RESUMO
PURPOSE: Geographic atrophy (GA), a late stage of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), is a major cause of blindness. Even while central visual acuity remains relatively well preserved, GA often causes considerable compromise of visual function and quality of life. No treatment currently exists. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of pegcetacoplan, a complement C3 inhibitor, for treatment of GA. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled phase 2 study. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty-six patients with GA. METHODS: Patients with GA were assigned randomly in a 2:2:1:1 ratio to receive intravitreal injections of 15 mg pegcetacoplan monthly or every other month (EOM) or sham intravitreal injections monthly or EOM for 12 months with follow-up at months 15 and 18. Area and growth of GA were measured using fundus autofluorescence imaging. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was mean change in square root GA lesion area from baseline to month 12. Secondary outcome measures included mean change from baseline in GA lesion area without the square root transformation, distance of GA lesion from the fovea, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low-luminance BCVA, and low-luminance visual acuity deficit. The primary safety end point was the number and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: In patients receiving pegcetacoplan monthly or EOM, the GA growth rate was reduced by 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9-49; P = 0.008) and 20% (95% CI, 0-40; P = 0.067) compared with the sham treatment group. Post hoc analysis showed that the effect was greater in the second 6 months of treatment, with observed reductions of 45% (P = 0.0004) and 33% (P = 0.009) for pegcetacoplan monthly and EOM, respectively. Two cases of culture-positive endophthalmitis and 1 case of culture-negative endophthalmitis occurred in the pegcetacoplan monthly group. New-onset investigator-determined exudative AMD was reported more frequently in pegcetacoplan-treated eyes (18/86 eyes [20.9%] and 7/79 eyes [8.9%] in monthly and EOM groups, respectively) than in sham-treated eyes (1/81 eyes [1.2%]). CONCLUSIONS: Local C3 inhibition with pegcetacoplan resulted in statistically significant reductions in the growth of GA compared with sham treatment. Phase 3 studies will define the efficacy and safety profile further.
Assuntos
Complemento C3/antagonistas & inibidores , Inativadores do Complemento/uso terapêutico , Atrofia Geográfica/tratamento farmacológico , Degeneração Macular/complicações , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Angiofluoresceinografia , Atrofia Geográfica/diagnóstico , Atrofia Geográfica/etiologia , Humanos , Injeções Intravítreas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Acuidade Visual/fisiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To test the effects of an encapsulated cell-based delivery of a neuroprotective agent, ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), on progression of macular telangiectasia type 2, a neurodegenerative disease with no proven effective therapy. DESIGN: Randomized sham-controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-nine study eyes of 67 eligible participants were enrolled. METHODS: Single-masked randomized clinical trial of 24 months' duration conducted from May 2014 through April 2017 in 11 clinical centers of retinal specialists in the United States and Australia. Participants were randomized 1:1 to surgical implantation of intravitreal sustained delivery of human CNTF versus a sham procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the difference in the area of neurodegeneration as measured in the area of the ellipsoid zone disruption (or photoreceptor loss) measured on spectral-domain (SD) OCT images at 24 months from baseline between the treated and untreated groups. Secondary outcomes included comparison of visual function changes between treatment groups. RESULTS: Among the 67 participants who were randomized (mean age, 62±8.9 years; 41 women [61%]; 58 white persons [86%]), 65 (97%) completed the study. Two participants (3 study eyes) died and 3 participants (4 eyes) were found ineligible. The eyes receiving sham treatment had 31% greater progression of neurodegeneration than the CNTF-treated eyes. The difference in mean area of photoreceptor loss was 0.05±0.03 mm2 (P = 0.04) at 24 months. Retinal sensitivity changes, measured using microperimetry, were correlated highly with the changes in the area of photoreceptor loss (r = 0.86; P < 0.0001). The mean retinal sensitivity loss of the sham group was 45% greater than that of the treated group (decrease, 15.81±8.93 dB; P = 0.07). Reading speed deteriorated in the sham group (-13.9 words per minute) with no loss in the treated group (P = 0.02). Serious adverse ocular effects were found in 2 of 51 persons (4%) in the sham group and 2 of 48 persons (4%) in the treated group. CONCLUSIONS: In participants with macular telangiectasia type 2, a surgical implant that released CNTF into the vitreous cavity, compared with a sham procedure, slowed the progression of retinal degeneration. Further research is needed to assess longer-term clinical outcomes and safety.
Assuntos
Terapia Baseada em Transplante de Células e Tecidos/métodos , Fator Neurotrófico Ciliar/administração & dosagem , Implantes de Medicamento , Degeneração Retiniana/terapia , Telangiectasia Retiniana/terapia , Idoso , Fator Neurotrófico Ciliar/efeitos adversos , Eletrorretinografia , Feminino , Angiofluoresceinografia , Humanos , Injeções Intravítreas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Células Fotorreceptoras de Vertebrados , Leitura , Retina/fisiopatologia , Degeneração Retiniana/diagnóstico , Degeneração Retiniana/fisiopatologia , Telangiectasia Retiniana/diagnóstico , Telangiectasia Retiniana/fisiopatologia , Método Simples-Cego , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Campos Visuais/fisiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Excessive accumulation of retinol-based toxins has been implicated in the pathogenesis of geographic atrophy (GA). Fenretinide, an orally available drug that reduces retinol delivery to the eye through antagonism of serum retinol-binding protein (RBP), was used in a 2-year trial to determine whether retinol reduction would be effective in the management of geographic atrophy. METHODS: The efficacy of fenretinide (100 and 300 mg daily, orally) to slow lesion growth in geographic atrophy patients was examined in a 2-year, placebo-controlled double-masked trial that enrolled 246 patients at 30 clinical sites in the United States. RESULTS: Fenretinide treatment produced dose-dependent reversible reductions in serum RBP-retinol that were associated with trends in reduced lesion growth rates. Patients in the 300 mg group who achieved serum retinol levels of ≤ 1 µM (≤ 2 mg/dL RBP) showed a mean reduction of 0.33 mm in the yearly lesion growth rate compared with subjects in the placebo group (1.70 mm/year vs. 2.03 mm/year, respectively, P = 0.1848). Retinol-binding protein reductions <2 mg/dL correlated with further reductions in lesion growth rates (r = 0.478). Fenretinide treatment also reduced the incidence of choroidal neovascularization (approximately 45% reduction in incidence rate in the combined fenretinide groups vs. placebo, P = 0.0606). This therapeutic effect was not dose dependent and is consistent with anti-angiogenic properties of fenretinide, which have been observed in other disease states. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study and the established safety profile of fenretinide in chronic dosing regimens warrant further study of fenretinide in the treatment of geographic atrophy.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Fenretinida/uso terapêutico , Atrofia Geográfica/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Sensibilidades de Contraste/fisiologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Fenretinida/efeitos adversos , Atrofia Geográfica/sangue , Atrofia Geográfica/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas Plasmáticas de Ligação ao Retinol/antagonistas & inibidores , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Vitamina A/sangueRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection interval influences treatment burden and compliance in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This real-world study investigates visual acuity (VA), injection-interval extension, central macular thickness (CMT) and safety in nAMD eyes switched to the anti-VEGF agent brolucizumab and followed for up to 18 months. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with nAMD who were switched from other anti-VEGF agents to brolucizumab only. Patient eyes were grouped into three nested cohorts with the overall cohort receiving ≥ 1 brolucizumab injection, the second receiving ≥ 3 brolucizumab injections with a follow-up period of ≥ 12 months and the third cohort receiving ≥ 3 brolucizumab injections with a follow-up period of ≥ 18 months. Study endpoints included changes from baseline at 12 or 18 months in VA, injection intervals, and CMT. Sub-group analyses were conducted using baseline injection interval length or baseline VA as qualifiers. RESULTS: Overall, 482 eyes received ≥ 1 brolucizumab injection; 174 eyes received ≥ 3 brolucizumab injections with ≥ 12 months of follow-up, and 95 eyes received ≥ 3 brolucizumab injections with ≥ 18 months of follow-up. VA (mean [95% confidence intervals]) remained stable relative to baseline after 12 months (- 1.1 [- 3.7, 1.6] letters; p = 0.42) and 18 months (0.0 [- 3.1, 3.1] letters; p = 0.98) of brolucizumab treatment, respectively, and pre-switch injection intervals or baseline VA had no notable effect. Following the switch to brolucizumab, injection intervals were extended from baseline to month 12 by 26.9 (19.7, 34.0) days (p < 0.0001), and eyes with pre-switch injection intervals < 8 weeks were able to have their injection intervals extended by 23.6 days longer than eyes with pre-switch injection intervals ≥ 8 weeks. At 18 months, injection intervals were extended by 36.3 (25.6, 46.9) days (p < 0.0001) compared to baseline. Following switch to brolucizumab, CMT was reduced at both 12 and 18 months (12 months: - 35.2 (- 51.7, - 18.8) µm, p < 0.0001; 18 months: - 38.9 (- 54.3, - 22.0) µm, p < 0.0001). Intraocular inflammation-related adverse events were reported in 4.6% of brolucizumab-treated eyes. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study demonstrates that injection intervals may be significantly extended with maintained vision and reduced CMT in nAMD eyes switching to brolucizumab therapy from other anti-VEGFs.
RESUMO
Objective: Retrospective, real-world study to evaluate visual acuity (VA), anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection intervals, and central macular thickness (CMT) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) eyes switched to brolucizumab only or to brolucizumab alternating with another anti-VEGF. Methods: The overall study population comprised eyes that were given ≥1 brolucizumab injection between 1 October 2019 and 30 November 2021. The brolucizumab-only (BRO) cohort consisted of prior anti-VEGF-treated eyes treated exclusively with ≥3 brolucizumab injections over ≥12 or ≥18 months; the alternating brolucizumab (ALT) cohort comprised prior anti-VEGF-treated eyes treated with ≥2 brolucizumab injections and ≥1 other anti-VEGF over ≥12 or ≥18 months. Results: A total of 482 eyes received ≥1 brolucizumab injection during the study period. Mean VA changes from baseline were -1.1±15.1 letters (BRO cohort; n = 174) and 1.3±13.0 letters (ALT cohort; n = 47) at Month 12, and 0.0±13.5 letters (BRO cohort; n = 95) and -7.3±17.2 letters (ALT cohort; n = 29) at Month 18. Mean changes in injection intervals were +26.9±48.1 days (BRO cohort) and +11.1±17.3 days (ALT cohort) at Month 12 and +36.3±52.3 days (BRO cohort) and +14.0±19.9 days (ALT cohort) at Month 18. Mean changes in CMT were -35.2±108.1 µm (BRO cohort) and -31.5±91.2 µm (ALT cohort) at Month 12 and -38.9±75.0 µm (BRO cohort) and -9.0±59.9 µm (ALT cohort) at Month 18. Intraocular inflammation-related adverse events were recorded in 22/482 (4.6%) eyes. Conclusion: Treatment with either brolucizumab alone or brolucizumab alternating with another anti-VEGF can preserve vision, reduce CMT, and extend anti-VEGF injection intervals in patients with nAMD.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity of time domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) in detecting conversion to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in eyes at high risk for choroidal neovascularization (CNV), compared with detection using fluorescein angiography (FA) as the gold standard. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged ≥50 years with nonneovascular AMD at high risk of progressing to CNV in the study eye and evidence of neovascular AMD in the fellow eye. METHODS: At study entry and every 3 months through 2 years, participants underwent best-corrected visual acuity, supervised Amsler grid testing, preferential hyperacuity perimetry (PHP) testing, stereoscopic digital fundus photographs with FA, and OCT imaging. A central Reading Center graded all images. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The sensitivity of OCT in detecting conversion to neovascular AMD by 2 years, using FA as the reference standard. Secondary outcomes included comparison of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of OCT, PHP, and supervised Amsler grid relative to FA for detecting incident CNV. RESULTS: A total of 98 participants were enrolled; 87 (89%) of these individuals either completed the 24-month visit or exited the study after developing CNV. Fifteen (17%) study eyes had incident CNV confirmed on FA by the Reading Center. The sensitivity of each modality for detecting CNV was: OCT 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.68), supervised Amsler grid 0.42 (95% CI, 0.15-0.72), and PHP 0.50 (95% CI, 0.23-0.77). Treatment for incident CNV was recommended by the study investigator in 13 study eyes. Sensitivity of the testing modalities for detection of CNV in these 13 eyes was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.39-0.91) for OCT, 0.50 (95% CI, 0.19-0.81) for supervised Amsler grid, and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.35-0.93) for PHP. Specificity of the OCT was higher than that of the Amsler grid and PHP. CONCLUSIONS: Time-domain OCT, supervised Amsler grid, and PHP have low to moderate sensitivity for detection of new-onset CNV compared with FA. Optical coherence tomography has greater specificity than Amsler grid or PHP. Among fellow eyes of individuals with unilateral CNV, FA remains the best method to detect new-onset CNV.
Assuntos
Neovascularização de Coroide/diagnóstico , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Degeneração Macular Exsudativa/diagnóstico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Inibidores da Angiogênese/administração & dosagem , Neovascularização de Coroide/tratamento farmacológico , Neovascularização de Coroide/fisiopatologia , Progressão da Doença , Reações Falso-Positivas , Feminino , Angiofluoresceinografia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Testes de Campo Visual , Campos Visuais , Degeneração Macular Exsudativa/tratamento farmacológico , Degeneração Macular Exsudativa/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if a mobile application, the Checkup Vision Assessment System, could reliably monitor visual acuity (VA) and metamorphopsia remotely versus standard VA reference tests in the clinic. With the current COVID-19 pandemic, an even greater need for remote monitoring exists. Mobile tools enhance the ability to monitor patients virtually by enabling remote monitoring of VA and Amsler grid findings. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter reliability analysis. METHODS: Participants: Patients (N = 108) with near corrected VA better than 20/200 and a diagnosis of age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, or healthy patients without retinal disease (best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA] of 20/32 or better). INTERVENTION: participants were tested using the Checkup, reference VA, and Amsler tests, with the order of testing (Checkup or reference) randomized. Patients monitored their vision using Checkup at least twice a week at home between office visits. Main outcome measurements were near corrected VA and Amsler grid test results. RESULTS: Agreement was strong between Checkup and reference tests for VA (r = 0.86) and Amsler grid (sensitivity: 93%; specificity: 92%). Home versus clinic testing showed excellent agreement (r = 0.96). Patients reported successful home use. There were no serious adverse events or discontinuations. Patients rated the usability of Checkup to be excellent. CONCLUSIONS: There was good agreement between Checkup and in-clinic test results for VA and Amsler grid. The low variance of Checkup testing, agreement between in-clinic and home results, and excellent usability support Checkup as a reliable method for monitoring retinal pathology in clinic and home settings.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Retinopatia Diabética/fisiopatologia , Degeneração Macular/fisiopatologia , Aplicativos Móveis , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos , Acuidade Visual , Campos Visuais/fisiologia , Idoso , Comorbidade , Retinopatia Diabética/diagnóstico , Retinopatia Diabética/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Degeneração Macular/diagnóstico , Degeneração Macular/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , SARS-CoV-2Assuntos
Coriorretinite/etiologia , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/complicações , Adulto , Coriorretinopatia de Birdshot , Coriorretinite/imunologia , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/tratamento farmacológico , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/imunologia , Feminino , Antígenos HLA-A/imunologia , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas/sangue , Imunoglobulinas/uso terapêutico , Retina/patologia , gama-Globinas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To provide data on the short-term effect of intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Randomized phase II clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-one eyes of 121 subjects (109 eligible for analysis) with DME and Snellen acuity equivalent ranging from 20/32 to 20/320. INTERVENTIONS: Random assignment to 1 of 5 groups: (A) focal photocoagulation at baseline (n = 19), (B) intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg of bevacizumab at baseline and 6 weeks (n = 22), (C) intravitreal injection of 2.5 mg of bevacizumab at baseline and 6 weeks (n = 24), (D) intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg of bevacizumab at baseline and sham injection at 6 weeks (n = 22), or (E) intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg of bevacizumab at baseline and 6 weeks with photocoagulation at 3 weeks (n = 22). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Central subfield thickness (CST) on optical coherence tomography and best-corrected visual acuity (VA) were measured at baseline and after 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. RESULTS: At baseline, median CST was 411 mum and median Snellen VA equivalent was 20/50. Compared with group A, groups B and C had a greater reduction in CST at 3 weeks and about 1 line better median VA over 12 weeks. There were no meaningful differences between groups B and C in CST reduction or VA improvement. A CST reduction > 11% (reliability limit) was present at 3 weeks in 36 of 84 (43%) bevacizumab-treated eyes and 5 of 18 (28%) eyes treated with laser alone, and at 6 weeks in 31 of 84 (37%) and 9 of 18 (50%) eyes, respectively. Combining focal photocoagulation with bevacizumab resulted in no apparent short-term benefit or adverse outcomes. Endophthalmitis developed in 1 eye. The following events occurred during the first 24 weeks in subjects treated with bevacizumab without attributing cause to the drug: myocardial infarction (n = 2), congestive heart failure (n = 1), elevated blood pressure (n = 3), and worsened renal function (n = 3). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that intravitreal bevacizumab can reduce DME in some eyes, but the study was not designed to determine whether treatment is beneficial. A phase III trial would be needed for that purpose.
Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Retinopatia Diabética/tratamento farmacológico , Edema Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Inibidores da Angiogênese/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Bevacizumab , Terapia Combinada , Retinopatia Diabética/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções , Fotocoagulação a Laser , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Retina/efeitos dos fármacos , Retina/patologia , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Acuidade Visual/efeitos dos fármacos , Corpo VítreoAssuntos
Amigos , Oftalmologia/história , Logro , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais , Estados UnidosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess anatomic and visual outcomes of ocriplasmin use for symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion (VMA). DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: Macula Society members were surveyed online to collect data on ocriplasmin for symptomatic VMA. Clinical and optical coherence tomography data were collected using standardized data entry forms. RESULTS: There were 208 patients (208 eyes) with symptomatic VMA followed at least 3 weeks after receiving ocriplasmin. At baseline, VMA was focal (<1500 µm) in 179 eyes (86%), broad in 9 eyes (4%), and not reported in 20 eyes (10%). A full-thickness macular hole (MH) was present in 75 eyes (36%); size was <400 µm in 62 eyes (82%). Baseline mean visual acuity was approximately 20/63. Of the 204 eyes with ≥12 weeks follow-up, pars plana vitrectomy (PPVx) was performed in 12 (6%) by 4 weeks, 31 (15%) by 12 weeks, and 64 (31%) by the last visit. VMA had resolved by 12 weeks with ocriplasmin alone in 83 of 191 eyes (43%) by week 12 and in 148 of 200 eyes (74%) by the last visit, including eyes undergoing PPVx. Among eyes with a baseline MH, closure was achieved with ocriplasmin alone in 10 of 65 (15%) by 1 week, 26 of 74 (35%) by 4 weeks, and 30 of 75 (40%) at the last visit. Mean change in visual acuity at the last visit compared with baseline was -0.06±0.40 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (modest vision improvement) (P = 0.03). At the last visit, visual acuity improved by ≥2 lines in 69 eyes (35%) and by ≥3 lines in 54 eyes (27%). Visual acuity decreased ≥2 lines in 35 eyes (18%) and by 3 lines in 27 eyes (14%) at the final visit. Complications included photopsias (15%), dimness of vision (14%), decreased color vision (10%), MH development (5%), macular retinal pigment epithelium atrophy (2.7%), retinal detachment (1.9%), and retinal tear (1.4%). No endophthalmitis cases were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Physician-reported outcomes on ocriplasmin use confirmed VMA release in 45% and closure of MH in 40% of eyes without PPVx. Visual acuity decreased in approximately 20% of eyes. Adverse events were not infrequent and suggest caution when considering ocriplasmin use.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To report vision and safety outcomes from an extension of a 2-year investigation evaluating verteporfin photodynamic therapy in patients with age-related macular degeneration with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV). DESIGN AND SETTING: Open-label extension of selected patients from 2 multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials, the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration With Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) Investigation, at 22 ophthalmology practices in Europe and North America. PARTICIPANTS: Patients enrolled in the TAP Investigation and followed up for at least 24 months in whom verteporfin therapy to CNV might reduce the risk of further vision loss. METHODS: Before receiving verteporfin therapy in the extension, eligible patients signed a written informed consent form accompanied by an oral consent process approved by local institutional review boards. Methods were similar to those described for 1- and 2-year results, with follow-up examinations beyond 2 years continuing at 3-month intervals with a few exceptions, including that extension patients with fluorescein leakage from CNV were to receive open-label verteporfin therapy irrespective of their original treatment assignment. RESULTS: Of 402 patients in the verteporfin group, 351 (87.3%) completed the month 24 examination; 320 (91.2%) of these enrolled in the extension study. The enrolled participants included 124 (78.0%) of the 159 verteporfin-treated patients with lesions composed of predominantly classic CNV at baseline, of whom 105 (84.7%) completed the month 36 examination. Verteporfin-treated patients with this lesion composition at baseline who participated in the extension study, with or without a month 36 examination, appeared more likely to have a younger age, better level of visual acuity, absence of fluorescein leakage from classic CNV, or no progression of classic CNV beyond the baseline boundaries of the lesion at the month 24 examination compared with those who did not enroll in the extension. For the 105 patients with a predominantly classic baseline lesion composition who completed the month 36 examination, an average of 1.3 treatments were given from the month 24 examination up to, but not including, the month 36 examination. A letter score loss in the study eye of at least 15 from baseline for these patients occurred in 39 (37.5%) at the month 24 examination compared with 44 (41.9%) of these patients at the month 36 examination. Visual acuity changed little from the month 24 examination (mean, -1.9 lines) to the month 36 examination (mean, -2.0 lines) for these eyes. Verteporfin-treated patients had little change in the mean visual acuity lost and few or no additional instances of infusion-related back pain or photosensitivity reactions from month 24 to month 36. Two patients originally assigned to placebo had acute severe vision decrease within 7 days after verteporfin treatment during the extension. One patient originally assigned to verteporfin had acute severe vision decrease after verteporfin treatment of the fellow eye during the extension. CONCLUSIONS: Vision outcomes for verteporfin-treated patients with predominantly classic lesions at baseline remained relatively stable from month 24 to month 36, although only approximately one third of the verteporfin-treated patients originally enrolled with this lesion composition had a month 36 examination. From these results, the TAP Study Group identified no safety concerns to preclude repeating photodynamic therapy with verteporfin. Additional treatment was judged likely to reduce the risk of further vision loss. Caution appears warranted in the absence of comparison with an untreated group during the extension and since not all patients in the TAP Investigation participated in the TAP Extension.
Assuntos
Corioide/irrigação sanguínea , Degeneração Macular/complicações , Neovascularização Patológica/tratamento farmacológico , Neovascularização Patológica/etiologia , Fotoquimioterapia , Fármacos Fotossensibilizantes/uso terapêutico , Porfirinas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Fóvea Central , Humanos , Degeneração Macular/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Fármacos Fotossensibilizantes/efeitos adversos , Porfirinas/efeitos adversos , Segurança , Verteporfina , Acuidade VisualAssuntos
Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/complicações , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/etiologia , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Criança , Feminino , Angiofluoresceinografia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Injeções Intravítreas , Fotocoagulação a Laser , Edema Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Edema Macular/etiologia , Neovascularização Retiniana/etiologia , Neovascularização Retiniana/cirurgia , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/diagnóstico , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/terapia , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidoresRESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe the presentation and management of an immunocompetent patient with endogenous Nocardia chorioretinitis. METHODS: A previously healthy 55-year-old woman presented with reduced vision and metamorphopsia after accidental inhalation of Nocardia organisms from planting soil. She developed systemic nocardiosis with pulmonary and cerebellar involvement as well as bilateral chorioretinitis. Ocular infection resulted in choroidal neovascularization, which was successfully treated with intravitreal triamcinolone and thermal laser photocoagulation. DISCUSSION: This patient is one of only a few immunocompetent individuals to develop endogenous nocardial chorioretinitis. Systemic antibiotic treatment and local laser therapy for subsequent choroidal neovascularization were effective in management of this case.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 1-mg and 4-mg doses of preservative-free intravitreal triamcinolone with observation for eyes with vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to perfused central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). METHODS: Multicenter, randomized, clinical trial of 271 participants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Gain in visual acuity letter score of 15 or more from baseline to month 12. RESULTS: Seven percent, 27%, and 26% of participants achieved the primary outcome in the observation, 1-mg, and 4-mg groups, respectively. The odds of achieving the primary outcome were 5.0 times greater in the 1-mg group than the observation group (odds ratio [OR], 5.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-14.1; P = .001) and 5.0 times greater in 4-mg group than the observation group (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.8-14.4; P = .001); there was no difference identified between the 1-mg and 4-mg groups (OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.5-2.1; P = .97). The rates of elevated intraocular pressure and cataract were similar for the observation and 1-mg groups, but higher in the 4-mg group. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal triamcinolone is superior to observation for treating vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to CRVO in patients who have characteristics similar to those in the SCORE-CRVO trial. The 1-mg dose has a safety profile superior to that of the 4-mg dose. Application to Clinical Practice Intravitreal triamcinolone in a 1-mg dose, following the retreatment criteria applied in the SCORE Study, should be considered for up to 1 year, and possibly 2 years, for patients with characteristics similar to those in the SCORE-CRVO trial. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00105027.
Assuntos
Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Edema Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/tratamento farmacológico , Triancinolona Acetonida/administração & dosagem , Transtornos da Visão/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Angiofluoresceinografia , Seguimentos , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Injeções , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Edema Macular/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Observação , Estudos Prospectivos , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/complicações , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/diagnóstico , Retratamento , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Resultado do Tratamento , Triancinolona Acetonida/efeitos adversos , Transtornos da Visão/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Visão/etiologia , Acuidade Visual/efeitos dos fármacos , Corpo VítreoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 1-mg and 4-mg doses of preservative-free intravitreal triamcinolone with standard care (grid photocoagulation in eyes without dense macular hemorrhage and deferral of photocoagulation until hemorrhage clears in eyes with dense macular hemorrhage) for eyes with vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: Multicenter, randomized clinical trial of 411 participants. Main Outcome Measure Gain in visual acuity letter score of 15 or more from baseline to month 12. RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent, 26%, and 27% of participants achieved the primary outcome in the standard care, 1-mg, and 4-mg groups, respectively. None of the pairwise comparisons between the 3 groups was statistically significant at month 12. The rates of elevated intraocular pressure and cataract were similar for the standard care and 1-mg groups, but higher in the 4-mg group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference identified in visual acuity at 12 months for the standard care group compared with the triamcinolone groups; however, rates of adverse events (particularly elevated intraocular pressure and cataract) were highest in the 4-mg group. Application to Clinical Practice Grid photocoagulation as applied in the SCORE Study remains the standard care for patients with vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to BRVO who have characteristics similar to participants in the SCORE-BRVO trial. Grid photocoagulation should remain the benchmark against which other treatments are compared in clinical trials for eyes with vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to BRVO. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00105027.
Assuntos
Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Fotocoagulação a Laser , Edema Macular/terapia , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/terapia , Triancinolona Acetonida/administração & dosagem , Transtornos da Visão/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Injeções , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Edema Macular/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/complicações , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/diagnóstico , Retratamento , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Resultado do Tratamento , Triancinolona Acetonida/efeitos adversos , Transtornos da Visão/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Visão/etiologia , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Corpo Vítreo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term safety and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) results of a telescope prosthesis in patients with end-stage age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Prospective, open-label clinical trial with fellow-eye controls. METHODS: Patients with end-stage AMD (bilateral geographic atrophy or disciform scars; BCVA, 20/80 to 20/800) received the telescope prosthesis at 28 centers. Methods were similar to those described in the one-year results, with follow-up visits continuing at 18 and 24 months. Main outcome measures included BCVA change from baseline, endothelial cell density (ECD) and morphometry, and incidence of complications. RESULTS: At two years, data from 174 (92.6%) of 188 available patients were analyzed. Overall, 103 (59.5%) of 173 telescope-implanted eyes gained three lines or more (doubling of visual angle) of BCVA compared with 18 (10.3%) of 174 fellow control eyes (P < .0001). Mean BCVA improved 3.6 lines (standard deviation [SD], 1.9 lines) and 2.8 lines (SD, 2.3 lines) from baseline in eyes with the 3X and 2.2X device models, respectively. Mean ECD stabilized through two years, with 2.4% mean cell loss occurring from one to two years. There was no significant change in coefficient of variation or percentage of hexagonal endothelial cells from within six months to two years after surgery. The most common complication was inflammatory deposits. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term results of this telescope prosthesis show the substantial BCVA improvement at one year is maintained at two years. Key indicators of corneal health demonstrate ECD change that reflects remodeling of the endothelium associated with the implantation procedure. ECD stabilizes over time, and there is no evidence of any ongoing endothelial trauma.
Assuntos
Degeneração Macular/fisiopatologia , Degeneração Macular/cirurgia , Implantação de Prótese , Acuidade Visual , Contagem de Células , Endotélio Corneano/patologia , Humanos , Lentes , Estudos Longitudinais , Degeneração Macular/patologia , Miniaturização , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Auxiliares Sensoriais , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is a common cause of vision loss in patients <50 years of age. In these patients, CNV is often the result of pathologic myopia, ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, angioid streaks, or idiopathic causes. Rarely, CNV is seen in children, usually in association with inherited macular dystrophies such as Best's disease (vitelliform macular dystrophy) or drusen of the optic nerve. This article discusses the role of optometrists in the detection and management of CNV. Untreated CNV can cause rapid deterioration of central vision and is associated with a poor prognosis. Optometrists may be able to improve the prognosis of younger patients with CNV by recognizing the signs, symptoms, and risk factors for CNV and promptly referring patients with suspected CNV to a retina specialist. They can also help patients by providing long-term support and rehabilitation. Recent treatment advances, such as the availability of verteporfin (Visudyne; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) therapy, that are applicable to younger patients with CNV have increased the importance of early detection of CNV and prompt referral of patients to a specialist who can treat CNV.
Assuntos
Neovascularização de Coroide , Baixa Visão/etiologia , Fatores Etários , Neovascularização de Coroide/complicações , Neovascularização de Coroide/diagnóstico , Neovascularização de Coroide/fisiopatologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Prognóstico , Baixa Visão/fisiopatologia , Acuidade VisualRESUMO
Several recent developments may provide an opportunity to improve outcome in individuals who develop neovascular age-related maculopathy (age-related macular degeneration [ARMD]). Concurrent with progress in isolating clinically relevant subtypes of neovascular ARMD, several therapies have been introduced that show promise for halting progression of this disorder. However, data from controlled clinical trials to test the relative efficacy of different management strategies across these subtypes of disease presentation remain limited. In addition, strategies to control ARMD may evolve quickly as more is learned about how specific molecular events, such as cell-mediated inflammation and angiogenesis, contribute to disease expression. A roundtable of investigators was convened to discuss and summarize recent progress in the treatment of ARMD. Case studies were then presented to provide an opportunity for experts to reveal their specific thought processes in the approach to neovascular ARMD based on their own interpretation of current clinical data and empirical experience.