Clinical outcomes of melanoma brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiation and anti-PD-1 therapy.

BACKGROUND: The anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1) therapy nivolumab has significant clinical activity in patients with metastatic melanoma. However, little is known about the safety and outcomes in patients receiving anti-PD-1 therapy and stereotactic radiation for the treatment of brain metastases (BMs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were analyzed retrospectively from two prospective nivolumab protocols enrolling 160 patients with advanced resected and unresectable melanoma at a single institution. Patients were included if BMs were diagnosed and treated with stereotactic radiation within 6 months of receiving nivolumab. The primary end point of this study was neurotoxicity; secondary end points included BM control and survival. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients with a total of 73 BMs treated over 30 sessions were identified. Radiation was administered before, during and after nivolumab in 33 lesions (45%), 5 lesions (7%), and 35 lesions (48%), respectively. All BMs were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in a single session except 12 BMs treated with fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy, nine of which were in the postoperative setting. One patient experienced grade 2 headaches following SRS with symptomatic relief with steroid treatment. No other treatment-related neurologic toxicities or scalp reactions were reported. Eight (11%) local BM failures with a ≥20% increase in volume were noted. Of these lesions, hemorrhage was noted in 4, and edema was noted in 7. Kaplan-Meier estimates for local BM control following radiation at 6 and 12 months were 91% and 85%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) from the date of stereotactic radiation and nivolumab initiation was 11.8 and 12.0 months, respectively, in patients receiving nivolumab for unresected disease (median OS was not reached in patients treated in the resected setting). CONCLUSIONS: In our series, stereotactic radiation to melanoma BMs is well tolerated in patients who received nivolumab. BM control and OS appear prolonged compared with standard current treatment. Prospective evaluation is warranted.

Clinical outcomes of melanoma brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery and anti-PD-1 therapy, anti-CTLA-4 therapy, BRAF/MEK inhibitors, BRAF inhibitor, or conventional chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The effect of immunologic and targeted agents on intracranial response rates in patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) is not yet clearly understood. This report analyzes outcomes of intact MBMs treated with single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and anti-PD-1 therapy, anti-CTLA-4 therapy, BRAF/MEK inhibitors(i), BRAFi, or conventional chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were included if MBMs were treated with single-session SRS within 3 months of receiving systemic therapy. The primary end point of this study was distant MBM control. Secondary end points were local MBM control defined as a >20% volume increase on follow-up MRI, systemic progression-free survival, overall survival (OS) from both SRS and cranial metastases diagnosis, and neurotoxicity. Images were reviewed alongside two neuro-radiologists at our institution. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were treated to 314 MBMs over 119 SRS treatment sessions between January 2007 and August 2015. No significant differences were noted in age (P = 0.27), gender (P = 0.85), treated gross tumor volume (P = 0.26), or the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (P = 0.51) between the treatment cohorts. Twelve-month Kaplan-Meier (KM) distant MBM control rates were 38%, 21%, 20%, 8%, and 5% (P = 0.008) for SRS with anti-PD-1 therapies, anti-CTLA-4 therapy, BRAF/MEKi, BRAFi, and conventional chemotherapy, respectively. No significant differences were noted in the KM local MBM control rates among treatment groups (P = 0.25). Treatment with anti-PD-1 therapy, anti-CTLA-4 therapy, or BRAF/MEKi significantly improved OS on both univariate and multivariate analyses when compared with conventional chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: In our institutional analysis of patients treated with SRS and various systemic immunologic and targeted melanoma agents, significant differences in distant MBM control and OS are noted. Prospective evaluation of the potential synergistic effect between these agents and SRS is warranted.

Relationship of Schmorl's nodes to vertebral body endplate fractures and acute endplate disk extrusions.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Literature regarding clinical pain syndromes associated with acute, traumatic Schmorl's nodes (SNs) is limited. Our purpose was to determine whether an SN could be related to a previous traumatic event producing either acute SN or a vertebral endplate fracture. METHODS: Two neuroradiologists independently reviewed initial and follow-up MR examinations of 14 patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute, symptomatic thoracolumbar SNs or vertebral body endplate fractures that evolved into SNs to evaluate marrow edema, signal intensity, margin definition, presence of intravertebral extruded disk material, and pattern of contrast enhancement. RESULTS: Edema of the affected vertebral body, adjacent to an endplate without wedging or collapse, was observed on the initial MR images in all cases. The initial MR images of six (43%) of 14 patients exhibited only edema of the marrow immediately adjacent to the endplate without wedging or collapse. The MR images obtained at the time of follow-up showed subsequent formation of a chronic and eventually asymptomatic SN for all six patients. The initial MR images of eight (57%) of the 14 patients showed the typical appearance of acute SNs with marrow edema of the affected vertebra. The contrast-enhanced images of three patients manifested enhancement of the invaginated disk material in three (100%) of three cases and enhancement of the surrounding vertebral body in one case (33%). Six (43%) of 14 patients had acute typical compression fracture of a vertebral body of at least one additional level. CONCLUSION: Most (57%) of the SNs in this series could be traced to episodes of significant, sudden-onset, localized, nonradiating back pain and tenderness for which the MR images showed SNs surrounded by vertebral body marrow edema. The remaining SNs (43%) were not immediately apparent as SNs and manifested only as vertebral body edema representing endplate fracture but did evolve into classical chronic SNs that follow-up imaging revealed.