Pulmonary hypertension in patients affected by sleep-related breathing disorders: up to date from the literature.

Sleep-related breathing disorders (SBD) are conditions of abnormal and difficult respiration during sleep, including chronic snoring, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), central sleep apnea (CSA), sleep-related hypoventilation disorders and sleep-related hypoxemia. Some of them have a limited impact on health, but others (e.g., OSA) can have serious consequences, because of their dangerous effects on sleep and the hematic balance of oxygen and carbon dioxide. According to several population-based studies, prevalence of OSA is relatively high, approximately 3-7% for adult males and 2-5% for adult females in the general population. However, methodological differences and difficulties in characterizing this syndrome yielded to variability in estimates. Moreover, it is estimated that only about 40% of patients with OSA are diagnosed, which can lead to underestimation of disease prevalence. OSA is directly correlated with age and male sex and to risk factors such as obesity. Several studies found that OSA is associated with an increased risk of diabetes, some cancer types, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, such as hypertension, coronary artery disease and stroke. Pulmonary hypertension (PH), a noted cardiovascular disease, is significantly associated with sleep-related breathing disorders and lot of scientific studies published in the literature demonstrated a strong link between these conditions and the development of pulmonary hypertension PH. PH is relatively less common than sleep-related breathing disorders. The purpose of this systematic review is to analyze both the current knowledge around the consequences that SBD may have on pulmonary hemodynamics and the effects resulting from pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments of SDB on PH.

Exacerbation Burden in COPD and Occurrence of Mortality in a Cohort of Italian Patients: Results of the Gulp Study.

Objective: To describe the burden of moderate to severe exacerbations and all-cause mortality; the secondary objectives were to analyze treatment patterns and changes over follow-up. Design: Observational, multicenter, retrospective, cohort study with a three year follow-up period. Setting: Ten Italian academic secondary- and tertiary-care centers. Participants: Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD referring to the outpatient clinics of the participating centers were retrospectively recruited. Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures: Annualized frequency of moderate and severe exacerbations stratified by exacerbation history prior to study enrollment. Patients were classified according to airflow obstruction, GOLD risk categories, and divided in 4 groups: A = no exacerbations; B = 1 moderate exacerbation; C = 1 severe exacerbation; D = ≥2 moderate and/or severe exacerbations. Overall all-cause mortality stratified by age, COPD category, and COPD therapy. A logistic regression model assessed the association of clinical characteristics with mortality. Results: 1111 patients were included (73% males), of which 41.5% had a history of exacerbations. As expected, the proportion of patients experiencing ≥1 exacerbation during follow-up increased according to pre-defined study risk categories (B: 79%, C: 84%, D: 97.4%). Overall, by the end of follow-up, 45.5% of patients without a history of exacerbation experienced an exacerbation (31% of which severe), and 13% died. Deceased patients were significantly older, more obstructed and hyperinflated, and more frequently active smokers compared with survivors. Severe exacerbations were more frequent in patients that died (23.5%, vs 10.2%; p-value: 0.002). Chronic heart failure and ischemic heart disease were the only comorbidities associated with a higher odds ratio (OR) for death (OR: 2.2, p-value: 0.001; and OR: 1.9, p-value: 0.007). Treatment patterns were similar in patients that died and survivors. Conclusion: Patients with a low exacerbation risk are exposed to a significant future risk of moderate/severe exacerbations. Real life data confirm the strong association between mortality and cardiovascular comorbidities in COPD.

Effectiveness of a new "focused pulse" high-frequency chest wall oscillation in patients with moderate to severe COPD.

BACKGROUND: Chest physiotherapy plays a crucial role in the treatment of COPD, although the optimal techniques for airway clearance have not been definitively established. Among the different techniques, high-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) has gained attention for its potential to create a widespread lung percussion, facilitating the removal of secretions and potentially clearing the peripheral bronchial tree. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a novel "focused pulse" HFCWO in patients with moderate to severe COPD. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomized to three groups: a group treated with the PEP technique, a group with "focused pulse "HFCWO" and a group with pharmacological therapy alone (control group). The primary outcomes were changes in respiratory function parameters, changes in dyspnea and quality of life scores as well as daily life activity and health status assessment. The secondary outcomes were the number of exacerbations and the number of practitioner or emergency department (ED) visits after 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: Sixty patients concluded the study with 20 patients allocated to each group. The two devices improved respiratory function tests, quality of life and health scores and dyspnea compared to the control group. Maximal expiratory pressure and diffusing lung carbon oxide were significantly improved in the focused pulse HFCWO group compared to the PEP group. Only pulse-focused HFCWO showed a statistically significant lower number of exacerbations and visits to ED or practitioner compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The focused pulse HFCWO technique improves daily life activities and lung function in patients with stable COPD. The device demonstrated significantly greater effectiveness in lowering COPD exacerbations as well as visits to ED or practitioner.

The current practice in the diagnostic work-up of patients with hemoptysis of unknown etiology: an international survey.

BACKGROUND: Hemoptysis is a challenging and potentially life-threatening medical condition. The most appropriate diagnostic work-up is debated and several diagnostic approaches are implemented worldwide. METHODS: An international, online survey was carried out to investigate the current practice of the diagnostic work-up of patients with hemoptysis of unknown etiology. RESULTS: Overall, 604 physicians responded to the survey. At baseline, chest X-ray was suggested as the first diagnostic investigation by 342 (56.6%) participants. Computed tomography (CT) was suggested in each patient with non- and life-threatening hemoptysis by 310 (51.3%) and 526 (87.1%) respondents, respectively. Contrast-enhanced CT is the currently preferred technique (333, 55.1%). In case of patchy ground glass opacities and negative CT, 287 (47.5%) and 222 (36.8%) participants, respectively, would always offer bronchoscopy. Otorhinolaryngological evaluation was mostly suggested in case of suspected upper airways bleeding before other investigations (212, 35.1%). A follow-up was recommended for idiopathic hemoptysis by the majority of the participants (316, 52.3%). A multidisciplinary assessment is deemed crucial for each patient with life-threatening hemoptysis (437, 72.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Chest X-ray and contrast-enhanced CT are currently preferred as the first diagnostic investigations, regardless of hemoptysis severity. Bronchoscopy is suggested in case of negative radiological examination and when CT shows only ground glass opacities. Otorhinolaryngological evaluation is advised before any other investigations when upper airways bleeding is suspected. Patients with idiopathic hemoptysis are suggested to undergo a clinical follow-up and in case of life-threatening bleeding a multidisciplinary assessment is deemed crucial. Due to the heterogeneous approaches a consensus statement would be needed.

Herpes Virus Infection in Lung Transplantation: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention Strategies.

Lung transplantation is an ultimate treatment option for some end-stage lung diseases; due to the intense immunosuppression needed to reduce the risk of developing acute and chronic allograft failure, infectious complications are highly incident. Viral infections represent nearly 30% of all infectious complications, with herpes viruses playing an important role in the development of acute and chronic diseases. Among them, cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, being associated with an increased risk of chronic lung allograft failure. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with transformation of infected B cells with the development of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs). Similarly, herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella zoster virus and human herpesviruses 6 and 7 can also be responsible for acute manifestations in lung transplant patients. During these last years, new, highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tests have been developed, and preventive and prophylactic strategies have been studied aiming to reduce and prevent the incidence of these viral infections. In this narrative review, we explore epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment options for more frequent herpes virus infections in lung transplant patients.

Real time visualization may be advisable to exclude aspiration in patients undergoing capsule endoscopy examination

No disponible