RESUMO
Postpartum depression is a serious health issue affecting as many as 10-15 % of postpartum women. This longitudinal study aimed to explore how psychological variables such as cognitive emotion regulation strategies, breastfeeding self-efficacy (BSE), and dimensions of social support predicted postpartum depressive symptoms (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale). The data were collected with web-based survey questionnaires between May 2008 and December 2009, in a sample of 737 new mothers. The same questionnaire was surveyed at three points in time: 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postpartum. Data were analyzed using multilevel modeling (level 1, time points; level 2, person). Results showed that BSE, certain cognitive emotion regulation strategies, perceived available support, and need for support predicted the rate of postpartum depressive symptoms. Only breastfeeding self-efficacy predicted change in postpartum depressive symptoms. This study illustrates the importance of psychological variables with regard to postpartum depressive symptoms. Implications for preventative efforts are discussed.
Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno/psicologia , Depressão Pós-Parto/psicologia , Comportamento Materno/psicologia , Mães/psicologia , Autoeficácia , Apoio Social , Adaptação Psicológica , Adulto , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Depressão Pós-Parto/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Estudos Longitudinais , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To study short- and long-term improvement in obstetric anal incontinence after secondary overlapping sphincteroplasty and repeat repairs. DESIGN: A prospective analysis based on incontinence scores and patient satisfaction. SETTING: Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, a tertiary unit also dealing with sphincter repair. POPULATION: Of 40 obstetric patients operated consecutively from February 1996 to April 2004, 33 (83%) patients with median age of 36 years were eligible for evaluation. METHODS: Wexner's and St. Mark's incontinence score, clinical examination, anal ultrasonography and manometry, and neurophysiological examination when indicated. Patient satisfaction to treatment was recorded. The patients had anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty. Five had repeat operations, four sphincteroplasty and two post-anal repair. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anal incontinence, patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The 33 patients were examined after median 7 (range 2-62) months and 103 (62-162) months. Median incontinence scores preoperatively and after short- and long-term follow-up were 12 (5-20), 7 (5-20) (p < 0.01) and 9 (0-18) (p < 0.05), respectively. Three patients (9%) had normalized anal incontinence (score ≤1) after short- and long-term follow-up. Corresponding numbers for improved anal incontinence were 22 (67%) and 16 (49%), respectively. Improvement in incontinence scores and patients' satisfaction were concordant. Symptom duration (n = 7), pudendal neuropathy (n = 6), repeat repair (n = 5) and instrument delivery (n = 3) were associated with adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in anal incontinence at short-term follow-up is attenuated at long-term follow-up. Stoma formation, sacral nerve stimulation and neo-sphincter formation must be considered in compliant patients.
Assuntos
Canal Anal/cirurgia , Parto Obstétrico/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Incontinência Fecal/etiologia , Incontinência Fecal/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The aim of the present study was to assess indications for induction and describe the characteristics and delivery outcome in medical compared to non-medical/elective inductions. During a three-month period, 1663 term inductions were registered in 24 delivery units in Norway. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies with cephalic presentation at gestational age 37+0 and beyond. Indications, pre-induction Bishop scores, mode of delivery and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes were registered, and compared between the medically indicated and elective induction groups. Ten percent of the inductions were elective, and the four most common indications were maternal request (35%), a previous negative delivery experience or difficult obstetric history (19%), maternal fatigue/tiredness (17%) and anxiety (15%). Nearly half of these inductions were performed at 39+0-40+6 weeks. There were fewer nulliparous women in the elective compared to the medically indicated induction group, 16% vs. 52% (p<0.05). The cesarean section rate in the elective induction group was 14% and 17% in the medically indicated group (14% vs. 17%, OR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.3). We found that one in ten inductions in Norway is performed without a strict medical indication and 86% of these inductions resulted in vaginal delivery.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/psicologia , Trabalho de Parto Induzido/métodos , Trabalho de Parto Induzido/psicologia , Adulto , Cesárea/psicologia , Parto Obstétrico/psicologia , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Trabalho de Parto/fisiologia , Trabalho de Parto/psicologia , Noruega/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Nascimento a Termo/psicologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Most newborns manage the transition from intra- to extrauterine life without interventions, yet neonatal morbidity caused by failure of transition remains an important health problem. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of neonatal stabilization and resuscitation measures and guideline compliance during the first minutes after birth. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational study of all births in three Norwegian hospitals. All interventions performed, including suctioning, use of pulse oximetry, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), positive pressure ventilation (PPV), supplemental oxygen, intubation, and administration of drugs, were registered at every on-call team shift during the study period. RESULTS: A total of 1,507 live-born infants were included, of whom 264 (18%) were brought to the resuscitation crib. Oropharyngeal suctioning was performed in 77 (5%), deep blind suctioning was carried out in 10 (1%) and 84 (6%) were monitored using pulse oximetry. PPV was provided in 58 cases (4%) - 8 (21%) of <34 weeks and 50 (3%) of ≥34 weeks of gestation. Sustained inflation is not routinely used in these departments. CPAP (without PPV) was provided in 17 cases (1%) - 4 (0.3%) were intubated and ventilated through the endotracheal tube. Supplemental oxygen was given to 39 infants (3%) - 9 without pulse oximetry monitoring. The median (interquartile range) birth weight and gestational age of the newborns requiring PPV and/or CPAP were 3,220 g (2,643-3,858) and 39 weeks (37-41), respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study, the need for resuscitation and/or stabilization measures was commonly considered, and 4% of all newborns received PPV. Despite strong guideline emphasis on the use of pulse oximetry to guide oxygen administration, many infants received oxygen treatment without pulse oximetry monitoring.
Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes/normas , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Oxigênio/uso terapêutico , Ressuscitação/normas , Displasia Broncopulmonar/epidemiologia , Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Ventilação com Pressão Positiva Intermitente , Intubação Intratraqueal , Masculino , Noruega , Oximetria , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
CONTEXT: Defibrillation as soon as possible is standard treatment for patients with ventricular fibrillation. A nonrandomized study indicates that after a few minutes of ventricular fibrillation, delaying defibrillation to give cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) first might improve the outcome. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of CPR before defibrillation on outcome in patients with ventricular fibrillation and with response times either up to or longer than 5 minutes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized trial of 200 patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in Oslo, Norway, between June 1998 and May 2001. Patients received either standard care with immediate defibrillation (n = 96) or CPR first with 3 minutes of basic CPR by ambulance personnel prior to defibrillation (n = 104). If initial defibrillation was unsuccessful, the standard group received 1 minute of CPR before additional defibrillation attempts compared with 3 minutes in the CPR first group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Primary end point was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary end points were hospital admission with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 1-year survival, and neurological outcome. A prespecified analysis examined subgroups with response times either up to or longer than 5 minutes. RESULTS: In the standard group, 14 (15%) of 96 patients survived to hospital discharge vs 23 (22%) of 104 in the CPR first group (P =.17). There were no differences in ROSC rates between the standard group (56% [58/104]) and the CPR first group (46% [44/96]; P =.16); or in 1-year survival (20% [21/104] and 15% [14/96], respectively; P =.30). In subgroup analysis for patients with ambulance response times of either up to 5 minutes or shorter, there were no differences in any outcome variables between the CPR first group (n = 40) and the standard group (n = 41). For patients with response intervals of longer than 5 minutes, more patients achieved ROSC in the CPR first group (58% [37/64]) compared with the standard group (38% [21/55]; odds ratio [OR], 2.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-4.63; P =.04); survival to hospital discharge (22% [14/64] vs 4% [2/55]; OR, 7.42; 95% CI, 1.61-34.3; P =.006); and 1-year survival (20% [13/64] vs 4% [2/55]; OR, 6.76; 95% CI, 1.42-31.4; P =.01). Thirty-three (89%) of 37 patients who survived to hospital discharge had no or minor reductions in neurological status with no difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with standard care for ventricular fibrillation, CPR first prior to defibrillation offered no advantage in improving outcomes for this entire study population or for patients with ambulance response times shorter than 5 minutes. However, the patients with ventricular fibrillation and ambulance response intervals longer than 5 minutes had better outcomes with CPR first before defibrillation was attempted. These results require confirmation in additional randomized trials.