Value of esophageal pacing in evaluation of supraventricular tachycardia.

Esophageal stimulation was performed in 40 patients who had spontaneous paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs). The purpose of this study was to look for the most sensitive stimulation protocol and criteria that would help to define the mechanism of reentry. In 20 patients (group I) atrial pacing up to second-degree atrioventricular block was performed under control conditions and isoproterenol, and SVT was induced in 14 patients (70%), 11 in the control state and 3 while receiving isoproterenol. In 20 patients (group II) atrial pacing and programmed atrial stimulation using 1 and 2 extrastimuli delivered at 2 cycle lengths (600 and 500 ms) was performed in the control state and while receiving isoproterenol. SVT was induced in all patients, in 13 patients in the control state and in 7 while receiving isoproterenol. Programmed stimulation always induced SVT and was the only method capable of tachycardia induction in 14 patients. The mechanism of SVT could be established in 91%. The measurement of the ventriculoatrial interval was the most useful sign to define the site of reentry. Occurrence of a bundle branch block helped to delineate the mechanism in 4 patients. When a positive P wave in V1 preceded the esophageal atrial electrocardiogram, it suggested that there was reentry through a left-sided accessory atrioventricular connection in 6 patients. SVT could always be induced by programmed atrial stimulation in the control state and under isoproterenol. The location of the P wave in V1 compared to the ventriculogram and the esophageal electrocardiogram helped to define the mechanism of tachycardia.

[Induction of supraventricular tachycardia (paroxysmal junctional tachycardia and atrial tachycardia) by esophageal stimulation]. / Induction des tachycardies supraventriculaires (tachycardies jonctionnelles paroxystiques--tachycardies atriales) par stimulation oesophagienne.

Transesophageal stimulation is tending to replace endocavitary electrophysiological studies in the investigation and treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of this technique in the evaluation of paroxysmal junctional tachycardia (PJT) and atrial tachycardia (AT). Fifty-eight patients with these arrhythmias (PJT, n = 23; AT, n = 35) were investigated under basal conditions and then during Isoproterenol infusions with a protocol using incremental atrial stimulation and programmed atrial stimulation delivering one and two extra-stimuli on two paced rhythms (400-600 ms). It was possible to induce the arrhythmia in the 23 patients with PJT either under basal conditions (n = 16) or during Isoproterenol (n = 7). A reentrant mechanism was suggested in 22 patients by the following findings: position of the auriculogramme with respect to the ventriculogramme, presence or absence of a delaying branch block, situation and morphology of the P wave in lead V1 compared with atrial activation recorded by the esophageal catheter. Atrial tachycardia was induced in 26 patients (74 per cent), 19 under basal conditions, 6 with Isoproterenol and once after carotid sinus massage. As a conclusion, we can say that the sensitivity of transesophageal stimulation is the same as for endocavitary stimulation.