Less increase of CT-based calcium scores of the coronary arteries : Effect three years after breast-conserving radiotherapy using breath-hold.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective longitudinal study was to compare coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores determined before the start of whole breast irradiation with those determined 3 years afterwards. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Changes in CAC scores were analysed in 99 breast cancer patients. Three groups were compared: patients receiving left- and right-sided radiotherapy, and those receiving left-sided radiotherapy with breath-hold. We analysed overall CAC scores and left anterior descending (LAD) and right coronary artery (RCA) CAC scores. Between the three groups, changes of the value of the LAD minus the RCA CAC scores of each individual patient were also compared. RESULTS: Three years after breath-hold-based whole breast irradiation, a less pronounced increase of CAC scores was noted. Furthermore, LAD minus RCA scores in patients treated for left-sided breast cancer without breath-hold were higher when compared to LAD minus RCA scores of patients with right-sided breast cancers and those with left-sided breast cancer treated with breath-hold. CONCLUSION: Breath-hold in breast-conserving radiotherapy leads to a less pronounced increase of CT-based CAC scores. Therefore, breath-hold probably prevents the development of radiation-induced coronary artery disease. However, the sample size of this study is limited and the follow-up period relatively short.

Bilateral breast cancer, synchronous and metachronous; differences and outcome.

The aims of this study were twofold: to analyze the incidence of patients having synchronous or metachronous bilateral invasive breast cancer (SBBC and MBBC) and to assess the characteristics and outcome compared to those having unilateral breast cancer (UBC). The used data were obtained from our prospective population-based cohort study which had been started in 1983. Bilateral breast cancer (BBC) was categorized as SBBC (≤3 months of the first primary) or MBBC (>3 months after the first primary). The incidence of SBBC was 1% and that of MBBC 7.0 %. Patients with UBC showed more ductal carcinoma compared to patients with BBC. MBBC status was an independent significant predictor of local failure (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.3-2.7). SBBC status was an independent predictor of distant metastases (HR 2.6; 95% CI 1.4-4.5). Overall survival (OS) was better for MBBC (HR 0.6; 95% CI 0.4-0.8) and worse for SBBC (HR 2.3; 95% CI 1.5-3.6) compared to UBC. We noted: (1) MBBC showed a significant higher local failure compared to UBC, (2) SBBC, compared to MBBC and UBC had a significant higher distant metastases rate, (3) disease-specific survival and OS were significantly worse for SBBC compared to UBC and MBBC, and (4) that the OS for MBBC compared to UBC, was significantly better.

Trends and Variation in the Use of Radiotherapy in Non-metastatic Rectal Cancer: a 14-year Nationwide Overview from the Netherlands.

AIMS: This study describes nationwide primary radiotherapy utilisation trends for non-metastasised rectal cancer in the Netherlands between 2008 and 2021. In 2014, both colorectal cancer screening and a new guideline specifying prognostic risk groups for neoadjuvant treatment were implemented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with non-metastasised rectal cancer in 2008-2021 (n = 37 510) were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and classified into prognostic risk groups. Treatment was studied over time and age. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were carried out to identify factors associated with (i) radiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy use for intermediate rectal cancer and (ii) chemoradiotherapy without versus with surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer. RESULTS: For early rectal cancer, the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy decreased (15% to 5% between 2008 and 2021), whereas the use of endoscopic resections increased (8% in 2015, 17% in 2021). In intermediate-risk rectal cancer, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (43% until 2011, 25% in 2015) shifted to radiotherapy (42% in 2008, 50% in 2015), the latter being most often applied in older patients. In locally advanced rectal cancer, the use of chemoradiotherapy without surgery increased (2-4% in 2008-2013, 17% in 2019-2021). Both neoadjuvant treatment in intermediate disease and omission of surgery following chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced disease varied with increasing age (odds ratio>75vs<50: 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.54-3.06) and treatment region (Southwest and Northwest odds ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.42-0.93 and odds ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.95, respectively, compared with the North). CONCLUSION: Treatment patterns in non-metastasised rectal cancer significantly changed over time. Effects of both the national screening programme and the new treatment guideline were apparent, as well as a paradigm shift towards organ preservation (watch-and-wait). Observed regional variations may indicate adoption differences regarding new treatment strategies.

Timing of radiotherapy in breast-conserving therapy: a large prospective cohort study of node-negative breast cancer patients without adjuvant systemic therapy.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the issue of timing of radiation therapy (RT) after lumpectomy in relation to recurrences and outcome. METHODS: Analysis was done on 1107 breast-conserving therapies (BCT) with 1070 women, all without lymph node metastasis and without any adjuvant systemic therapy. Timing was defined as time from lumpectomy till RT. Patients were categorised into tertiles: <45 days, 45-56 days, and 57-112 days. RESULTS: Local control did not show a difference between the tertiles. The distant metastasis-free survival as well as the disease-specific survival showed a decreased outcome starting the RT to early after the lumpectomy. CONCLUSION: The results of this cohort study further refines the hypothesis that timing of RT in BCT might have an impact on outcome. It suggests that a randomised trial in timing of RT in BCT seems necessary to give a definite answer.

Complicated postoperative recovery increases omission, delay and discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Stage III colon cancer.

AIM: The study included investigation of factors determining suboptimal adjuvant chemotherapy of patients diagnosed with Stage III colon cancer. METHOD: All 606 patients diagnosed with Stage III colon cancer between 2006 and 2008 in the western part of the Netherlands were included. Patient [gender, age, comorbidity and socio-economic status (SES)], tumour (location, stage and grade) and treatment (emergency surgery, laparoscopic surgery, reoperation, hospital stay and multidisciplinary meeting) factors were examined in logistic regression analyses predicting a complicated postoperative period and omission, delay and discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Overall, 27% of all patients experienced a complicated postoperative period, which was independently associated with emergency surgery, older age, multiple comorbidity, male gender and poor tumour grade. Of patients who survived this period, 60% received chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was omitted more often in women, the elderly and in patients with Stage IIIB, reoperation, prolonged hospital stay and (borderline) after open surgery. Of patients who received chemotherapy, 86% started within 8 weeks after surgery. Patients with a higher SES, reoperation and prolonged hospital stay had a higher probability of a delayed start. Sixty-seven per cent of patients completed their chemotherapy. For women, elderly patients and patients with prolonged hospital stay a higher probability of discontinuation was noted. CONCLUSION: Age was the most important predictive factor for receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. However, at all ages, complicated postoperative recovery negatively influenced the administration of chemotherapy to Stage III colon cancer patients, as well as a timely start and completion of chemotherapy.

Long-term cosmetic changes after breast-conserving treatment of patients with stage I-II breast cancer and included in the EORTC 'boost versus no boost' trial.

BACKGROUND: In breast cancer treated with breast-conserving radiotherapy, the influence of the boost dose on cosmetic outcome after long-term follow-up is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 348 patients participating in the EORTC 'boost versus no boost' mega trial with a minimum follow-up of 6 years. Digitalised pictures were analysed using specific software, enabling quantification of seven relative asymmetry features associated with different aspects of fibrosis. RESULTS: After 3 years, we noted a statistically significantly poorer outcome for the boost patients for six features compared with those of the no boost patients. Up to 9 years of follow-up, results continued to worsen in the same magnitude for the both patient groups. We noted the following determinants for poorer outcome: (i) boost treatment, (ii) larger excision volumes, (iii) younger age, (iv) tumours located in the central lower quadrants of the breast and (v) a boost dose administered with photons. CONCLUSIONS: A boost dose worsens the change in breast appearance in the first 3 years. Moreover, the development of fibrosis associated with whole-breast irradiation, as estimated with the relative asymmetry features, is an ongoing process until (at least) 9 years after irradiation.

Local progression and pseudo progression after single fraction or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for large brain metastases. A single centre study.

PURPOSE: The 1-year local control rates after single-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastases > 3 cm diameter are less than 70%, but with fractionated SRT (FSRT) higher local control rates have been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare our treatment results with SRT and FSRT for large brain metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In two consecutive periods, 41 patients with 46 brain metastases received SRT with 1 fraction of 15 Gy, while 51 patients with 65 brain metastases received FSRT with 3 fractions of 8 Gy. We included patients with brain metastases with a planning target volume of > 13 cm(3) or metastases in the brainstem. RESULTS: The minimum follow-up of patients still alive was 22 months. Comparing 1 fraction of 15 Gy with 3 fractions of 8 Gy, the 1-year rates of freedom from any local progression (54% and 61%, p = 0.93) and pseudo progression (85% and 75%, p = 0.25) were not significantly different. Overall survival rates were also not different. CONCLUSION: The 1-year local progression and pseudo progression rates after 1 fraction of 15 Gy or 3 fractions of 8 Gy for large brain metastases and metastases in the brainstem are similar. For better local control rates, FSRT schemes with a higher biological equivalent dose may be necessary.

Limited Impact of Breast Cancer and Non-breast Malignancies on Survival in Older Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Results of a Large, Single-Centre, Population-Based Study.

AIMS: To analyse the disease-free survival and overall survival in older adults with breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy, focusing on the relevance of non-breast malignancy (NBM) with respect to survival rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analyses were based on 1205 women aged 65 years and older with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy between 1999 and 2015. Patients were divided into three age categories: 65-70, 71-75 and >75 years. Multivariate survival analysis was carried out using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The two youngest age categories showed excellent results, with a 12-year disease-free survival of 84.6 and 86.3%, respectively. We noted a 17.2% incidence of NBM, particularly for colon cancer and lung cancer. Most (72.9%) occurred after a diagnosis of breast cancer. Of those 72.9%, about 50% died as a result of NBM within 2 years of the diagnosis of NBM. The overall 12-year NBM-specific survival was 92.0%. The 12-year overall survival was 60.0% for all and for the three abovementioned age categories was 73.3, 54.4 and 28.4%, respectively. The cause of death for all was predominantly non-malignancy-related morbidity. CONCLUSION: The impact of breast cancer on life expectancy was limited, in particularly for women aged 65-75 years. The relevance of NBM on survival was limited.

Target Volume Coverage and Organ at Risk Doses for Left-sided Whole-breast Irradiation With or Without Internal Mammary Chain Irradiation: A Comparison Between Three Techniques Representing the Past and the Present.

AIMS: The 15-year results of the EORTC 229922-10925 phase III trial showed a significant reduction in breast cancer mortality and breast cancer recurrences after internal mammary chain (IMC) and medio-supraclavicular irradiation. Unexpectedly, cardiac death was not increased, and the incidence of cardiac events did not differ between left- and right-sided cases, although target volume coverages and organ at risk doses were unknown. Therefore, a planning study was carried out comparing the past and the present, to eventually enable, thereafter, an increased therapeutic ratio of IMC irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A planning study was carried out on target volume coverage and organ at risk doses for whole-breast irradiation (WBI) ± IMC comparing the results between two-dimensional radiotherapy (free-breathing), hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT; breath-hold) and robust intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT; free-breathing) for 10 left-sided breast cancer cases. Two-dimensional radiotherapy consisted of two tangential wedged photon breast fields and mixed electron/photon beams for the IMC. Hybrid IMRT included two tangential photon breast fields (70%) complemented with IMRT (30%). IMPT plans were created using multi-field robust optimisation (5 mm set-up and 3% range uncertainties) with two (WBI) or three (WBI + IMC) beams. RESULTS: Target volume dose objectives were met for hybrid IMRT and IMPT. For two-dimensional radiotherapy, target coverage was 97% and 83% for breast and IMC, respectively. The mean heart dose for WBI only was <2 Gy for all techniques. For WBI + IMC, heart doses (mean heart dose, mean left anterior descending region, volume of the heart receiving 5 Gy (V5) were significantly higher for two-dimensional radiotherapy when compared with contemporary techniques. The V5 left anterior descending region reduced from 100% (two-dimensional radiotherapy) to 70% and 20% for hybrid IMRT and IMPT, respectively. CONCLUSION: Contemporary radiotherapy techniques result in improved target volume coverage and significantly decreased heart doses for WBI + IMC radiotherapy. Hence, nowadays an increased therapeutic ratio of elective IMC irradiation may be anticipated.

Impaired Geriatric 8 Score is Associated with Worse Survival after Radiotherapy in Older Patients with Cancer.

AIMS: To investigate whether the Geriatric 8 (G8) score and the Timed Get Up and Go Test (TGUGT), together with clinical and demographic patient characteristics, are associated with survival and late toxicity after (chemo)radiation therapy, administered with curative intent in older patients with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred and two patients aged ≥65 years (median age 72 years, range 65-96 years), diagnosed with either breast, non-small cell lung, prostate, head and neck, rectal or oesophageal cancer, and referred for curative (chemo)radiation therapy, took part in a multicentre prospective cohort study in eight radiotherapy centres in the Netherlands. The G8 and TGUGT scores were assessed before starting treatment. Other potential predictors and late toxicity were also recorded. Survival status and date of death, if applicable, were ascertained at the Dutch national death registry. RESULTS: After 2.5 years, the overall survival was 83%. Survival was 87% for patients with high G8 scores and 55% for patients with low G8 scores (Log-rank P value < 0.0001). Survival was 77% for patients with good TGUGT results and 50% for patients with poor TGUGT results (Log-rank P value < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, in addition to age and type of primary tumour, the association of the G8 score with overall survival remained, with a hazard ratio of 2.1 (95% confidence interval 1.2-3.8) for low versus high scores. CONCLUSIONS: G8 was associated with overall survival in older patients with cancer irradiated with curative intent. This association was independent of the predictive value of age and primary tumour.

Reduced increase of calcium scores using breath-hold in left-sided whole breast irradiation.

PURPOSE: In this prospective longitudinal study, Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) scores determined before the start of whole breast irradiation were compared with those determined 7 years afterwards. The aim was to examine whether the use of a breath-hold (BH) technique is associated with less increase of CAC scores. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Changes in CAC scores were analysed in 87 breast cancer patients. The results of the following groups were compared: patients receiving right (R) or left-sided radiotherapy using free breathing (L-FB) with those receiving left-sided radiotherapy with BH (L-BH). We compared the changes of CAC scores between these groups over time, testing the hypothesis that a significantly reduced increase of calcium scores is observed when using BH. RESULTS: For L-BH cases, when compared with L-FB cases, for overall as well as for Left Anterior Descending coronary artery (LAD) CAC scores, we noted significantly less increased CAC scores (p < 0.01). This effect of BH was even more striking in the group with CAC scores >0 at baseline. The attenuated increase over time of CAC scores in the L-BH group was robust to correction for age and statin use (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: After a median follow-up of 7.4 years, we found significantly less increased CAC scores when using BH. This is a relevant finding since higher levels of CAC scores are associated with higher probabilities of coronary artery events. Moreover, it underlines the rationale for the use of BH in left-sided whole breast irradiation.

Variation in the Use of Boost Irradiation in Breast-Conserving Therapy in the Netherlands: The Effect of a National Guideline and Cofounding Factors.

AIMS: To determine the variation in radiation therapy boost use in a nationwide study following adjustment of a national guideline in 2011, as well as to address the relationship to patient, tumour and radiation therapy institutional factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All invasive breast cancers and non-invasive breast cancers (ductal carcinoma in situ; DCIS) that received external whole-breast radiation between 2011 and 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Box plots were used to evaluate variation over time and logistic regression was carried out to address other factors influencing the variation. Funnel plots were constructed, with unadjusted and adjusted data for patient and tumour factors significantly affecting the use of a boost. RESULTS: For breast cancer patients (n = 45,207), the proportion receiving a boost and its range decreased over the years from 37.3-92.7% in 2011 to 28.3-65.4% in 2016. This trend was not observed in DCIS patients (n = 6,844). Young age, large tumours, high grade and the absence of tumour-free resection margins were associated with boost use for both breast cancer and DCIS. For breast cancer, triple-negative tumour subtype and metastatic lymph node involvement were also associated with boost use. Institutional factors did not influence the use of a boost and institutional variation remained substantial after case-mix adjustments. CONCLUSION: Following adjustment of a nationwide implemented guideline, variation in radiation therapy boost use decreased in patients with breast cancer but not in patients with DCIS. Several tumour and patient characteristics were associated with boost use. Substantial institutional variation could not be explained by differences in patient, tumour or predefined institutional characteristics.

The addition of a boost dose on the primary tumour bed after lumpectomy in breast conserving treatment for breast cancer. A summary of the results of EORTC 22881-10882 "boost versus no boost" trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of the boost dose to the primary tumour bed in the framework of breast conserving therapy on local control, cosmetic results, fibrosis and overall survival for patients with early stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five thousand five hundred and sixty-nine patients after lumpectomy followed by whole breast irradiation of 50 Gy were randomised. After a microscopically complete lumpectomy (5318 patients), the boost doses were either 0 or 16 Gy, while after a microscopically incomplete (251 patients) lumpectomy randomisation was between 10 and 26 Gy. The results at a median follow-up of 10 years are presented. RESULTS: At 10 years, the cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 10.2% versus 6.2% for the 0 Gy and the 16 Gy boost groups (p < 0.0001) and 17.5% versus 10.8% for the 10 and 26 Gy boost groups, respectively (p > 0.1). There was no statistically significant interaction per age group but recurrences tended to occur earlier in younger patients. As younger patients had a higher cumulative risk of local relapse by year 10, the magnitude of the absolute 10-year risk reduction achieved with the boost decreased with increasing age. Development of fibrosis was significantly dependent on the boost dose with a 10-year rate for severe fibrosis of 1.6% after 0 Gy, 3.3% after 10 Gy, 4.4% after 16 Gy and 14.4% after 26 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSION: An increase of the dose with 16 Gy improved local control for patients after a complete lumpectomy only. The development of fibrosis was clearly dose dependent. With 10 years median follow-up, no impact of survival was observed.

[Guideline 'Treatment of breast cancer 2008' (revision)]. / Richtlijn 'Behandeling van het mammacarcinoom 2008' (herziening).

The Dutch evidence-based guideline 'Treatment of breast cancer' has been revised, and integrated with the guideline 'Screening for and diagnosis of breast cancer'. The guideline can be found on www. oncoline.nl and on www.cbo.nl. The Internet programme 'Adjuvant!' (www.adjuvantonline.com) can be used to predict both the prognosis and the efficacy of systemic adjuvant therapy for each patient. The indications for adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy have been widened. The aim is to reduce the absolute probability of death by at least 4-5% within 10 years. The goal of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer is to enable breast-conserving therapy for large tumours in relatively small breasts. One could consider transferring responsibility for follow-up after 5 years from the hospital to the screening organisation following mastectomy, to the family doctor following breast-conserving therapy, and to an outpatient clinic for hereditary tumours in carriers of gene mutation. Cessation of follow-up above the age of 75 could also be considered.

Prognostic value of mitotic counts in axillary node negative breast cancer patients with predominantly well-differentiated tumours.

AIMS: In axillary node negative (ANN) breast cancer patients additional prognostic markers are needed to decide whether adjuvant systemic treatment might be useful. METHODS: In the present study, the prognostic relevance of mitotic counts and Bloom-Richardson grade (BR-grade) was evaluated in 164 ANN breast cancer patients. No adjuvant systemic treatment was given to any of these patients. Mitotic counts were determined twice, in routine practice and in revision. RESULTS: A substantial reproducibility of mitotic counts was found, provided that the cut-off value chosen was high enough. After a median follow-up of 10 years, mitotic counts had no prognostic significance for survival at any cut-off value. A trend towards a significant worse survival was found for patients with Bloom-Richardson grade II or III in comparison with grade I. CONCLUSIONS: Based on data in the literature a positive association between both mitotic counts and BR-grade and survival in ANN breast cancer may exist, but the extent of this putative association and its clinical relevance can be argued, particularly in a group of patients with predominantly well differentiated tumours.

Factors influencing time between surgery and radiotherapy: A population based study of breast cancer patients.

This study describes variation in the time interval between surgery and radiotherapy in breast cancer (BC) patients and assesses factors at patient, hospital and radiotherapy centre (RTC) level influencing this variation. To do so, the factors were investigated in BC patients using multilevel logistic regression. The study sample consisted of 15,961 patients from the Netherlands Cancer Registry at 79 hospitals and 19 (RTCs) with breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy directly followed by radiotherapy. The percentage of patients starting radiotherapy ≤42 days varied from 14% to 94%. Early year of incidence, higher age, higher stage, mastectomy, higher ASA category and no availability of radiotherapy facilities were significantly associated with a longer time interval between radiotherapy and surgery. More patients received radiotherapy ≤42 days in hospitals with on-site radiotherapy facilities (OR 1.36, p = 0.024). Among the remainder, significant variation was found at the RTC level (11.1%, σ(2) = 0.254, SE 0.054), and at the hospital level (6.4% σ2 = 0.443, SE 0.163) (ICC 0.064). The significant delay and unexplained variance remaining at the RCT and hospital level suggests delays caused by the patient referral pathway from hospital to RCT, and indicates potential for improvement at both levels.

Acute toxicity of concurrent adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy (CMF or AC) in breast cancer patients. a prospective, comparative, non-randomised study.

The concurrent administration of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in breast cancer treatment might lead to an increased incidence of side-effects. In this prospective, non-randomised, comparative study, the acute toxicity of radiotherapy alone (RT) and radiotherapy concurrent with doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC/RT) and radiotherapy concurrent with cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil (CMF/RT) was compared. We used the common toxicity criteria (CTC) to score the level of acute toxicity before, during and 6 months after the completion of the period of irradiation. The number of hospital admissions, as well as the compliance of chemotherapy, were noted. We observed that patients treated with AC/RT and CMF/RT had significant higher incidences of (high-grade) skin-toxicity, oesophagitis, dyspnoea, malaise, anorexia, nausea and hospital admission compared with those treated with RT only. The target-volume of radiotherapy was the main predictor of (high-grade) acute skin toxicity and oesophagitis. AC/RT was associated with significant more (high-grade) skin toxicity than CMF/RT. The dose of chemotherapy was reduced to less than 85% of the planned dose in 11% of patients, 17% of patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy needed admission to hospital. From the results of our study, we conclude that the concurrent administration of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy leads to an unacceptably high level of acute toxicity.

Patient population analysis in EORTC trial 22881/10882 on the role of a booster dose in breast-conserving therapy.

The changing composition of the patient population in breast cancer, which has been reported over the last decade, has important consequences for prognosis. In the present trial, an analysis of the population in an EORTC trial (22881/10882) on breast-conserving therapy was conducted. A shift towards earlier stages has been seen stage per stage, therefore better survival and local control rates are likely to be expected in comparison to previously published series. The majority of tumours in this trial were small, with a median clinical size of 2 cm and a median pathological size of 1.5 cm. A substantial number of lesions were detected in a pre-clinical stage (17.8%). Nodal involvement was present in only 19% of all patients and usually in only a low number of nodes (only 4% of all patients had four or more nodes invaded). The median number of nodes examined was 12, the difference between institutions was large. There was a significant correlation between the number of nodes examined, the percentage of patients with positive nodes (P = 0.03) and the percentage of patients with massive axillary invasion (P = 0.003). The correlation between clinical evidence and pathological invasion of the axillary nodes showed that 15% of the clinical examinations were false-negative and 51% were false-positive. Pathological nodal invasion could be clinically predicted in only 31% of patients, and consequently clinical examination of the axilla was a poor predictor of prognosis in this study. Pathological invasion of axillary lymph nodes was better correlated to pathological tumour size than clinical or radiological size.

Quality assurance of EORTC trial 22922/10925 investigating the role of internal mammary--medial supraclavicular irradiation in stage I-III breast cancer: the individual case review.

To assess consistency among participants in an European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) phase III trial randomising between irradiation and no irradiation of the internal mammary and medial supraclavicular (IM-MS) lymph nodes, all participating institutes were invited to send data from 3 patients in each arm as soon as they started accrual. The evaluation focused on eligibility, compliance with the radiotherapy guidelines, treatment techniques and dose prescription to the IM-MS region. Nineteen radiotherapy departments provided a total of 111 cases, all being eligible. Minor discrepancies were found in the surgery and pathology data in almost half the patients. Major radiotherapy protocol deviations were very limited: 2 cases of unwarranted irradiation of the supraclavicular region and a significant dose deviation to the internal mammary region in 5 patients. The most frequently observed minor protocol deviation was the absence of delineation of the target volumes in 80% of the patients. By detecting systematic protocol deviations in an early phase of the trial, recommendations made to all the participating institutes should improve the interinstitutional consistency and promote a high-quality treatment.