Effects of dual blockade of Renin-Angiotensin system on concentric left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension: a randomized, controlled pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays a major role in promoting left ventricular (LV) remodeling in essential hypertension. We designed a controlled, randomized pilot study aimed to test the hypothesis that the dual RAS blockade with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (ACEi) + angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) can be more effective in decreasing LV hypertrophy and improving diastolic function than a largely employed association such as ACEi + calcium-antagonist (Ca-A). METHODS: Twenty-four never-treated hypertensive patients with LV concentric hypertrophy were randomized to ramipril + candesartan or ramipril + lercanidipine. Before and after the 6-month treatment they underwent a 24-h blood pressure (BP) monitoring and echocardiographic examination. RESULTS: At baseline, age, body mass index (BMI), 24-h BP, and LV morpho-functional parameters were similar between the two groups. The 6-month treatment induced in both groups a significant decrease of 24-h BP, septal and posterior wall thickness, and LV mass index (LVMi) (ACEi + ARB 155 +/- 19 to 122 +/- 17 g/m(2), P < 0.0001; ACEi + Ca-A 146 +/- 18 to 127 +/- 20 g/m(2), P < 0.0001). Systolic function remained unchanged; LV diastolic parameters increased significantly in both groups. The extent of 24-h BP decrease was similar between the two groups (-13.3/16.3% vs. -12.3/15.8%, P = 0.63/P = 0.71), whereas the decrease of LV mass (-22% vs. -12.8%, P < 0.005) and the improvement of diastolic function were greater in ACEi + ARB group. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with ACEi + Ca-A, ACEi + ARB treatment showed a greater antiremodeling effect, that can be reasonably ascribed to a BP-independent effect of the dual RAS blockade.

Family history of hypertension influences left ventricular diastolic function during chronic antihypertensive therapy.

BACKGROUND: Genetic factors play an important role in linking insulin resistance and hypertension, also influencing insulin sensitivity changes during antihypertensive treatment. This study was aimed to evaluate whether genetic predisposition to hypertension can also influence left ventricular (LV) changes during antihypertensive treatment. METHODS: We enrolled 36 never-treated hypertensives: 18 with both parents hypertensive (F+) and 18 with both parents normotensive (F-), matched for age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). The patients were evaluated twice, before and after 2.5 years of treatment with enalapril. At both evaluations the patients underwent: 24-h blood pressure (BP) monitoring, LV echocardiogram, and oral glucose tolerance test, with measurements of glucose and insulin levels. RESULTS: At basal evaluation the two groups were not different with regard to gender, age, BMI, 24-h BP, and fasting glucose; glucose metabolic clearance rate was significantly lower in F+. The LV mass index was similar between the groups, whereas diastolic parameters were significantly lower in F+. At second evaluation, 24-h BP and LV mass were decreased to the same extent in both groups; glucose metabolic clearance rate significantly increased in F- and remained unchanged in F+. The improvement of LV diastolic function, found in both group, was significantly greater in F-. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic predisposition to hypertension, in addition to affecting insulin sensitivity, influences LV functional changes during antihypertensive treatment. Despite a similar extent of 24-h BP and LV mass decrease, F+ patients showed no changes in insulin sensitivity and a smaller improvement in LV diastolic function than F-.

Masked hypertension in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Relationship with left-ventricular structure and function.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate in type 2 diabetes mellitus the relationship between masked hypertension (MH) and left ventricular (LV) morpho-functional characteristics. METHODS: Using 24-hour BP monitoring and echocardiography, we evaluated 71 type 2 diabetic patients, without overt cardiac disease and never treated with antihypertensive drugs: 45 normotensive subjects with clinic BP <130/85 mmHg and 26 sustained hypertensives (SH)(clinic BP > or = 140 and/or 90 mmHg and 24-hour BP > or =125 and/or 80 mmHg), matched for age, gender, BMI and duration of diabetes with clinically normotensive patients. MH was diagnosed with clinic BP <130/85 mmHg and 24-hour BP > or =125 and/or 80 mmHg. RESULTS: Among clinically normotensive patients, 21 (47%) had MH and 24 were true normotensive (NT, 24-hour BP <125/80 mmHg). LV mass increased from NT to MH to SH (p < 0.001); the parameters of LV diastolic function were similar between MH and SH and significantly lower than in NT. CONCLUSION: In type 2 diabetic patients with clinic BP <130/85 mmHg, MH is frequent and is associated with LV remodelling characterized by increased myocardial mass and preclinical impairment of LV diastolic function; the remodelling is qualitatively and for some aspects also quantitatively similar to that found in sustained hypertensive patients. Therefore it would be useful to look for MH in diabetic subjects with clinic BP <130/85 mmHg, who, following the guidelines, are not entitled to antihypertensive treatment: the finding of MH could identify a subgroup of patients at higher cardiovascular risk and therefore needing a prompt antihypertensive treatment.

Metabolic syndrome and morphofunctional characteristics of the left ventricle in clinically hypertensive nondiabetic subjects.

BACKGROUND: The study was aimed to evaluate the impact of the metabolic syndrome on left ventricular (LV) structure and function in nondiabetic patients, never treated with antihypertensive or lipid-lowering drugs. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients, with recent finding of clinic BP >140 or 90 mm Hg, underwent 24-h blood pressure (BP) monitoring, echocardiogram, evaluation for metabolic syndrome (Adult Treatment Panel III criteria). RESULTS: Metabolic syndrome was diagnosed in 38 subjects (43.2%) (metabolic syndrome+). Age, gender, 24-h systolic and diastolic BP were similar between metabolic syndrome+ and metabolic syndrome- groups, whereas body mass index, clinic and 24-h heart rate, fasting glycemia, and triglycerides were significantly higher and HDL-cholesterol lower in metabolic syndrome + subjects. The prevalence of sustained hypertension (24-h BP >125 or 80 mm Hg) was similar between the two groups. Relative wall thickness and LV mass were significantly greater in the metabolic syndrome+ group, also after correction for body mass index. The LV systolic function was similar between the two groups, whereas all the parameters of diastolic function, but the mitral E/A ratio, were significantly lower in the metabolic syndrome+ group. From multiple regression analysis the main independent determinant of LV mass index was the presence of metabolic syndrome, followed by the 24-h systolic BP. CONCLUSIONS: Nondiabetic patients with metabolic syndrome showed more pronounced alterations of LV geometry and function compared with subjects without metabolic syndrome. These greater preclinical myocardial abnormalities were not accounted for by difference in age, gender, or 24-h BP and can be reasonably ascribed to the interplay of the metabolic syndrome components, making the metabolic syndrome in itself a relevant clinical problem, possibly a cardiovascular disease equivalent, that deserves aggressive treatment.

OSA, metabolic syndrome and CPAP: effect on cardiac remodeling in subjects with abdominal obesity.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment influence left ventricular (LV) remodelling independently of abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS). METHODS: Cardiorespiratory examination, 24-h BP monitoring and echocardiogram were performed in overweight/obese patients with increased abdominal adiposity and symptoms suggesting OSA : OSA/MetS (n.50), OSA/noMetS (n.22), noOSA/MetS (n.29), noOSA/noMets (n.16). The evaluation was repeated in 41 patients after ≥18 months of CPAP. RESULTS: Despite similar age, gender, BMI and 24-h BP, the 2 groups with MetS had greater LV remodelling (LV hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction) than the 2 groups without MetS. From multiple regression analysis independent determinants for LV mass were MetS, 24-h systolic BP and age, for LV diastolic function were LV mass index, MetS and age. After CPAP, the 20 patients with decreased body weight showed diastolic BP decrease, LV hypertrophy regression and diastolic function improvement, whereas, despite similar respiratory improvement, BP and LV parameters were unchanged in the 21 patients with body weight unchanged/increased. CONCLUSION: In patients with increased abdominal adiposity, LV remodelling is not associated to OSA per se; chronic CPAP treatment does not influence LV remodelling whose regression is mainly linked to body weight decrease.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors influence left ventricular mass and function independently of the antihypertensive effect.

In our retrospective study, we evaluated whether ACE inhibitors can influence left ventricular (LV) morphofunctional characteristics in essential hypertension independently of the antihypertensive effect. We studied 21 hypertensive patients (group 1) before and after at least 18 months of treatment with ACE inhibitors that did not induce any blood pressure (BP) reduction; as a control group, we evaluated 19 hypertensive patients (group 2) not treated with antihypertensive drugs during the same period. At baseline, the 2 groups, neither one previously treated with antihypertensive drugs, were not significantly different with regard to sex, age, body mass index, 24-hour BP, and heart rate; LV mass index was similar between the groups, whereas LV diastolic indices were significantly lower in group 1. At the second evaluation, body mass index, 24-hour BP, and heart rate were unchanged in both groups; LV mass index was significantly decreased in group 1 and increased in group 2. LV diastolic parameters were significantly improved in group 1, whereas in group 2, diastolic function was significantly deteriorated. In conclusion, our clinical study shows that ACE inhibitors can induce LV hypertrophy regression and improvement of diastolic function also in the absence of any antihypertensive effect.

Isolated office hypertension: a 3-year follow-up study.

The study aimed to evaluate, over a 3-year period, the progression towards sustained hypertension and left ventricular (LV) changes in patients with isolated office (IO) hypertension (office BP>140 and/or 90 mmHg, daytime BP<130/80 mmHg). After 3 years from the basal evaluation, 38 subjects with basal normal BP and 42 subjects with basal IO hypertension underwent a second 24-h BP monitoring and echocardiography; 19 patients of the basal IO hypertension group were not revaluated because they had already developed ambulatory hypertension and were on antihypertensive treatment. At the second evaluation, the 38 normotensive subjects had unchanged BP and LV parameters; 25 IO hypertensives have developed sustained hypertension. Considering them together with the 19 patients already treated, 72% of 61 IO hypertensives developed ambulatory hypertension over a 3-year period. The patients who subsequently developed hypertension differed from the group who did not only for lower basal values of LV diastolic parameters; all the patients with basal LV hypertrophy and/or preclinical diastolic impairment subsequently developed sustained hypertension. In conclusion, IO hypertensive patients show a high rate of progression towards sustained hypertension. Basal LV hypertrophy and/or preclinical diastolic dysfunction were the only markers of a greater risk of becoming hypertensives.