Long-term cardio-vascular risk assessment in chronic kidney disease and kidney transplanted patients following SARS-COV-2 disease: protocol for multi-center observational match controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) produced a pandemic since March 2020 by affecting more than 243 million people with more than 5 million deaths globally. SARS-CoV-2 infection is produced by binding to angiotensin-converting enzyme, which among other sites is highly expressed in the endothelial cells of the blood vessels, pericytes and the heart, as well as in renal podocytes and proximal tubular epithelial cells. SARS-CoV-2 and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are interconnected by risk factors association with an increased incidence of the disease and by determining de novo cardiac complications. At the same time, COVID-19 disease can lead to acute kidney injury directly, or due to sepsis, multi-organ failure and shock. Therefore, the pre-existence of both CVD and chronic kidney disease (CKD) is linked with a higher risk of severe disease and worse prognosis. METHODS: The main aim of this study is to assess the CV risk in a CKD (stage 3 to 5), dialysis and kidney transplanted population, following SARS-CoV-2 infection, with focus on the endothelial dysfunction as compared to a control group of matched patients. By using clinical evaluation, flow-mediated dilatation, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, intima-media thickness, echocardiographic parameters, lung ultrasound, bioimpedance spectroscopy and a series of novel biomarkers, the investigators will determine the long-term impact of this disease on CV and renal outcomes. DISCUSSION: This study will address the challenges and implications in long-term CV sequeale of COVID-19 and focus on a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms and possible therapeutic options. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Patient enrolment in the trial started in January 2021 and is expected to finish at the end of 2022. The study can be found on ClinicalTrials.gov database with NCT05125913 identifier. Registered on 18 November 2021 - Retrospectively registered.

The Impact of Frailty and Severe Cognitive Impairment on Survival Time and Time to Initiate Dialysis in Older Adults With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

Background and objectives Frailty and cognitive impairment significantly impact survival time and time to initiate dialysis in older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aims to evaluate the effects of frailty and cognitive impairment on these outcomes and determine the most effective assessment tool for predicting early dialysis initiation and short survival time. Materials and methods This prospective observational cohort study involved 240 patients aged ≥65 years with stage 4 or 5 CKD, recruited from a nephrology outpatient department (ambulatory care) between March 2020 and March 2021. Frailty was assessed using the Physical Frailty Phenotype (PFP), PRISMA-7, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and FRAIL scale. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The primary outcomes were time to initiate dialysis and survival time, with secondary outcomes including hospitalization rates, length of stay, and mortality after dialysis initiation. Results Frail patients only showed significantly shorter time to dialysis initiation when identified by the PFP and FRAIL scale (28.3 months for frail vs. 31.2 months for non-frail, p = 0.028; 26.9 months for frail vs. 30.9 months for non-frail, p = 0.038). The PFP, FRAIL, and CFS tools indicated significantly shorter survival times for frail patients compared to non-frail patients (26.8 months for frail vs. 30.6 months for non-frail, p = 0.003). Frailty is strongly correlated with severe cognitive impairment, as 45.5% of frail patients (according to the FRAIL scale) have dementia compared to 15.1% of non-frail patients (p<0.001). However, cognitive impairment did not significantly affect the time to dialysis initiation or survival time. Hospitalization rates and length of stay in the hospital were significantly higher only for frail patients identified by PRISMA-7, with a median hospital length of stay of 9.15 days for frail patients vs 6.37 days for non-frail patients (p = 0.044). Overall, 37.5% of the patients did not survive during the study follow-up, with frail patients having a higher mortality rate. Conclusion Frailty, mainly when assessed by PFP and FRAIL, is a significant predictor of early dialysis initiation and reduced survival time in older adults with advanced CKD. Cognitive impairment, while prevalent, did not independently predict these outcomes. Regular frailty screening should be incorporated into CKD management to tailor interventions and improve patient outcomes.

Associations between Kidney Disease Progression and Metabolomic Profiling in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients-A 3 Year Follow-Up Prospective Study.

Background: kidney transplant recipients are exposed to multiple pathogenic pathways that may alter short and long-term allograft survival. Metabolomic profiling is useful for detecting potential biomarkers of kidney disease with a predictive capacity. This field is still under development in kidney transplantation and metabolome analysis is faced with analytical challenges. We performed a cross-sectional study including stable kidney transplant patients and aimed to search for relevant associations between baseline plasmatic and urinary metabolites and relevant outcomes over a follow-up period of 3 years. Methods: we performed a cross-sectional study including 72 stable kidney transplant patients with stored plasmatic and urinary samples at the baseline evaluation which were there analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance in order to quantify and describe metabolites. We performed a 3-year follow-up and searched for relevant associations between renal failure outcomes and baseline metabolites. Between-group comparisons were made after classification by observed estimated glomerular filtration rate slope during the follow-up: positive slope and negative slope. Results: The mean estimated GFR (glomerular filtration rate) was higher at baseline in the patients who exhibited a negative slope during the follow-up (63.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. 55.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0,019). After log transformation and division by urinary creatinine, urinary dimethylamine (3.63 vs. 3.16, p = 0.027), hippuric acid (7.33 vs. 6.29, p = 0.041), and acetone (1.88 vs. 1, p = 0.023) exhibited higher concentrations in patients with a negative GFR slope when compared to patients with a positive GFR slope. By computing a linear regression, a significant low-strength regression equation between the log 2 transformed plasmatic level of glycine and the estimated glomerular filtration rate was found (F (1,70) = 5.15, p = 0.026), with an R2 of 0.069. Several metabolites were correlated positively with hand grip strength (plasmatic tyrosine with r = 0.336 and p = 0.005 and plasmatic leucine with r = 0.371 and p = 0.002). Other urinary metabolites were found to be correlated negatively with hand grip strength (dimethylamine with r = -0.250 and p = 0.04, citric acid with r = -0.296 and p = 0.014, formic acid with r = -0.349 and p = 0.004, and glycine with r = -0.306 and p = 0.01). Conclusions: some metabolites had different concentrations compared to kidney transplant patients with negative and positive slopes, and significant correlations were found between hand grip strength and urinary and plasmatic metabolites.

Clinical Implications and Risk Factors for Erectile Dysfunction in Kidney Transplant: A Single-Center Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects the great majority of people undergoing dialysis and also the majority of patients undergoing kidney transplantation. In this study, we investigated the degree of erectile dysfunction (ED), as well as its prevalence, contributory variables, and overall impact after renal transplant. METHODS: Adult male kidney transplant patients were the subject of an observational, non-interventional study that was conducted at a single center. Age, time and type of dialysis before transplantation, comorbidities, factors associated with cardiovascular risk, data on sexual history, physical examination, and laboratory results were among the clinical data we examined. In addition to gathering clinical and demographic characteristics, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire was used to evaluate sexual function. RESULTS: A total of 170 renal transplanted patients between 20 and 70 years old (mean age: 45.40±11.5) were included in this study. All of the patients had immunosuppressive treatment with a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) and had a normal glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The prevalence of sexual dysfunction increased with age (42.6% of patients under 40, 47.4% of patients in the 40-60 age group, and 78.9% of patients over 60). Mild, moderate, and severe ED was noted in 33.5%, 20.6%, and 10.6% of cases, respectively, and 51 (30%) patients reported having a normal sexual function. While calcium channel blockers (122 cases) were the most commonly used antihypertensive medication and chronic glomerulosclerosis (55.3%) was the most common cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) before transplantation, none of these variables appear to have affected the severity of erectile dysfunction. The only medications associated with sexual dysfunction were alpha-blockers and aspirin (75 mg) (p=0.026 and p=0.013, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although kidney transplantation has positive impacts on the quality of life, erectile dysfunction is a frequent condition among patients with renal transplants, and it has an increased frequency with age. In our study, it has been observed that only a small percentage of the research group had a normal sexual function, although most of the patients were young, and that alpha-blockers and aspirin (75 mg) are associated with erectile dysfunction.

Non-Traditional Non-Immunological Risk Factors for Kidney Allograft Loss-Opinion.

Rates of late allograft loss have improved slowly in the last decades. Well described traditional risk factors that influence allograft survival include cardiovascular events, rejection, infections and post-transplant neoplasia. Here, we critically evaluate the influence of several non-immunological, non-traditional risk factors and describe their impact on allograft survival and cardiovascular health of kidney transplant recipients. We assessed the following risk factors: arterial stiffness, persistent arteriovenous access, mineral bone disease, immunosuppressive drugs residual levels variability, hypomagnesemia, glomerular pathological alterations not included in Banff criteria, persistent inflammation and metabolic acidosis.