RESUMO
Objective: Renoprotection from reperfusion injury appears to be conferred by HIF-2a activation, which can be stimulated by exogenous acetate administration. The study objective was to assess whether administration of acetate in a porcine model can mitigate kidney injury related to ischemia-reperfusion after renal hilar occlusion. Methods: A porcine single-kidney model was created by performing a laparoscopic nephrectomy followed by animal recovery. After 2 days, the animals underwent laparoscopic hilar dissection. Block randomization was used to assign pigs into one of four experimental groups. One treatment block of pigs received 150 mEq of sodium acetate intravenously during 90 minutes of en bloc occlusion of the renal hilum (herein noted as "cross-clamping"). Another block received 0.75 g/kg of oral sodium acetate for 3 days prior to cross-clamping. A third block received no acetate and underwent hilar dissection without cross-clamping (negative control). The final block received no acetate and underwent cross-clamping (positive control). Serum creatinine was used to estimate renal function post-nephrectomy. Results: A total of 16 animals (4 pigs in each group) completed the study protocol. Median pig weight was 34.6 kg. One pig receiving IV acetate was excluded from the final analysis because of unrecoverable renal failure after cross-clamping. There was a significantly lower mean serum creatinine for the IV acetate group compared with the positive control group 72 hours after cross-clamping (p = 0.012). The same effect was not observed for the pigs receiving oral acetate. By day 7, renal function had recovered without significant difference in all groups. Conclusions: We observed that the administration of intravenous acetate conferred a significant renoprotective benefit in our single kidney ischemia-reperfusion porcine model 72 hours after hilar occlusion. This work is hypothesis-generating, and further work in human subjects undergoing renal hilar occlusion during partial nephrectomy is warranted.
Assuntos
Modelos Animais de Doenças , Rim , Traumatismo por Reperfusão , Animais , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Rim/irrigação sanguínea , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/prevenção & controle , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/tratamento farmacológico , Suínos , Substâncias Protetoras/farmacologia , Substâncias Protetoras/uso terapêutico , Sus scrofa , Acetato de Sódio/farmacologia , Acetato de Sódio/uso terapêutico , Acetatos/farmacologia , Acetatos/uso terapêutico , Isquemia/tratamento farmacológico , Creatinina/sangue , NefrectomiaRESUMO
Growing evidence suggests that many patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma (NMIUC) can undergo bladder-sparing management with salvage intravesical therapies. However, inherent or developed disease resistance, particularly after multiple lines of prior salvage therapy, implores the continued pursuit of new treatment combinations. Herein, we describe the outcomes of 26 patients (31 treated units; 24 lower tract, 7 upper tract) with high-risk NMIUC treated with sequential intravesical gemcitabine and cabazitaxel with concomitant intravenous pembrolizumab (GCP) at the University of Iowa from August 2020 to February 2023. Median (IQR) follow-up was 30 (IQR: 17-35) months. Treated units had a history of high-risk NMIUC with a median of four prior endoluminal inductions. Overall, 87% of units presented with CIS or positive urine cytology. The 1- and 2-year recurrence-free survival was 77% (CI: 58-88%) and 52% (CI: 30-70%), respectively. The 2-year progression-free and cancer-specific survival was 70% (CI: 44-85%) and 96% (CI: 75-99%), respectively. In total, 22/26 (85%) patients reported any adverse event and 5/26 (19%) reported a grade ≥3 adverse event; however, all patients tolerated a full induction course. These results suggest that GCP is an effective and tolerable treatment option for patients with recurrent high-risk NMIUC.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Nephroureterectomy is commonly performed for high-grade (HG) upper tract (UT) urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, some patients may benefit from a de-escalation of surgical management, particularly for noninvasive disease and carcinoma in situ (CIS). Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is currently the only guideline-recommended endoluminal treatment option. Gemcitabine/Docetaxel (Gem/Doce) has shown promising efficacy as a treatment for noninvasive HG UTUC, though a comparison to BCG is lacking. We report the outcomes of patients treated with endoluminal Gem/Doce vs. BCG for UT-CIS. METHODS: A single-institutional retrospective review of patients treated with Gem/Doce vs. BCG for UT-CIS was performed. Treatment was instilled via nephrostomy or retrograde ureteral catheter. In both treatment groups, induction consisted of 6 weekly instillations. Maintenance was initiated if disease-free and consisted of 6 monthly instillations in the Gem/Doce group and a reduced dose (one-tenth) 3-week course at 3 months in the BCG group. Recurrence was defined as biopsy-proven disease or HG cytology. RESULTS: The final cohort included 53 patients with 65 upper tract units; 31 received BCG and 34 received Gem/Doce. Median follow-up was 88 and 29 months in the BCG and Gem/Doce groups, respectively. Presenting pathology included biopsy-proven CIS and HG cytology in 9.7% and 90% of the BCG group, and 8.8% and 91% of the Gem/Doce group, respectively. The 2-year estimates for recurrence-free and nephroureterectomy-free survival were 61% and 89% for the BCG group and 54% and 100% for the Gem/Doce group, respectively. Upon multivariable analysis, instillation via percutaneous nephrostomy tube was associated with an increased risk of recurrence (HR 3.89, 95% CI 1.59-9.53). The development of any symptom was not statistically different between treatment groups (Pâ¯=â¯0.12). There were 2 treatment-related deaths that occurred, 1 within each treatment group. CONCLUSION: Endoluminal Gem/Doce and BCG have similar oncological outcomes and major adverse event rates in the treatment of UT-CIS. Further prospective evaluation is warranted.
Assuntos
Vacina BCG , Carcinoma in Situ , Desoxicitidina , Docetaxel , Gencitabina , Humanos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Docetaxel/administração & dosagem , Docetaxel/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vacina BCG/uso terapêutico , Vacina BCG/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Carcinoma in Situ/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma in Situ/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Administração Intravesical , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
ABSTRACT Purpose: We aimed to assess failure rates of salvage interventions and changes in split kidney function (SKF) following failed primary repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of adult patients at an academic medical center who underwent salvage intervention following primary treatment for UPJO was performed. Symptomatic failure was defined as significant flank pain. Radiographic failure was defined as no improvement in drainage or a decrease in SKF by ≥7%. Overall failure, the primary outcome, was defined as symptomatic failure, radiographic failure, or both. Results: Between 2008-2017, 34 patients (median age 38 years, 50% men) met study criteria. UPJO management was primary pyeloplasty/secondary endopyelotomy for 21/34 (62%), primary pyeloplasty/secondary pyeloplasty for 6/34 (18%), and primary endopyelotomy/secondary pyeloplasty for 7/34 (21%). Median follow-up was 3.3 years following secondary intervention. Patients undergoing primary pyeloplasty/secondary endopyelotomy had significantly higher overall failure than those undergoing primary pyeloplasty/secondary pyeloplasty (16/21 [76%] vs. 1/6 [17%], p=0.015). Among patients undergoing secondary endopyelotomy, presence of a stricture on retrograde pyelogram, stricture length, and SKF were not associated with symptomatic, radiographic, or overall failure. Serial renography was performed for 28/34 (82%) patients and 2/28 (7%) had a significant decline in SKF. Conclusions: Following failed primary pyeloplasty, secondary endopyelotomy had a greater overall failure rate than secondary pyeloplasty. No radiographic features assessed were associated with secondary endopyelotomy failure. Secondary intervention overall failure rates were higher than reported in the literature. Unique to this study, serial renography demonstrated that significant functional loss was overall infrequent.