Unexplained diarrhoea in HIV-1 infected individuals.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal symptoms, in particular diarrhoea, are common in non-treated HIV-1 infected individuals. Although various enteric pathogens have been implicated, the aetiology of diarrhoea remains unexplained in a large proportion of HIV-1 infected patients. Our aim is to identify the cause of diarrhoea for patients that remain negative in routine diagnostics. METHODS: In this study stool samples of 196 HIV-1 infected persons, including 29 persons with diarrhoea, were examined for enteropathogens and HIV-1. A search for unknown and unexpected viruses was performed using virus discovery cDNA-AFLP combined with Roche-454 sequencing (VIDISCA-454). RESULTS: HIV-1 RNA was detected in stool of 19 patients with diarrhoea (66%) compared to 75 patients (45%) without diarrhoea. In 19 of the 29 diarrhoea cases a known enteropathogen could be identified (66%). Next to these known causative agents, a range of recently identified viruses was identified via VIDISCA-454: cosavirus, Aichi virus, human gyrovirus, and non-A non-B hepatitis virus. Moreover, a novel virus was detected which was named immunodeficiency-associated stool virus (IASvirus). However, PCR based screening for these viruses showed that none of these novel viruses was associated with diarrhoea. Notably, among the 34% enteropathogen-negative cases, HIV-1 RNA shedding in stool was more frequently observed (80%) compared to enteropathogen-positive cases (47%), indicating that HIV-1 itself is the most likely candidate to be involved in diarrhoea. CONCLUSION: Unexplained diarrhoea in HIV-1 infected patients is probably not caused by recently described or previously unknown pathogens, but it is more likely that HIV-1 itself plays a role in intestinal mucosal abnormalities which leads to diarrhoea.

Human cytomegalovirus DNA in plasma and serum specimens of renal transplant recipients is highly fragmented.

Quantitation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in plasma and serum by PCR is increasingly used to identify patients at risk for developing CMV disease and to monitor the efficacy of antiviral therapy. Although CMV DNA levels are generally interpreted as viral loads, the exact nature of the viral DNA in these specimens is unknown. We studied the state of CMV DNA in plasma and serum specimens obtained from three renal transplant recipients at peak viral DNA levels during primary CMV infection. For this purpose, DNA isolated from these specimens was fractionated by size, and CMV DNA levels in the resulting DNA fractions were measured by quantitative PCR targeted at large (578-bp) and small (134-bp) amplicons. These experiments showed that the molecular sizes of DNA fragments from which CMV DNA is amplified were small (<2,000 bp), indicating that CMV DNA in plasma and serum is highly fragmented. Furthermore, CMV DNA levels were consistently higher when targeted at the smaller amplicon, providing additional evidence for the fragmentation of viral DNA. In conclusion, the first results with three patients have shown that CMV DNA in plasma and serum is highly fragmented and does not necessarily reflect the amount of infectious virus. These observations have potential consequences for understanding CMV pathogenesis and interpreting CMV DNA levels in individual patient management.