Atrial fibrillation and risk of adverse outcomes in heart failure with reduced, mildly reduced, and preserved ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently co-exist. Contemporary classification of HF categorizes it into HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Aggregate data comparing the risk profile of AF between these three HF categories are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at determining any significant differences in AF-associated all-cause mortality, HF hospitalizations, cardiovascular mortality (CV), and stroke between HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases until February 28, 2023. Data were combined using DerSimonian-Laird random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies comprising 248 323 patients were retained: HFrEF 123 331 (49.7%), HFmrEF 40 995 (16.5%), and HFpEF 83 997 (33.8%). Pooled baseline AF prevalence was 36% total population, 30% HFrEF, 36% HFmrEF, and 42% HFpEF. AF was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality in the total population with pooled hazard ratio (HR) = 1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07-1.21), HFmrEF (HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.05-1.50) and HFpEF (HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.09-1.24), but not HFrEF (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.93-1.14). AF was associated with a higher risk of HF hospitalizations in the total population (HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.14-1.46), HFmrEF (HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.20-2.24), and HFpEF (HR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.17-1.83), but not HFrEF (HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.87-1.18). AF was only associated with CV in the HFpEF subcategory but was associated with stroke in all three HF subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: AF appears to be associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization in HFmrEF and HFpEF. With these findings, the paucity of data and treatment guidelines on AF in the HFmrEF subgroup becomes even more significant and warrant further investigations.

Persistence of significant secondary mitral regurgitation post-cardiac resynchronization therapy and survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis : Mitral regurgitation and mortality post-CRT.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) significantly reduces secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. However, uncertainty remains as to whether improvement in secondary MR correlates with improvement with mortality seen in CRT. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the association of persistent unimproved significant secondary MR (defined as moderate or moderate-to-severe or severe MR) compared to improved MR (no MR or mild MR) post-CRT with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and heart failure hospitalization. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases till July 31, 2022 identified studies reporting clinical outcomes by post-CRT secondary MR status. In 12 prospective studies of 4954 patients (weighted mean age 66.8 years, men 77.8%), the median duration of follow-up post-CRT at which patients were re-evaluated for significant secondary MR was 6 months and showed significant relative risk reduction of 30% compared to pre-CRT. The median duration of follow-up post-CRT for ascertainment of main clinical outcomes was 38 months. The random effects pooled hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of all-cause mortality in patients with unimproved secondary MR compared to improved secondary MR was 2.00 (1.57-2.55); p < 0.001). There was insufficient data to evaluate secondary outcomes in a meta-analysis, but limited data that examined the relationship showed significant association of unimproved secondary MR with increased cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization. The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that lack of improvement in secondary MR post-CRT is associated with significantly elevated risk of all-cause mortality and possibly cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Future studies may investigate approaches to address persistent secondary MR post-CRT to help improved outcome in this population.

Evolution and Prognosis of Tricuspid and Mitral Regurgitation Following Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Significant changes in tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and mitral regurgitation (MR) post-cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are increasingly recognized. However, uncertainty remains as to whether risk of CIED-associated TR and MR differs with right ventricular pacing (RVP) via CIED with trans-tricuspid RV leads, compared to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), conduction system pacing (CSP), and leadless pacing (LP). AIMS: Synthesize extant data on risk and prognosis of significant post-CIED TR and MR across pacing strategies. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases published until October 31st, 2023. Significant post-CIED TR and MR were defined as ≥ moderate. RESULTS: Fifty-seven TR studies (N=13,723 patients) and 90 MR studies (N =14,387 patients) were included. For all CIED, risk of post-CIED TR increased (pooled odds ratio (OR)=2.46 and 95% CI=1.88-3.22), while risk of post-CIED MR reduced (OR=0.74, 95% CI=0.58-0.94) after 12 and 6 months of median follow-up respectively. RVP via CIED with trans-tricuspid RV leads was associated with increased risk of post-CIED TR (OR=4.54, 95% CI=3.14-6.57) and post-CIED MR (OR=2.24, 95% CI=1.18-4.26). Binarily, CSP did not alter TR risk (OR=0.37, 95% CI=0.13-1.02), but significantly reduced MR (OR =0.15, 95% CI=0.03-0.62). CRT did not significantly change TR risk (OR=1.09, 95% CI=0.55-2.17), but significantly reduced MR with prevalence pre-CRT of 43%, decreasing post-CRT to 22% (OR =0.49, 95% CI=0.40-0.61). There was no significant association of LP with post-CIED TR (OR=1.15, 95% CI=0.83-1.59) or MR (OR=1.31, 95% CI=0.72-2.39). CIED-associated TR was independently predictive of all-cause mortality (pooled hazard ratio (HR)=1.64, 95% CI=1.40-1.90) after median of 53 months. MR persisting post-CRT independently predicted all-cause mortality (HR=2.00, 95% CI=1.57-2.55) after 38 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that, when possible, adoption of pacing strategies which avoid isolated trans-tricuspid RV leads may be beneficial in preventing incident or deteriorating atrioventricular valvular regurgitation and might reduce mortality.

Recognition, Prevention, and Management of Arrhythmias and Autonomic Disorders in Cardio-Oncology: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

With the advent of novel cancer therapeutics and improved screening, more patients are surviving a cancer diagnosis or living longer with advanced disease. Many of these treatments have associated cardiovascular toxicities that can manifest in both an acute and a delayed fashion. Arrhythmias are an increasingly identified complication with unique management challenges in the cancer population. The purpose of this scientific statement is to summarize the current state of knowledge regarding arrhythmia identification and treatment in patients with cancer. Atrial tachyarrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation, are most common, but ventricular arrhythmias, including those related to treatment-induced QT prolongation, and bradyarrhythmias can also occur. Despite increased recognition, dedicated prospective studies evaluating true incidence are lacking. Moreover, few studies have addressed appropriate prevention and treatment strategies. As such, this scientific statement serves to mobilize the cardio-oncology, electrophysiology, and oncology communities to develop clinical and scientific collaborations that will improve the care of patients with cancer who have arrhythmias.

Emerging Implantable-Device Technology for Patients at the Intersection of Electrophysiology and Heart Failure Interdisciplinary Care.

Cardiac implantable electronic devices, including implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and therapy, are part of guideline-indicated treatment for a subset of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Current technological advancements in cardiac implantable electronic devices have allowed the detection of specific physiological parameters that are used to forecast clinical decompensation through algorithmic, multiparameter remote monitoring. Other recent emerging technologies, including cardiac contractility modulation and baroreflex activation therapy, may provide symptomatic or physiological benefits in patients without indications for cardiac resynchronization. Our goal in this state-of-the-art review is to describe the new commercially available technologies, their purported mechanisms of action, and the evidence surrounding their clinical roles, limitations and future directions. Finally, we underline the need for standardized workflow and close interdisciplinary management of this population to ensure the delivery of high-quality care.

Wearables, telemedicine, and artificial intelligence in arrhythmias and heart failure: Proceedings of the European Society of Cardiology Cardiovascular Round Table.

Digital technology is now an integral part of medicine. Tools for detecting, screening, diagnosis, and monitoring health-related parameters have improved patient care and enabled individuals to identify issues leading to better management of their own health. Wearable technologies have integrated sensors and can measure physical activity, heart rate and rhythm, and glucose and electrolytes. For individuals at risk, wearables or other devices may be useful for early detection of atrial fibrillation or sub-clinical states of cardiovascular disease, disease management of cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension and heart failure, and lifestyle modification. Health data are available from a multitude of sources, namely clinical, laboratory and imaging data, genetic profiles, wearables, implantable devices, patient-generated measurements, and social and environmental data. Artificial intelligence is needed to efficiently extract value from this constantly increasing volume and variety of data and to help in its interpretation. Indeed, it is not the acquisition of digital information, but rather the smart handling and analysis that is challenging. There are multiple stakeholder groups involved in the development and effective implementation of digital tools. While the needs of these groups may vary, they also have many commonalities, including the following: a desire for data privacy and security; the need for understandable, trustworthy, and transparent systems; standardized processes for regulatory and reimbursement assessments; and better ways of rapidly assessing value.

Modified design of stimulation of the left ventricular endocardium for cardiac resynchronization therapy in nonresponders, previously untreatable and high-risk upgrade patients (SOLVE-CRT) trial.

The WiSE system is a novel, leadless endocardial system that can provide cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients who cannot be treated with a conventional epicardial left ventricular lead. Safety and efficacy were being evaluated in the pivotal, randomized, double-blind SOLVE-CRT Trial (Stimulation of the Left Ventricular Endocardium for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.) The trial was initiated in 2018; however, patient enrollment was significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic necessitating a change in design. This article describes the revised trial and the scientific rationale for the specific changes in the protocol.

Combination Biomarkers for Risk Stratification in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure Biomarkers Prognostication in HF.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend measuring natriuretic peptide biomarkers to establish prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We assessed whether a combination biomarkers approach improve prognostication in patients with stable HFrEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: An observational cohort study recruited 202 patients with stable HFrEF at a single center, tertiary care hospital undergoing elective cardiac resynchronization therapy device placement from 2013 to 2015. Twenty-four biomarkers were analyzed individually and in combination using Cox proportion hazard regression model for major adverse cardiac events (ie, death, cardiac transplant, left ventricular assist device placement), and major adverse cardiac events plus HF hospitalizations. The single best biomarker for predicting major adverse cardiac events is peripheral mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (C statistic = 0.771 ± 0.045) compared to current guideline recommended N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (C=0.668 ± 0.046). The best combined biomarkers for predicting major adverse cardiac events are blood urea nitrogen, coronary sinus C-reactive protein, peripheral mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide and peripheral soluble IL-1 receptor-like 1 (C = 0.767 ± 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: In this observational cohort, the combined biomarkers (blood urea nitrogen, C-reactive protein, mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide and soluble IL-1 receptor-like 1) or the single biomarker (mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin) was superior to N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, the current guideline recommended biomarker in predicting cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFrEF. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and examine whether single or combined biomarkers improve HFrEF prognostication.

Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients-a systematic review.

Machine learning (ML) algorithms "learn" information directly from data, and their performance improves proportionally with the number of high-quality samples. The aim of our systematic review is to present the state of the art regarding the implementation of ML techniques in the management of heart failure (HF) patients. We manually searched MEDLINE and Cochrane databases as well the reference lists of the relevant review studies and included studies. Our search retrieved 122 relevant studies. These studies mainly refer to (a) the role of ML in the classification of HF patients into distinct categories which may require a different treatment strategy, (b) discrimination of HF patients from the healthy population or other diseases, (c) prediction of HF outcomes, (d) identification of HF patients from electronic records and identification of HF patients with similar characteristics who may benefit form a similar treatment strategy, (e) supporting the extraction of important data from clinical notes, and (f) prediction of outcomes in HF populations with implantable devices (left ventricular assist device, cardiac resynchronization therapy). We concluded that ML techniques may play an important role for the efficient construction of methodologies for diagnosis, management, and prediction of outcomes in HF patients.

Autonomic modulation and cardiac arrhythmias: old insights and novel strategies.

The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a critical role in both health and states of cardiovascular disease. There has been a long-recognized role of the ANS in the pathogenesis of both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). This historical understanding has been expanded in the context of evolving insights into the anatomy and physiology of the ANS, including dysfunction of the ANS in cardiovascular disease such as heart failure and myocardial infarction. An expanding armamentarium of therapeutic strategies-both invasive and non-invasive-have brought the potential of ANS modulation to contemporary clinical practice. Here, we summarize the integrative neuro-cardiac anatomy underlying the ANS, review the physiological rationale for autonomic modulation in atrial and VAs, highlight strategies for autonomic modulation, and finally frame future challenges and opportunities for ANS therapeutics.

Risk of ventricular arrhythmia in cardiac resynchronization therapy responders and super-responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is associated with improved survival, and reduction in heart failure hospitalization, and ventricular arrhythmia (VA) risk. However, the impact of CRT super-response [CRT-SR, increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to ≥ 50%] on VA remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We undertook a meta-analysis aimed at determining the impact of CRT response and CRT-SR on risk of VA and all-cause mortality. Systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, identifying all relevant English articles published until 31 December 2019. A total of 34 studies (7605 patients for VA and 5874 patients for all-cause mortality) were retained for the meta-analysis. The pooled cumulative incidence of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy for VA was significantly lower at 13.0% (4.5% per annum) in CRT-responders, vs. 29.0% (annualized rate of 10.0%) in CRT non-responders, relative risk (RR) 0.47 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.56, P < 0.0001]; all-cause mortality 3.5% vs. 9.1% per annum, RR of 0.38 (95% CI 0.30-0.49, P < 0.0001). The pooled incidence of VA was significantly lower in CRT-SR compared with CRT non-super-responders (non-responders + responders) at 0.9% vs. 3.8% per annum, respectively, RR 0.22 (95% CI 0.12-0.40, P < 0.0001); as well as all-cause mortality at 2.0% vs. 4.3%, respectively, RR 0.47 (95% CI 0.33-0.66, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy super-responders have low absolute risk of VA and all-cause mortality. However, there remains a non-trivial residual absolute risk of these adverse outcomes in CRT responders. These findings suggest that among CRT responders, there may be a continued clinical benefit of defibrillators.

Ventricular activation patterns during intrinsic conduction and right ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) involves stimulation of both right ventricle (RV) and left ventricle (LV). LV pacing from the sites of delayed electrical activation improves CRT response. The RV-LV conduction is typically measured in intrinsic rhythm. The differences in RV-LV conduction patterns and timing between intrinsic rhythm and during paced RV activation, these differences are not fully understood. METHODS: Enrolled patients were implanted with a de novo CRT device and quadripolar LV lead, with lead implant locations at the implanting physician's discretion. QRS duration and conduction delay between the RV lead and each of the four LV electrodes (D1, M2, M3, and P4) were measured during intrinsic conduction and RV pacing. RESULTS: Conduction measurements were collected from 275 patients across 14 international centers (68 ± 13 years of age, 73% male, 45% ischemic, 158 ± 22 ms QRS duration). Mean RV-LV conduction time was shorter during intrinsic conduction versus RV pacing by 59.6 ms (106.5 ± 36.5 versus 166.1 ± 32.1 ms, p < 0.001). The intra-LV activation delay between the latest and earliest activating LV electrode was also shorter during intrinsic conduction versus RV pacing by 6.6 ms (20.6 ± 13.1 vs. 27.2 ± 21.2 ms, p < 0.001). Intrinsic conduction and RV pacing resulted in a different activation order in 72.7% of patients, and the same LV activation order in 27.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in RV-LV conduction time, intra-LV conduction time, and activation pattern were observed between intrinsic conduction and RV pacing. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating intrinsic versus paced ventricular activation to guide LV pacing site selection in CRT patients.

Real-world behavior of CRT pacing using the AdaptivCRT algorithm on patient outcomes: Effect on mortality and atrial fibrillation incidence.

BACKGROUND: The AdaptivCRT (aCRT) algorithm continuously adjusts cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) according to intrinsic atrioventricular conduction, providing synchronized left ventricular pacing in patients with normal PR interval and adaptive BiV pacing in patients with prolonged PR interval. Previous analyses demonstrated an association between aCRT and clinical benefit. We evaluated the incidence of patient mortality and atrial fibrillation (AF) with aCRT compared with standard CRT in a real-world population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients enrolled in the Medtronic Personalized CRT Registry and implanted with a CRT from 2013-2018 were divided into aCRT ON or standard CRT groups based upon device-stored data. A Frailty survival model was used to evaluate the potential survival benefit of aCRT, accounting for patient heterogeneity and center variability. Daily AF burden and first device-detected AF episodes of various durations were recorded by the device during follow-up. A total of 1814 CRT patients with no reported long-standing AF history at implant were included. Mean follow-up time was 26.1 ± 16.5 months and 1162 patients (64.1%) had aCRT ON. Patient survival probability at 36 months was 88.3% for aCRT ON and 83.7% for standard CRT (covariate-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53-0.96, P = .028). Mean AF burden during follow-up was consistently lower in aCRT ON patients compared with standard CRT. At 36 months, the probability of AF was lower in patients with aCRT ON, regardless of which AF definition threshold was applied (6 minutes-30 days, all P < .001). CONCLUSION: Use of the AdaptivCRT algorithm was associated with improved patient survival and lower incidence of AF in a real-world, prospective, nonrandomized registry.

Left ventricular wall thickness assessed by cardiac computed tomography and cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes.

AIMS: Up to 30% of selected heart failure patients do not benefit clinically from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Left ventricular (LV) wall thickness (WT) analysed using computed tomography (CT) has rarely been evaluated in response to CRT and mitral regurgitation (MR) improvement. We examined the association of LVWT and the ability to reverse LV remodelling and MR improvement after CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-four patients scheduled for CRT underwent pre-procedural CT. Reduced LVWT was defined as WT <6 mm and quantified as a percentage of total LV area. Endpoints were 6-month clinical and echocardiographic response to CRT [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and LV end-systolic volume (LVESV)], MR improvement and 2-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Patients were divided into three groups according to the percentage of LVWT <6 mm area: ≤20%, 20-50%, and ≥50%. At 6 months, 75%, 71%, and 42% of the patients experienced NYHA improvement in the ≤20%, 20-50%, and ≥50% group, respectively. Additionally, ≤20% group presented higher LVEF, LVEDV, and LVESV positive response rate (86%, 59%, and 83%, respectively). Both 20-50% and ≥50% groups exhibited a lower LVEF, LVEDV, and LVESV positive response rate (52% and 42%; 47% and 45%; and 53% and 45%, respectively). Additionally, ≥25% of LVWT <6 mm inclusive of at least one papillary muscle insertion was the only predictor of lack of MR improvement. Lastly, ≥50% group experienced significantly lower 2-year MACE survival free probability. CONCLUSION: WT evaluated using CT could help to stratify the response to CRT and predict MR improvement and outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01097733.

Left ventricle and mitral valve reverse remodeling in response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves left heart geometry and function in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICMP). We aimed to detail the effects of CRT on left ventricular (LV) and mitral valve (MV) remodeling using 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients with NICMP who underwent CRT implantation between 2009 and 2012, and had pre-CRT and follow-up echocardiograms available, were included. Paired t test, linear and logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used for statistical assessment. RESULTS: The mean age and QRS duration were 60 years and 157 ms, respectively, and 13 (28.9%) were female. At a mean follow-up of 3 years, there were 22 (48.9%) "CRT responders" (≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume index [LVESVi]). Significant improvements were observed in LV ejection fraction (26.3% vs 34.3%) and LVESVi (87.7 vs 71.1 mL/m2 ), as well as mitral regurgitation vena contracta width, MV tenting height and area, and end-systolic interpapillary muscle distance. Five-year actuarial survival was 87.5%. Multivariate regression analyses revealed the pre-CRT LVESVi (ß = 0.52), and MV coaptation length (ß = -0.34) and septolateral annular diameter (ß = 0.25) as good correlates of follow-up LVESVi. Variables associated with CRT response were pre-CRT MV coaptation length (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.0-3.1) and posterior leaflet tethering angle (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.0-1.14), irrespective of baseline QRS morphology and duration (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves LV and MV geometry and function in half of patients with NICMP, which is paralleled by decreased mitral regurgitation severity. The extent of pre-CRT LV remodeling and MV tethering are associated with CRT response.

Design and rationale for the Stimulation Of the Left Ventricular Endocardium for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in non-responders and previously untreatable patients (SOLVE-CRT) trial.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes, functional capacity and quality of life in patients with heart failure. Despite two decades of experience with CRT, the rate of non-response remains approximately 30%. CRT efficacy is impacted by pacing location, which is anatomically limited in conventional systems. A new wireless endocardial left ventricular (LV) pacing system allows CRT without such limitations and has shown promise in open-label studies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate its use in a patient population with poor therapeutic alternatives. METHODS: The SOLVE CRT study is an international, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial of patients with Class I and IIa indications for CRT who have either failed to respond to or have been unable to receive conventional CRT. Enrollment will comprise 350 patients implanted with the wireless CRT system randomized 1:1 to therapy on (Treatment) or therapy off (Control) for the six-month period over which trial primary endpoints will be evaluated. The primary safety endpoint will measure the proportion of patients free from system- and procedure-related complications. Primary efficacy endpoints will assess absolute change in LV end-systolic volume LVESV, proportion of patients reducing LVESV by ≥15% and clinical composite score for Treatment versus Control patients. Primary endpoints will be evaluated on an intention-to-treat basis, though per-protocol and as-treated analysis will also be performed. CONCLUSION: SOLVE-CRT will quantify the safety and effectiveness of wireless CRT in non-responders to conventional CRT and indicated patients who have been unable to receive CRT via the usual transvenous approach.

Electrocardiographic optimization techniques in resynchronization therapy.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a cornerstone of therapy for patients with heart failure, reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, and a wide QRS complex. However, not all patients respond to CRT: 30% of CRT implanted patients are currently considered clinical non-responders and up to 40% do not achieve LV reverse remodelling. In order to achieve the best CRT response, appropriate patient selection, device implantation, and programming are important factors. Optimization of CRT pacing intervals may improve results, increasing the number of responders, and the magnitude of the response. Echocardiography is considered the reference method for atrioventricular and interventricular (VV) intervals optimization but it is time-consuming, complex and it has a large interobserver and intraobserver variability. Previous studies have linked QRS shortening to clinical response, echocardiographic improvement and favourable prognosis. In this review, we describe the electrocardiographic optimization methods available: 12-lead electrocardiogram; fusion-optimized intervals (FOI); intracardiac electrogram-based algorithms; and electrocardiographic imaging. Fusion-optimized intervals is an electrocardiographic method of optimizing CRT based on QRS duration that combines fusion with intrinsic conduction. The FOI method is feasible and fast, further reduces QRS duration, can be performed during implant, improves acute haemodynamic response, and achieves greater LV remodelling compared with nominal programming of CRT.

The effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular and mitral valve geometry and secondary mitral regurgitation in patients with left bundle branch block.

BACKGROUND: Secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) is common in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We aimed to define CRT effects on left ventricular (LV) and mitral valve (MV) geometry, and their correlation with MR severity. METHODS: Forty-one patients with LBBB and ≥mild secondary MR underwent CRT between 2009 and 2012, and had baseline and follow-up echocardiograms available. Repeated measure and linear regression analyses were performed to assess for changes in MV and LV geometry and MR severity, and associations with follow-up MR grade. RESULTS: The mean age and baseline QRS duration were 65.5 ± 14.9 years and 160 ± 24 ms. At a mean follow-up of 2.6 ± 1.8 years, there was an increase in LV ejection fraction and reductions in LV end-systolic volume index, MR grade, and end-systolic interpapillary muscle distance (P < .05 for all). Linear correlations were observed between follow-up MR grade and baseline MV tenting height (r = .44), left atrial volume index (r = .41), LV end-systolic volume index (r = .4), MV tenting area (r = .38), LV ejection fraction (r = -.34), and end-systolic interpapillary muscle distance (r = .34) (P < .05 for all). Multiple regression analysis revealed associations between follow-up MR grade and baseline MV tenting height (ß/mm = 0.42, P = .006) and left atrial volume index (ß/mL/m2  = 0.4, P = .008), independent of QRS duration (ß/ms=-0.07; P = 0.6) and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (ß = -0.34, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with LBBB and secondary MR results in LV and MV geometric reverse remodeling and decreases MR severity. Extent of baseline MV tethering is independently associated with persistent MR at follow-up.

The heart regulates the endocrine response to heart failure: cardiac contribution to circulating neprilysin.

Aims: Heart failure (HF) is accompanied by major neuroendocrine changes including the activation of the natriuretic peptide (NP) pathway. Using the unique model of patients undergoing implantation of the CARMAT total artificial heart and investigating regional differences in soluble neprilysin (sNEP) in patients with reduced or preserved systolic function, we studied the regulation of the NP pathway in HF. Methods and results: Venous blood samples from two patients undergoing replacement of the failing ventricles with a total artificial heart were collected before implantation and weekly thereafter until post-operative week 6. The ventricular removal was associated with an immediate drop in circulating NPs, a nearly total disappearance of circulating glycosylated proBNP and furin activity and a marked decrease in sNEP. From post-operative week 1 onwards, NP concentrations remained overall unchanged. In contrast, partial recoveries in glycosylated proBNP, furin activity, and sNEP were observed. Furthermore, while in patients with preserved systolic function (n = 6), sNEP concentrations in the coronary sinus and systemic vessels were similar (all P > 0.05), in patients with reduced left-ventricular systolic function, sNEP concentration, and activity were ∼three-fold higher in coronary sinus compared to systemic vessels (n = 21, all P < 0.0001), while the trans-pulmonary gradient was neutral (n = 5, P = 1.0). Conclusion: The heart plays a pivotal role as a regulator of the endocrine response in systolic dysfunction, not only by directly releasing NPs but also by contributing to circulating sNEP, which in turn determines the bioavailability of other numerous vasoactive peptides.