Shoot structure and photosynthetic efficiency along the light gradient in a Scots pine canopy.

We examined the effects of structural and physiological acclimation on the photosynthetic efficiency of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) shoots. We estimated daily light interception (DLI) and photosynthesis (DPHOT) of a number of sample shoots situated at different positions in the canopy. Photosynthetic efficiency (epsilon) was defined as the ratio of DPHOT to the potential daily light interception (DLI(ref)) defined as the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) intercepted per unit area of a sphere at the shoot location. To calculate DLI(ref), DLI and DPHOT, the radiation field surrounding a shoot in the canopy was first modeled using simulated directional distributions of incoming PAR on a clear and an overcast day, and estimates of canopy gap fraction in different directions provided by hemispherical photographs. A model of shoot geometry and measured data on shoot structure and photosynthetic parameters were used to simulate the distribution of PAR irradiance on the needle surface area of the shoot. Photosynthetic efficiency (epsilon) was separated into light-interception efficiency (epsilon(I) = DLI/DLI(ref)) and conversion efficiency (epsilon(PHOT) = DPHOT/DLI). This allowed us to quantify separately the effect of structural acclimation on the efficiency of photosynthetic light capture (epsilon(l)), and the effect of physiological acclimation on conversion efficiency (epsilon(PHOT)). The value of epsilon increased from the top to the bottom of the canopy. The increase was largely explained by structural acclimation (higher epsilon(I)) of the shade shoots. The value of epsilon(PHOT) of shade foliage was similar to that of sun foliage. Given these efficiencies, the clear-day value of DPHOT for a sun shoot transferred to shade was only half that of a shade shoot at its original position. The method presented here provides a tool for quantitatively estimating the role of acclimation in total canopy photosynthesis.

Response of LAI-2000 estimates to changes in plant surface area index in a Scots pine stand.

We assessed the accuracy with which the LAI-2000 plant canopy analyzer measured changes in leaf area index (LAI) and plant area index (PAI) in a 25-year-old Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stand. Stand density was 2100 stems ha(-1) and mean tree height was 8.7 m. Needle and branch areas of the stand were reduced progressively to zero by the stepwise removal of branches on all trees growing in a circular plot with a radius of 25 m. An LAI-2000 estimate was taken after each step reduction. The needle and branch surface areas removed at each step were estimated from direct measurements and were compared with the changes in the LAI-2000 estimates. Initially (before removal of branches), directly measured PAI was 5.2 (needles = 86%, branches = 8% and stems = 6%). The LAI-2000 estimate of total surface area was 66% of direct PAI and 77% of direct LAI. There was a nonlinear relationship between the LAI-2000 estimate and directly measured PAI, such that their ratio (equivalent to the clumping factor) increased from 0.66 to 1.05 with decreasing PAI. At the last measurement, when only stems were left, the LAI-2000 estimate agreed well with the direct measurement of PAI. The LAI-2000 underestimated the direct measurement of LAI at the first three steps when LAI was > 2 and the proportion of woody area was small (< 20%). However, because the LAI-2000 estimate included stem and branch areas, it overestimated the direct measurement of LAI at the last three measurements when the proportion of woody area was large (> 20%).

Variation in the ratio of shoot silhouette area to needle area in fertilized and unfertilized Norway spruce trees.

We compared the range and variation in shoot silhouette area to projected leaf area ratio (SPAR) in fertilized and unfertilized (control) Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) trees. We measured SPAR for several view directions of 169 shoots at different depths in the crown of fertilized and control trees. There was an increase in SPAR with depth in the crown in both control and fertilized trees. In the fertilized trees, however, mean SPAR was larger overall, the increase with depth in the crown was steeper, and there was a larger variation in SPAR with inclination and rotation angle of the shoot (relative to the view direction). In particular, shoots in the lower crown of fertilized trees were rotationally asymmetrical ("flat") and had high values of the maximum ratio of shoot silhouette area to projected leaf area (SPAR(max)). Differences in SPAR between fertilized and control trees were explained by changes in shoot structure in response to fertilization and shading. Shoots of fertilized trees were larger and had more needle area than shoots of control trees. However, the ratio of needle area to shoot size was smaller in fertilized trees than in control trees, implying less within-shoot shading and, consequently, a larger SPAR. Also, the increase in SPAR with increased shading (depth in the crown) could be explained by a decrease in the ratio of needle area to shoot size. In addition, because fertilized trees had more needle area than control trees, the effect of shading at a given depth in the crown was more pronounced in fertilized trees than in control trees.

Dependence of light interception efficiency of Scots pine shoots on structural parameters.

The ratio of shoot silhouette area to total needle area (STAR) is one means of quantifying the light interception efficiency of a coniferous shoot. The silhouette area (or STAR) of a shoot depends on various structural characteristics of the shoot, and also varies with the direction of the shoot relative to the direction of radiation (sun angle). The mean STAR taken over all directions in space is the mean ratio of shoot silhouette area to total needle area in an isotropic radiation field. It also represents a mean STAR with respect to a spherical shoot orientation. In this study, equations for the relationship between mean STAR and easily measurable shoot characteristics were developed. The STAR values in different directions were determined from photographically measured shoot silhouette areas. Mean STAR varied between 0.079 and 0.308, and averaged 0.146. A clear increase in mean STAR with age was found. The material consisted of 305 Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) shoots from Sweden and Finland, representing shoots of different age and a wide variation in site fertility. The needle area density in the shoot cylinder, together with the diameters of the shoot cylinder and the twig explained 87% of the variation in mean STAR.

Photosynthesis of a Scots pine shoot: a comparison of two models of shoot photosynthesis in direct and diffuse radiation fields.

Two models of shoot photosynthesis, the needle surface element model (SEM) and needle volume element model (VEM), were tested against empirical data obtained from measurements of the photosynthetic response of twelve Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) shoots in direct and diffuse radiation. The models assume that shoot photosynthesis is obtained as the integrated response of either all needle surface area elements (SEM) or all needle volume elements (VEM) of the shoot. The models differ in that needles are treated as optically black in SEM, whereas in VEM radiation penetrates into the needle. The photosynthetic response of a surface/volume element was described as a Blackman-type curve and the distributions of irradiance on the elements were derived by computer simulation, based on a model of shoot geometry. The parameters (initial slope and maximum rate) of the Blackman-curve of an element were estimated iteratively by the method of least squares, i.e., by minimizing the residual sum of squares of simulated and measured rates of shoot photosynthesis. The parameter estimation was done separately for direct and diffuse radiation, and the models were evaluated based on the notion that, for the "ideal" model, the estimated parameter values should be the same in direct and diffuse radiation. Both models produced shoot photosynthesis curves that agreed well with measurements, but there was a discrepancy in the estimated parameter values, indicating that differences in the photosynthetic response of shoots in direct and diffuse radiation could not be explained solely on the basis of the simulated irradiance distributions. The agreement was, however, much better for the volume element model, which accounts for penetration of radiation into the needles.