The Phase 3 INVIGORATE Trial of Reproxalap in Patients with Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis.

Purpose: There is an unmet need for new treatments for allergic conjunctivitis. Objective: To assess the activity of reproxalap, a novel reactive aldehyde species modulator, in a real-world model of seasonal allergen exposure. Methods: The INVIGORATE Trial, a prospective, quadruple-masked, vehicle-controlled, crossover, sequence-randomized Phase 3 trial, tested the efficacy of reproxalap in adults with a history of moderate to severe allergic conjunctivitis, ragweed pollen allergy, and allergen chamber-induced ocular itching and redness. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 0.25% reproxalap ophthalmic solution or vehicle, followed by a 2-week washout period before crossing over to the other test article. The primary endpoint was ocular itching from 110 to 210 minutes after chamber entry; the key secondary endpoint was ocular redness over the chamber duration (0-4 scales for both endpoints). Results: Of the 95 randomly assigned patients, 89 completed all visits (reproxalap to vehicle: n = 46; vehicle to reproxalap: n = 43). Primary and key secondary endpoints were met: reproxalap significantly reduced ocular itching (mean [SE]: -0.50 [0.03], p < 0.001) and redness (-0.14 [0.01], p < 0.001) relative to vehicle. Responder analyses confirmed the clinical relevance of both end points. Reproxalap was safe and well tolerated. No clinically significant changes in safety assessments were observed. No serious or severe treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported. The most commonly reported TEAE was mild and transient installation site irritation after reproxalap versus vehicle administration. Conclusion: In this well-controlled allergen chamber trial, reproxalap was statistically superior to vehicle across typical symptoms and signs of allergic conjunctivitis. Trial Registration: NCT04207736.

Clinical diagnosis and management of Demodex blepharitis: the Demodex Expert Panel on Treatment and Eyelid Health (DEPTH).

BACKGROUND: Twelve ocular surface disease experts convened to achieve consensus about Demodex blepharitis (DB) using a modified Delphi panel process. METHODS: Online surveys were administered using scaled, open-ended, true/false, and multiple-choice questions. Consensus for questions using a 1 to 9 Likert scale was predefined as median scores of 7-9 and 1-3. For other question types, consensus was achieved when 8 of 12 panellists agreed. Questions were randomized, and results of each survey informed the following survey. RESULTS: Twelve practitioners comprised the Demodex Expert Panel on Treatment and Eyelid Health (DEPTH). Following 3 surveys, experts agreed that DB is chronic (n = 11) and recurrent (n = 12) and is often misdiagnosed. Consensus was achieved regarding inflammation driving symptoms (median = 7; range 7-9), collarettes as the most common sign (n = 10) and pathognomonic for DB (median = 9; range 8-9), and itching as the most common symptom (n = 12). Panellists agreed that DB may be diagnosed based on collarettes, mites, and/or patient symptoms (n = 10) and felt that patients unresponsive to typical therapies should be evaluated for DB (n = 12). Consensus about the most effective currently available OTC treatment was not reached. CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi methodology proved effective in establishing consensus about DB, including signs, symptoms, and diagnosis. Consensus was not reached about the best treatment or how to grade severity. With increased awareness, eyecare practitioners can offer DB patients better clinical outcomes. A follow-up Delphi panel is planned to obtain further consensus surrounding DB treatment.

Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for Demodex blepharitis.

Purpose: To obtain consensus on Demodex blepharitis (DB) treatment using a modified Delphi panel process. Methods: Literature search identified gaps in knowledge surrounding treatment of DB. Twelve ocular surface disease experts comprised the Demodex Expert Panel on Treatment and Eyelid Health (DEPTH). They completed a live roundtable discussion in addition to 3 surveys consisting of scaled, open-ended, true/false, and multiple-choice questions pertaining to the treatment of DB. Consensus for scaled questions using a 1 to 9 Likert scale was predefined as median scores of 7-9 and 1-3. For other question types, consensus was achieved when 8 of 12 panelists agreed. Results: The experts agreed that an effective therapeutic agent for treatment of DB would likely decrease the necessity of mechanical intervention, such as lid scrubs or blepharoexfoliation (Median = 8.5; Range 2-9). When treating DB, panelists believed that collarettes serve as a surrogate for mites, and that eliminating or reducing collarettes should be the main clinical goal of treatment (Median = 8; Range 7-9). The panelists would treat patients with at least 10 collarettes, regardless of other signs or symptoms and agreed that DB can be cured, but there is always the possibility for a reinfestation (n = 12). There was also consensus that collarettes, and therefore mites, are the primary treatment target and the way by which clinicians can monitor patient response to therapy (Median = 8; Range 7-9). Conclusion: Expert panelists achieved consensus on key facets of DB treatment. Specifically, there was consensus that collarettes are pathognomonic for DB, that DB patients with >10 collarettes should be treated even in the absence of symptoms, and that treatment efficacy can be tracked by collarette resolution. By increasing awareness about DB, understanding the goals of and monitoring treatment efficacy, patients will receive better care and, ultimately, better clinical outcomes.

TFOS Lifestyle Report Executive Summary: A Lifestyle Epidemic - Ocular Surface Disease.

The Tear Film & Ocular Surface Society (TFOS) Workshop entitled 'A Lifestyle Epidemic: Ocular Surface Disease' was a global initiative undertaken to establish the direct and indirect impacts of everyday lifestyle choices and challenges on ocular surface health. This article presents an executive summary of the evidence-based conclusions and recommendations of the 10-part TFOS Lifestyle Workshop report. Lifestyle factors described within the report include contact lenses, cosmetics, digital environment, elective medications and procedures, environmental conditions, lifestyle challenges, nutrition, and societal challenges. For each topic area, the current literature was summarized and appraised in a narrative-style review and the answer to a key topic-specific question was sought using systematic review methodology. The TFOS Lifestyle Workshop report was published in its entirety in the April 2023 and July 2023 issues of The Ocular Surface journal. Links to downloadable versions of the document and supplementary material, including report translations, are available on the TFOS website: http://www.TearFilm.org.

Bilateral posterior capsule rupture and anterior vitreous prolapse from vigorous eye rubbing.

PURPOSE: We present the case of a 71-year-old male who developed decreased visual acuity eleven years after uncomplicated bilateral cataract extraction and in-the-bag IOL implantation following recent bouts of vigorous eye rubbing. OBSERVATIONS: On examination, the posterior capsules were ruptured centrally in both eyes, and there was anterior vitreous prolapse bilaterally. While both IOLs remained in the visual axis, there was mild bilateral decentration and resultant decreased vision. CONCLUSION AND IMPORTANCE: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first reported case of bilateral simultaneous posterior capsule rupture with anterior vitreous prolapse due to eye rubbing. Contrasting to previous case reports, this scenario demonstrates that severe eye rubbing can have variable severity and complications. Frequent and vigorous eye rubbing can be a precipitating cause of late postoperative posterior capsule rupture and should be avoided in pseudophakic patients, especially those with older IOL models.

Reproxalap Activity and Estimation of Clinically Relevant Thresholds for Ocular Itching and Redness in a Randomized Allergic Conjunctivitis Field Trial.

INTRODUCTION: This clinical trial assessed the activity of reproxalap, a novel reactive aldehyde species modulator, and estimated clinically relevant thresholds for changes in ocular itching and redness in an allergic conjunctivitis field trial. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled phase 2 trial. Patients with ragweed-associated allergic conjunctivitis were assessed over 28 days in an environmental setting with approximately four doses per day of either 0.25% reproxalap, 0.5% reproxalap, or vehicle. Patients recorded ocular itching, redness, tearing, and eyelid swelling scores (each with a 0-4 scale, except for a 0-3 scale for swelling), and completed the Allergic Conjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire at the beginning and end of the trial. RESULTS: Mixed model of repeated measures analysis demonstrated statistically lower itching and tearing scores (pooled P = 0.026 and P < 0.001, respectively) and numerically lower redness and eyelid swelling scores than vehicle on days when pollen exceeded the 95th percentile value. Using three anchor-based and three distribution-based approaches, the meaningful within-patient change and the between-group meaningful difference for patient-reported ocular itching and redness was estimated to be approximately 0.5. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event associated with reproxalap was transient irritation upon instillation. CONCLUSION: In a field clinical trial, reproxalap was well tolerated and superior to vehicle in reducing ocular itching on high-pollen days. The clinical meaningfulness threshold estimates of 0.5 units are among the first such calculations generated for the standard ocular itching and redness scores, providing important context for the clinical interpretation of clinical trials in allergic conjunctivitis.

While allergic conjunctivitis affects millions of patients worldwide, treatments with new mechanisms have not been introduced in decades. Reproxalap, a medicine being investigated as a treatment for allergic conjunctivitis, works by regulating reactive aldehyde species­molecules that are increased in a variety of inflammatory diseases. This clinical trial assessed the activity of reproxalap and estimated what amount of change in ocular itching and redness should be considered clinically important. Patients with ragweed-associated allergic conjunctivitis were assessed over 28 days and were given one of three possible eye drops at approximately four doses per day: 0.25% reproxalap; 0.5% reproxalap; or vehicle, which was composed of the same ingredients but does not contain reproxalap. Patients recorded ocular itching, redness, tearing, and eyelid swelling (all scales ranged from 0 [none] to 4 [severe] except for eyelid swelling, which ranged from 0 to 3), and completed a quality-of-life questionnaire on allergic conjunctivitis at the beginning and end of the trial. The results indicated that reproxalap was significantly better than vehicle in reducing itching and tearing scores and was better than vehicle in reducing redness and eyelid swelling scores on days when pollen counts were high. The trial also suggested that a reduction in ocular itching and redness scores of approximately 0.5 or more (scale 0­4) is likely to be clinically important. Overall, reproxalap was well tolerated and no safety concerns were noted. The most common side effect was transient ocular discomfort after eye drop administration.

Dry eye disease flares: A rapid evidence assessment.

PURPOSE: Characteristics of periodic flares of dry eye disease (DED) are not well understood. We conducted a rapid evidence assessment to identify evidence for and characteristics of DED flares. METHODS: Literature searches were performed in Embase® via Ovid®, MEDLINE®, and PubMed®. Clinical trials and observational studies published 2009-2019 were included if they investigated patients aged ≥18 years with clinically diagnosed DED who experienced a flare, defined as a temporary or transient episode of increased ocular discomfort, typically lasting days to a few weeks. Triggers of flares, patient-reported outcomes (symptoms), clinician-measured outcomes (signs), and changes in tear molecules were captured. RESULTS: Twenty-one publications that included 22 studies met inclusion criteria. Five observational studies described evidence of DED flares in daily life, 5 studies reported changes following cataract/refractive surgery in patients with preoperative DED, and 12 studies employed controlled environment (CE) models. Real-world triggers of DED flares included air conditioning, wind, reading, low humidity, watching television, and pollution. CE chambers (dry, moving air) and surgery also triggered DED flares. Exacerbations of symptoms and signs of DED, assessed through varied measures, were reported during flares. Across studies, matrix metalloproteinase-9 and interleukin-6 increased and epidermal growth factor decreased during DED flares. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from 22 studies identified triggers and characteristics of DED flares. Further research is needed to assist clinicians in early diagnosis and treatment of patients experiencing flares.

Posterior lamellar keratoplasty: techniques, outcomes, and recent advances.

Over the past 2 decades, posterior lamellar keratoplasty (PLK) has emerged as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty in the treatment of corneal endothelial disorders. The reasons for this trend include the search for a safer procedure to replace diseased endothelium that provides faster and better visual rehabilitation and reduces the need for postoperative care. Different surgical techniques, surgical instruments, devices, and lasers have been introduced to overcome technical difficulties, thus improving clinical outcomes. Yet, surgeons and eye banks must address the complications and limitations that arise during the transition to these new techniques. This review discusses the most significant aspects of the evolution of PLK, including a detailed description of current techniques and the direction of future treatment for corneal endothelial disease with the use of laser-assisted surgery, bioengineered corneas, cell therapy, and new pharmacologic therapy.

Dry Eye Disease: Early Recognition with Guidance on Management and Treatment for Primary Care Family Physicians.

Primary care presentations of dry eye disease (DED) are common and pose a diagnostic challenge due to the variety of symptoms and the absence of certainty for family practitioners. While there are many published articles on the topic, the 2017 Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society Dry Eye Workshop was a landmark report in distinguishing multifactorial differences. Redefined terms clarified the DED disorder. The ocular surface-the tear/air interface-is the primary refractive component of the eye, which is why DED is so significant and impacts vision. There is a high prevalence of DED in the community, ranging from 5% to 30% of people across multiple studies. Elderly patients have up to 75% increased risk of DED and receive more intensive treatment than younger age groups. DED is also more common in women than men, occurring in 9.8% of postmenopausal women. The causes of DED span defective lacrimal apparatus and systemic disorders. Despite its prevalence, up to one-half of patients with confirmed DED do not receive proper alleviating treatment. Risk factors on functional and environmental bases follow. Tools to elicit a diagnosis more confidently are outlined using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and the Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye questionnaires (SANDE). Lacritin, lutein, vitamin A, and balanced nutrition are essential contributors to maintaining healthy eyes with appropriate management and treatment. The authors hope that this paper will prompt a more accurate and expedient diagnosis of DED in primary care practice and an earlier recognition of specialist referrals.

Dry eye disease (DED) poses a diagnostic challenge to primary care physicians. The condition involves the tear/air interface, at the corneal (ocular) surface, where light enters the eye. Any change in light refraction affects regular sight. Symptoms of DED include itching, grittiness, foreign body sensation, redness, excessive tearing, and visual blurring, the lattermost being the most common presentation. Ultimately, the untreated disease leads to continued discomfort and visual deficit, but when severe, it can result in blindness. Up to 30% of the population suffers from DED, with the elderly, particularly women, more affected. Unfortunately, up to 50% of those affected have inadequate treatment. Questionnaires help in diagnosis. Simple office tests can indicate the severity of eye problems. Technology with smartphone photography can take high-resolution images, which are useful in education and teaching. A multitude of conditions cause DED, including blepharitis, an infection of the eyelids. Environmental risks also abound. Proper nutrition is essential in maintaining eye health. Intermittent eye symptoms are likely to be underrated by the public, by purchasing over-the-counter products such as artificial tears rather than seeking a proper medical check. Newer prescription medications are now available for DED relief before advancing to debility requiring specialist treatment. Dry Eye Disease: Early Recognition with Guidance on Management and Treatment for Primary CareFamily Physicians (MP4 95031 kb).

The utility of a normal tear osmolarity test in patients presenting with dry eye disease like symptoms: A prospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the diagnostic utility of normal tear osmolarity in patients with symptoms suggestive of dry eye disease (DED). METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study of 100 patients that underwent tear osmolarity testing (TearLab™) if they endorsed one or more symptoms of potential DED. Patients were included for the study if they had a normal tear osmolarity test (value <308 mOsm/L in each eye, and an inter-eye difference <8 mOsm/L). The main outcome measure was the presence of any alternate diagnosis to explain the patient's symptoms. Results were recorded and descriptive and univariate statistics were employed. RESULTS: Mean tear osmolarity was 293.40 mOsms/L (±6.82), with a mean absolute difference of 2.85 mOsms/L (±1.98) between the eyes. A possible alternate diagnosis was established in 89% of patients with normal tear osmolarity testing. The most frequent diagnoses included anterior blepharitis (26%) and allergic conjunctivitis (21%). CONCLUSIONS: Common symptoms of DED overlap significantly with a wide variety of other ocular surface diseases, and a normal tear osmolarity test should increase clinical suspicion for alternate causes of those symptoms. Anterior blepharitis and allergic conjunctivitis were the most common diagnoses made in symptomatic patients with normal tear osmolarity who may have otherwise been misdiagnosed and treated for DED.

Corneal crosslinking: Current protocols and clinical approach.

Members of the ASCRS Cornea Clinical Committee performed a review of the current literature on the corneal crosslinking (CXL) procedure for treating corneal ectasia. The members explored the data on the techniques currently in use and under investigation, including their advantages, safety profiles, risks, and cost analyses, compared with data on corneal transplantation. They concluded that CXL limits the progression of keratoconus, thus reducing the need for transplantation. They also found that compared with permitting the disease to progress naturally, CXL techniques carry significant and long-term cost and safety benefits, primarily by reducing the need for corneal transplantation. Studies of various CXL techniques (eg, epithelium-on treatment, changes in ultraviolet light parameters, riboflavin composition) continue with the ultimate goal of improving the procedure's safety and efficacy.

An algorithm for the preoperative diagnosis and treatment of ocular surface disorders.

Any ocular surface disease (OSD), but most commonly, dry-eye disease (DED), can reduce visual quality and quantity and adversely affect refractive measurements before keratorefractive and phacorefractive surgeries. In addition, ocular surgery can exacerbate or induce OSD, leading to worsened vision, increased symptoms, and overall dissatisfaction postoperatively. Although most respondents of the recent annual American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) Clinical Survey recognized the importance of DED on surgical outcomes, many were unaware of the current guidelines and most were not using modern diagnostic tests and advanced treatments. To address these educational gaps, the ASCRS Cornea Clinical Committee developed a new consensus-based practical diagnostic OSD algorithm to aid surgeons in efficiently diagnosing and treating visually significant OSD before any form of refractive surgery is performed. By treating OSD preoperatively, postoperative visual outcomes and patient satisfaction can be significantly improved.

Epidemiology of gram-negative conjunctivitis in neonatal intensive care unit patients.

PURPOSE: To describe the epidemiologic features, risk factors, and antibiotic susceptibilities for gram-negative conjunctivitis among neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. METHODS: In a University Tertiary Care Hospital with a level III-IV NICU, 65 NICU infants (< eight weeks of age) with positive culture results for conjunctivitis between January 1, 2001 and June 1, 2007, were included. Patient demographics, clinical examination results, device usage, and antibiotic susceptibility data were compared between infants with gram-negative conjunctivitis and infants without gram-negative conjunctivitis. RESULTS: One or more episodes of gram-negative conjunctivitis occurred in 38% (n = 25/65) of NICU infants. Predominant pathogens included Klebsiella species (23%), Escherichia coli (17%), Serratia marcescens (17%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3%), and Enterobacter species (2%). Birth weight and gestational age were significantly less in infants with gram-negative conjunctivitis than in infants without gram-negative conjunctivitis (P = .008 and P = .008, respectively). With multivariate analysis, birth weight less than 1500 g (odds ratio [OR], 4.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42 to 13.36), and gestational age of 29 weeks or fewer (OR, 5.60; 95% CI, 1.88 to 16.66) were identified as risk factors for the development of gram-negative conjunctivitis. Antibiotic resistance of gram-negative organisms to ampicillin, cefazolin, gentamicin, and levofloxacin were 96%, 52%, 13%, and 7% respectively. Of the Klebsiella isolates, two (25%) of eight were resistant to gentamicin. CONCLUSIONS: Low birth weight and low gestational age in NICU infants with clinical signs of conjunctivitis should raise the suspicion for a gram-negative cause. Given the observed resistance patterns of Klebsiella isolates, gentamicin resistance should be considered when designing empiric treatment.

Central corneal thickness measured by the Orbscan II system, contact ultrasound pachymetry, and the Artemis 2 system.

PURPOSE: To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by the Orbscan II device, contact ultrasound (US) pachymetry, and the noncontact Artemis 2 scanning US system. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA. METHODS: The CCT in 40 eyes (20 normal subjects) was measured by the Orbscan II followed by contact US pachymetry and then the Artemis 2. Results were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA), paired t tests, and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in CCT measurements between the 3 modes (F = 32.84, P = .0001, 1-way ANOVA). Artemis 2 and US pachymetry measurements were highly correlated (r2 = 0.963, P < .0001), although Artemis 2 values were a mean of 11.2 microm +/- 6.6 (SD) thinner than pachymetry values. Artemis 2 and Orbscan II measurements were less well correlated (r2 = 0.851, P < .001); Orbscan II values were a mean of 7.5 +/- 15.7 microm thinner than Artemis 2 values. Orbscan II values showed a trend toward increasing underestimation of CCT in thinner corneas. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound pachymetry and Artemis 2 CCT measurements were highly correlated; the 11 microm mean difference in measurements may be attributed to decentration, oblique incidence of the probe to the cornea, or possibly the effect of topical anesthesia with contact pachymetry. Although the mean difference between Orbscan II and Artemis 2 values was 7.5 microm, Orbscan values were less correlated than Artemis 2 values with contact US pachymetry and were prone to underestimation of the CCT in thinner corneas.

Trends in resistance to ciprofloxacin, cefazolin, and gentamicin in the treatment of bacterial keratitis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microbial profile, resistance patterns, and antibiotic sensitivity of bacterial keratitis to three commonly used ocular antibiotics. METHODS: All cases of bacterial keratitis referred to the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Microbiology Laboratory from two consecutive annual 10-month periods were reviewed. The bacterial profile and resistance to ciprofloxacin, cefazolin, and gentamicin was evaluated within the two intervals. RESULTS: Of the 485 cultures analyzed, 66.4% (322) were positive for bacterial isolates. Of these, 19.2% were polymicrobial, 87.5% were gram-positive, and 12.5% were gram-negative. The most prevalent isolate was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (45.5%), followed by S. aureus (15.2%). The resistance patterns for gram-positive bacteria for ciprofloxacin for the first versus second time interval were 12% and 22% (P = 0.04) respectively, for cefazolin 13% and 23% (P = 0.04), and for gentamicin 4% and 7% (P = 0.36). The resistance patterns for gram-negative bacteria for ciprofloxacin, cefazolin, and gentamicin were not significantly different in the two tested time periods (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There was increased resistance of gram-positive organisms to ciprofloxacin and cefazolin, but not gentamicin, in the two examined time periods. Increased resistance to these commonly used antibiotics emphasizes the need for close follow-up after initial empiric treatment, and maintaining a low threshold for selecting alternative therapy.

Prevalence of ocular surface dysfunction in patients presenting for cataract surgery evaluation.

PURPOSE: To report the prevalence of ocular surface dysfunction in patients presenting for cataract surgery evaluation. SETTING: Duke University Eye Center and Weill Cornell Ophthalmology, single-physician practices. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting for cataract surgery evaluation were identified. Patient information including demographics, medical history, slitlamp findings, tear osmolarity, and tear matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) levels were recorded. Patients were considered to have ocular surface dysfunction if any of the following outcomes were present: visually significant abnormal corneal surface examination, positive MMP-9 test, or abnormal osmolarity values (>307 mOsm/L or >7 mOsm/L intereye difference). Patient symptoms were recorded using the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) or Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye questionnaires. RESULTS: There were 120 patients (69% women), mean age 69.5 years ± 8.4 (SD). Abnormal osmolarity was found in 68 patients (56.7%), and abnormal MMP-9 in 76 patients (63.3%). Clinical findings showed that 47 patients (39.2%) had positive corneal staining on presentation, 9 patients (7.5%) had epithelial basement membrane dystrophy, and 2 patients (1.6%) had Salzmann nodules. Questionnaire data showed 54 (54.0%) of 100 patients reported symptoms suggestive of ocular surface dysfunction. In the asymptomatic group of 46 patients, 39 (85%) had at least 1 abnormal tear test (osmolarity or MMP-9) and 22 (48%) had both tests abnormal. Overall, 96 (80%) of 120 patients had at least 1 abnormal tear test result suggestive of ocular surface dysfunction and 48 patients (40%) had 2 abnormal results. CONCLUSIONS: Objective ocular surface dysfunction findings were common among patients presenting for cataract surgery, yet many presented undiagnosed. Clinicians should be aware of this high prevalence and consider screening with tear testing before surgery.

Surgical techniques and adjuvants for the management of primary and recurrent pterygia.

The removal and rate of recurrence of pterygium have been discussed for years. The disorder is highly associated with environmental factors, and recurrence rates can be unacceptably high and cannot be successfully predicted. New techniques and graft preparations and postoperative management strategies are helping to reduce the recurrence rates and provide an ocular surface that is near ideal for future cataract or refractive surgery. This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of various treatment strategies.

Varicella-zoster virus: mechanisms of pathogenicity and corneal disease.

As ophthalmologists, many of our patients suffer from the ravages, both ocular and non-ocular, of the varicella-zoster virus. This article is a comprehensive review of the pathogenetic mechanisms of this ubiquitous virus. We review the basic virology, mechanisms of varicella, zoster, latency, reactivation, and the host immune response to the virus. Herpes zoster ophthalmicus is discussed with special attention to the cornea and mechanisms of viral keratitis.

Corneal keloid: report of natural history and outcome of surgical management in two cases.

PURPOSE: To report the natural history and the outcome after the surgical management of 2 cases of corneal keloids. METHODS: Two male patients, 21 and 24 years old, with a history of corneal opacity for 5 and 17 years, respectively, with no history of an ocular trauma were studied. RESULTS: The first patient initially underwent a superficial keratectomy (SK), after which the corneal opacification recurred. He subsequently underwent 2 SK procedures combined with phototherapeutic keratectomy and mitomycin C, followed by a femtosecond laser-assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. The second patient underwent a bilateral SK followed by a penetrating keratoplasty in the left eye with the rapid recurrence of the lesion. The patient subsequently underwent an implantation of a Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis in the right eye, with a favorable outcome. The histopathologic features of both excised corneal specimens were consistent with the diagnosis of a corneal keloid. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal keloids recur after SK and phototherapeutic keratectomy, indicating that keratoplasty procedures may be more effective than keratectomy procedures in their management. However, corneal keloids may recur even after a penetrating keratoplasty, in which case keratoprosthesis implantation represents a viable option for visual rehabilitation.