.28; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.18-0.42), total infectious complications (odds ratio, 0.41; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.27-0.63), abdominal infections including dehiscence (odds ratio, 0.59; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.38-0.94), abdominal infections excluding dehiscence (odds ratio, 0.52; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.31-0.86), wound complications including dehiscence (odds ratio, 0.55; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.34-0.89), and wound complications excluding dehiscence (odds ratio, 0.43; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.25-0.76) all significantly favored primary repair. CONCLUSION: Meta-analysis of currently published randomized, controlled trials favors primary repair over fecal diversion for penetrating colon injuries.


Assuntos
Colo/lesões , Colo/cirurgia , Colostomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Ferimentos Penetrantes/cirurgia , Humanos , Morbidade , Mortalidade , Razão de Chances , Estudos Prospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização
8.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 45(3): 360-7; discussion 367-9, 2002 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12068195

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: We report the early results of patients treated with stapled hemorrhoidectomy, which has recently been introduced into the United States. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids were treated at two institutions with the Proximate HCS Hemorrhoidal Circular Stapler supplied by Ethicon Endo-Surgery. Patients were prospectively evaluated for functional recovery and postoperative pain on a 1 to 10 scale. RESULTS: There were 45 (66 percent) males and 23 (34 percent) females with a mean age of 56 years and median duration of symptoms of 5 years. The mean operative time was 22.2 minutes. The operation was performed with spinal (50 percent), local (40 percent), or general (10 percent) anesthesia and as an outpatient (56 percent) or overnight admission (44 percent). Ninety-three percent of patients remained asymptomatic with a mean follow-up of 34 weeks, whereas the remaining 7 percent required either surgical excision or rubber band ligation for persistent symptoms. There was no mortality, new incontinence, fecal impaction, or persistent pain. The total morbidity was 19 percent, with urinary retention as the most common complication (12 percent). The mean pain score decreased from 3.6 on postoperative Day 1 to 1.4 at postoperative Day 7. Ninety-nine percent of patients made a complete functional recovery by postoperative Day 7. CONCLUSIONS: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy is safe, effective, and can be performed as an outpatient procedure with local or regional anesthesia. There seems to be minimal postoperative pain and early recovery, although a benefit over traditional hemorrhoidectomy needs to be proven in a randomized trial.


Assuntos
Hemorroidas/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Grampeadores Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Grampeamento Cirúrgico/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Hemorroidas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/fisiopatologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica/fisiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos , Retenção Urinária/etiologia , Retenção Urinária/fisiopatologia
9.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 45(2): 212-8, 2002 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11852335

RESUMO

PURPOSE: There is a lack of data regarding the degree of ischemic change that may occur in small and large bowel after superselective arterial embolotherapy with platinum microcoils. The purpose of this study was to gain a clearer understanding of the ischemic complications of superselective embolization of peripheral mesenteric arteries with microcoils by gross and histologic examination of postembolectomy bowel specimens at several time intervals in an adult porcine model. METHODS: Two-millimeter platinum microcoils with fibrils were superselectively deployed into six isolated mesenteric branch vessels in each of nine adult pigs. The animals were observed for two days (n = 3), one month (n = 3), or three months (n = 3) and then killed. At necropsy, intestines were examined for gross abnormalities. Sections of bowel containing microcoils were identified under fluoroscopy, resected, and evaluated histologically. RESULTS: A total of 54 microcoils were deployed into the distal arterial mesentery supplying the jejunum (n = 14), ileum (n = 26), and colon (n = 14) of nine adult pigs. Each animal received six microcoils. There were no clinical complications, and all pigs gained weight during their observation periods. Gross examination of the intestines did not reveal any evidence of acute or chronic ischemia. The coils were found in the distal arterial vasculature of the intestine. Histologic examination revealed mild superficial necrosis of villous tips in several samples; however, this finding is likely related to a fixation artifact rather than ischemic injury. There was no other histologic evidence suggestive of ischemic injury. CONCLUSIONS: Gross and histologic findings after superselective arterial embolotherapy demonstrated minimal changes in the bowel, and there were no significant clinical consequences to the animals. We conclude that transcatheter arterial embolotherapy in pigs is safe and may be applicable in the control of massive lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage in humans.


Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Isquemia/etiologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/etiologia , Angiografia , Animais , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Mucosa Intestinal/irrigação sanguínea , Intestinos/irrigação sanguínea , Suínos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa