Occupational exposure to bacterial single cell protein induces inflammation in lung and blood.

Bacterial single cell protein (BSCP) is used as a protein enrichment in livestock and fish feed, and is extracted from dried bacterial mass. In the production of BSCP, workers are exposed to organic dust containing high levels of endotoxins that may induce acute airway inflammation. However, the long term effect on the airways of such exposure is not known, and we have examined inflammatory markers in induced sputum and blood among BSCP exposed workers. We included 21 non-smoking production workers (age 31-42 (range; mean 35)) without respiratory symptoms and 21 healthy non-exposed references (age 21-52 (range; mean 34)). Airborne endotoxin concentrations were measured, and induced sputum samples and blood samples were collected from the workers and non-exposed references. The airborne endotoxin concentration measured in inhaled air during the work shift was 430 EU/m(3) (50-2000) (median (range)). The percentage of neutrophils in induced sputum was 79% (66-93) (median (25th-75th percentiles)) and 31% (25-45) (p < 0.001) for operators and references, respectively. Protein analysis in induced sputum supernatant showed significantly elevated levels of interleukins IL-1beta and IL-12 (p < 0.05), while blood analysis showed significantly elevated levels of PDGF-BB (platelet-derived growth factor-BB) and RANTES (regulated upon activation normally T cell expressed and secreted) (p < 0.05). Workers exposed to BSCP had an airway inflammation characterized by a high level of neutrophils. However, only a few cytokines were elevated in lung and blood, which could imply low inflammatory activity suggestive of possible adaptation mechanisms due to daily exposure to BSCP, or that the inflammation reaction was a dose-related response occurring at higher levels.

Resection rectopexy for external rectal prolapse reduces constipation and anal incontinence.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The main aim was to examine constipation and anal incontinence in patients before and after resection for external rectal prolapse. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients had ligament preserving suture rectopexy and sigmoid resection (resection rectopexy) for external rectal prolapse by laparoscopic (n = 15) or open (n = 5) technique during 2001-2005. They were prospectively evaluated for constipation and anal incontinence using validated incontinence and KESS-constipation scores. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Constipation score was significantly reduced from mean 7.7 (5.4-9.9) to 4.5 (2.5-6.4) after median 4 months (1-19) and to 4.3 (2.2-6.3) after median 17 months (4-51). Six and four patients were constipated preoperatively and 17 months postoperatively, respectively. The four symptoms feeling incomplete evacuation of stool, minutes in lavatory per attempt, use of enemas/digitation and painful evacuation effort were significantly reduced, whilst stool consistency increased. Fourteen patients (70%) had anal incontinence. Corresponding and significant reduction in their scores were from mean 12.5 (9.4-15.5) to 5.1 (2.1-8.1) and to 3.6 (1.3-5.9). Incontinence was improved in 13 and unaltered in one patient(s). Two patients with worse outcome had increased stool consistency and constipation scores. Resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse reduced anal incontinence and constipation.