Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Rehabil ; 32(6): 811-826, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29473482

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospective surveillance and targeted physiotherapy (PSTP) compared to education (EDU) on the prevalence of arm morbidity and describe the associated program cost. DESIGN: Pilot randomized single-blinded controlled trial. SETTING: Urban with assessments and treatment delivered in hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Women scheduled for breast cancer surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to PSTP ( n = 21) or EDU ( n = 20) and assessed presurgery and 12 months postsurgery. All participants received usual care, namely, preoperative education and provision of an education booklet with postsurgical exercises. The PSTP group was monitored for arm morbidity every three months and referred for physiotherapy if arm morbidity was identified. The EDU group received three education sessions on nutrition, stress and fatigue management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Arm morbidity was based on changes in the surgical arm(s) from presurgery in four domains: (1) shoulder range of motion, (2) strength, (3) volume, and (4) upper body function. Complex arm morbidity indicated ≥2 domains impaired. Second, the cost of the PSTP program was described. RESULTS: At 12 months, 18 (49%) participants (10 PSTP and 8 EDU) had arm morbidity, with EDU participants presenting more complex arm morbidity compared to PSTP participants. PSTP participants attended 4.4 of 5 assessments with 90% retention. The PSTP program cost was $150 covered by the Health Care Provider and the Patient Out-of-Pocket Travel cost was CAN$40. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that PSTP is feasible among women with breast cancer for early identification of arm morbidity. A larger study is needed to determine the cost and effectiveness benefits.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Extremidade Superior/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Força Muscular/fisiologia , Projetos Piloto , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/fisiologia
2.
Phys Ther ; 100(3): 468-476, 2020 03 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32043126

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early identification of breast cancer-related upper body issues is important to enable timely physical therapist treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the feasibility and reliability of women performing self-managed prospective surveillance for upper body issues in the early postoperative phase as part of a hospital-based physical therapy program. DESIGN: This was a prospective, single-site, single-group feasibility and reliability study. METHODS: Presurgery arm circumference measurements were completed at home and at the hospital by participants and by a physical therapist. Instruction in self-measurement was provided using a video guide. After surgery, all circumference measurements were repeated along with self-assessment and therapist assessment for shoulder flexion and abduction active range of motion. Feasibility was determined by recruitment/retention rates and participant-reported ease of performing self-measurements (1 [very difficult] to 10 [very easy]). Reliability was determined as intrarater reliability, interrater reliability, and agreement. RESULTS: Thirty-three women who were 53.4 (SD = 11.4) years old participated, with recruitment and retention rates of 79% and 94%, respectively. Participant-reported ease of measurement was 8.2 (SD = 2.2) before surgery and 8.0 (SD = 1.9) after surgery. The intrarater reliability and interrater reliability were excellent before surgery (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] ≥ 0.94; 95% confidence interval = 0.87-0.97) and after surgery (ICC ≥ 0.91; 95% confidence interval = 0.76-0.96). Agreement between self-assessed and therapist-assessed active shoulder flexion (κ = 0.79) and abduction (κ = 0.71) was good. LIMITATIONS: Further testing is needed using a prospective design with a longer follow-up to determine whether self-managed prospective surveillance and timely treatment can hinder the development of chronic breast cancer-related upper body issues. CONCLUSIONS: Self-measured arm circumference and shoulder range of motion are reliable, and their inclusion in a hospital-based program of prospective surveillance for upper body issues seems feasible. This approach may improve early detection and treatment.


Assuntos
Braço/anatomia & histologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Autogestão , Articulação do Ombro/fisiopatologia , Neoplasias da Mama/fisiopatologia , Intervalos de Confiança , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Tamanho do Órgão , Seleção de Pacientes , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa