Self-reported diagnostic confidence predicts diagnostic accuracy in axial spondyloarthritis imaging.

OBJECTIVES: Reporting diagnostic confidence (DC) in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) imaging is recommended by the ASAS guidelines. Our aim was to investigate whether self-reported DC predicts diagnostic accuracy in axSpA imaging using X-ray (XR), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis including 163 patients with low back pain (89 axSpA and 56 non-axSpA). Nine blinded readers with different experience levels (inexperienced (< 1 year), semi-experienced (3-8 years) and experienced (> 12 years)) scored the sacroiliac joint images for compatibility with axSpA. DC was reported on a scale from 1 (not sure) to 10 (very sure). Mean DC scores and standard deviations were calculated for correct and incorrect responses using XR, CT, MRI, XR+MRI and CT+MRI. Differences in DC were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: DC scores were higher for correct axSpA diagnoses and differed significantly between correct and incorrect responses for all modalities (p< 0.001), with a mean DC of 7.1 ± 2.1 and 6.3 ± 2.1 for XR, 8.3 ± 1.8 and 6.7 ± 2.0 for CT, 8.1 ± 1.9 and 6.2 ± 1.9 for MRI, 8.2 ± 1.8 and 6.7 ± 1.8 for XR+MRI and 8.4 ± 1.8 and 6.8 ± 1.8 for CT+MRI, respectively. This was also the case when looking at the results by experience group, except for XR in the inexperienced group. CONCLUSION: Providing self-reported DC in radiological reports is useful information to predict diagnostic reliability in axSpA imaging.

Visualizing patterns of intervertebral disc damage with dual-energy computed tomography: assessment of diagnostic accuracy in an ex vivo spine biophantom.

BACKGROUND: Previously, dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has been established for imaging spinal fractures as an alternative modality to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). PURPOSE: To analyze the diagnostic accuracy of DECT in visualizing intervertebral disc (IVD) damage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The lumbar spine of a Great Dane dog was used as an ex vivo biophantom. DECT was performed as sequential volume technique on a single-source CT scanner. IVDs were imaged before and after an injection of sodium chloride solution and after anterior discectomy in single-source sequential volume DECT technique using 80 and 135 kVp. Chondroitin/Collagen maps (cMaps) were reconstructed at 1 mm and compared with standard CT. Standardized regions of interest (ROI) were placed in the anterior anulus fibrosus, nucleus pulposus, and other sites. Three blinded readers classified all images as intact disc, nucleus lesion, or anulus lesion. Additionally, clinical examples from patients with IVD lesions were retrospectively identified from the radiological database. RESULTS: Interrater reliability was almost perfect with a Fleiss kappa of 0.833 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-0.835) for DECT, compared with 0.780 (95% CI 0.778-0.782) for standard CT. For overall detection accuracy of IVD, DECT achieved 91.0% sensitivity (95% CI 83.6-95.8) and 92.0% specificity (95% CI 80.8-97.8). Standard CT showed 91.0% sensitivity (95% CI 83.6-95.8) and 78.0% specificity (95% CI 64.0-88.5). CONCLUSION: DECT reliably identified IVD damage in an ex vivo biophantom. Clinical examples of patients with different lesions illustrate the accurate depiction of IVD microstructure. These data emphasize the diagnostic potential of DECT cMaps.

Age-dependent microstructural changes of the intervertebral disc: a validation of proteoglycan-sensitive spectral CT.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the two major components of the intervertebral disc (IVD) in an ex vivo phantom, as well as age-related changes in patients. METHODS: Collagen and chondroitin sulfate were imaged at different concentrations in agar solution. Age-related changes in disc density were retrospectively analyzed in normal-appearing discs in dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) images from a patient cohort with various spinal pathologies (n = 136). All computed tomography (CT) scans were acquired using single-source DECT at 80 and 135 kVp with automatic exposure calculation. In 136 patients, the attenuation of normal-appearing discs on collagen/chondroitin maps (cMaps) correlated with the patients' age with Pearson's r using standardized regions of interest in the anterior anulus fibrosus (AAF) and nucleus pulposus (NP). RESULTS: DECT collagen mapping revealed concentration-dependent Hounsfield units (HU) of IVD components. For collagen, we found Pearson's r = 0.9610 (95% CI 0.6789-0.9959), p = 0.0023 at 120 kVe, and r = 0.8824 (95% CI 0.2495-0.9871), p = 0.0199 in cMap. For chondroitin sulfate, Pearson's r was 0.9583 (95% CI 0.6603-0.9956), p = 0.0026 at 120 kVp, and r = 0.9646 (95% CI 0.7044-0.9963), p = 0.0019 in cMap. Analysis of normal-appearing IVDs revealed an inverse correlation of density with age in the AAF: Pearson's r = - 0.2294 at 135 kVp (95% CI - 0.4012 to - 0.04203; p=0.0141) and r = - 0.09341 in cMap (95% CI - 0.2777 to 0.09754; p = 0.0003). In the NP, age and density did not correlate significantly at 135 kVp (p = 0.9228) and in cMap (p = 0.3229). CONCLUSIONS: DECT-based collagen mapping allows microstructural analysis of the two main intervertebral disc components-collagen and chondroitin sulfate. IVD density declines with age, presumably due to a reduction in collagen and chondroitin sulfate content. Age-related alterations of disc microstructure appear most pronounced in the AAF. KEY POINTS: • DECT-based collagen mapping allows precise analysis of the two main intervertebral disc components-collagen and chondroitin sulfate. • Intervertebral disc (IVD) density declines with age, presumably due to a reduction in collagen and chondroitin sulfate content. • Age-related alterations of disc microstructure are most pronounced in the anterior anulus fibrosus (AAF).

Learning imaging in axial spondyloarthritis: more than just a matter of experience.

OBJECTIVE: Reliable interpretation of imaging findings is essential for the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and requires a high level of experience. We investigated experience-dependent differences in diagnostic accuracies using X-ray (XR), MRI and CT. METHODS: This post hoc analysis included 163 subjects with low back pain. Eighty-nine patients had axSpA, and 74 patients had other conditions (mechanical, degenerative or non-specific low back pain). Final diagnoses were established by an experienced rheumatologist before the reading sessions. Nine blinded readers (divided into three groups with different levels of experience) scored the XR, CT and MRI of the sacroiliac joints for the presence versus absence of axSpA. Parameters for diagnostic performance were calculated using contingency tables. Differences in diagnostic performance between the reader groups were assessed using the McNemar test. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Fleiss kappa. RESULTS: Diagnostic performance was highest for the most experienced reader group, except for XR. In the inexperienced and semi-experienced group, diagnostic performance was highest for CT&MRI (78.5% and 85.3%, respectively). In the experienced group, MRI showed the highest performance (85.9%). The greatest difference in diagnostic performance was found for MRI between the inexperienced and experienced group (76.1% vs 85.9%, p=0.001). Inter-rater agreement was best for CT in the experienced group with κ=0.87. CONCLUSION: Differences exist in the learnability of the imaging modalities for axSpA diagnosis. MRI requires more experience, while CT is more suitable for inexperienced radiologists. However, diagnosis relies on both clinical and imaging information.