Comparison of EUS-guided ablation and surgical resection for nonfunctioning small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a propensity score-matching study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Treatment strategies for small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) <2 cm in size are still under debate. The feasibility and safety of EUS-guided ethanol ablation (EUS-EA) have been demonstrated. However, sample sizes in previous studies were small with no comparative studies on surgery. Therefore, we aimed to compare the safety and long-term outcomes of EUS-EA with those of surgery for the management of nonfunctioning small PNETs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with PNETs who were managed by EUS-EA (from 2011 to 2018) and surgery (from 2000 to 2018) at Asan Medical Center. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to increase comparability. The primary outcome was early and late major adverse events (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) after treatment. Secondary outcomes were 10-year overall (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates, length of hospital stay, and development of endocrine pancreatic insufficiency. RESULTS: Of all patients, 97 and 188 patients were included in the EUS-EA and surgery groups, respectively. PSM created 89 matched pairs. EUS-EA was associated with a significantly lower rate of early major adverse events (0% vs 11.2%, P = .003). Late major adverse events occurred more frequently after surgery, with no significant difference between groups (3.4% vs 10.1%, P = .07). Both treatment modalities showed comparable 10-year OS and DSS rates. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the EUS-EA group (4 days vs 14.1 days, P < .001), and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency was less common after EUS-EA than after surgery (33.3% vs 48.6%, P = .121). CONCLUSIONS: EUS-EA had fewer adverse events and a shorter hospital stay with similar OS and DSS rates compared with surgery, suggesting that EUS-EA may be a preferred alternative to surgical resection in selected patients with nonfunctioning small PNETs.

Long-term clinical outcomes of a fully covered self-expandable metal stent for refractory pancreatic strictures in symptomatic chronic pancreatitis: An 11-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) has recently been applied in the management of chronic pancreatitis patients with pancreatic strictures. However, related long-term effects remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of FCSEMS placement in chronic pancreatitis patients with refractory strictures. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed our database for patients undergoing FCSEMS placement for refractory pancreatic strictures between September 2008 and December 2010. The main outcomes were technical, radiological, and clinical success, as well as recurrence and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were included. Technical success was achieved in all patients. The median FCSEMS indwelling time was 3.2 months (interquartile range [IQR], 3.0-4.9 months). Radiological success was achieved in all patients (complete, n = 2; partial, n = 33). Clinical success was achieved in 29 patients (82.9%; complete analgesic cessation, n = 19; analgesic reduction >50%, n = 11). During the median follow-up of 136 months, (IQR, 85.8-145.5 months), eight patients (22.9%) experienced recurrence. The median interval from stent removal to recurrence was 24.9 months (IQR, 11.3-30.3 months). Biliary obstruction, an early adverse event, occurred in two patients (5.7%); the late adverse event stent-induced de novo stricture was observed in 17 patients (48.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that an FCSEMS is effective for relieving refractory strictures in chronic pancreatitis. However, FCSEMSs were associated with stent-induced de novo strictures in nearly half of the patients. Prospective studies are required to further evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of FCSEMSs in chronic pancreatitis.

Clinical utility of directional eFLOW compared with contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound for assessing the vascularity of pancreatic and peripancreatic masses.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) can be used for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions by evaluating microvascular circulation and patterns of contrast enhancement. However, routine use of CEH-EUS is limited by its high cost, the lack of contrast agent availability and the absence of expertise with this technique. Directional eFLOW (D-eFLOW) (Aloka Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was introduced as a new high-definition modality that detects blood flow in microvessels. Because it uses built-in functions, it entails no additional cost and reduces time for examination. The present study compared the usefulness of D-eFLOW and CEH-EUS for differential diagnosis of pancreatic and peripancreatic lesions. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 130 patients who underwent EUS and D-eFLOW examinations from January 2016 to March 2020 to evaluate pancreatic and peripancreatic masses. RESULTS: All 130 patients underwent D-eFLOW and CEH-EUS examinations. Histological diagnoses were confirmed in 130 patients by EUS-FNA and/or surgery. D-eFLOW and CEH-EUS showed good correlation in evaluating the vascularity of pancreatic and peripancreatic tumors (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In evaluating the characteristics of tumorous lesions, vascularity detected by D-eFLOW showed good correlation with enhancement patterns of CEH-EUS. D-eFLOW can be considered a good alternative to CEH-EUS in diagnosing pancreatic and peripancreatic masses.

A comparison between 25-gauge and 22-gauge Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic and peripancreatic masses: a randomized non-inferiority study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and fine-needle biopsy (FNB) are the current standard of care for sampling pancreatic and peripancreatic masses. Recently, a 22G EUS-FNB needle with Franseen geometry was developed, and this device was also introduced in a 25G platform. We compared the performance of the 25G and 22G Franseen needles for EUS-guided sampling of pancreatic and peripancreatic solid masses. METHODS: We conducted a parallel-group randomized non-inferiority trial at a tertiary-care center from November 2018 to May 2019. The primary outcome was the quality of the histologic core assessed using the Gerke score. The optimal histologic core is indicated by a Gerke score of 4 or 5, which enables optimal histologic interpretation. The overall diagnostic accuracy and adverse event rate were also evaluated. RESULTS: 140 patients were enrolled and randomized (1:1) to the 25G and 22G groups. Tissue acquisition by EUS-FNB was successful in all patients. The optimal histologic core procurement rate was 87.1 % (61/70) for the 25G needle vs. 97.1 % (68/70) for the 22G; difference -10 % (95 % confidence interval -17.35 % to -2.65 %). High quality specimens were more frequently obtained in the 22G group than in the 25G group (70.0 % [49/70] vs. 28.6 % [20 /70], respectively; P < 0.001). The overall diagnostic accuracy did not differ between the groups (97.4 % for 25G vs. 100 % for 22G). CONCLUSIONS: The 25G Franseen needle was inferior to the 22G needle in histologic core procurement. Therefore, for cases in which tissue architecture is pivotal for diagnosis, a 22G needle, which procures relatively higher quality specimens than the 25G needle, should be used.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic papillectomy for early-stage cancer in duodenal ampullary adenoma: Comparison to surgical treatment.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: While recent evidences support endoscopic resection as curative in ampullary tumors with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, only small case series have reported endoscopic management of early-stage ampullary cancer; thus, radical surgery remains the only accepted treatment modality. We evaluated the long-term outcomes of early ampullary adenocarcinoma administered endoscopic management. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of 715 patients undergoing endoscopic papillectomy (EP) in a single tertiary medical center in Korea in 2004-2016. We included patients incidentally diagnosed with early-stage adenocarcinoma (Tis and T1a, American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition) after EP and with >2 years of follow-up data and analyzed their demographics, histopathologic data, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Among 70 total patients in the EP-alone (n = 42) and subsequent surgery (n = 28) groups, we observed no significant differences in demographics or tumor size (2.0 ± 0.6 vs 1.9 ± 0.5 cm, P = 0.532), histologic grade (P = 0.077), tumor extent (P = 1.000), lymphovascular invasion (2.4% vs 10.7%, P = 0.344), or complete resection rates (57.1% vs 57.1%, P = 1.000) between groups. Adenocarcinoma lesions were larger in the subsequent surgery group (0.7 ± 0.5 vs 1.1 ± 0.7 cm, P = 0.002). The EP-alone group received more additional ablative treatment (42.9% vs 14.3%, P = 0.024). The 5-year disease-free and cancer-free survival rates were 79.1% vs 87.4% (P = 0.111) and 93.5% versus 87.4% (P = 0.726), respectively, and did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic papillectomy followed by endoscopic surveillance showed long-term outcomes comparable with surgical resection for early ampullary cancer and maybe curable alternative to surgery for incidentally found early-stage ampullary cancer, especially in patients unfit for or refusing radical surgery.

Effects of pancreatic resection for benign pancreatic neoplasms on pancreatic volume and endocrine function: A long-term computed tomography-based study.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic surgery may result in changes in pancreatic volume and endocrine function. The effects of pancreatic resection for benign neoplasms on pancreatic volume and endocrine function have not been established yet. This study aimed to investigate the long-term results of different pancreatic surgeries for benign pancreatic neoplasms on pancreatic volume and endocrine function. METHODS: The medical records of 30 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and 30 patients who underwent left-sided pancreatectomy(LP) for benign pancreatic neoplasms between 2005 and 2012 were reviewed. The changes in pancreatic volume after pancreatic surgery were assessed using multi-detector row computed tomography volumetry. Endocrine pancreatic function was evaluated on the basis of fasting glucose level or oral glucose tolerance test result. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 91.3 months (interquartile range, 75.7-119.1 months). Reduction in pancreatic volume after surgery was more pronounced in patients who underwent PD than in those who underwent LP (median percentage of volume reduction, 23.8% vs 5.1%, p < .001). Multivariable analysis of prognostic factors for endocrine insufficiency showed that PD to be significant factor. (HR 3.87, 95% CI 1.12-14.66, p = .037). CONCLUSIONS: The surgical methods for benign pancreatic neoplasms affect the reduction in pancreatic volume. Furthermore, the methods of pancreatic surgery were associated with the risk of endocrine insufficiency. Further studies with a large number of patients are warranted to evaluate the association between the degree of volume reduction and the development of endocrine insufficiency.

A novel method of biopsy for indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures: tube-assisted biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC) provides an accurate diagnosis of indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures. However, the procedure is expensive and can be performed using only limited accessories. Therefore, we devised a novel tube-assisted biopsy (TAB) technique and evaluated its feasibility, diagnostic yield, and safety for indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures. METHODS: The medical records of patients with indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures who underwent TAB between September 2018 and July 2019 were reviewed. We assessed the technical success rate, adverse event rate, sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of TAB in differentiating malignant from benign lesions. RESULTS: TABs were performed in 16 patients: 12 had biliary strictures; four had pancreatic strictures. The technical success rate was 93.7 % (15/16), and the sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of TAB were 87.5 %, 100 %, and 93.7 %, respectively. No serious adverse events occurred either during or after the procedure in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: TAB has an acceptable accuracy for the diagnosis of indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures and may represent a useful diagnostic method in patients where SOC cannot be implemented.

Durability and outcome of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticoduodenostomy using a fully covered metal stent for segregated right intrahepatic duct dilatation.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Segregated right intrahepatic duct dilatation (IHD) results from complete obstruction of the biliary tract proximal to the hilar level. We aimed to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) hepaticoduodenostomy (HDS) in segregated right IHD. METHODS: Consecutive patients who had undergone EUS-guided HDS with a fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) in an academic tertiary center were recruited. All patients had segregated right hepatic duct and failed drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Demographic data, endoscopic findings, procedure details, and outcome data were extracted from a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2017, there were 35 patients who had undergone EUS-guided HDS with a median follow-up duration of 169 (3-2091) days. Malignancy accounted for 71.4% of the ductal segregation, followed by surgical complication (17.1%). Technical and clinical success rate was 97.1% and 80%, respectively. Early adverse event (AE) happened in seven patients (20%), two of them required endoscopic reintervention, and no percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) or surgery was performed because of AE. The median stent patency duration was 331 (3-1202) days. The median duration of fistula tract keeping was 1280 (3-1280) days. There was no significant difference in terms of patency rate with respect to whether the underlying pathology was benign or malignant (P = 0.776). EUS-guided HDS for right posterior sectional duct segregation was associated with higher 3-month stent patency rate when compared with right anterior sectional duct (79.1% vs 38.1%, P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided HDS with an FCSEMS appears to be a safe and effective treatment as a viable alternative option to PTBD after failed ERCP. It creates a durable and reliable fistula tract for permanent access to an isolated ductal system, and this application deserves more attention.

The number of wire placement in the pancreatic duct and metal biliary stent as risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Many post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) risk factors, including pancreatic duct cannulation, have been identified; however, whether the number of repeated and unintentional wire placements (WPs) in the pancreatic duct during wire-guided cannulation affects PEP risk is unknown. We aimed to identify the effects of repeated WP in the pancreatic duct and other potential risk factors on PEP incidence. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 877 patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We examined potential patient-related and procedure-related risk factors, and PEP incidence by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (3.9%) had PEP. Univariable analysis revealed younger age, malignant common bile duct or ampulla of Vater stricture, two or more episodes of WPs in the pancreatic duct, and metal biliary stent as risk factors for PEP. Following multivariable analysis, two or more episodes of WPs in the pancreatic duct and metal biliary stent remained in the final model. PEP did not increase significantly in case of a one episode of WP (4.0%) compared with no episode of WP in the pancreatic duct (2.7%). However, patients with two episodes of WPs had 8.0% incidence and three or more episodes of WPs had 14.3%. CONCLUSIONS: A WP in the pancreatic duct and a metal biliary stent were associated with increased PEP incidence in patients undergoing ERCP. As for the pancreatic duct wire cannulation, two or more WPs considerably increased PEP incidence. This suggests that preventive measures or alternative procedures might be considered in patients with such cases during and after ERCP.

Endoscopic features and clinical outcomes of colorectal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colorectal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma is a rare disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and endoscopic features of colorectal MALT lymphoma. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with colorectal MALT lymphoma at Asan Medical Center from 2002 to 2016 were eligible. Medical records were reviewed to investigate clinical features and treatment outcomes. Endoscopic pictures were assessed to characterize the endoscopic features of colorectal MALT lymphoma. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were enrolled. The median age was 60 years (interquartile range, 55-71), and 21 (41%) were men. Twenty-six patients (51%) were asymptomatic. Forty-four patients (86%) were in early disease stages, namely Lugano stages I, II, and IIE. Endoscopic appearances were classified as 4 distinct types: subepithelial tumor type (26 patients, 51%), polyposis type (10 patients, 20%), epithelial mass type (7 patients, 14%), and ileitis type (8 patients, 16%). The rectum (20 patients, 39%) was the most common location, followed by the ileocecal area (15 patients, 30%). An initial endoscopic impression of lymphoma was made in only 7 patients. Forceps biopsy sampling as the initial tissue acquisition method could histologically diagnose MALT lymphoma in 28 of 35 patients (80%). Polypectomy as the initial histologic diagnosis could diagnose MALT lymphoma in 16 of 16 patients. Progression-free and overall survival rates at 5 years were 92% and 94%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal MALT lymphomas show various endoscopic appearances, complicating the endoscopic suspicion of colorectal MALT lymphoma. The prognosis of colorectal MALT lymphoma was excellent.

Efficacy and Safety of Fully Covered Self-Expanding Metal Stents for Malignant Esophageal Obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Malignant dysphagia can result in poor nutritional status with severe weight loss. Rapid relief from dysphagia can be achieved with esophageal self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs), a minimally invasive method. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of SEMSs for malignant dysphagia. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2015, 119 patients with malignant dysphagia underwent esophageal SEMS insertion with endoscopic assistance. Their demographics and clinical outcomes were collected. Factors associated with stent-related complications and patient survival were evaluated. All data were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of the 119 patients was 64.9 ± 11.6 years, and 25 (21%) were female. Seventy-five patients (63.0%) had squamous carcinoma, majority of which were located in the lower thoracic esophagus (n = 42), followed by middle thoracic esophagus (n = 19) and upper esophagus (n = 10). Eighty patients (67.2%) underwent SEMS insertion at diagnosis. Technical and clinical success rates were 99.2 and 89.9%, respectively. Complications occurred in 47 patients (39.5%); the most common complication was migration (36.3%), followed by pain and obstruction. The median stent patency time was 145 days (95% confidence interval 55.19-234.81 days). Gastric cancer (odds ratio 3.51, 95% confidence interval 1.21-10.15; p = 0.021) and a 20-mm-wide stent (odds ratio 2.922, 95% confidence interval 1.237-6.904; p = 0.015) were risk factors for complications. CONCLUSIONS: SEMSs are effective in palliation of malignant dysphagia. However, stent-related complications should be borne in mind, particularly in patients with gastric cancer with esophageal invasion and with larger width stents.

Metabolic factors affect the occurrence of colorectal neoplasm on surveillance colonoscopies.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although metabolic factors such as obesity and hyperlipidemia were reported to be associated with high prevalence of colorectal neoplasm (CRN), their influence on the occurrence of CRN at surveillance colonoscopy has not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to analyze the association between metabolic factors and the risk of CRN at the time of surveillance colonoscopy. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 1792 asymptomatic subjects (average 52.1 years, 1233 male) who underwent screening and follow-up surveillance colonoscopies. Fasting glucose level, fasting insulin level, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), lipid profile, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, and colonoscopic findings at the time of baseline screening were analyzed to find any associations with the occurrence of CRN at the time of surveillance colonoscopy. RESULTS: The median interval between screening and surveillance colonoscopies was 3.34 years. The 3- and 5-year cumulative CRN incidences were 22.3% and 54.8%, respectively. Several metabolic factors such as hypertension, waist circumference, fasting insulin, fasting glucose, HbA1c, and triglyceride were associated with the occurrence of CRN in univariate analysis. Age, current alcohol drinker status, and high-risk colonoscopy findings at baseline remained independent risk factors for CRN occurrence in multivariate analysis. High waist circumference was also an independent risk factor (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.04; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic factors, especially waist circumference, affect CRN occurrence at the time of surveillance colonoscopy. The surveillance colonoscopy interval may be optimized based on metabolic factors and screening colonoscopy findings.

Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for adenocarcinoma in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) is a technically difficult procedure. We analyzed the long-term clinical outcomes of ESD for adenocarcinoma in the EGJ to determine the feasibility of this treatment approach. METHODS: Subjects who underwent ESD for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma between December 2004 and December 2011 were eligible for this study. Clinical features and treatment outcomes were retrospectively reviewed using medical records. RESULTS: A total of 88 subjects underwent ESD at our institute. The median patient age was 66 years (interquartile range [IQR] 59-71 years), and the male-to-female ratio was 10.0:1. The median tumor diameter was 20 mm (IQR 14-25 mm), and the median procedure time was 40 min (IQR 30-60 min). Adverse events occurred in nine patients (10.2 %), namely bleeding (n = 6) and suspicious microperforation (n = 3). En bloc, complete, and curative resection rates were 88.6 % (78/88), 83.0 % (73/88), and 60.2 % (53/88), respectively. In multivariate analysis, undifferentiated histology (P = 0.009) and elevated lesions (P = 0.011) were factors associated with noncurative resection. During a median follow-up period of 68.5 months, local tumor recurrence was detected in two patients (2.4 %), and the 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were 96.6 and 100.0 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ESD for the treatment of EGJ cancer may be an effective and safe treatment strategy based on favorable long-term outcomes.

Probability of high-risk colorectal neoplasm recurrence based on the results of two previous colonoscopies.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for the surveillance colonoscopy interval are largely based on the most recent colonoscopy findings. AIM: We aimed to evaluate differences in the probability of high-risk neoplasm recurrence according to the two previous colonoscopy findings. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study from a tertiary-care center. A total of 4,143 subjects who underwent three or more colonoscopies for screening or surveillance purposes from January 2001 to December 2011 were enrolled. We compared the probability of high-risk neoplasm detection on follow-up colonoscopies after the second colonoscopy based on risk categories in both the second and first colonoscopies. RESULTS: At the final colonoscopy, 370 participants (8.9 %) had high-risk neoplasms. In patients with a normal second colonoscopy, the probability of high-risk neoplasm recurrence was different between those with normal, low-risk, and high-risk findings at the first colonoscopy (3.8, 6.8, and 17.7 %, respectively). The hazard ratio of a high-risk neoplasm at the final colonoscopy for patients with a normal second and low-risk first colonoscopy over a normal second and normal first colonoscopy was 3.07 (95 % CI 2.04-4.64, P < 0.001). The hazard ratio of high-risk neoplasm at the final colonoscopy for patients with a normal second and high-risk first colonoscopy over a normal second with normal first colonoscopy was 7.88 (95 % CI 4.90-12.67, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of high-risk colorectal neoplasm recurrence differs according to the two previous colonoscopy findings. Therefore, surveillance intervals could be adjusted not just only by the most recent colonoscopy findings but also by considering two previous colonoscopy findings.

Surgical Removal of a Huge Common Bile Duct Stone.

A 65-year-old woman was diagnosed with an 8 cm large common bile duct stone and multiple stones in both intrahepatic ducts because of abnormal liver function tests. After a multidisciplinary approach, surgical removal was considered, and primary closure after laparoscopic removal of the common bile duct stone was performed. The patient recovered without complications and was discharged on the fourth postoperative day. Endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones is the standard treatment, but surgical removal through laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is also a safe and effective treatment method for such huge gallstones.