A unique case of "double-orifice aortic valve"-comprehensive assessment by 2-, 3-dimensional, and color Doppler echocardiography.

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a powerful imaging tool for the comprehensive assessment of valvular structure and function. TEE may be of added benefit when anatomy is difficult to delineate accurately by transthoracic echocardiography. In this article, we present 2-, 3-dimensional, and color Doppler TEE images from a male patient with aortic stenosis. A highly unusual and complex pattern of valvular calcification created a functionally "double-orifice" valve. Such an abnormality may have implications for the accuracy of continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography, which assumes a single orifice valve in native aortic valves.

Low CRB-65 Scores Effectively Rule out Adverse Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19 Irrespective of Chest Radiographic Abnormalities.

Background: CRB-65 (Confusion; Respiratory rate ≥ 30/min; Blood pressure ≤ 90/60 mmHg; age ≥ 65 years) is a risk score for prognosticating patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. However, a significant proportion of COVID-19 patients have normal chest X-rays (CXRs). The influence of CXR abnormalities on the prognostic value of CRB-65 is unknown, limiting its wider applicability. Methods: We assessed the influence of CXR abnormalities on the prognostic value of CRB-65 in COVID-19. Results: In 589 study patients (71 years (IQR: 57-83); 57% males), 186 (32%) had normal CXRs. On ROC analysis, CRB-65 performed similarly in patients with normal vs. abnormal CXRs for predicting inpatient mortality (AUC 0.67 ± 0.05 vs. 0.69 ± 0.03). In patients with normal CXRs, a CRB-65 of 0 ruled out mortality, NIV requirement and critical illness (intubation and/or ICU admission) with negative predictive values (NPVs) of 94%, 98% and 99%, respectively. In patients with abnormal CXRs, a CRB-65 of 0 ruled out the same endpoints with NPVs of 91%, 83% and 86%, respectively. Patients with low CRB-65 scores had better inpatient survival than patients with high CRB-65 scores, irrespective of CXR abnormalities (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: CRB-65, CXR and CRP are independent predictors of mortality in COVID-19. Adding CXR findings (dichotomised to either normal or abnormal) to CRB-65 does not improve its prognostic accuracy. A low CRB-65 score of 0 may be a good rule-out test for adverse clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients with normal or abnormal CXRs, which deserves prospective validation.

Characterisation of Ferritin-Lymphocyte Ratio in COVID-19.

Introduction: The ferritin-lymphocyte ratio (FLR) is a novel inflammatory biomarker for the assessment of acute COVID-19 patients. However, the prognostic value of FLR for predicting adverse clinical outcomes in COVID-19 remains unclear, which hinders its clinical translation. Methods: We characterised the prognostic value of FLR in COVID-19 patients, as compared to established inflammatory markers. Results: In 217 study patients (69 years [IQR: 55-82]; 60% males), FLR was weakly correlated with CRP (R = 0.108, p = 0.115) and white cell count (R = -0.144; p = 0.034). On ROC analysis, an FLR cut-off of 286 achieved a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 30% for predicting inpatient mortality (AUC 0.60, 95% CI: 0.53-0.67). The negative predictive values of FLR for ruling out mortality, non-invasive ventilation requirement and critical illness (intubation and/or ICU admission) were 86%, 85% and 93%, respectively. FLR performed similarly to CRP (AUC 0.60 vs. 0.64; p = 0.375) for predicting mortality, but worse than CRP for predicting non-fatal outcomes (all p < 0.05). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, COVID-19 patients with FLR values > 286 had worse inpatient survival than patients with FLR ≤ 286, p = 0.041. Conclusions: FLR has prognostic value in COVID-19 patients, and appears unrelated to other inflammatory markers such as CRP and WCC. FLR exhibits high sensitivity and negative predictive values for adverse clinical outcomes in COVID-19, and may be a good "rule-out" test. Further work is needed to improve the sensitivity of FLR and validate its role in prospective studies for guiding clinical management.

Comparison of Lymphocyte-CRP Ratio to Conventional Inflammatory Markers for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19.

Background: In COVID-19 patients, lymphocyte-CRP ratio (LCR) is a promising biomarker for predicting adverse clinical outcomes. How well LCR performs compared to conventional inflammatory markers for prognosticating COVID-19 patients remains unclear, which hinders the clinical translation of this novel biomarker. Methods: In a cohort of COVID-19 inpatients, we characterised the clinical applicability of LCR by comparing its prognostic value against conventional inflammatory markers for predicting inpatient mortality and a composite of mortality, invasive/non-invasive ventilation and intensive care unit admissions. Results: Of the 413 COVID-19 patients, 100 (24%) patients suffered inpatient mortality. On Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis, LCR performed similarly to CRP for predicting mortality (AUC 0.74 vs. 0.71, p = 0.049) and the composite endpoint (AUC 0.76 vs. 0.76, p = 0.812). LCR outperformed lymphocyte counts (AUC 0.74 vs. 0.66, p = 0.002), platelet counts (AUC 0.74 vs. 0.61, p = 0.003) and white cell counts (AUC 0.74 vs. 0.54, p < 0.001) for predicting mortality. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with a low LCR (below a 58 cut-off) had worse inpatient survival than patients with other LCR values (p < 0.001). Conclusion: LCR appears comparable to CRP, but outperformed other inflammatory markers, for prognosticating COVID-19 patients. Further studies are required to improve the diagnostic value of LCR to facilitate clinical translation.

Normal high-sensitivity cardiac troponin for ruling-out inpatient mortality in acute COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of inpatient mortality risk in COVID-19 patients is important for guiding clinical decision-making. High sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) is a biomarker of cardiac injury associated with a worse prognosis in COVID-19. We explored how hs-cTnT could potentially be used in clinical practice for ruling in and ruling out mortality in COVID-19. METHOD: We tested the diagnostic value of hs-cTnT in laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients (≥18 years old) admitted to the Royal Berkshire Hospital (UK) between 1st March and 10th May 2020. A normal hs-cTnT was defined as a value within the 99th percentile of healthy individuals (≤14 ng/L), and an elevated hs-cTnT was defined as >14 ng/L. Adverse clinical outcome was defined as inpatient mortality related to COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 191 COVID-19 patients (62% male; age 66±16 years) had hs-cTnT measured on admission. Of these patients, 124 (65%) had elevated hs-cTnT and 67 (35%) had normal hs-cTnT. On a group level, patients with elevated hs-cTnT had worse inpatient survival (p = 0.0014; Kaplan-Meier analysis) and higher risk of inpatient mortality (HR 5.84 [95% CI 1.29-26.4]; p = 0.02; Cox multivariate regression) compared to patients with normal hs-cTnT. On a per-patient level, a normal hs-cTnT had a negative predictive value of 94% (95% CI: 85-98%) for ruling out mortality, whilst an elevated hs-cTnT had a low positive predictive value of 38% (95% CI: 39-47%) for ruling in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In this study cohort of COVID-19 patients, the potential clinical utility of hs-cTnT appears to rest in ruling out inpatient mortality. This finding, if prospectively validated in a larger study, may allow hs-cTnT to become an important biomarker to facilitate admission-avoidance and early safe discharge.

Radiologist opinions regarding reporting incidental coronary and cardiac calcification on thoracic CT.

Objectives: Coronary and cardiac calcification are frequent incidental findings on non-gated thoracic computed tomography (CT). However, radiologist opinions and practices regarding the reporting of incidental calcification are poorly understood. Methods: UK radiologists were invited to complete this online survey, organised by the British Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (BSCI). Questions included anonymous information on subspecialty, level of training and reporting practices for incidental coronary artery, aortic valve, mitral and thoracic aorta calcification. Results: The survey was completed by 200 respondents: 10% trainees and 90% consultants. Calcification was not reported by 11% for the coronary arteries, 22% for the aortic valve, 35% for the mitral valve and 37% for the thoracic aorta. Those who did not subspecialise in cardiac imaging were less likely to report coronary artery calcification (p = 0.005), aortic valve calcification (p = 0.001) or mitral valve calcification (p = 0.008), but there was no difference in the reporting of thoracic aorta calcification. Those who did not subspecialise in cardiac imaging were also less likely to provide management recommendations for coronary artery calcification (p < 0.001) or recommend echocardiography for aortic valve calcification (p < 0.001), but there was no difference for mitral valve or thoracic aorta recommendations. Conclusion: Incidental coronary artery, valvular and aorta calcification are frequently not reported on thoracic CT and there are differences in reporting practices based on subspeciality. Advances in knowledge: On routine thoracic CT, 11% of radiologists do not report coronary artery calcification. Radiologist reporting practices vary depending on subspeciality but not level of training.

Reporting incidental coronary, aortic valve and cardiac calcification on non-gated thoracic computed tomography, a consensus statement from the BSCI/BSCCT and BSTI.

Incidental coronary and cardiac calcification are frequent findings on non-gated thoracic CT. We recommend that the heart is reviewed on all CT scans where it is visualised. Coronary artery calcification is a marker of coronary artery disease and it is associated with an adverse prognosis on dedicated cardiac imaging and on non-gated thoracic CT performed for non-cardiac indications, both with and without contrast. We recommend that coronary artery calcification is reported on all non-gated thoracic CT using a simple patient-based score (none, mild, moderate, severe). Furthermore, we recommend that reports include recommendations for subsequent management, namely the assessment of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and, if the patient has chest pain, assessment as per standard guidelines. In most cases, this will not necessitate additional investigations. Incidental aortic valve calcification may also be identified on non-gated thoracic CT and should be reported, along with ancillary findings such as aortic root dilation. Calcification may occur in other parts of the heart including mitral valve/annulus, pericardium and myocardium, but in many cases these are an incidental finding without clinical significance.

Proportion of acute ischaemic strokes attributable to a cardiac aetiology in an unselected young patient population: A single centre experience.

The incidence of acute ischaemic stroke in young patients is increasing and identifying the underlying cause is critically important with regards to their optimal management. The true proportion of cardiac causes of stroke in young patients is poorly defined. We aimed to determine the proportion of strokes attributable to cardiac causes in an unselected, consecutive cohort of young patients. We used the database of a large stroke service to identify patients aged ≤55 years presenting with stroke between 01 January 2015 and 31 December 2017. We reviewed their clinical notes and investigations and then categorised patients by the cause of their stroke.We screened 202 cases, and excluded 35, resulting in a study population of 167 patients; 24.0% (40/167) had a cardiac cause of stroke including 9.6% (16/167) had patent foramen ovale, 9.0% (15/167) had intracardiac source of embolus and 5.4% (9/167) had atrial fibrillation; 50.8% (85/167) had other more likely causes; and 25.1% (42/167) had no clear underlying cause.A high proportion (24%) of strokes in young patients are secondary to a cardiac cause. Thorough investigation in these patients is warranted and requires close interdisciplinary links between cardiologists and stroke physicians to ensure optimal management.

Myopericarditis and myositis in a patient with COVID-19: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent myopericarditis and myositis can present in patients with pre-existing systemic inflammatory diseases. Here we present a case of myopericarditis and myositis associated with COVID-19, in the absence of respiratory symptoms. CASE SUMMARY: We present a middle-aged female with a history of hypertension and previous myopericarditis. The patient was admitted with symptoms of central chest pain, and ECG and echocardiographic features of myopericarditis. Her symptoms did not improve, and CT thorax suggested possible SARS-CoV-2 infection for which she tested positive, despite no respiratory symptoms. Whilst on the ward, she developed bilateral leg weakness and a raised creatine kinase (CK), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of her thighs confirmed myositis. A cardiac MRI confirmed myopericarditis. She was treated with colchicine 500 µg twice daily, ibuprofen 400 mg three times day, and prednisolone 30 mg per day, and her symptoms and weakness improved. DISCUSSION: We describe the first reported case of concurrent myopericarditis, and myositis associated with COVID-19. Conventional therapy with colchicine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and glucocorticoids improved her symptoms, and reduced biochemical markers of myocardial and skeletal muscle inflammation.

Radionuclide imaging in ischaemic heart failure.

INTRODUCTION OR BACKGROUND: Many tests are available for the investigation of patients with heart failure. The identification of the underlying aetiology of ventricular dysfunction is crucial as early treatment may limit or even reverse myocardial abnormalities. SOURCES OF DATA: This article describes cardiac radionuclide imaging techniques and their applications in ischaemic ventricular dysfunction. Evidence for the role of these techniques is summarized with particular reference to current guidelines. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Both positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) techniques are widely validated for the detection of myocardial viability and their use is recommended in both national and international guidelines. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Although assessments of ventricular phase and myocardial innervation hold promise for the stratification of patients to cardiac resynchronization therapy, the poor performance of echocardiographic predictors of response in the recently published PROSPECT trial suggest that these techniques face a tough challenge. GROWING POINTS: The use of integrated multimodality imaging techniques such as PET/computed tomography to assess for ischaemic causes of left ventricular dysfunction is an area that is currently under investigation, as is the role of nuclear techniques in the assessment of stem cell retention, distribution and function when used in patients with heart failure. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Ongoing developments in radionuclide molecular imaging for assessment of angiogenesis, apoptosis and interstitial alterations during cardiac remodeling may have important implications for the prognosis and treatment of patients with heart failure.

Cardiac radionuclide imaging in stable coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndromes.

INTRODUCTION: The increasing number of available cardiac imaging techniques has made the investigation of coronary artery disease (CAD) more complex. Appropriate patient referral depends on an understanding of the pre-test likelihood of CAD and the information provided by each test. SOURCES OF DATA: This article describes myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) and summarizes evidence for its role in stable CAD and acute coronary syndromes with particular reference to current guidelines. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: MPS has been extensively validated for the cost-effective diagnosis and prognosis of functionally significant CAD in both the acute and chronic settings. Its use is emphasized in the current NICE, national and international guidelines. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Although normal MPS is associated with good outcomes, assessments of subclinical atherosclerosis such as coronary artery calcium scoring and computed tomography coronary angiography (CTA) demonstrate that non-flow-limiting CAD remains prognostically important. GROWING POINTS: Technological developments, such as attenuation correction to improve diagnostic accuracy or analysis of left ventricular phase to detect dyssynchrony, carry the possibility of increasing the information that can be usefully gained from a single MPS study. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Of particular importance will be the role of MPS in an integrated imaging strategy that involves both anatomical and functional cardiac assessments. The use of hybrid technology that combines techniques such as MPS and CTA into a single imaging unit requires careful consideration with regard to diagnostic usefulness and cost-effectiveness.

64-Channel cardiac computed tomography: intraobserver and interobserver variability (part 1): coronary angiography.

OBJECTIVES: To assess intraobserver and interobserver variation in computed tomography coronary angiography (CTA) in 3 patient cohorts at very low, low-to-intermediate, and intermediate-to-high likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: One hundred thirty-three patients underwent 64-channel CTA. Coronary arteries were analyzed by 2 experienced blinded observers and reported as having 0%, 1% to 29%, 30% to 49%, 50% to 69%, 70% to 99%, or 100% stenosis. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement was calculated at cohort level and combined. RESULTS: Overall intraobserver and interobserver agreement was good (kappa = 0.74 and kappa = 0.78, respectively). Segmental agreement for stenoses 50% or greater and 70% or greater was greater than 96%. Disagreements were more likely in the presence of noneccentric calcification for both intraobserver (odds ratio = 0.45 and 0.22) and interobserver (odds ratio = 0.40 and 0.10) measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Interobserver and intraobserver variability for the detection of coronary stenoses on CTA is good and justifies routine clinical use. The presence of noneccentric calcium and mixed plaque morphology are important causes of disagreement.

64-Channel cardiac computed tomography: intraobserver and interobserver variability, part 2: global and regional ventricular function, mass, and first pass perfusion.

OBJECTIVES: To assess intraobserver and interobserver variability in cardiac computed tomographic measurements of global biventricular function, left ventricular (LV) regional wall motion, systolic wall thickening, and first pass perfusion in 3 patient cohorts at very low, low to intermediate, and intermediate to high cardiac risk. METHODS: One hundred thirty-three patients underwent 64-channel cardiac computed tomography. Images were analyzed by 2 experienced, blinded observers. Intraobserver and interobserver agreements were calculated for each cohort and were combined for patients with structurally normal hearts. RESULTS: Intraobserver and interobserver agreements were good for all global and regional LV parameters with narrow levels of agreement. Right ventricular ejection fraction agreement was also good, but other right ventricular parameters showed wide levels of agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Biventricular ejection fraction, LV regional wall motion, and systolic wall thickening, volume, and mass show good reproducibility for use in standard clinical practice. Right ventricular volumetric and mass data in patients with congenital heart disease should be interpreted with caution.

Ascending aortic dissection in a pregnant patient with neonatally repaired coarctation of aorta and bicuspid aortic valve.

Aortic dissection is characterised by a tear in the intimal and medial layers of the endovascular aortic wall which propagates distally. Here, we discuss the case of a 35-year-old woman who was 37 weeks pregnant and presented with dizziness and blurred vision. She had a history of a neonatal end-to-end repair of a coarctation of aorta, a known bicuspid aortic valve and a dilated ascending aorta under surveillance. A transthoracic echocardiogram revealed an ascending aortic dissection. An emergency CT aortogram was performed which confirmed the diagnosis. The patient underwent emergency caesarean section and aortic surgery, with a good outcome for mother and baby. The case highlights the atypical nature of presentation and the absence of haemodynamic instability. Atypical and unexplained symptoms on a background of congenital heart disease should trigger a referral to cardiology with thorough investigation, often with echocardiography, to exclude rare and life-threatening complications.

Comparison of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for assessment of global and regional myocardial function and infarction in patients with low to intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) has the potential to assess both coronary anatomy and ventricular function in a single study. We examined the agreement between CCT and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) for the assessment of global and regional ventricular function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Research CCT was performed in 52 patients with a low to intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease referred for MPS. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume, left ventricular end-systolic volume, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and myocardial wall motion and thickening were compared between techniques. In addition, myocardial contrast attenuation on CCT was compared with radiotracer uptake on MPS. LVEF values agreed well (mean difference, 4.1%; SD, 15.13%), but CCT left ventricular end-diastolic volume was greater compared with MPS (mean difference, 46.0 mL; SD, 33.34 mL) (P < .001). There was moderate agreement for segmental myocardial motion and thickening, with kappa values of 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.63) and 0.47 (95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.53), respectively. Seventeen patients had hypoattenuation in at least 1 myocardial segment on CCT. Three of four patients with concomitant abnormalities of wall motion and thickening on CCT had infarction in the same territory on MPS. CONCLUSIONS: There was good agreement for LVEF between CCT and MPS but myocardial volumes differed, and these modalities cannot be used interchangeably. Mild abnormalities of regional function are detected more commonly by CCT than by MPS. Myocardial hypoattenuation on CCT is highly specific for myocardial infarction when associated with reduction of systolic wall thickening and regional wall motion abnormality.

Sixty-four-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis of functionally significant coronary stenoses in patients with a low to intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Multislice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTA) was proposed as a method for investigating possible coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients who present with chest pain but with a low to intermediate likelihood of CAD. Sixty-four-channel CTA was compared prospectively with (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) (as the gold standard in the detection of flow-limiting stenoses) for the detection of functionally significant CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-two consecutive symptomatic patients with a low to intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease, and who were referred for MPS, also underwent CTA. The CTA datasets were analyzed by two experienced observers who were blinded to the MPS data, and coronary artery segments were reported as < 50%, 50% to 69%, 70% to 99% stenoses, or occluded. The MPS images were similarly analyzed for inducible perfusion abnormalities, and coronary territories were identified. At the patient level, agreement between CTA and MPS for CTA lesions at >/= 50% was 87% (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 84%; positive predictive value, 50%; negative predictive value, 100%). For CTA lesions, agreement at >/= 70% was 96% (sensitivity, 86%; specificity, 98%; positive predictive value, 86%; negative predictive value, 98%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a low to intermediate likelihood of CAD, there is good correlation between MPS and CTA for the detection of functionally significant coronary artery stenoses when CTA detects a narrowing of >/= 70% severity. Computed tomography coronary angiography stenoses of 70% should be used to determine functional significance, and not 50%, as is the usual practice at present.

Recommendations for accurate CT diagnosis of suspected acute aortic syndrome (AAS)--on behalf of the British Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (BSCI)/British Society of Cardiovascular CT (BSCCT).

Accurate and timely assessment of suspected acute aortic syndrome is crucial in this life-threatening condition. Imaging with CT plays a central role in the diagnosis to allow expedited management. Diagnosis can be made using locally available expertise with optimized scanning parameters, making full use of recent advances in CT technology. Each imaging centre must optimize their protocols to allow accurate diagnosis, to optimize radiation dose and in particular to reduce the risk of false-positive diagnosis that may simulate disease. This document outlines the principles for the acquisition of motion-free imaging of the aorta in this context.