Growth Outcomes Audit for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate (UCLP) After 2-stage Palate Repair.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of 1 and 2-stage palatoplasty protocol on the dental arch relationships in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) in a single center. METHODS: Our study consisted of 349 individuals divided into 2 groups according to the palatoplasty protocol. Two-stage group comprised 169 subjects with UCLP (mean age: 6.9 y, 110 male and 59 female) who underwent lip, nasal ala, and anterior palate repair with vomer flap from 3 to 6 months (first surgery stage). Soft palate repair occurred from 12 to 18 months (second surgery stage). The one-stage group comprised 180 subjects with UCLP (mean age: 7.2 y, 108 male and 72 female) who underwent 1-stage palatoplasty. Dental models were evaluated by 3 experienced orthodontists applying Goslon Yardstick and the 5-year-old index (FYOI). The influence of the palatoplasty technique and surgeon factor on the interarch relationship was evaluated. The weighted Kappa was used to assess intraexaminer and interexaminer agreements for comparisons of dental arch relationships. Intergroup comparisons were conducted using the χ 2 test ( P <0.05). RESULTS: The intraexaminer reliability was very good (0.81 to 0.98) and interexaminer reliability varied from satisfactory to very good (0.56 to 0.83). The mean occlusal index of the 2-stage and 1-stage groups was 2.77 and 3.03, respectively. The variability of the mean index between surgeons varied from 2.38 to 3.2 in the 2-stage group and 2.91 to 3.2 in the 1-stage group. There were significant differences in the frequency of Goslon 5 index ( P =0.002) between groups, with the 2-stage group presenting less cases (1.18%) than the group 1-stage (11.11%). CONCLUSION: The interarch relationship was similar for both palate repair protocols. Two-stage palatoplasty showed a decreased prevalence of Goslon index 5.

Assessment of speech nasality in children with Robin Sequence.

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of primary palatoplasty in Robin Sequence (RS); to verify the relationship between modalities of assessment of nasality; to compare nasality between techniques at palatoplasty. METHODS: This study involved the identification of hypernasality in four modalities: live assessment with 4-point scale; live assessment with cul-de-sac test; multiple listeners' ratings of recorded phrase; nasometric assessment. Live ratings of speech nasality and nasalance scores were retrieved from charts, while a recorded phrase was rated by listeners for occurrence of hypernasality. Agreement between the modalities was established as well as association between nasality, nasal turbulence and age at surgery and at assessment. Fisher's exact test was used to compare findings between surgical techniques. RESULTS: Agreement between nasalance, live assessment with 4-point scale, live assessment with cul-de-sac, and multiple listeners' ratings of recorded samples ranged between reasonable (0.32) and perfect (1.00). Percentage occurrence of hypernasality varied largely between assessment modalities. Mean occurrence of hypernasality was lower for the group submitted to Furlow technique (26%) than the group that received von Langenbeck technique (53%). Only findings obtained live were statistically significant (scale: p=0.012; cul-de-sac: p<0.001). Listeners identified nasal turbulence for 22 (32%) samples out of the 69 recordings, and an association was found between hypernasality and nasal turbulence. CONCLUSION: Lower occurrence of hypernasality was identified for patients with RS in Furlow group. Identification of hypernasality varied largely among the four assessment modalities.

Assessment of speech nasality in children with Robin Sequence / Avaliação da nasalidade de fala em crianças com Sequência de Robin

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of primary palatoplasty in Robin Sequence (RS); to verify the relationship between modalities of assessment of nasality; to compare nasality between techniques at palatoplasty. METHODS: This study involved the identification of hypernasality in four modalities: live assessment with 4-point scale; live assessment with cul-de-sac test; multiple listeners' ratings of recorded phrase; nasometric assessment. Live ratings of speech nasality and nasalance scores were retrieved from charts, while a recorded phrase was rated by listeners for occurrence of hypernasality. Agreement between the modalities was established as well as association between nasality, nasal turbulence and age at surgery and at assessment. Fisher's exact test was used to compare findings between surgical techniques. RESULTS: Agreement between nasalance, live assessment with 4-point scale, live assessment with cul-de-sac, and multiple listeners' ratings of recorded samples ranged between reasonable (0.32) and perfect (1.00). Percentage occurrence of hypernasality varied largely between assessment modalities. Mean occurrence of hypernasality was lower for the group submitted to Furlow technique (26%) than the group that received von Langenbeck technique (53%). Only findings obtained live were statistically significant (scale: p=0.012; cul-de-sac: p<0.001). Listeners identified nasal turbulence for 22 (32%) samples out of the 69 recordings, and an association was found between hypernasality and nasal turbulence. CONCLUSION: Lower occurrence of hypernasality was identified for patients with RS in Furlow group. Identification of hypernasality varied largely among the four assessment modalities. .

OBJETIVO: Reportar os resultados da palatoplastia primária na Sequência de Robin (SR); verificar a relação entre modalidades de avaliação da nasalidade; comparar nasalidade entre técnicas na palatoplastia. MÉTODOS: Este estudo envolveu a identificação da hipernasalidade em quatro modalidades: avaliação ao vivo com escala de quatro pontos; avaliação ao vivo com teste cul-de-sac; julgamento de gravações por juízes e avaliação nasométrica. Julgamentos ao vivo da nasalidade e escores de nasalância foram obtidos em prontuários, enquanto uma frase gravada foi julgada por juízes para ocorrência de nasalidade. Concordância entre as quatro modalidades foi estabelecida assim como associação entre nasalidade, turbulência nasal e idades na cirurgia e na avaliação. Teste exato de Fisher foi usado para comparar achados entre as técnicas cirúrgicas. RESULTADOS: A concordância entre nasalância, avaliação ao vivo com escala de quatro pontos e com teste cul-de-sac e julgamentos de gravações por juízes variou entre razoável (0,32) e perfeita (1,00). Porcentagem de ocorrência de hipernasalidade variou muito entre as diferentes modalidades. Ocorrência média de hipernsalidade no grupo operado com técnica de Furlow foi menor (26%) do que no grupo que recebeu a técnica de von Langenbeck (53%). Somente os resultados avaliados ao vivo foram estatisticamente significantes (escala: p=0,012; cul-de-sac: p<0,001). Juízes ouviram turbulência nasal em 22 (32%) das 69 gravações e uma associação entre hipernasalidade e turbulência nasal foi encontrada. CONCLUSÃO: Ocorrência de hipernasalidade foi menor para os pacientes com SR que receberam a técnica de Furlow. Identificação da hipernasalidade variou grandemente entre as quatro modalidades de avaliação. .