Growth of LNCaP human prostate cancer cells is stimulated by estradiol via its own receptor.

We report that growth of LNCaP human prostate cancer cells is significantly stimulated (up to 120% above control) by physiological estradiol (E2) concentrations. This growth increase appears to be comparable to that induced by either testosterone or dihydrotestosterone, as also reported by others. This paper presents novel illustrative evidence for estrogen-binding proteins and messenger RNA transcripts in LNCaP cells. In fact, 1) the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction system documented normal messenger RNA for estrogen receptors (ER); 2) the radioligand binding assay allowed the detection of high affinity, reduced capacity binding sites in both soluble and nuclear cell fractions; and 3) the immunocytochemical analysis showed a consistently intensive staining for both ER and progesterone receptors. Compared to other human estrogen-responsive mammary cancer cells, MCF7 and ZR75-1, ER expression in LNCaP cells was not significantly lower, as shown by levels of the ER transcripts, number of sites per cell, or femtomoles per mg DNA as well as the percentage and intensity of immunocytochemical staining. A relative estimate of ER expression obtained by matching LNCaP with another human prostate cancer cell line, PC3, always displayed significantly and consistently higher levels in LNCaP cells. The detection of relatively high type I ER content in either cell compartment of LNCaP cells was paralleled by a highly intensive staining for progesterone receptors. In addition, evidence that the synthetic androgen R1881 did not compete for type I binding of E2 and that any E2-induced growth was completely reversed by the pure antiestrogen ICI-182,780, but unaffected by the antiandrogen Casodex, clearly suggests that the biological response of LNCaP cells to E2 is mediated via its own receptor.

17 beta-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity in endometrial cancer cells: different metabolic pathways of estradiol in hormone-responsive and non-responsive intact cells.

In this paper we report that two human long-term endometrial cancer cell lines, Ishikawa and HEC-1A, exhibit quite different abilities in metabolizing estrogens. As a matter of fact, incubation of Ishikawa cells with close-to-physiological concentrations of estradiol (E2) as precursor resulted in: (1) elevated formation (up to 90%) of E2-sulphate (E2-S), using lower precursor concentrations; (2) very limited conversion to estrone (E1) (< 10% at 24 h incubation), as either free or sulphate; and (3) low but consistent production of other estrogen derivatives, such as 2-hydroxy-estrogens and estriol. Conversely, scant amounts (if any) of E2-S were found in HEC-1A cells, while no detectable formation of other estrogen metabolites could be observed after 24 h. On the other hand, E1 production was significantly greater (nearly 60% at 24 h) than in Ishikawa cells, a large proportion of E1 (over 50% of the total) being formed after only 6 h incubation using time-course experiments. The hypothesis that E2 metabolism could be minor in Ishikawa cells as a consequence of the high rate of E2-S formation encountered is contradicted by the evidence that conversion to E1 also remains limited in the presence of much lower E2-S amounts, seen using higher molar concentrations of precursor. Overall, we observe that 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (17 beta-HSD) activity diverges significantly in intact Ishikawa and HEC-1A endometrial cancer cells. This difference could not merely be accounted for by the diverse amounts of substrate (E2) available to the cells, nor may it be imputed to different levels of endogenous estrogens. It should rather be sought in different mechanisms controlling 17 beta-HSD activity or, alternatively, in the presence of distinct isoenzymes in the two different cell types.

Oxidative and reductive pathways of estrogens in hormone responsive and non-responsive human breast cancer cells in vitro.

In order to measure the formation and degradation rates of estradiol by human breast cancer cells, after assessing the biochemical basis of hormone responsiveness and growth response to estrogens, we considered both responsive, estrogen receptor (ER) positive, and non-responsive, ER-negative, breast cancer cell lines, i.e. MCF7, ZR75-1 and MDA-MB231. To this end, we employed a novel "intact cell" approach which allows us, after 24 h incubation, to analyze several enzyme activities in sequence, concurrently with the monitoring of labeled precursor degradation. Our investigations led to the following evidence: (a) the reductive activity of the 17 beta-hydroxysteroid oxoreductase (17 beta-HSOR) appears to be higher than the oxidative only in responsive, ER-rich MCF7 and ZR75-1 cells, as also previously observed by others; (b) this activity is, on the contrary, much lower in MDA-MB231 cells and other unresponsive, ER-poor breast cancer cell lines; (c) conversely, the oxidative activity shows an opposite pattern, being limited in MCF7 and ZR75-1 cells and much higher in MDA-MB231 cells. Overall, a 17 beta-HSOR reductive pathway prevails in both MCF7 and ZR75-1 cells, whilst the oxidative pathway is prevalent in MDA-MB231 cells, leading to a large formation of estrone that is no further metabolized, at least in the experimental conditions used. Our results may provide a likely explanation of previous data on the different estrogen content of breast tumor tissues.

Steroid-growth factor interaction in human prostate cancer. 1. Short-term effects of transforming growth factors on growth of human prostate cancer cells.

In order to better define potential mechanisms of growth regulation in human prostate cancer cells, we have compared biological responses (such as short-term response to both transforming growth factor alpha and beta; TFG alpha and TFG beta) in relation to hormone sensitivity of LNCaP, DU145, and PC3 cells. Androgen receptor (AR) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) content of each cell line was also investigated. In addition, expression of EGF, TGF alpha, and TGF beta was evaluated through immunofluorescent staining. Growth of androgen non-responsive PC3 cells was stimulated by TGF alpha (about 35%) and inhibited by TGF beta (more than 50%), with respect to controls, after 48 h exposure. Conversely, AR-positive, hormone-responsive LNCaP cells proved to be poorly sensitive, at least short-term, to either growth factor. Furthermore, high levels of both EGF-R and TGF alpha, and a fairly high amount of EGF, were found in DU145 cells and, to a lesser extent, in LNCaP cells; in contrast, PC3 cells exhibited low expression levels of both receptors (EGF-R) and ligands (EGF, TGF alpha), but displayed remarkable TGF beta binding and relatively high levels of endogenous TGF beta. Overall, these results suggest a differential sensitivity to TGF alpha and TGF beta by prostate cancer cells; TGF alpha response seems not to be proportional to the EGF-R content of individual cell lines.