Association between first-week propofol administration and long-term outcomes of critically ill mechanically ventilated patients: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND & AIM: Propofol is commonly used in ICUs, but its long-term effects have not been thoroughly studied. In vitro studies suggest it may harm mitochondrial function, potentially affecting clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the association between substantial propofol sedation and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre cohort study of critically ill, mechanically ventilated (≥7 days) adults to compare patients who received a substantial dose of propofol (cumulative >500 mg) during the first week of ICU admission with those who did not. The primary outcome was the association between substantial propofol administration and 6-month mortality, adjusted for relevant covariates. Subanalyses were performed for administration in the early (day 1-3) and late (day 4-7) acute phases of critical illness due to the metabolic changes in this period. Secondary outcomes included tracheostomy need and duration, length of ICU and hospital stay (LOS), discharge destinations, ICU, hospital, and 3-month mortality. RESULTS: A total of 839 patients were enrolled, with 73.7 % receiving substantial propofol administration (substantial propofol dose group). Six-month all-cause mortality was 32.4 %. After adjusting for relevant variables, we found no statistically significant difference in 6-month mortality between both groups. There were also no significant differences in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that substantial propofol administration during the first week of ICU stay in the least sick critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients is safe, with no significant associations found with 6-month mortality, ICU or hospital LOS, differences in discharge destinations or need for tracheostomy.

Macronutrient intake and outcomes of ICU patients with refeeding hypophosphatemia.

BACKGROUND: Normocaloric vs. calorie-restricted feeding in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients with refeeding hypophosphatemia (RH) is associated with increased mortality rates. Until now, only total energy provision has been studied. Data on individual macronutrients (proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates) and clinical outcomes are lacking. This study evaluates associations between macronutrient intake among RH patients during the first week of ICU admission and clinical outcomes. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective observational cohort study was conducted among prolonged mechanically ventilated RH ICU patients. The primary outcome was the association of separate macronutrient intakes during the first week of ICU admission with 6-month mortality, adjusted for relevant variables. Other parameters included ICU-, hospital- and 3-month mortality, mechanical ventilation duration and length of ICU and hospital stay. Macronutrient intakes were subsequently analyzed during day 1-3 and day 4-7 of ICU admission. RESULTS: In total, 178 RH patients were included. Six-month all-cause mortality was 29.8%. Higher protein intake during days 1-3 of ICU admission (>0.71 g/kg∗day; HR 2.224, 95%CI 1.261-3.923, p = 0.006), higher age (HR 1.040, 95%CI 1.015-1.066, p = 0.002) and higher APACHE II scores on ICU admission (HR 1.086, 95%CI 1.034-1.140, p = 0.001) were associated with increased 6-month mortality. No differences in other outcomes were observed. CONCLUSION: High protein - not carbohydrate or lipid - intake during the first three days of ICU admission in patients with RH is associated with increased 6-month mortality, but not short-term outcomes. We hypothesize a time-dependent and dose-response relationship between protein intake and mortality in refeeding hypophosphatemia ICU patients, although additional (randomized controlled) studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Prospective observational cohort study of reached protein and energy targets in general wards during the post-intensive care period: The PROSPECT-I study.

INTRODUCTION: Nutrition plays an essential role in the recovery of critical illness. In the post-Intensive Care Unit (ICU) period, patients typically return to oral nutrition gradually. However, studies quantifying nutritional intake in the post-ICU hospitalization period are scarce and formal guidelines are lacking. This study aims to describe energy and protein intake in detail over the entire post-ICU hospitalization period and explore associations between protein intake and clinical outcomes. METHODS: A prospective observational single-center cohort study was conducted amongst post-ICU patients in general wards after a minimum ICU-stay of 72 h and who received (par)enteral feeding for ≥24 h in the ICU. Oral intake was assessed daily using food order lines and digital photography of meal leftovers. Other data, including amounts of (par)enteral nutrition, were collected from electronic medical records. The primary outcome was to identify energy and protein intake, and reached targets, in the post-ICU period. In addition, length of hospital stay after ICU discharge, readmission and mortality rates were compared between patients meeting protein targets or not. RESULTS: In total, 48 patients were included. Complete nutritional data of 34 patients were analyzed in the current study, adding up to a total number of 484 observational days, 1681 photos and 6634 food order lines. Inter-rater agreement was excellent (ICC 0.878). Overall mean energy and protein adequacy for all nutritional groups was 82.3% (SD 18.3) and 83.1% (SD 19.8). Only 51.2% of the study participants (n = 21) reached overall >90% of prescribed protein targets during their entire post-ICU ward stay. The lowest intake was seen in the patient group with exclusively oral intake (median protein adequacy 75.5%), whereas patients with (supplemental) enteral nutrition (EN) all met >90% of their protein targets. Prescribed targets were below recommendations, and prescribed calories and proteins were neither ordered nor consumed. Discontinuation of EN resulted in immediate marked drops in energy (44.1%) and protein intake (50.7%). Subsequently, patients needed up to six days to reach protein targets again. No differences in clinical outcomes were observed. CONCLUSION: Most patients did not meet energy and protein targets in the post-ICU hospitalization period. Nutrition performance was highly dependent on the route of nutrition and was lowest among patients with oral intake only (despite of food fortification strategies and/or oral nutritional supplements). The best intake was observed in patients receiving (supplemental) EN. However, cessation of EN posed an immediate nutritional risk. No differences in clinical outcomes were found in this study. Our findings stress the need for follow-up studies to close the gap with individualized nutritional support in the post-ICU period to reach protein and energy targets.

Video-assisted placement of enteral feeding tubes using the Integrated Real-Time Imaging System (IRIS)-technology in critically ill patients.

INTRODUCTION: In critically ill patients, nasogastric (NG) and nasojejunal (NJ) feeding tube placements are standard procedures. However, about 1.9% of blind tube insertions are malpositioned in the tracheopulmonary system, whereas guided procedures may result in a significant delay in nutritional delivery. Guided methods, such as Cortrak and fluoroscopy, have success rates of 82.6-85% and 93% respectively. The current study aims to investigate the performance of video-assisted feeding tube placement in the post-pyloric position using Integrated Real Time Imaging System (IRIS-) technology. METHODS: A prospective cohort study in patients requiring enteral feeding was conducted in a mixed medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU). The primary outcome was the post-pyloric placement of IRIS feeding tubes, as confirmed by X-ray. Secondary study objectives included gastric placement, ease of use and adverse events. RESULTS: Thirty-one feeding tubes were placed using IRIS-technology; one patient was excluded for analysis due to protocol violation. One procedure was terminated due to significant bleeding (epistaxis) and desaturation. Only eighteen (58%) feeding tubes were placed in post-pyloric position (including two past the ligament of Treitz). In subjects who needed post-pyloric placement due gastroparesis, IRIS was mostly unsuccessful (success rate of 25%). However, when gastric placement was the primary objective, 96.8% of tubes were correctly placed. During insertion, tracheal visualization occurred in 27% of cases, and the IRIS feeding tube was repositioned early in the procedure without causing patient harm. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time video-assisted post-pyloric feeding tube placement in critically ill ICU patients was only successful in 58% of cases and therefore currently cannot be recommended for this indication. However, a high success rate (96.8%) for gastric placement was achieved. IRIS tube placement detected tracheal misplacement immediately and had few adverse events.

Association of bioelectric impedance analysis body composition and disease severity in COVID-19 hospital ward and ICU patients: The BIAC-19 study.

BACKGROUND: The current severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic is unprecedented in its impact. It is essential to shed light on patient characteristics that predispose to a more severe disease course. Obesity, defined as a BMI>30 kg/m2, is suggested to be one of these characteristics. However, BMI does not differentiate between fat mass and lean body mass, or the distribution of fat tissue. The aim of the present study was to assess the body composition of COVID-19 patients admitted to the ward or the ICU and identify any associations with severity of disease. METHODS: We performed an observational cross-sectional cohort study. Bioelectric impedance analysis was conducted amongst all confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to the ward or ICU of our hospital in the Netherlands, between April 10 and 17, 2020. Body water measurements and derived values were recalculated to dry weight, using a standard ratio of extracellular water to total body water of 0.38. Data were compared between the ward and ICU patients, and regression models were used to assess the associations between baseline characteristics, body composition, and several indicators of disease severity, including a composite score composed of mortality, morbidity, and ICU admission. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were included, of which 30 in the ward and 24 in the ICU. The mean age was 67 years (95%-CI 64-71), and 34 (63%) were male. Mean BMI was 29.7 (95%-CI 28.2-31.1) kg/m2 and did not differ between groups. Body composition values were not independently associated with disease severity. In multiple logistic regression analyses, a low phase angle was associated with COVID-19 severity in the composite score (OR 0.299, p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: We found no significant associations between body composition, including fat mass, visceral fat area, and fat-free mass, and disease severity in our population of generally overweight COVID-19 patients. A lower phase angle did increase the odds of severe COVID-19. We believe that factors other than body composition play a more critical role in the development of severe COVID-19.