Cardiovascular Safety of Testosterone-Replacement Therapy.

BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular safety of testosterone-replacement therapy in middle-aged and older men with hypogonadism has not been determined. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, noninferiority trial, we enrolled 5246 men 45 to 80 years of age who had preexisting or a high risk of cardiovascular disease and who reported symptoms of hypogonadism and had two fasting testosterone levels of less than 300 ng per deciliter. Patients were randomly assigned to receive daily transdermal 1.62% testosterone gel (dose adjusted to maintain testosterone levels between 350 and 750 ng per deciliter) or placebo gel. The primary cardiovascular safety end point was the first occurrence of any component of a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke, assessed in a time-to-event analysis. A secondary cardiovascular end point was the first occurrence of any component of the composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or coronary revascularization, assessed in a time-to-event analysis. Noninferiority required an upper limit of less than 1.5 for the 95% confidence interval of the hazard ratio among patients receiving at least one dose of testosterone or placebo. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) duration of treatment was 21.7±14.1 months, and the mean follow-up was 33.0±12.1 months. A primary cardiovascular end-point event occurred in 182 patients (7.0%) in the testosterone group and in 190 patients (7.3%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.17; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Similar findings were observed in sensitivity analyses in which data on events were censored at various times after discontinuation of testosterone or placebo. The incidence of secondary end-point events or of each of the events of the composite primary cardiovascular end point appeared to be similar in the two groups. A higher incidence of atrial fibrillation, of acute kidney injury, and of pulmonary embolism was observed in the testosterone group. CONCLUSIONS: In men with hypogonadism and preexisting or a high risk of cardiovascular disease, testosterone-replacement therapy was noninferior to placebo with respect to the incidence of major adverse cardiac events. (Funded by AbbVie and others; TRAVERSE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03518034.).

Efficacy, tolerability, and bone density outcomes of elagolix with add-back therapy for endometriosis-associated pain: twelve months of an ongoing randomized phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Elagolix, an approved oral treatment for endometriosis-associated pain, has been associated with hypoestrogenic effects when used as monotherapy. Hormonal add-back therapy has the potential to mitigate these effects. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy, tolerability, and bone density outcomes of elagolix 200 mg twice daily with 1 mg estradiol/0.5 mg norethindrone acetate (add-back) therapy once daily compared with placebo in premenopausal women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. STUDY DESIGN: This ongoing, 48-month, phase 3 study consists of a 12-month double-blind period, with randomization 4:1:2 to elagolix 200 mg twice daily with add-back therapy, elagolix 200 mg twice daily monotherapy for 6 months followed by elagolix with add-back therapy, or placebo. The coprimary endpoints were proportion of patients with clinical improvement (termed "responders") in dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain at month 6. We report 12-month results on efficacy of elagolix with add-back therapy vs placebo in reducing dysmenorrhea, nonmenstrual pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and fatigue. Tolerability assessments include adverse events and change from baseline in bone mineral density. RESULTS: A total of 679 patients were randomized to elagolix with add-back therapy (n=389), elagolix monotherapy (n=97), or placebo (n=193). Compared with patients randomized to placebo, a significantly greater proportion of patients randomized to elagolix with add-back therapy responded with clinical improvement in dysmenorrhea (62.8% vs 23.7%; P≤.001) and nonmenstrual pelvic pain (51.3% vs 36.8%; P≤.001) at 6 months. Compared with placebo, elagolix with add-back therapy produced significantly greater improvement from baseline in 7 hierarchically ranked secondary endpoints including dysmenorrhea (months 12, 6, 3), nonmenstrual pelvic pain (months 12, 6, 3), and fatigue (months 6) (all P<.01). Overall, the incidence of adverse events was 73.8% with elagolix plus add-back therapy and 66.8% with placebo. The rate of severe and serious adverse events did not meaningfully differ between treatment groups. Study drug discontinuations associated with adverse events were low in patients receiving elagolix with add-back therapy (12.6%) and those receiving placebo (9.8%). Patients randomized to elagolix monotherapy exhibited decreases from baseline in bone mineral density of -2.43% (lumbar spine), -1.54% (total hip), and -1.78% (femoral neck) at month 6. When add-back therapy was added to elagolix at month 6, the change from baseline in bone mineral density remained in a similar range of -1.58% to -1.83% at month 12. However, patients who received elagolix plus add-back therapy from baseline exhibited little change from baseline in bone mineral density (<1% change) at months 6 and 12. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, elagolix with add-back therapy resulted in significant, clinically meaningful improvement in dysmenorrhea, nonmenstrual pelvic pain, and fatigue at 6 months that continued until month 12 for both dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain. Elagolix with add-back therapy was generally well tolerated. Loss of bone mineral density at 12 months was greater in patients who received elagolix with add-back therapy than those who received placebo. However, the change in bone mineral density with elagolix plus add-back therapy was <1% and was attenuated compared with bone loss observed with elagolix monotherapy.

Chronic opioid use and complication risks in women with endometriosis: A cohort study in US administrative claims.

BACKGROUND: Women with endometriosis are prescribed opioids for pain relief but may be vulnerable to chronic opioid use given their comorbidity profile. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted in the Clinformatics™ DataMart database between 2006 and 2017 comparing women aged 18-50 years with endometriosis (N = 36 373) to those without (N = 2 172 936) in terms of risk of chronic opioid use, opioid dependence diagnosis, and opioid overdose. Chronic opioid use was defined as ≥120 days' supply dispensed or ≥10 fills of an opioid during any 365-day interval. Among women with endometriosis, we evaluated factors associated with higher risk of chronic opioid use and quantified the risk of complications associated with the use of opioids. RESULTS: Women with endometriosis were at greater risk for chronic opioid use (OR: 3.76; 95%CI: 3.57-3.96), dependence (OR: 2.73, 95%CI: 2.38-3.13) and overdose (OR: 4.34, 95%CI: 3.06-6.15) compared to women without. Chronic users displayed dose escalation and increase in days supplied over time, as well as co-prescribing with benzodiazepines and sedatives. Approximately 34% of chronic users developed constipation, 20% experienced falls, and 8% reported dizziness. Among endometriosis patients, women in younger age groups, those with other comorbidities associated with pain symptoms, as well as those with depression or anxiety were at a higher risk of developing chronic opioid use. CONCLUSIONS: Women with endometriosis had a four times greater risk of chronic opioid use compared to women without. Multimorbidity among these patients was associated with the elevated risk of chronic opioid use and should be taken into account during treatment selection.

Reductions in endometriosis-associated pain among women treated with elagolix are consistent across a range of baseline characteristics reflective of real-world patients.

BACKGROUND: Elagolix is an oral, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, that significantly reduces dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) in women with moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain. METHODS: Data were pooled from two 6-month, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies (Elaris Endometriosis [EM]-I and II) in which 2 doses of elagolix were evaluated (150 mg once daily and 200 mg twice daily). Pooled data from > 1600 women, aged 18-49, were used to evaluate the efficacy of elagolix and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in prespecified subgroups of women with various baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 1686 women treated, 1285 (76.2%) completed the studies. The percentages of women with clinically meaningful reductions in dysmenorrhea and NMPP were generally consistent by subgroup. Significant treatment by subgroup interaction was demonstrated for dysmenorrhea response in baseline analgesic use (p < 0.01) and previous history of pregnancy (p < 0.05) subgroups, and for NMPP response in the baseline NMPP score (p < 0.05) and history of pregnancy (p < 0.05) subgroups. Patient-reported reduction in pain at month 3 was significant across all subgroups taking elagolix 200 mg BID, and significant across most subgroups with elagolix 150 mg QD. Women across subgroups experienced improvement within each domain of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30), although significant treatment by subgroup interactions were observed in several categories. CONCLUSIONS: Elagolix was effective in reducing dysmenorrhea and NMPP, and improving HRQoL, compared with placebo across numerous subgroups of women with various baseline characteristics, covering a broad segment of the endometriosis disease and patient types. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01620528 ; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01931670 .

Testosterone concentrations and risk of cardiovascular events in androgen-deficient men with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Whether androgen deficiency among men increases the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events or is merely a disease marker remains a subject of intense scientific interest. OBJECTIVES: Among male subjects in the AIM-HIGH Trial with metabolic syndrome and low baseline levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol who were randomized to niacin or placebo plus simvastatin, we examined the relationship between low baseline testosterone (T) concentrations and subsequent CV outcomes during a mean 3-year follow-up. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of men with available baseline plasma T concentrations, we examined the relationship between clinical/demographic characteristics and T concentrations both as a continuous and dichotomous variable (<300 ng/dL ["low T"] vs. ≥300 ng/dL ["normal T"]) on rates of pre-specified CV outcomes, using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among 2118 male participants in whom T concentrations were measured, 643 (30%) had low T and 1475 had normal T concentrations at baseline. The low T group had higher rates of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, elevated body mass index, metabolic syndrome, higher blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c, and triglyceride levels, but lower levels of both low-density lipoprotein and HDL-cholesterol, and a lower rate of prior myocardial infarction (MI). Men with low T had a higher risk of the primary composite outcome of coronary heart disease (CHD) death, MI, stroke, hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome, or coronary or cerebral revascularization (20.1%) compared with the normal T group (15.2%); final adjusted HR 1.23, P = .07, and a higher risk of the CHD death, MI, and stroke composite endpoint (11.8% vs. 8.2%; final adjusted HR 1.37, P = .04), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis, there was an association between low baseline testosterone concentrations and increased risk of subsequent CV events in androgen-deficient men with established CV disease and metabolic syndrome, particularly for the composite secondary endpoint of CHD death, MI, and stroke. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: In this AIM-HIGH Trial post hoc analysis of 2118 men with metabolic syndrome and low HDL-cholesterol with available baseline plasma testosterone (T) samples, 643 males (30%) had low T (mean: 229 ng/dL) and 1475 (70%) had normal T (mean: 444 ng/dL) concentrations. The "low T" group had a 24% higher risk of the primary 5-component endpoint (20.1%) compared with the normal T group (15.2%); final adjusted HR 1.23, P = .07). There was also a 31% higher risk of the secondary composite endpoint: coronary heart disease death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (11.8% vs. 8.2%, final adjusted HR 1.37, P = .04) in the low vs. normal T group, respectively.

Achieving clinically meaningful response in endometriosis pain symptoms is associated with improvements in health-related quality of life and work productivity: analysis of 2 phase III clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis-related pain symptoms have a negative impact on health-related quality of life and productivity. In fact, as endometriosis-related symptom severity and the number of symptoms experienced increases, health-related quality of life decreases. Dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain are prominent symptoms experienced by women with endometriosis and were shown to have improved with the oral, nonpeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, elagolix. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this post hoc analysis was to address the question of if patients show a clinical response (in dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain), do they also have improvements in health-related quality of life and in productivity? STUDY DESIGN: This post hoc analysis used data from the Elaris Endometriosis-I and Elaris Endometriosis-II phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled studies. A surgical diagnosis of endometriosis (in the past 10 years), premenopausal, aged 18-49 years, and moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain were among the inclusion criteria for both trials. Women self-reported pain daily using a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 3 (severe pain); daily pain was assigned to either dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain based on self-reported bleeding on that particular day. In addition, their self-reported endometriosis-associated pain must have been an average of moderate or severe during the month leading to baseline for inclusion in the trial program. Patients were characterized as achieving a clinical response for dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain (ie, responder or nonresponder), which was defined as women who did not have an increase in analgesic use and who met the pain reduction score threshold at month 3. Pain reduction score thresholds were defined separately for dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain in the trial using receiver-operating characteristics analysis. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Endometriosis Health Profile-30; work productivity was assessed using the Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire. RESULTS: Women enrolled in Elaris Endometriosis-I (n = 871) and Elaris Endometriosis-II (n = 815) were included in this analysis. Patients with a clinical response during treatment to dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain also experienced a meaningful improvement in all domains of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 at month 3. Patients who did not show a dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain clinical response at month 3 did not exhibit mean improvements in Endometriosis Health Profile-30 domain scores that indicate an Endometriosis Health Profile-30 responder. Productivity improved among dysmenorrhea clinical responders. In the Elaris Endometriosis-I study, clinical responders lost a total of 5.9 hours compared with a total of 13.0 hours for nonresponders of employment-related work at month 3 (P < .0001). Among women in the Elaris Endometriosis-II study, a total of 4.1 hours and 10.4 employment-related hours were lost at month 3 for dysmenorrhea responders vs nonresponders (P < .001). Similar results were obtained when analyzed by non-enstrual pelvic pain responder status. CONCLUSION: Women with moderate to severe endometriosis-related pain, who are clinical responders based on dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain, also experience significant and clinically meaningful improvement in health-related quality of life and productivity as measured by the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 and Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire, respectively.

Clinically Meaningful Reduction in Dyspareunia Is Associated With Significant Improvements in Health-Related Quality of Life Among Women With Moderate to Severe Pain Associated With Endometriosis: A Pooled Analysis of Two Phase III Trials of Elagolix.

BACKGROUND: Dyspareunia experienced by women diagnosed with endometriosis is associated with a decreased health-related quality of life (HRQoL). AIM: We evaluated the relationship of clinically meaningful improvements in dyspareunia with HRQoL changes among women with endometriosis. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of pooled data from the phase III ELARIS-I and ELARIS-II clinical trials. Women aged 18-49 years with moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain were randomized to placebo, elagolix 150 mg once daily, or elagolix 200 mg twice daily. HRQoL was measured using the validated Endometriosis Health Profile-30 questionnaire (EHP-30), consisting of 5 core domains and a sexual intercourse modular domain. Dyspareunia was ranked 0-3 (none, mild, moderate, or severe) or not applicable using a daily eDiary and averaged monthly. A woman with a clinically meaningful dyspareunia response (dyspareunia responder) was defined as a woman with a reduction from the baseline in dyspareunia score greater than or equal to a predetermined cutoff while maintaining stable/decreased analgesic use. OUTCOMES: Dyspareunia response impact on EHP-30 scores was determined at 3 and 6 months using multivariate linear regression controlling for age, baseline EHP-30 scores, and dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain symptom severity. RESULTS: Analysis included 1,368 women with a mean age of 32.2 years. Dyspareunia responders had significant improvements vs non-responders in all adjusted mean EHP-30 domain scores at months 3 and 6 (control and powerlessness: -17.8 and -18.5; emotional well-being: -10.0 and -10.4; pain: -15.3 and -15.7; self-image: -11.4 and -12.8; social support: -14.3 and -14.0; and sexual intercourse: -18.1 and -19.7; all P < .0001). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dyspareunia improvements are associated with both personal and psychological benefits. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This study involved a large sample of women from a well-defined patient population to provide statistical power in evaluating the results. As such, the findings may not be generalizable in a real-world setting. Although the perception of dyspareunia and its severity and the associated effect on HRQoL was subjective, the use of a large patient sample was used to minimize potential issues with this limitation. CONCLUSION: Clinically meaningful responses in dyspareunia are associated with improvements across multiple HRQoL domains among women with endometriosis. Agarwal SK, Soliman AM, Pokrzywinski RM, et al. Clinically Meaningful Reduction in Dyspareunia Is Associated with Significant Improvements in Health-Related Quality of Life Among Women with Moderate to Severe Pain Associated with Endometriosis: A Pooled Analysis of Two Phase III Trials of Elagolix. J Sex Med 2020;17:2427-2433.

Patient-completed or symptom-based screening tools for endometriosis: a scoping review.

PURPOSE: The objective of this review was to evaluate existing patient-completed screening questionnaires and/or symptom-based predictive models with respect to their potential for use as screening tools for endometriosis in adult women. Validated instruments were of particular interest. METHODS: We conducted structured searches of PubMed and targeted searches of the gray literature to identify studies reporting on screening instruments used in endometriosis. Studies were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria that followed the PICOS (population, intervention, comparison, outcomes, study design) framework. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies were identified, of which 10 described measures for endometriosis in general, 2 described measures for endometriosis at specific sites, and 4 described measures for deep-infiltrating endometriosis. Only 1 study evaluated a questionnaire that was solely patient-completed. Most measures required physician, imaging, or laboratory assessments in addition to patient-completed questionnaires, and several measures relied on complex scoring. Validation for use as a screening tool in adult women with potential endometriosis was lacking in all studies, as most studies focused on diagnosis versus screening. CONCLUSIONS: This literature review did not identify any fully validated, symptom-based, patient-reported questionnaires for endometriosis screening in adult women.

Impact of demographic and clinical factors on elagolix plus add-back therapy effects on patient-reported nonbleeding symptoms in women with heavy menstrual bleeding and uterine fibroids: a post hoc analysis of data from two clinical trials.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of elagolix plus add-back therapy (estradiol [1 mg] and norethindrone acetate [0.5 mg] once daily) on patient-reported nonbleeding symptoms and menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids (UFs) across different subpopulations. Design: Post hoc analysis of two phase 3 clinical trials-Elaris UF-1 and UF-2. Setting: A total of 76 (UF-1) and 77 (UF-2) US clinical sites. Patients: Women (N = 591) with UFs and heavy menstrual bleeding. Interventions: Elagolix (300 mg) twice daily with add-back therapy (the indicated dose for UF-associated heavy menstrual bleeding) vs. placebo for 6 months. Main Outcome Measures: "Very much improved" or "much improved" change in nonbleeding symptoms (abdominal/pelvic pain, abdominal/pelvic pressure/cramping, back pain, and abdominal bloating) and menstrual bleeding measured using a Patient Global Impression of Change scale. Improvements were assessed in subpopulations stratified using baseline characteristics (age, race [self-reported], body mass index, and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics fibroid classification). Results: Across subpopulations, differences favored elagolix plus add-back therapy (vs. placebo) for most symptoms at month 1 and all symptoms at months 3 as well as 6. In patients with characteristics commonly associated with high disease burden (age >40 years, Black/African American), those treated with elagolix plus add-back therapy reported significantly greater improvements vs. placebo at months 1-6 (P<.05) for all nonbleeding and bleeding symptoms (P≤.05). Conclusions: Premenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding and UFs receiving elagolix plus add-back therapy experienced significant improvements in nonbleeding as well as bleeding symptoms from months 1-6, regardless of baseline characteristics. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT02654054 and NCT02691494.

Effect of Testosterone on Progression From Prediabetes to Diabetes in Men With Hypogonadism: A Substudy of the TRAVERSE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The effect of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) in men with hypogonadism on the risk of progression from prediabetes to diabetes or of inducing glycemic remission in those with diabetes is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of TRT in preventing progression from prediabetes to diabetes in men with hypogonadism who had prediabetes and in inducing glycemic remission in those with diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nested substudy, an intention-to-treat analysis, within a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial (Testosterone Replacement Therapy for Assessment of Long-Term Vascular Events and Efficacy Response in Hypogonadal Men [TRAVERSE]) was conducted at 316 trial sites in the US. Participants included men aged 45 to 80 years with hypogonadism and prediabetes or diabetes who were enrolled in TRAVERSE between May 23, 2018, and February 1, 2022. Intervention: Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 1.62% testosterone gel or placebo gel until study completion. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the risk of progression from prediabetes to diabetes, analyzed using repeated-measures log-binomial regression. The secondary end point was the risk of glycemic remission (hemoglobin A1c level <6.5% [to convert to proportion of total hemoglobin, multiply by 0.01] or 2 fasting glucose measurements <126 mg/dL [to convert to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0555] without diabetes medication) in men who had diabetes. Results: Of 5204 randomized participants, 1175 with prediabetes (mean [SD] age, 63.8 [8.1] years) and 3880 with diabetes (mean [SD] age, 63.2 [7.8] years) were included in this study. Mean (SD) hemoglobin A1c level in men with prediabetes was 5.8% (0.4%). Risk of progression to diabetes did not differ significantly between testosterone and placebo groups: 4 of 598 (0.7%) vs 8 of 562 (1.4%) at 6 months, 45 of 575 (7.8%) vs 57 of 533 (10.7%) at 12 months, 50 of 494 (10.1%) vs 67 of 460 (14.6%) at 24 months, 46 of 359 (12.8%) vs 52 of 330 (15.8%) at 36 months, and 22 of 164 (13.4%) vs 19 of 121 (15.7%) at 48 months (omnibus test P = .49). The proportions of participants with diabetes who experienced glycemic remission and the changes in glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels were similar in testosterone- and placebo-treated men with prediabetes or diabetes. Conclusions and Relevance: In men with hypogonadism and prediabetes, the incidence of progression from prediabetes to diabetes did not differ significantly between testosterone- and placebo-treated men. Testosterone replacement therapy did not improve glycemic control in men with hypogonadism and prediabetes or diabetes. These findings suggest that TRT alone should not be used as a therapeutic intervention to prevent or treat diabetes in men with hypogonadism. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03518034.

Phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of elagolix in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Objective: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of elagolix, a GnRH antagonist, to treat polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Design: A phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Setting: Outpatient and academic medical centers. Patients: One hundred fourteen women with PCOS (aged 18-35 years, body mass index 18.5-38 kg/m2). Interventions: Patients were randomized 2:2:2:2:2:3 to elagolix (25 mg twice daily, 50 mg once daily, 75 mg twice daily, 150 mg once daily, and 300 mg twice daily) or placebo. Main Outcome Measures: The primary endpoint was menstrual cycle normalization (defined as 2 menstrual cycles 21-35 days in length during the 4-month treatment period). The secondary endpoint was change from baseline to week 1 in the area under the luteinizing hormone (LH) serum concentration-time curve (AUC). Additional endpoints included change from baseline in serum hormone levels. Results: No significant improvement in restoring normal menstrual cycles was observed in treated subjects; 3 of 114 patients met the primary endpoint. Six patients experienced progesterone elevations indicative of ovulation. The LH levels decreased from baseline to week 16, and LH AUC was significantly reduced from baseline to week 1 in all elagolix treatment groups (P<.1 vs placebo). Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels generally remained stable through week 16, with no significant differences in FSH AUCs. Serum estradiol and testosterone concentrations were consistently reduced from baseline in all elagolix dose groups compared with placebo. Adverse event rates were similar across treatment groups. Conclusions: Elagolix treatment did not normalize the ovulatory cycle in patients with PCOS. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT03951077.

Low-Dose Elagolix for the Treatment of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Patients With Uterine Leiomyomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of elagolix 150 mg once-daily monotherapy in patients with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomas. METHODS: A phase 4, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-month treatment study was conducted in premenopausal patients aged 18-51 years with heavy menstrual bleeding (defined as menstrual blood loss greater than 80 mL during one menstrual cycle) associated with uterine leiomyomas. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive elagolix 150 mg once daily or placebo. The primary endpoint was reduction in menstrual blood loss volume to less than 80 mL at the final month and at least a 50% reduction in menstrual blood loss volume from baseline to the final month. RESULTS: Of 82 randomized patients, 54 received elagolix 150 mg and 28 received placebo. With elagolix, 49.4% (95% CI 35.1-63.8%) of patients met the primary endpoint, compared with 23.3% (95% CI 7.2-39.5%) of patients who received placebo ( P =.035). Statistically significant differences between elagolix and placebo in mean reduction of menstrual blood loss from baseline were seen as early as month 1 ( P <.05 for months 1-3 and 5). Significantly more patients receiving elagolix experienced suppression of bleeding compared with placebo ( P =.036). Greater improvements were observed in the elagolix group (vs placebo) in the proportion of patients with amenorrhea, in hemoglobin concentrations, and in health-related quality of life. No serious or severe adverse events were reported for elagolix, compared with 7.1% of participants in the placebo group having serious adverse events (coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19] n=1, enlarged uvula n=1). Three patients (5.6%) discontinued elagolix due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: Elagolix 150 mg once-daily monotherapy significantly improved heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomas compared with placebo in premenopausal patients. Treatment with elagolix 150 mg once daily was generally well-tolerated in this study, with no new safety signals. FUNDING SOURCE: AbbVie Inc. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03886220.

Development and Validation of ICD-10-CM-based Algorithms for Date of Last Menstrual Period, Pregnancy Outcomes, and Infant Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Validation studies of algorithms for pregnancy outcomes based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes are important for conducting drug safety research using administrative claims databases. To facilitate the conduct of pregnancy safety studies, this exploratory study aimed to develop and validate ICD-10-CM-based claims algorithms for date of last menstrual period (LMP) and pregnancy outcomes using medical records. METHODS: Using a mother-infant-linked claims database, the study included women with a pregnancy between 2016-2017 and their infants. Claims-based algorithms for LMP date utilized codes for gestational age (Z3A codes). The primary outcomes were major congenital malformations (MCMs) and spontaneous abortion; additional secondary outcomes were also evaluated. Each pregnancy outcome was identified using a claims-based simple algorithm, defined as presence of ≥ 1 claim for the outcome. Positive predictive values (PPV) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 586 medical records were sought and 365 (62.3%) were adjudicated, including 125 records each for MCMs and spontaneous abortion. Last menstrual period date was validated among maternal charts procured for pregnancy outcomes and fewer charts were adjudicated for the secondary outcomes. The median difference in days between LMP date based on Z3A codes and adjudicated LMP date was 4.0 (interquartile range: 2.0-10.0). The PPV of the simple algorithm for spontaneous abortion was 84.7% (95% CI 78.3, 91.2). The PPV for the MCM algorithm was < 70%. The algorithms for the secondary outcomes pre-eclampsia, premature delivery, and low birthweight performed well, with PPVs > 70%. CONCLUSIONS: The ICD-10-CM claims-based algorithm for spontaneous abortion performed well and may be used in pregnancy studies. Further algorithm refinement for MCMs is needed. The algorithms for LMP date and the secondary outcomes would benefit from additional validation in a larger sample.

Prostate Safety Events During Testosterone Replacement Therapy in Men With Hypogonadism: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The effect of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) on the risk of prostate cancer and other adverse prostate events is unknown. Objective: To compare the effect of TRT vs placebo on the incidences of high-grade prostate cancers (Gleason score ≥4 + 3), any prostate cancer, acute urinary retention, invasive prostate procedures, and pharmacologic treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with hypogonadism. Design, Setting, and Participants: This placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized clinical trial enrolled 5246 men (aged 45-80 years) from 316 US trial sites who had 2 testosterone concentrations less than 300 ng/dL, hypogonadal symptoms, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) or increased CVD risk. Men with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations greater than 3.0 ng/mL and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) greater than 19 were excluded. Enrollment took place between May 23, 2018, and February 1, 2022, and end-of-study visits were conducted between May 31, 2022, and January 19, 2023. Intervention: Participants were randomized, with stratification for prior CVD, to topical 1.62% testosterone gel or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary prostate safety end point was the incidence of adjudicated high-grade prostate cancer. Secondary end points included incidence of any adjudicated prostate cancer, acute urinary retention, invasive prostate surgical procedure, prostate biopsy, and new pharmacologic treatment. Intervention effect was analyzed using a discrete-time proportional hazards model. Results: A total of 5204 men (mean [SD] age, 63.3 [7.9] years) were analyzed. At baseline, the mean (SD) PSA concentration was 0.92 (0.67) ng/mL, and the mean (SD) IPSS was 7.1 (5.6). The mean (SD) treatment duration as 21.8 (14.2) months in the TRT group and 21.6 (14.0) months in the placebo group. During 14 304 person-years of follow-up, the incidence of high-grade prostate cancer (5 of 2596 [0.19%] in the TRT group vs 3 of 2602 [0.12%] in the placebo group; hazard ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 0.39-6.77; P = .51) did not differ significantly between groups; the incidences of any prostate cancer, acute urinary retention, invasive surgical procedures, prostate biopsy, and new pharmacologic treatment also did not differ significantly. Change in IPSS did not differ between groups. The PSA concentrations increased more in testosterone-treated than placebo-treated men. Conclusions and Relevance: In a population of middle-aged and older men with hypogonadism, carefully evaluated to exclude those at high risk of prostate cancer, the incidences of high-grade or any prostate cancer and other prostate events were low and did not differ significantly between testosterone- and placebo-treated men. The study's findings may facilitate a more informed appraisal of the potential risks of TRT. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03518034.

A cardiovascular safety study of LibiGel (testosterone gel) in postmenopausal women with elevated cardiovascular risk and hypoactive sexual desire disorder.

Evaluation of the safety of hormonal preparations for the treatment of female sexual dysfunction is important to assess the benefit-to-risk profile of these drugs and has been strongly encouraged by the Food and Drug Administration. LibiGel (Biosante Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lincolnshire, IL), a low-dose testosterone gel, is under development for the treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in oophorectomized women. To evaluate the long-term effects of LibiGel on risk for cardiovascular (CV) events, breast cancer, and general safety, a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study using a novel adaptive design to optimize sample size and power is being conducted. The primary end point of the BioSante LibiGel Safety Study (BLISS) is a composite of CV events including death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, coronary revascularization, hospitalized unstable angina, and venous thromboembolic events. Breast cancer is a coprimary end point. Postmenopausal women (both surgically and naturally) with HSDD and increased risk for CV events will be followed up for up to 5 years postrandomization with an interim data analysis for regulatory approval after the last woman enrolled has been on therapy for at least 12 months. Determination of the number of subjects to enroll is based on an adaptive design that uses interim data to estimate the predictive probability of study success. In agreement with the Food and Drug Administration, LibiGel will be declared safe if the upper limit of the 97.2% CI of the hazard ratio is ≤2.0 or the upper bound of the 97.2% CI for the absolute difference between CV event rates per 100 person-years is ≤1% and the observed hazard ratio is ≤2.0. The BLISS study will define the CV safety profile of low-dose testosterone therapy in the formulation of LibiGel for postmenopausal women with HSDD, and the trial design may provide a paradigm for studies that aim to document long-term safety when the proposed outcome under study is an uncommon adverse event.

Responsiveness and thresholds for clinically meaningful changes in worst pain numerical rating scale for dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain in women with moderate to severe endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility, responsiveness, and thresholds for clinically meaningful change of a numerical rating scale for worst pain associated with dysmenorrhea (NRS-DYS) and nonmenstrual pelvic pain (NRS-NMPP) in women with moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain. DESIGN: Analysis of data from two phase III randomized clinical trials (EM-I [NCT01620528] and EM-II [NCT01931670]). SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Premenopausal women ages 18-49 years with moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain. INTERVENTION(S): Participants in both trials were randomized 3:2:2 to receive placebo, elagolix 150 mg once daily, or elagolix 200 mg twice daily for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): NRS-DYS and NRS-NMPP. RESULT(S): EM-I enrolled 871 women and EM-II enrolled 815 women. For patients with a global impression of improvement at month 3, the least-squares mean change between baseline and month 3 was -3.6 (EM-I and EM-II) for NRS-DYS and -1.9 (EM-I) and -2.0 (EM-II) for NRS-NMPP. Standard errors of measurement were 2.99 (EM-I) and 2.86 (EM-II) for NRS-DYS and 1.74 (EM-I) and 1.71 (EM-II) for NRS-NMPP. Baseline half standard deviations were 0.78 (EM-I) and 0.85 (EM-II) for NRS-DYS and 0.92 (EM-I) and 0.96 (EM-II) for NRS-NMPP. Based on these results, clinically meaningful changes were defined as a reduction of 4 points for NRS-DYS and 2 points for NRS-NMPP. CONCLUSION(S): This study demonstrated the utility and responsiveness of separate numerical rating scales to assess worst pain for dysmenorrhea and NMPP in women with moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain and identified initial thresholds for clinically meaningful change.

Psychometric assessment of the PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 6a in women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a common problem in women of reproductive age and has impacts on health-related quality of life and productivity. Fatigue is an important part of the burden of endometriosis, it is not often included as an endpoint in clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: The study assessed the psychometric properties of the PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 6a in women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. METHODS: In a phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (NCT01620528), women aged 18-49 years with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-related pain were randomized to elagolix 150 mg once daily, elagolix 200 mg twice daily, or placebo for 6 months. PROMIS Fatigue and dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) scores were assessed at baseline and months 1, 3, and 6, and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) was assessed at months 1, 3, and 6. Reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability), construct validity (convergent and known groups validity), and responsiveness were evaluated. RESULTS: The analysis included 871 women, mean age 31.5 years. Internal consistency supported a single concept (Cronbach's alpha 0.93). For the 238 patients with no change in PGIC at month 1, the intraclass correlation coefficient for the PROMIS Fatigue T-score was 0.7 and paired t-test statistically significant (2.84, p = 0.0049). Correlations with other measures were expected to be fairly low as concepts were not redundant. The PROMIS Fatigue discriminated among known groups with mean scores of 55.3, 62.3, and 65.8 at month 3 (PGIC improvement, no change, worsening, respectively). Statically significant discrimination, and change score responsiveness, were seen using clinically relevant anchors (dysmenorrhea and NMPP) at months 3 and 6 between responders and non-responders. Anchor-based (PGIC) responsiveness showed significant improvement from baseline to months 3 and 6 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS Fatigue has good reliability, validity, and responsiveness in women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain.

Psychometric assessment of the health-related productivity questionnaire (HRPQ) among women with endometriosis.

Objective: Endometriosis impacts health-related quality of life. The objective was to assess the validity and responsiveness of the Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire, version 2 (HRPQ). Methods: Outcome measures (Endometriosis Health Profile-30; pain scales; and global assessment) from Elaris Endometriosis I and II clinical trials (EM-I, EM-II) were used. Validity testing using Cohen's conventions was assessed. Known-groups validity was evaluated using generalized linear models comparing clinical responders, assessment of change, and the endometriosis impact. The effect size (ES) and standard error of means were calculated to evaluate responsiveness. Results: 871 and 815 women participated in the EM-I and EM-II trials. The total hours of lost work among employed women were 16.5 (±11.4) hours per week for EM-I and 15.2 (±11.3) for EM-II. The total hours of lost work among the household group were 8.3 (±8.7) hours for EM-I and 8.4 (±9.0) hours for EM-II. HRPQ discriminated between all known group assessments tested. Correlations for the HRPQ compared to other measures were small to moderate. Moderate to large ES was observed and the ability of the HRPQ to detect change was strong using patient-reported impressions. Conclusion: The HRPQ is a valid and responsive tool for evaluating patient-reported productivity at work and at home among women with endometriosis.

Responsiveness Evaluation and Recommendation for Responder Thresholds for Endometriosis Health Profile-30: Analysis of Two Phase III Clinical Trials.

Objective: To evaluate the responsiveness of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) and ascertain score changes that are indicative of response to treatment. A post hoc analysis of two Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials among women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain (Elaris Endometriosis I and II [EM-I and EM-II]). Materials and Methods: EHP-30 core items and sexual relationship module were administered at day 1, month 3 (M3), and month 6 (M6) to monitor patient-reported impacts of endometriosis-related pain. A seven-response level Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) was administered at M3 and M6. Dysmenorrhea (DYS), nonmenstrual pelvic pain (NMPP), and dyspareunia (DYSP) were collected using a daily diary. Three psychometric approaches, "triangulation," were used to suggest responder thresholds for the EHP-30 domains. The three approaches were anchor- and distribution-based analyses and use of clinically relevant indicators (DYS, NMPP, DYSP). Results: EM-I and EM-II enrolled 871 and 815 women, respectively. All EHP-30 domains improved during the trials (M3, M6). Differences (p < 0.001) for all EHP-30 domains were found among the PGIC responses at M3 and M6, indicating greater change was associated with greater EHP-30 improvements. Large effect sizes were noted for all EHP-30 domains (EM-I range -0.59 to -1.80; EM-II range -0.52 to -1.59). EHP-30 thresholds of meaningful change ranged from -20 to -35, with greater changes indicating greater improvement in health status. Conclusion: Responder thresholds by EHP-30 domain are recommended to evaluate treatment efficacy. Clinicians can individualize goals of treatment by EHP-30 domain and track changes using the EHP-30.

Estimating the Effect of Elagolix Treatment for Endometriosis on Postmenopausal Bone Outcomes: A Model Bridging Phase III Trials to an Older Real-World Population.

Elagolix, a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist, is used in premenopausal women with endometriosis. There is a risk of bone loss with elagolix, but the long-term effects of BMD loss later in life cannot be directly assessed and has not been quantified. To address this gap in knowledge, this study indirectly estimated the impact of elagolix on postmenopausal fracture risk. BMD change in premenopausal women with endometriosis treated with elagolix was modeled from the phase III program data (elagolix group) and used to simulate treatment effects on (fracture risk assessment tool estimated) 10-year risks of hip and major osteoporotic fracture in women ages 50 to 79 years from the 2005-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES; N = 2303). Change in the proportion of women reaching risk-based antiosteoporotic treatment thresholds was also estimated. For elagolix versus NHANES, median 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture was 4.73% versus 4.70% in women ages 50 to 59 years, 7.03% versus 6.97% in women ages 60 to 69 years, and 10.83% versus 10.68% in women ages 70 to 79 years. Median 10-year risk of hip fracture in these same groups was 0.19% versus 0.18% for women ages 50 to 59 years, 0.51% versus 0.49% for women 60 to 69 years, and 2.22% versus 2.14% for women 70 to 79 years. The proportion of women reaching risk-based antiosteoporotic treatment thresholds caused by elagolix 150 mg daily for 12 months was 0.36% higher at age 50 to 59 years, 0.23% at age 60 to 69 years, and 1.79% at age 70 to 79 years. The number needed to harm was 643 for one additional hip fracture and 454 for one additional major osteoporotic fracture. Results were similar for elagolix 200 mg twice a day for 3 months. In the modeled scenarios, elagolix had minimal impact on long-term risk of fracture and reaching risk-based treatment thresholds. © 2020 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research © 2020 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.