Pediatric Facial Burns and Consumer Products: A Nationwide Analysis.

Pediatric facial burns pose significant challenges in terms of physical, psychological, and social impacts on children. Understanding the causes of these burns is crucial for prevention and appropriate care. This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of causes and preventive measures related to pediatric facial burns caused by consumer products. Using data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) from 2012 to 2021, we analyzed 130,461 cases of pediatric facial burns. Common causes included household items such as cleaning supplies, hot water, kitchen appliances, and health and beauty products. Differences in burn causes were observed between genders, with boys more prone to burns from welding equipment, gasoline, and grills, while girls were more susceptible to burns from hair curling equipment, candles, and health and beauty products. The mean age of children burned by different items varied, highlighting the need for age-appropriate preventive measures. The authors discuss the importance of caregiver education, safe storage practices, supervision, and clear communication in preventing pediatric facial burns. By raising awareness of potential burn sources and implementing preventive strategies, the incidence of pediatric facial burns can be significantly reduced.

Understanding the Drivers of Cost and Length of Stay in a Cohort of 21,875 Patients with Severe Burn.

Burn management has significantly advanced in the past 75 years, resulting in improved mortality rates. However, there are still over one million burn victims in the United States each year, with over 3,000 burn-related deaths annually. The impacts of individual patient, hospital, and regional demographics on length of stay (LOS) and total cost have yet to be fully explored in a large nationally representative cohort. Thus, this study aimed to examine various hospital and patient characteristics using a sample of over 20,000 patients. Inpatient data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2008 to 2015 were analyzed, and only patients with an ICD-9 code for second- or third-degree burns were included. In addition, a major operating room procedure must have been indicated on the discharge summary for patients to be included in the final dataset, ensuring that only severe burns requiring complex care were analyzed. Analysis of covariance models was used to evaluate the impact of various patient, hospital, and regional variables on both LOS and cost. The study found that skin grafts and fasciotomy significantly increased the cost of hospitalization. Having burns on the face, neck, and trunk significantly increased costs for patients with second-degree burns, while burns on the trunk resulted in the longest LOS for patients with third-degree burns. Infections in the hospital and additional procedures, such as flaps and skin grafts, also led to longer stays. The study also found that the prevalence of postoperative complications, such as electrolyte imbalance, was high among patients with burn surgery.

Major traumatic amputations and replantations of the upper extremity in Germany - National quality reports 2014-2018.

The treatment of traumatic major upper limb amputation is complex and of great urgency. Loss of time often represents a majorrestriction for replantation. Thus, logistical and infrastructural developments, such as the expansion of specialised hand trauma centres, are crucial for optimizing delivery of care. Surveillance represents the fundament for a proper, demand-adapted implementation of such therapeutical improvements. However, a comprehensive database for surveillance of these injuries does currently not exist in Germany or Europe. In this study quality reports of German hospitals from 2014 to 2018 were screened retrospectively for traumatic major upper extremity amputations and replantations. A total of 329 amputations and 87 replantations were recorded, accounting for an overall replantation rate (RR) of 26%. Most of the injuries affected the level of the wrist and forearm. Treatment of these injuries experienced an increasing centralisation to medical teaching facilities, which accounted for higher RRs compared with non-teaching facilities. The cumulatively most populous federal states handled most of the amputation injures in this five-year study period. Ratio calculations on the basis of population counts, however, revealed great discrepancies to these results, with Hamburg, Rhineland-Palatinate and Saarland accounting for the highest per capita incidences. In 2018 Germany was provided with 46 specialised hand trauma and replantation centres, which performed 45% of the replantations in that year, revealing a RR of 17%, compared to an overall RR of 14% in that year. Nevertheless, there might be potential for improvement in the geographical distribution of these specialised centres. The provision of highly specialised therapy in highly specialised centres for highly complex injuries is a future challenge in replantation surgery. This data is contributing to logistical improvements for a need-adapted expansion of these specialised hand trauma centres. The study demonstrates an approach of a standardised and comprehensive injury surveillance program based on national quality reports, while underlining the importance of such a national or rather European database for optimisations in medical care. Level of evidence IV.

[Autologous tissue reconstruction of the lower extremity-indications and technique]. / Eigengewebsrekonstruktion der unteren Extremität ­ Indikation und Technik.

Autologous tissue reconstruction for defect coverage of lower extremity wounds describes a broad interdisciplinary spectrum of conservative, surgical and interventional treatment options. The goals of reconstruction are a resilient and function-preserving but also esthetically acceptable wound closure, which should enable rehabilitation and the return to participation in social and working life for those affected. Depending on the wound conditions as well as on potentially occurring concomitant injuries and comorbidities, the timing and method of defect coverage is selected in an individualized approach for each patient. It is essential that the plastic surgeon is involved as early as possible in the preparation of a treatment plan and can then select the most appropriate and least invasive reconstructive procedure from the armamentarium, depending on the localization and etiology of the soft tissue defect. These vary from secondary wound closure to skin grafts up to local and free flaps.

Comment on: "Thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: Is there a role for denervation? A systematic review".

We read with great interest the recent systematic review by Teo I. and Riley N. on denervation in thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. Undoubtedly, denervation of the first carpometacarpal (CMC-1) joint does represent a promising surgical treatment alternative for patients suffering from persistent CMC-1-joint osteoarthritis. A surgical standard, however, has not yet been implemented, as technical approach and indication of this procedure still show great variances. In order to contribute to an evidence-based standardization of CMC-1-joint denervation, we would like to share our considerations, approaches and anatomical findings in this comment.