The influence of preoperative 12-item veterans rand physical component scores on outcomes following cervical disc replacement.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of preoperative VR-12 physical component scores (PCS) on outcomes following cervical disc replacement (CDR). METHODS: Patients undergoing elective CDR were retrospectively identified. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of interest included VR-12 PCS/VR-12 Mental Component Score (MCS)/9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)/Short Form-12 (SF-12) PCS and MCS/Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF)/Visual Analog Scale-Neck Pain (VAS-NP)/VAS-Arm Pain (VAS-AP)/Neck Disability Index (NDI). Baseline up to two-year postoperative scores were obtained (average follow-up: 9.2 ± 6.8months). Two cohorts were created: VR-12 PCS < 35 or VR-12 PCS ≥ 35. Improvements in scores from baseline to six weeks postoperatively and to final follow-up were calculated. Changes in scores were compared to previously reported thresholds to determine rates of minimum clinically important difference (MCID). RESULTS: Of 127 patients, 64 were in the worse VR-12 PCS group. Patients with better VR-12 PCS were more likely to have private insurance (p = 0.034). When accounting for insurance differences, the worse VR-12 PCS group reported inferior NDI/VAS-NP/PHQ-9/PROMIS-PF/VR-12 PCS/SF-12 PCS at six weeks and final follow-up (p ≤ 0.015, all). The worse VR-12 PCS group reported greater improvements in VAS-AP and VR-12 PCS by six weeks and in NDI/VR-12 MCS/VR-12 PCS/SF-12 PCS by final follow-up (p ≤ 0.026, all). Patients with worse VR-12 PCS reported greater MCID achievement for VR-12 MCS and SF-12 PCS (p ≤ 0.034, both). CONCLUSION: Following surgery, patients with worse VR-12 PCS report greater improvements in PROs, highlighting the increased relative impact of surgery for patients with worse baseline physical function. These findings can be used to optimize patient experience perioperatively and inform postoperative expectations.

Impact of preoperative back pain severity on PROMIS outcomes following minimally invasive lumbar decompression.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of baseline back pain severity on PROMIS mental health outcomes following minimally invasive lumbar decompression (LD). METHODS: Patients undergoing elective, primary, single-level LD were retrospectively reviewed from a prospective single spine surgeon registry. Perioperative characteristics, demographics, and the following patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were extracted: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)/Patient-Health Questionnaire-9 /PROMIS-Physical Function/Anxiety/Pain Interference/Sleep Disturbance (PROMIS-PF/A/PI/SD). Two cohorts were created: preoperative VAS-B < 7 and VAS-B ≥ 7. Change in PROs (ΔPROs) from baseline to six weeks/final follow-up were determined. Average patient follow-up was 13.4 ± 8.8 months. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rates were calculated and compared through multivariable logistic regression. Postoperative scores and ΔPROs, were compared with multivariable linear regression while all other data was compared between groups with inferential statistics. RESULTS: Altogether, 347 patients were included, with 190 in the VAS-B < 7 group. VAS-B ≥ 7 reported worse outcomes preoperatively (p ≤ 0.013, all). At six weeks, VAS-B ≥ 7 reported worse VAS-B (p = 0.017), with no other significant differences. At final follow-up, patients with worse VAS-B reported worse ODI (p = 0.040) and VAS-B while all other PROs were similar (p ≥ 0.078, all). VAS-B ≥ 7 experienced greater 6-week improvements in VAS-B/ODI/PROMIS-PI/PROMIS-SD (p ≤ 0.009, all), greater VAS-B/ODI/PROMIS-SD improvement by final follow-up (p ≤ 0.009, all) and greater MCID achievement in ODI/VAS-B (p ≤ 0.027). CONCLUSION: Patients with worse baseline back pain report inferior baseline scores that converge with those with milder preoperative back pain by 6 weeks after LD and reported greater 6-week improvements in disability, pain interference, and sleep disturbance by 6 weeks, and greater improvements in disability and sleep disturbance by final follow-up.

Establishing minimum clinically important difference for patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

BACKGROUND: The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) has not been established in lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). Our study aims to establish MCID for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of physical function and pain for LLIF through anchor-based and distribution-based approaches. METHODS: Patients undergoing LLIF with preoperative and 6-month postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were identified. PROMs of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), 12-Item Short Form Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS), Veterans RAND 12-Item Short Form Physical Component Score (VR-12 PCS), visual analog scale (VAS) back, and VAS leg were collected at preoperative and 6-month postoperative time points. Anchor-based MCID calculations were average change, minimal detectable change, change difference, receiver operating characteristic curve, and cross-sectional analysis using ODI as the anchor. Distribution-based calculations were standard error of measurement, reliable change index, effect size, and 0.5 ∗ ΔSD. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included. Anchor-based approaches MCID ranges were PROMIS-PF 1.1-9.6, SF-12 PCS 6.4-16.5, VR-12 PCS 5.9-12.9, VAS Back 1.4-4.6, and VAS Leg 1.3-4.3. The area under curve for receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis ranged from 0.63 to 0.71. Distribution-based MCID ranges were PROMIS-PF 1.4-4.5, SF-12 PCS 1.9-12.7, VR-12 PCS 2.0-6.6, VAS Back 0.4-1.4, and VAS Leg 0.5-2.0. CONCLUSION: MCID thresholds varied widely depending on the calculation method. The closest to (0,1) ROC approach was the most clinically appropriate MCID calculation. The corresponding MCID values for LLIF were PROMIS-PF at 7.8, SF-12 PCS at 6.4, VR-12 PCS at 9.3, VAS Back at 4.6, and VAS Leg at 4.3.

Correlation of mental health with physical function, pain, and disability following anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated the influence of preoperative mental health on outcomes following spine surgery, but prior literature has not assessed the influence of mental health at time of outcome survey collection. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) were identified from a prospective registry. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected preoperatively and up to 1 year postoperatively. Mental health measures studied included 12-item Short Form (SF-12) Mental Component Score (MCS) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), SF-12 Physical Component Score (PCS), visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were compared to the mental health measures by Pearson's correlation tests. RESULTS: A total of 166 patients were included. SF-12 MCS demonstrated positive correlation to PROMIS-PF preoperatively (|r|= 0.379) and at 6 weeks (|r|= 0.387) (p ≤ 0.016, all). SF-12 MCS demonstrated negative correlation to VAS back at 6 months (|r|= 0.359), VAS leg at 6 weeks (|r|= 0.475) and 12 weeks (|r|= 0.422), and ODI up to 6 months postoperatively (|r|= 0.417-0.526) (p ≤ 0.037, all). PHQ-9 negatively correlated with PROMIS-PF at all periods studied (|r|= 0.425-0.587) and SF-12 PCS up to 6 months postoperatively (|r|= 0.367-0.642) (p ≤ 0.016, all). PHQ-9 positively correlated to VAS back at 6 weeks (|r|= 0.408) and 6 months (|r|= 0.411), VAS leg at 6 weeks (|r|= 0.344), and ODI up to 6 months postoperatively (|r|= 0.321-0.669) (p ≤ 0.034, all). CONCLUSION: Inferior mental health correlated with inferior pain, function, and disability scores at one or more periods postoperatively. This finding was most consistent for correlation between mental health scores and disability. Optimization of mental health may positively influence outcomes, especially regarding disability, following ALIF.

Poor mental health scores correlate with inferior outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

BACKGROUND: Limited spine literature has studied the strength of association of mental health with other outcomes at time of survey collection. We aim to evaluate the degree to which mental health correlates with outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) at several postoperative periods. METHODS: Patients having undergone elective MIS-TLIF were searched within a retrospective single-surgeon database. Five hundred eighty-five patients were included. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS PF), 12-item Short Form Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS) and Mental Component Score (SF-12 MCS), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back and leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were collected preoperatively and at 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year periods. Pearson's correlation tests were used to evaluate the association between both SF-12 MCS and PHQ-9 scores to other PROs at each period. RESULTS: SF-12 MCS correlated with PROMIS PF (|r|= 0.308-0.531), SF-12 PCS (|r|= 0.207-0.328), VAS back (|r|= 0.279-0.474), VAS leg (|r|= 0.178-0.395), and ODI (|r|= 0.450-0.538) at all time points (P ≤ 0.021, all) except for preoperative SF-12 PCS and 1-year VAS leg. PHQ-9 correlated with PROMIS PF (|r|= 0.366-0.701), SF-12 PCS (|r|= 0.305-0.568), VAS back (|r|= 0.362-0.714), VAS leg (|r|= 0.319-0.694), and ODI (|r|= 0.613-0.784) at all periods (P < 0.001, all). CONCLUSION: Poor mental health scores were correlated with lower physical function, elevated pain scores, and higher disability. PHQ-9 scores demonstrated stronger correlation in all relationships compared to SF-12 MCS. Optimization of patient mental health may lead to improved patient perception regarding function, pain, and disability following MIS-TLIF.

Poor patient-reported mental health correlates with inferior patient-reported outcome measures following cervical disc replacement.

PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the correlation between the patient-reported mental health and the self-reported outcome measures (PROMs) physical function, pain, and disability at different time points following disc replacement (CDR). METHODS: A single-surgeon registry was searched for patients who had undergone CDR, excluding those with indication for infection, cancer, or trauma. One hundred fifty-one patients were included. PROMs were collected preoperatively as well as 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Mental health measures evaluated included 12-Item Short Form (SF-12), Mental Component Score (MCS), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) which were individually assessed via Pearson's correlation tests in relation to Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), SF-12 Physical Component Score (PCS), visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm pain, and Neck Disability Index (NDI). RESULTS: SF-12 MCS positively correlated with PROMIS-PF (range: r = 0.369-0.614) and SF-12 PCS (range: r = 0.208-0.585) with significance found at two or more time points for each (p ≤ 0.009, all). SF-12 MCS negatively correlated with VAS neck (range: r = - 0.259 to - 0.464), VAS arm (range: r = - 0.281 to - 0.567), and NDI (range: r = - 0.474 to - 831) with significance found at three or more time points (p ≤ 0.028, all). PHQ-9 significantly negatively correlated with PROMIS-PF (range: r = - 0.457 to - 0.732) and SF-12 PCS (range: r = - 0.332 to - 0.629) at all time points (p ≤ 0.013, all). PHQ-9 positively correlated with VAS neck (range: r = 0.351-0.711), VAS arm (range: r = 0.239-0.572), and NDI (range: r = 0.602-0.837) at four or more periods (p ≤ 0.032, all). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing CDR who reported lower mental health scores via either SF-12 MCS or PHQ-9 were associated with increased perception of pain and disability. Disability level correlated with mental health at all time periods. Patients with optimized mental health may report higher outcome scores following CDR.

Postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing MIS-TLIF versus LLIF for adjacent segment disease.

PURPOSE: Few studies examine the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) versus lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) for adjacent segment disease (ASD). We aim to compare the postoperative clinical trajectory through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in patients undergoing MIS-TLIF versus LLIF for ASD. METHODS: Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on surgical technique for ASD: MIS-TLIF versus LLIF. PROMs of 12-Item Short Form Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS), visual analog scale (VAS) back, VAS leg, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were collected at preoperative and postoperative 6-week/12-week/6-month/1-year time points. MCID attainment was calculated through comparison to established thresholds. Cohorts were compared through nonparametric inferential statistics. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were identified, with 22 patients undergoing MIS-TLIF after propensity score matching. Patients undergoing MIS-TLIF for ASD demonstrated significant postoperative improvement up to 1-year VAS back, up to 1-year VAS leg, and 6-month through 1-year ODI (p ≤ 0.035, all). Patients undergoing LLIF demonstrated significant postoperative improvement in 6-month SF-12 PCS, 6-month through 1-year VAS back, 12-week through 6-month VAS leg, and 6-month to 1-year ODI (p ≤ 0.035, all). No significant differences were calculated between surgical techniques for PROMs or MCID achievement rates. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing either MIS-TLIF or LLIF for adjacent segment disease demonstrated significant postoperative improvement in pain and disability outcomes. Additionally, patients undergoing LLIF reported significant improvement in physical function. Both MIS-TLIF and LLIF are effective for the treatment of adjacent segment disease.

Recovery ratios and minimum clinically important difference for clinical outcomes in workers' compensation recipients undergoing MIS-TLIF versus ALIF.

BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of literature that examines clinical outcomes through patient-reported outcomes (PROs), minimum clinically important difference (MCID), and recovery ratios (RR) for workers' compensation (WC) recipients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). METHODS: WC claimants undergoing MIS-TLIF versus ALIF were propensity score matched to account for demographic differences. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, and PROs were collected. PROs of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), 12-Item Short Form Physical Composite Score (SF-12 PCS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back, VAS leg, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were collected at preoperative and postoperative time points. MCID achievement was determined through comparison to values in literature. RR was calculated as the difference between postoperative and preoperative PROs over potential improvement. Comparison between surgical techniques was through non-parametric inferential statistics. RESULTS: Eighty-four WC claimants, with 50 patients undergoing MIS-TLIF, were identified after propensity score matching. ALIF patients had higher estimated blood loss. MIS-TLIF patients had higher postoperative day (POD) 0 VAS pain and POD 0 + 1 narcotic consumption. Patients undergoing either MIS-TLIF or ALIF reported significant improvement in pain and disability. ALIF patients reported significant improvement in physical function. ALIF patients reported superior 1-year PROMIS-PF, 6-week SF-12 PCS, 6-month VAS back, and 12-week VAS leg. No significant differences in MCID achievement rates were noted between cohorts. ALIF patients had higher RR in 6-week and 1-year PROMIS-PF and 6-week SF-12 PCS. CONCLUSION: Workers' compensation claimants undergoing either MIS-TLIF or ALIF reported significant improvement in pain and disability. ALIF patients reported superior postoperative physical function and pain. ALIF patients had higher recovery ratios in physical function. Workers' compensation claimants undergoing ALIF may experience greater physical function recovery and superior clinical outcomes in physical function and pain.

Effect of baseline veterans RAND-12 physical composite score on postoperative patient-reported outcome measures following lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

PURPOSE: To determine the prognostic value of preoperative Veterans RAND-12 (VR-12) Physical Composite Score (PCS) scores on postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). METHODS: LLIF patients were separated into 2 cohorts based on preoperative VR-12 PCS scores: VR-12 PCS < 30 (lesser physical function) and VR-12 PCS ≥ 30 (greater physical function). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of VR-12 PCS, VR-12 Mental Composite Score (MCS), Short Form-12 (SF-12) PCS, SF-12 MCS, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Back Pain (VAS-BP), VAS Leg Pain (VAS-LP), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were collected at preoperative and up to 2-year postoperative time points. Mean postoperative follow-up time was 16.69 ± 8.53 months. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was determined by comparing ∆PROM to previously established thresholds. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were included, with 38 patients with lesser preoperative physical function scores. Patients with lesser physical function reported significantly inferior preoperative PROM scores in all domains, except for SF-12 MCS and VAS-LP. At the 6-week postoperative time point, patients with lesser physical function reported significantly inferior VR-12 PCS, VR-12 MCS, SF-12 PCS, PROMIS-PF, and PHQ-9. At the final postoperative time point, patients with lesser physical function reported significantly inferior VR-12 PCS, VR-12 MCS, PROMIS-PF, PHQ-9, and ODI. Magnitude of 6-week postoperative improvement was significantly higher in the lesser physical function cohort for VR-12 PCS. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing LLIF with worse baseline VR-12 PCS scores reported inferior postoperative physical function, mental health, and disability outcomes. At the final postoperative follow-up, magnitude of postoperative improvement and MCID achievement did not significantly differ. Baseline VR-12 PCS scores may indicate inferior postoperative clinical outcomes in physical function, mental health, and disability in patients undergoing LLIF; however, baseline VR-12 PCS does not limit the magnitude of postoperative improvement.

Impact of preoperative symptom duration in patients undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the influence of preoperative symptom duration on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) for degenerative conditions. METHODS: Patients undergoing LLIF presenting with radiculopathy and/or neurogenic claudication were separated into two groups: preoperative symptom duration < 1-year (shorter duration) versus duration ≥ 1-year (longer duration). Patients undergoing surgery for trauma/malignancy/infection were excluded. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), 12-Item Short Form Physical/Mental Component Score (SF-12 PCS/MCS), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), visual analog scale (VAS) back/leg, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were collected at preoperative and postoperative time points. RESULTS: Eighty-two total patients, with 34 shorter-duration patients, were identified after propensity score matching for demographics. Longer-duration patients had higher estimated blood loss. All patients reported significant improvement in physical function, mental function, pain, and disability in at least one postoperative time point, except for SF-12 MCS in the shorter duration cohort. The longer duration cohort had higher MCID achievement in 12-week VAS back. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing LLIF demonstrated significant postoperative improvement in physical function, mental function, pain, and disability outcomes independent of preoperative symptom duration. Both cohorts, when compared by preoperative symptom duration, demonstrated similar postoperative PROM scores. Patients with longer preoperative symptom duration had higher 12-week leg pain MCID achievement. These findings suggest that delayed time to surgery may not lead to inferior clinical outcomes in patients undergoing LLIF for degenerative conditions.

Impact of body mass index on PROMIS outcomes following lumbar decompression.

BACKGROUND: No studies have examined the impact of body mass index (BMI) on newer Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar decompression (LD). METHODS: Patients undergoing LD with preoperative PROMIS measures were stratified into four cohorts: normal (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25 kg/m2), overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2), obese I (30 ≤ BMI < 35 kg/m2), and obese II-III (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2). Demographics, perioperative characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were obtained. PROs of PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), PROMIS Anxiety (PROMIS-A), PROMIS Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), PROMIS Sleep Disturbance (PROMIS-SD), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Back Pain (VAS-BP), VAS Leg Pain (VAS-LP), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were collected at preoperative and up to 2-year postoperative time points. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was determined through comparison of previously established values. Comparison between cohorts were determined through inferential statistics. RESULTS: A total of 473 patients were identified, with stratification of 125 patients in the normal cohort, 161 in the overweight cohort, 101 in the obese I cohort, and 87 in the obese II-III cohort. Mean postoperative follow-up time was 13.51 ± 8.72 months. Higher BMI patients had higher operative times, longer postoperative length of stay, and greater narcotic consumption (p ≤ 0.001, all). Patients with higher BMI (obese I, obese II-III) reported inferior preoperative PROMIS-PF, VAS-BP, and ODI scores (p ≤ 0.003, all). Postoperatively, obese I-III cohorts demonstrated inferior PROMIS-PF, PHQ-9, VAS-BP, and ODI scores at final follow-up (p ≤ 0.016, all). However, patients demonstrated similar postoperative changes and MCID achievement regardless of preoperative BMI. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing lumbar decompression demonstrated similar postoperative improvement in physical function, anxiety, pain interference, sleep disturbance, mental health, pain, and disability outcomes independent of preoperative BMI. However, obese patients reported worse physical function, mental health, back pain, and disability outcomes at final postoperative follow-up. Patients with greater BMI undergoing lumbar decompression demonstrate inferior postoperative clinical outcomes.

Time to achievement of minimum clinically important difference after lumbar decompression.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine factors associated with delayed time to achieve minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in patients undergoing lumbar decompression (LD) for the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back, and VAS leg pain. METHODS: Patients undergoing LD with preoperative and postoperative ODI, VAS back, and VAS leg scores were retrospectively reviewed from April 2016 to January 2021. MCID values from previously established studies were utilized to determine MCID achievement. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis determined the time to achieve MCID. Hazard ratios from multivariable Cox regression were utilized to determine the preoperative factors predictive of MCID achievement. RESULTS: Three-hundred and forty-three patients were identified undergoing LD. Overall MCID achievement rates were 67.4% for ODI, 67.1% for VAS back, and 65.0% for VAS leg. The mean time in weeks for MCID achievement was 22.52 ± 30.48 for ODI, 18.90 ± 27.43 for VAS back, and 20.96 ± 29.81 for VAS leg. Multivariable Cox regression revealed active smoker status, preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), ODI, VAS Back, and VAS Leg (HR 1.03-2.14) as predictors of early MCID achievement, whereas an American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) classification of 2, Black ethnicity, workers' compensation, private insurance, and diagnosis of foraminal stenosis were predictors of late MCID achievement (HR 0.34-0.58). CONCLUSION: Most patients undergoing LD achieved MCID within 6 months of surgery. Significant factors for early MCID achievement were active smoking status and baseline PROs. Significant factors for late MCID achievement were ASA = 2, Black ethnicity, type of insurance, and foraminal stenosis diagnosis. These factors may be considered by surgeons in setting patient expectations.

Depressed patients with greater symptom duration before MIS-TLIF do not report inferior outcomes.

PURPOSE: Patients with preoperative depressive symptoms may demonstrate inferior patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The effect of preoperative symptom duration (SD) on PROs in this population has not been well-studied. We aim to assess the influence of preoperative SD on PROs in patients with low mental health scores prior to minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). METHODS: Patients who had undergone elective, primary MIS-TLIF with preoperative SF-12 MCS score below 45.6, a previously established threshold for depression, were selected. Patients were divided into matched lesser duration (LD; SD<365 days) and greater duration (GD; SD≥365 days) cohorts. PROs were collected preoperatively and at 6-week/12-week/6-month/1-year postoperative periods. PROs included PROMIS-PF/ODI/VAS back/VAS leg/SF-12 MCS. PROs were compared within and between groups. Rates of achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were compared between groups. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two patients were included after matching cohorts. Patients in the LD cohort demonstrated improvement in PROMIS-PF at 12-weeks/6-month/1-year, and ODI/VAS back/VAS leg/SF-12 MCS at all postoperative periods (p≤0.024, all). Patients in the GD cohort demonstrated improvement in PROMIS-PF at 12-weeks/6-month/1-year, and ODI/VAS back/VAS leg/SF-12 MCS at all postoperative periods (p≤0.013, all). There were no differences in PROs or MCID achievement between cohorts at any period. CONCLUSION: Patients with preoperative depressive symptoms undergoing MIS-TLIF, regardless of duration of preoperative symptoms, demonstrated improvements in physical function, disability, pain, and mental health domains. Patients with greater duration of preoperative symptoms did not report inferior outcomes at any period. Rates of clinically important improvements in all domains were favorable and similar between cohorts.

Preoperative predictors of prolonged hospitalization in patients undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

PURPOSE: We aim to examine the preoperative factors associated with increased postoperative length of stay in patients undergoing LLIF in the hospital setting. METHODS: Patient demographics, perioperative characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected from a single-surgeon database. Patients undergoing LLIF in the hospital setting were separated into postoperative LOS <48 h (H) and LOS ≥ 48H. Univariate analysis for preoperative characteristics was utilized to determine covariates for multivariable logistic regression. Multivariable logistic regression was then utilized to determine significant predictors of extended postoperative length of stay. Secondary univariate analysis of inpatient complications, operative, and postoperative characteristics were calculated to determine postoperative factors associated with prolonged hospitalization. RESULTS: Two-hundred and forty patients were identified with 115 patients' LOS ≥ 48H. Univariate analysis identified age/Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score/gender/insurance type/number of contiguous fused levels/preoperative PROMs of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back/VAS leg/Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-PF)/Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)/degenerative spondylolisthesis diagnoses/foraminal stenosis/central stenosis for multivariable logistic regression. Multivariable logistic regression calculated significant positive predictors of LOS ≥ 48H to be age/3-level fusion/preoperative ODI scores. Negative predictors of LOS ≥ 48H were the diagnosis of foraminal stenosis/preoperative PROMIS-PF/male gender. The secondary analysis determined that patients with longer operative time/estimated blood loss/transfusion/postoperative day 0 and 1 pain and narcotic consumption/complications of altered mental status/postoperative anemia/fever/ileus/urinary retention were associated with prolonged hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Older patients undergoing LLIF with greater preoperative disability and 3-level fusion were more likely to require prolonged hospitalization. Male patients with higher preoperative physical function and who were diagnosed with foraminal stenosis were less likely to require prolonged hospitalization.

The influence of cognitive behavioral therapy on lumbar spine surgery outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: As more patients undergo lumbar spine surgery, novel interventions may improve physical and mental health outcomes. Few studies summarize the benefit of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) among lumbar spine surgery patients. This study collects randomized control trial data to investigate the influence of CBT on patient reported outcomes among lumbar spine surgery patients. METHODS: Our study used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and a medical library expert assisted in searching PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar. We calculated standardized mean differences (SMD) to evaluate the effect size of CBT versus control groups with a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included seven studies with a total of 531 patients. The majority of included studies evaluated lumbar fusion, with preoperative CBT performed by physiotherapists. The largest effects were observed for overall quality of life (SMD = 0.55 [95% CI 0.05, 1.05], p < 0.001, I2 = 86.7%) and psychological outcomes (SMD = 0.61 [95% CI 0.28, 0.94], p < 0.001, I2 = 89.7%) though disability and pain outcomes also favored CBT intervention. Included studies demonstrated low overall bias but large heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated negligible study design differences and revealed moderators including CBT session frequency and final follow-up duration (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared to usual care or alternative therapy control arms, CBT delivered the most improvement with overall quality of life and psychological outcomes. Among appropriately selected patients, CBT could improve perioperative disability, pain, quality of life, and psychological health following lumbar spine surgery.

SPINE20 A global advocacy group promoting evidence-based spine care of value.

PURPOSE: The Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) Studies have estimated that low back pain is one of the costliest ailments worldwide. Subsequent to GBD publications, leadership of the four largest global spine societies agreed to form SPINE20. This article introduces the concept of SPINE20, the recommendations, and the future of this global advocacy group linked to G20 annual summits. METHODS: The founders of SPINE20 advocacy group coordinated with G20 Saudi Arabia to conduct the SPINE20 summit in 2020. The summit was intended to promote evidence-based recommendations to use the most reliable information from high-level research. Eight areas of importance to mitigate spine disorders were identified through a voting process of the participating societies. Twelve recommendations were discussed and vetted. RESULTS: The areas of immediate concern were "Aging spine," "Future of spine care," "Spinal cord injuries," "Children and adolescent spine," "Spine-related disability," "Spine Educational Standards," "Patient safety," and "Burden on economy." Twelve recommendations were created and endorsed by 31/33 spine societies and 2 journals globally during a vetted process through the SPINE20.org website and during the virtual inaugural meeting November 10-11, 2020 held from the G20 platform. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first time that international spine societies have joined to support actions to mitigate the burden of spine disorders across the globe. SPINE20 seeks to change awareness and treatment of spine pain by supporting local projects that implement value-based practices with healthcare policies that are culturally sensitive based on scientific evidence.

Preoperative patient activation is predictive of improvements in patient-reported outcomes following minimally invasive lumbar decompression.

PURPOSE: To determine whether there is an association between preoperative 10-Item Patient Activation Measure (PAM-10) scores and clinical outcomes following MIS LD. METHODS: Patients undergoing a primary MIS LD were retrospectively reviewed and stratified according to their preoperative PAM-10 scores: "low PAM," "moderate PAM," and "high PAM." Preoperative PAM score cohorts were tested for improvements in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-Item Short-Form Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back and leg pain using multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were included: 29 had a low PAM score, 32 had a moderate PAM score, and 28 had a high PAM score. Cohorts experienced similar preoperative VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, ODI, and SF-12 PCS. Patients with low PAM scores experienced a trend of higher pain scores throughout 6 months with VAS back pain being significant at 3 months and VAS leg pain being significant at 6-week and 3-month follow-up. Patients with lower PAM scores experienced a worse improvement in ODI at 6-week, 3-month, and 6-month timepoints. Lastly, patients with lower PAM scores demonstrated less improvement in SF-12 PCS at 3-month and 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Lower preoperative PAM scores were associated with worse improvement in clinical outcomes following MIS LD. Patients with lower PAM scores had diminished improvement in long-term patient-reported outcomes including ODI, SF-12, and VAS back and leg pain. Our investigation suggests that preoperative PAM assessments may be an effective tool to predict postoperative outcomes following MIS LD.

The identification of risk factors for increased postoperative pain following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

PURPOSE: To evaluate specific demographic and perioperative variables associated with higher inpatient pain scores following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). METHODS: Patients who underwent a single-level, primary MIS TLIF were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative outcomes were collected, and postoperative inpatient VAS pain scores were measured. Both bivariate and stepwise multivariate Poisson regressions with robust error variance were used to assess risk factors for average inpatient pain score ≥ 5.0. A final backward stepwise regression model was created using age, gender, smoking status, diabetes status, insurance status, BMI, comorbidity burden, pedicle screw laterality, operative time, and estimated blood loss. RESULTS: A total of 255 patients undergoing primary, single-level MIS TLIF were included. Age less than 50 years, workers' compensation insurance, preoperative VAS pain score ≥ 7, and operative duration ≥ 110 min were associated with greater postoperative pain. However, other variables such as gender, BMI, smoking status, comorbidity burden, diabetes status, and pedicle screw laterality were not associated with increased postoperative pain. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that younger age, workers' compensation, elevated preoperative pain scores, and longer operative times are independently associated with greater inpatient pain following TLIF. Surgeons can use this information to better assess which patients may require additional pain control following TLIF. Patient expectations of postoperative outcomes in regard to pain and recovery may also be better managed. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material. (paragraph). Then process the ppt slide as graphical image.