A phase I pharmacokinetic study of intraperitoneal bortezomib and carboplatin in patients with persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: Intraperitoneal (IP) therapy improves survival compared to intravenous (IV) treatment for women with newly diagnosed, optimally cytoreduced, ovarian cancer. However, the role of IP therapy in recurrent disease is unknown. Preclinical data demonstrated IP administration of the proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib prior to IP carboplatin increased tumor platinum accumulation resulting in synergistic cytotoxicity. We conducted this phase I trial of IP bortezomib and carboplatin in women with recurrent disease. METHODS: Women with recurrent ovarian cancer were treated with escalating doses of IP bortezomib - in combination with IP carboplatin (AUC 4 or 5) every 21days for 6cycles. Pharmacokinetics of both agents were evaluated in cycle 1. RESULTS: Thirty-three women participated; 32 were evaluable for safety. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at the first dose level (carboplatin AUC 5, bortezomib 0.5mg/m2), prompting carboplatin reduction to AUC 4 for subsequent dose levels. With carboplatin dose fixed at AUC 4, bortezomib was escalated from 0.5 to 2.5mg/m2 without DLT. Grade 3/4 related toxicities included abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea which were infrequent. The overall response rate in patients with measurable disease (n=21) was 19% (1 complete, 3 partial). Cmax and AUC in peritoneal fluid and plasma increased linearly with dose, with a favorable exposure ratio of the peritoneal cavity relative to peripheral blood plasma. CONCLUSION: IP administration of this novel combination was feasible and showed promising activity in this phase I trial of heavily pre-treated women with ovarian cancer. Further evaluation of this IP combination should be conducted.

Tumor disposition of pegylated liposomal CKD-602 and the reticuloendothelial system in preclinical tumor models.

Liposomes, such as pegylated-liposomal CKD-602 (S-CKD602), undergo catabolism by macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs) of the reticuloendothelial system (RES). The relationship between plasma and tumor disposition of S-CKD602 and RES was evaluated in mice bearing A375 melanoma or SKOV-3 ovarian xenografts. Area under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) of liposomal encapsulated, released, and sum total (encapsulated + released) CKD-602 in plasma, tumor, and tumor extracellular fluid (ECF) were estimated. A375 and SKOV-3 tumors were stained with cd11b and cd11c antibodies as measures of macrophages and DC. The plasma disposition of S-CKD602 was similar in both xenograft models. The ratio of tumor sum total AUC to plasma sum total AUC was 1.7-fold higher in mice bearing human SKOV-3 xenografts, compared with A375. The ratio of tumor ECF AUC to tumor sum total AUC was 2-fold higher in mice bearing human SKOV-3 xenografts, compared with A375. The staining of cd11c was 4.5-fold higher in SKOV-3, compared with A375 (P < 0.0001). The increased tumor delivery and release of CKD-602 from S-CKD602 in the ovarian xenografts, compared with the melanoma xenografts, was consistent with increased cd11c staining, suggesting that variability in the RES may affect the tumor disposition of liposomal agents.

Bidirectional pharmacodynamic interaction between pegylated liposomal CKD-602 (S-CKD602) and monocytes in patients with refractory solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: STEALTH(®) liposomal CKD-602 (S-CKD602), a camptothecin analog, is eliminated by the reticuloendothelial system (RES), which consists of cells, including monocytes. We evaluated the relationship between monocyte and absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) in the blood and pharmacokinetic disposition of S-CKD602 and nonliposomal CKD-602 (NL-CKD602) in patients. METHODS: As part of a phase I study of S-CKD602 and phase I and II studies of NL-CKD602, the percent decreases in ANC and monocytes at their nadir were calculated. After S-CKD602, the amount of CKD-602 recovered in urine was measured. RESULTS: For S-CKD602 in patients <60 years, the percent decrease in ANC and monocytes were 43 ± 31 and 58 ± 26%, respectively (P = 0.001). For S-CKD602 in patients ≥60, the percent decrease in ANC and monocytes were 41 ± 31 and 45 ± 36%, respectively (P = 0.50). For NL-CKD602 (n = 42), the percent decrease in ANC and monocytes were similar (P > 0.05). For S-CKD602, the relationship between the percent decrease in monocytes and CKD-602 recovered in urine was stronger in patients <60 (R(2) = 0.82), compared with patients ≥60 (R(2) = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Monocytes are more sensitive to S-CKD602, compared with neutrophils, and the increased sensitivity is related to the liposomal formulation, not CKD-602. These results suggest that monocytes engulf S-CKD602, which causes the release of CKD-602 from the liposome and toxicity to the monocytes, and that the effects are more prominent in patients <60.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of pegylated liposomal CKD-602 in patients with advanced malignancies.

PURPOSE: S-CKD602 is a pegylated liposomal formulation of CKD602, a semisynthetic camptothecin analogue. Pegylated (STEALTH) liposomes can achieve extended drug exposure in plasma and tumor. Based on promising preclinical data, the first phase I study of S-CKD602 was done in patients with refractory solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: S-CKD602 was administered i.v. every 3 weeks. Modified Fibonacci escalation was used (three to six patients/cohort), and dose levels ranged from 0.1 to 2.5 mg/m2. Serial plasma samples were obtained over 2 weeks and total (lactone+hydroxyl acid) concentrations of encapsulated, released, and sum total (encapsulated+released) CKD602 measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (21 males) were treated. Median age, 62 years (range, 33-79 years) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, 0 to 1 (43 patients) and 2 (2 patients). Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 mucositis occurred in one of six patients at 0.3 mg/m2, grade 3 and 4 bone marrow suppression in two of three patients at 2.5 mg/m2, and grade 3 febrile neutropenia and anemia in one of six patients at 2.1 mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose was 2.1 mg/m2. Partial responses occurred in two patients with refractory ovarian cancer (1.7 and 2.1 mg/m2). High interpatient variability occurred in the pharmacokinetic disposition of encapsulated and released CKD602. CONCLUSIONS: S-CKD602 represents a promising new liposomal camptothecin analogue with manageable toxicity and promising antitumor activity. Phase II studies of S-CKD602 at 2.1 mg/m2 i.v. once every 3 weeks are planned. Prolonged plasma exposure over 1 to 2 weeks is consistent with STEALTH liposomes and provides extended exposure compared with single doses of nonliposomal camptothecins.

Phase 1 study of veliparib (ABT-888), a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, with carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: Veliparib is an oral inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-1 and -2. PARP-1 expression may be increased in cancer, and this increase confers resistance to cytotoxic agents. We aimed to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetics (PK) of veliparib combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included patients with advanced solid tumors treated with ≤ 3 prior regimens. Paclitaxel and carboplatin were administered on day 3 of a 21-day cycle. Veliparib was given PO BID days 1-7, except for cycle 1 in the first 46 patients to serve as control for toxicity and PK. A standard "3 + 3" design started veliparib at 10 mg BID, paclitaxel at 150 mg/m2, and carboplatin AUC 6. The pharmacokinetic (PK) disposition of veliparib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin was determined by LC-MS/MS and AAS during cycles 1 and 2. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were enrolled. Toxicities were as expected with carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy, including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and peripheral neuropathy. DLTs were seen in two of seven evaluable patients at the maximum administered dose (MAD): veliparib 120 mg BID, paclitaxel 200 mg/m2, and carboplatin AUC 6 (febrile neutropenia, hyponatremia). The MTD and RP2D were determined to be veliparib 100 mg BID, paclitaxel 200 mg/m2, and carboplatin AUC 6. Median number of cycles of the three-agent combination was 4 (1-16). We observed 22 partial and 5 complete responses. Veliparib did not affect paclitaxel or carboplatin PK disposition. CONCLUSION: Veliparib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin were well tolerated and demonstrated promising antitumor activity.

Expression and activity of taxane-metabolizing enzymes in ovarian tumors.

OBJECTIVE: Current firstline chemotherapy for ovarian cancer consists of carboplatin combined with either paclitaxel or docetaxel. Disposition of carboplatin is determined by renal clearance, while the taxanes are metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes. Although the majority of taxane metabolism occurs in the liver, recent data have shown that some solid tumors express CYP450 enzymes in the tumors themselves. The objective of this study was to determine whether ovarian tumors express genes regulating cellular efflux and subsequent metabolism, and whether any clinico-pathologic features correlated with expression. METHODS: Gene expression of CYP2C8, CYP3A4/A5 and the ABC transporter ABCB1 was determined in 56 primary epithelial ovarian tumors. Cells were grown from seven different tumors and exposed ex vivo to paclitaxel (PAC) and docetaxel (DOC) for up to 24 h. PAC and DOC concentrations were measured in the media by an LC-MS assay. RESULTS: Results from this analysis demonstrate that ovarian cancer cells do express functional taxane-metabolizing enzymes. Such expression appeared to enhance the ability of cancer cells to metabolize DOC. Specifically, the PK of DOC was correlated with the ratio of CYP4A5 to ABCB1 gene expression, thus representing a novel mechanism of chemotherapy resistance. There was no relationship between PAC PK parameters and gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of inter-individual variation in CYP450 enzyme and ABC transporter tumor expression and activity may influence the individualization of chemotherapy, by avoiding agents that are rapidly metabolized and selecting agents that are not.

Tumor, tissue, and plasma pharmacokinetic studies and antitumor response studies of docetaxel in combination with 9-nitrocamptothecin in mice bearing SKOV-3 human ovarian xenografts.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the antitumor activity of two different schedules of docetaxel and 9-nitrocamptothecin (9NC) in mice bearing human SKOV-3 ovarian carcinoma xenografts and evaluated the plasma, tissue, and tumor disposition of each agent alone and in combination. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The following treatment groups were evaluated: (1) docetaxel 10 mg/kg IV on days 0 and 7; (2) 9NC 0.67 mg/kg PO qdx5dx2wk; (3) 9NC 0.67 mg/kg PO qdx5dx2wk in combination with docetaxel 10 mg/kg IV on days 0 and 7; and (4) 9NC 0.67 mg/kg PO qdx5dx2wk in combination with docetaxel 10 mg/kg IV on days 4 and 11; (5) vehicle controls for each agent; and (6) no treatment controls. RESULTS: All treatment regimens produced significant antitumor activity as compared with control groups (P < 0.05). Docetaxel administered on days 0 and 7 or on days 4 and 11 in combination with 9NC resulted in similar antitumor activity (P > 0.05). High docetaxel concentrations in tumor were maintained at late time points as compared with plasma and tissues with the retention of docetaxel at 24 h being 132-fold and 15-fold higher in tumor than in plasma and liver, respectively. After administration of 9NC alone, the ratio of the 9-aminocamptothecin (9AC) area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) to 9NC AUC in plasma and tumor was 0.15 and 1.34, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of docetaxel and 9NC was effective against SKOV-3 xenografts. The lack of a difference in sequence-dependent antitumor activity may reflect the sensitivity of the SKOV-3 xenograft to 9NC. The factors associated with tumor-specific retention of docetaxel and the ratio of 9NC to 9AC in tumors is unknown.

Plasma, tumor, and tissue disposition of STEALTH liposomal CKD-602 (S-CKD602) and nonliposomal CKD-602 in mice bearing A375 human melanoma xenografts.

PURPOSE: S-CKD602 is a STEALTH liposomal formulation of CKD-602, a camptothecin analogue. The cytotoxicity of camptothecin analogues is related to the duration of exposure in the tumor. STEALTH liposomal formulations contain lipid conjugated to methoxypolyethylene glycol and have been designed to prolong drug circulation time, increase tumor delivery, and improve the therapeutic index. For STEALTH liposomal formulations of anticancer agents to achieve antitumor effects, the active drug must be released into the tumor extracellular fluid (ECF). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: S-CKD602 at 1 mg/kg or nonliposomal CKD-602 at 30 mg/kg was administered once via tail vein to mice bearing A375 human melanoma xenografts. Mice (n = 3 per time point) were euthanized at 0.083 to 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after S-CKD02 and from 0.083 to 24 h after nonliposomal CKD-602. Plasma samples were processed to measure encapsulated, released, and sum total (encapsulated plus released) CKD-602, and tumor and tissue samples were processed to measure sum total CKD-602. Microdialysis samples of tumor ECF were obtained from 0 to 2 h, 4 to 7 h, and 20 to 24 h after nonliposomal CKD-602 and from 0 to 2 h, 24 to 27 h, 48 to 51 h, and 72 to 75 h after S-CKD602. A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay was used to measure the total (sum of lactone and hydroxyl acid) CKD-602. The area under the concentration-versus-time curves (AUC) from 0 to infinity and time >1 ng/mL in tumor were estimated. RESULTS: For S-CKD602, the CKD-602 sum total AUC in plasma and tumor and the CKD-602 AUC in tumor ECF were 201,929, 13,194, and 187 ng/mL h, respectively. For S-CKD602, 82% of CKD-602 remains encapsulated in plasma. For nonliposomal CKD-602, the CKD-602 AUC in plasma and tumor and the CKD-602 AUC in tumor ECF were 9,117, 11,661, and 639 ng/mL.h, respectively. The duration of time the CKD-602 concentration was >1 ng/mL in tumor ECF after S-CKD602 and nonliposomal CKD-602 was >72 and approximately 20 h, respectively. For S-CKD602, the CKD-602 sum total exposure was 1.3-fold higher in fat as compared with muscle. The ratio of CKD-602 sum total exposure in fat to muscle was 3.8-fold higher after administration of S-CKD602 compared with nonliposomal CKD-602. CONCLUSION: S-CKD602 provides pharmacokinetic advantages in plasma, tumor, and tumor ECF compared with nonliposomal CKD-602 at 1/30th of the dose, which is consistent with the improved antitumor efficacy of S-CKD602 in preclinical studies. The distribution of S-CKD602 is greater in fat compared with muscle whereas the distribution of nonliposomal CKD-602 is greater in muscle compared with fat. These results suggest that the body composition of a patient may affect the disposition of S-CKD602 and released CKD-602.

Clinical and pharmacokinetic study evaluating the effect of food on the disposition of 9-nitrocamptothecin and its 9-aminocamptothecin metabolite in patients with solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: 9-Nitrocamptothecin (9NC) is an orally administered camptothecin analogue that has completed phase III trials for pancreatic cancer. In biological matrices, camptothecin analogues exist in equilibrium between the active-lactone (LAC) and inactive-hydroxy acid (HA) forms. 9NC has been administered on an empty stomach; however, it is unclear if food alters the absorption and disposition of 9NC and its 9-aminocamptothecin (9AC) active-metabolite. Thus, we evaluated the disposition of 9NC and 9AC after administration of 9NC under fasting conditions and after a standard meal. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive 9NC as a single oral dose at 1.5 mg/m(2) with 8 ounces (oz) of an acidic beverage under fasting conditions, or after a meal consisting of two eggs, 8 oz of orange juice, buttered toast, 8 oz of milk, and 4 oz of hash brown potatoes. Following a 72 h washout period, 9NC was administered with the alternative condition (i.e., with food or fasting). 9NC was then continued for 5 days of every week. Serial blood samples were obtained prior to and from 0.25 to 24 h after administration of 9NC. The total (sum of LAC + HA) of 9NC and 9AC were measured by an LC-MS/MS assay. Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) for 9NC and 9AC total were calculated. After the pharmacokinetic section of the study, patients received 9NC 1.5 mg/m(2) orally under fasting conditions daily for 5 days per week for 8 weeks. RESULTS: Sixteen patients with median (range) age 62 (47-83) years, diagnoses of colorectal (six patients), lung (two patients), and other (eight patients) malignancies, received 83 [median (range) 4 (2-9)] weeks of therapy. Patients with toxicities greater than grade 2: were diarrhea (1), nausea (2), vomiting (2), fatigue (2), anemia (3), neutropenia (3), and febrile neutropenia (2). Three patients (lung, unknown primary, and colon) had stable disease for eight weeks. The mean+/-SD of 9NC AUC(food) and 9NC AUC(fast) (n=9) were 330+/-182 and 558+/-379 ng/ml.h, respectively (P<0.05). The mean+/-SD of 9AC AUC(food) and 9AC AUC(fast) (n=9) were 244+/-60 and 256+/-101 ng/ml.h, respectively (P>0.05). The mean +/- SD ratio of 9NC AUC(food) to AUC(fasting) in individual patients (n=9) was 0.67+/-0.22. The mean +/- SD ratio of 9AC AUC(food) to AUC(fasting) in individual patients (n=9) was 1.14+/-0.61. CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of 9NC with food reduces the oral absorption of 9NC; however, there was no difference in the exposure of 9AC. The is high interpatient variability in the effect of food on the absorption of 9NC and the interpatient variability in the effect of food on the disposition of 9AC is even greater when compared to 9NC.

Relationship between plasma exposure of 9-nitrocamptothecin and its 9-aminocamptothecin metabolite and antitumor response in mice bearing human colon carcinoma xenografts.

9-Nitrocamptothecin has completed phase III studies in patients with newly diagnosed and refractory pancreatic cancer; however, the optimal 9-nitrocamptothecin treatment regimen is unclear. We used an intermittent schedule of 9-nitrocamptothecin to evaluate the relationship between plasma exposure of 9-nitrocamptothecin and its 9-aminocamptothecin metabolite and antitumor response in mice bearing human colon carcinoma xenografts. 9-Nitrocamptothecin was given orally at 0.44, 0.67, or 1.0 mg/kg/d qd x 5d x 2 weeks repeated q 4 weeks for two cycles to female C.B-17 SCID mice bearing HT29 or ELC2 human colon xenografts. Pharmacokinetic studies were done after oral administration of 0.67 mg/kg x 1. Serial samples were obtained and 9-nitrocamptothecin and 9-aminocamptothecin lactone concentrations in plasma were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis with fluorescence detection. The areas under plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from 0 to infinity for 9-nitrocamptothecin and 9-aminocamptothecin were calculated. The antitumor activity of 9-nitrocamptothecin was dose-dependent in both colon xenografts. At all doses, 9-nitrocamptothecin treatment resulted in significant antitumor activity in both xenografts compared with vehicle-treated and control groups and achieved levels of tumor regression that met criteria (minimum %T/C < or = 40%) for antitumor activity. In mice bearing HT29 xenografts, the 9-nitrocamptothecin and 9-aminocamptothecin lactone AUCs after administration of 9-nitrocamptothecin at 0.67 mg/kg were 41.3 and 5.7 ng/mL h, respectively. The responses seen in these xenograft models occurred at systemic exposures that are tolerable in adult patients. These results suggest that the intermittent schedule of 9-nitrocamptothecin may be an active regimen in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of weekly docetaxel, cisplatin, and daily capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Docetaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine are three active chemotherapeutic agents with different mechanisms of action. This phase I study investigated the feasibility and pharmacokinetics of this combination given on a weekly schedule. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Docetaxel and cisplatin were given i.v. over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and capecitabine was given orally bid on days 1 to 14 (every 21 days). Escalation occurred in cohorts of three patients until the maximum tolerated dose was defined. Pharmacokinetics studies of docetaxel and total and ultrafiltrate platinum after cisplatin administration were done on cycle 1 (with capecitabine) and cycle 2 (without capecitabine). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled. Two of six patients at dose level 5 had a dose-limiting infection and diarrhea. One of six evaluable patients at dose level 4 (27 mg/m2 docetaxel, 27 mg/m2 cisplatin, 825 mg/m2 capecitabine) had a dose-limiting hypomagnesemia. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were similar on cycles 1 and 2. Area under the plasma concentrations versus time curves of total platinum was significantly greater in cycle 2 compared with cycle 1 (P = 0.001). There was no difference in the disposition of docetaxel on cycles 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended docetaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine dose for phase II studies is 27/27/825 mg/m2. The alteration in total and ultrafiltrate platinum disposition on cycle 2 compared with cycle 1 may be inherent to sequential cisplatin administration; however, prior treatment with capecitabine cannot be ruled out as a factor.

A pharmacokinetic analysis of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in a patient with esophageal cancer on peritoneal dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Very little is known about the pharmacokinetics of chemotherapeutic agents in patients also being treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. We sought to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in plasma and peritoneal dialysate in a patient being treated for esophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: A single patient with esophageal adenocarcinoma and on peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease was treated with cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) on day 1 of weeks 1 and 5 and continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-4 of weeks 1 and 5 along with daily radiation therapy. Intense plasma and dialysate sampling was performed during the week 5 administration, followed by quantitation of platinum by atomic absorption spectrophotometry and 5-fluorouracil by LC-MS/MS. RESULTS: Following systemic administration, clearance of ultrafilterable (active) platinum over the first 6 h was 20.8 L/h, which is lower than previously reported clearance levels of ultrafilterable platinum. Total platinum AUC was 131 µg h/mL, also higher than an AUC previously reported for total platinum in patients with normal renal function. Platinum-related material was detected in the peritoneal cavity, but this is likely inactive. 5-Fluorouracil penetrated the intraperitoneal cavity, but the contribution of peritoneal dialysis to drug clearance was negligible at 0.072 %. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of intravenous cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy to a patient treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis is feasible, but clearance in dialysate is nominal, thus suggesting that dose reduction is indicated for cisplatin. Systemic drug administration results in limited intraperitoneal penetration of 5-fluorouracil and inactive platinum species.

Human mass balance study of TAS-102 using (14)C analyzed by accelerator mass spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: TAS-102 is an oral fluoropyrimidine prodrug composed of trifluridine (FTD) and tipiracil hydrochloride (TPI) in a 1:0.5 ratio. FTD is a thymidine analog, and it is degraded by thymidine phosphorylase (TP) to the inactive trifluoromethyluracil (FTY) metabolite. TPI inhibits degradation of FTD by TP, increasing systemic exposure to FTD. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors (6 M/2 F; median age 58 years; PS 0-1) were enrolled on this study. Patients in group A (N = 4) received 60 mg TAS-102 with 200 nCi [(14)C]-FTD, while patients in group B (N = 4) received 60 mg TAS-102 with 1000 nCi [(14)C]-TPI orally. Plasma, blood, urine, feces, and expired air (group A only) were collected up to 168 h and were analyzed for (14)C by accelerator mass spectrometry and analytes by LC-MS/MS. RESULTS: FTD: 59.8% of the (14)C dose was recovered: 54.8% in urine mostly as FTY and FTD glucuronide isomers. The extractable radioactivity in the pooled plasma consisted of 52.7% FTD and 33.2% FTY. TPI: 76.8% of the (14)C dose was recovered: 27.0% in urine mostly as TPI and 49.7% in feces. The extractable radioactivity in the pooled plasma consisted of 53.1% TPI and 30.9% 6-HMU, the major metabolite of TPI. CONCLUSION: Absorbed (14)C-FTD was metabolized and mostly excreted in urine. The majority of (14)C-TPI was recovered in feces, and the majority of absorbed TPI was excreted in urine. The current data with the ongoing hepatic and renal dysfunction studies will provide an enhanced understanding of the TAS-102 elimination profile.

Phase I Study of Veliparib (ABT-888) Combined with Cisplatin and Vinorelbine in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and/or BRCA Mutation-Associated Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Cisplatin is synergistic with vinorelbine and the PARP inhibitor veliparib, and has antineoplastic activity in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and BRCA mutation-associated breast cancer. This phase I study assessed veliparib with cisplatin and vinorelbine. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A 3+3 dose-escalation design evaluated veliparib administered twice daily for 14 days with cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2) days 1, 8) every 21 days, for 6 to 10 cycles, followed by veliparib monotherapy. Pharmacokinetics, measurement of poly(ADP-ribose) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and preliminary efficacy were assessed. IHC and gene-expression profiling were evaluated as potential predictors of response. RESULTS: Forty-five patients enrolled in nine dose cohorts plus five in an expansion cohort at the highest dose level and recommended phase II dose, 300 mg twice daily. The MTD of veliparib was not reached. Neutropenia (36%), anemia (30%), and thrombocytopenia (12%) were the most common grade 3/4 adverse events. Best overall response for 48 patients was radiologic response with 9-week confirmation for 17 (35%; 2 complete, 15 partial), and stable disease for 21 (44%). Germline BRCA mutation presence versus absence was associated with 6-month progression-free survival [PFS; 10 of 14 (71%) vs. 8 of 27 (30%), mid-P = 0.01]. Median PFS for all 50 patients was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval, 4.1-6.7). CONCLUSIONS: Veliparib at 300 mg twice daily combined with cisplatin and vinorelbine is well tolerated with encouraging response rates. A phase II randomized trial is planned to assess veliparib's contribution to cisplatin chemotherapy in metastatic TNBC and BRCA mutation-associated breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 22(12); 2855-64. ©2016 AACR.

Phase I study of weekly (day 1 and 8) docetaxel in combination with capecitabine in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: Capecitabine in combination with docetaxel given every 3 weeks has shown a high degree of activity in a number of tumor types, but at the expense of significant toxicity. To improve the therapeutic index, we evaluated a weekly regimen of docetaxel in combination with capecitabine, and determined the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities and pharmacokinetics of this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with docetaxel on days 1 and 8, and capecitabine, twice daily on days 1-14, of an every-21-day cycle. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were assessed on days 1 and 8 of the first cycle of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Enrolled in the study were 25 patients. The most frequent toxicities were asthenia, hand-foot syndrome and mucositis. Inability to deliver at least 75% of the planned doses of both drugs during the first two cycles of chemotherapy was noted at dose levels 2, 3 and 4. Dose level 1 (docetaxel 30 mg/m2 and capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily) is the recommended dose for phase II studies. Five patients experienced a partial response, and eight patients had stabilization of disease. Coadministration of capecitabine did not alter the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. CONCLUSION: The regimen consisting of docetaxel 30 mg/m2 (days 1, 8) and capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily (days 1-14) was well tolerated. Capecitabine did not alter pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. Further testing of this regimen in tumor-specific trials, especially gastric, lung and breast cancer, is warranted.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of intermittently administered 9-nitrocamptothecin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: 9-Nitrocamptothecin (9NC) is an oral camptothecin analogue currently administered at 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days/week in Phase III studies for pancreatic carcinoma. In an effort to increase the dose administered per day and determine whether the daily dose or number of days of treatment influence toxicity, we performed a Phase I study of 9NC using intermittent schedules of administration. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: On schedule A, 9NC was administered orally daily x 5 days for 2 weeks every 4 weeks (one cycle). On schedule B, 9NC was administered orally daily x 14 days every 4 weeks (one cycle). Dose levels were determined by adaptive dose finding. Serial blood samples were obtained on day 1 of each schedule for pharmacokinetic studies of 9NC and its 9-aminocamptothecin (9AC) metabolite, and lactone forms were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: The recommended Phase II doses for schedules A and B were 2.43 and 1.70 mg/m(2)/day, respectively, each providing the same dose intensity (i.e., 24 mg/m(2)/cycle). The primary toxicities on schedules A and B were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea. On schedule A, two patients with gastric cancer and two patients with pancreatic cancer had stable disease for more than six cycles. On schedule B, one patient with pancreatic cancer had stable disease for more than six cycles, and a patient with pancreatic cancer had a partial response. There was significant interpatient variability in the disposition of 9NC and 9AC. Most of the drug remained in the 9NC form with a ratio of 9NC to 9AC of approximately 4 to 1. CONCLUSIONS: These studies suggest that 9NC administered on an intermittent schedule is tolerable and may be an active regimen in patients with gastric or pancreatic cancers. Dosing 9NC on a mg/m(2) basis does not reduce pharmacokinetic variability.

Plasma pharmacokinetics and tissue and brain distribution of cisplatin in musk shrews.

PURPOSE: Cisplatin induces nausea and emesis, even with antiemetic supportive care. To assess platinum exposure, which could activate nausea and emesis, we quantitated platinum in the brain and various organs, and hindbrain and spinal cord substance P, a key neuropeptide for the neuronal signaling of nausea and emesis. METHODS: Musk shrews, a model species for nausea and emesis research, were dosed intraperitoneally with 20 mg/kg cisplatin and euthanized at up to 72 h after injection. Concentrations of platinum were quantitated in plasma ultrafiltrate, plasma, lung, kidney, combined forebrain and midbrain, hindbrain, and spinal cord by flameless atomic absorption spectrometry. Hindbrains and spinal cords were analyzed for substance P by immunohistochemistry after injection of 20 or 30 mg/kg. RESULTS: Plasma ultrafilterable platinum concentrations decreased rapidly till 60 min after dosing and then more slowly by 24 h. The concentrations of total platinum in both the fore- and midbrain and the hindbrain were similar at all time points and were at least 20-fold lower than plasma total platinum concentrations. There were no significant changes in substance P immunoreactivity after cisplatin dosing. Histology revealed damage to the renal cortex by 72 h after injection of cisplatin. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to examine platinum concentrations in musk shrews after administration of cisplatin and delineate substance P immunohistochemical staining in the hindbrain and spinal cord of this species. The platinum concentrations detected in the brain could potentially contribute to the neurological side effects of cisplatin, such as nausea and emesis.

Pharmacokinetic studies of 9-nitrocamptothecin on intermittent and continuous schedules of administration in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Oral administration of 9-nitrocamptothecin (9NC), and the formation of its metabolite 9-aminocamptothecin (9AC), may be associated with high interpatient and intrapatient variability. Therefore, we evaluated the plasma pharmacokinetics and urine recovery of 9NC administered on three different schedules as part of phase I and phase II studies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In phase I schedule A, 9NC was administered orally daily for 5 days per week for 2 weeks repeated every 4 weeks. On phase I schedule B, 9NC was administered daily for 14 days repeated every 4 weeks. In Phase II, 9NC was administered daily for 5 days during 8 weeks (one cycle). Serial blood samples were obtained on day 1 and day 10 or 11 for phase I studies, and day 1 and day 50 for the phase II study. Recovery of 9NC and 9AC in urine was evaluated on day 1 and day 10 or 11 in the phase I study. Area under the 9NC and 9AC plasma concentration vs time curves from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24 h) were calculated using compartmental analysis. RESULTS: The mean+/-SD 9NC lactone AUC0-24 h values on day 1 at the maximum tolerated dose of schedules A and B (2.43 and 1.70 mg/m2, respectively) and the phase II dose (1.5 mg/m2) were 78.9+/-54.4, 155.7+/-112.8, and 48.3+/-17.5 ng/ml.h, respectively. The mean+/-SD 9AC lactone AUC0-24 h values at these same doses of 9NC were 17.3+/-17.9, 41.3+/-16.6, and 31.3+/-12.8 ng/ml h, respectively. The ratios of 9NC lactone AUC0-24 h on day 10 or 11 to day 1 on phase I A and B were 1.27+/-0.68 and 1.73+/-1.56, respectively, and the ratios 9AC lactone AUC0-24 h on day 10 or 11 to day 1 on phase I A and B were 2.23+/-1.02 and 1.65+/-0.97, respectively. The recovery of 9NC and 9AC in the urine was <15%. CONCLUSIONS: There was significant interpatient and intrapatient variability in the disposition of 9NC and 9AC. 9NC and 9AC undergo primarily nonrenal elimination.

Clove extract inhibits tumor growth and promotes cell cycle arrest and apoptosis.

Cloves (Syzygium aromaticum) have been used as a traditional Chinese medicinal herb for thousands of years. Cloves possess antiseptic, antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral properties, but their potential anticancer activity remains unknown. In this study, we investigated the in vitro and in vivo antitumor effects and biological mechanisms of ethyl acetate extract of cloves (EAEC) and the potential bioactive components responsible for its antitumor activity. The effects of EAEC on cell growth, cell cycle distribution, and apoptosis were investigated using human cancer cell lines. The molecular changes associated with the effects of EAEC were analyzed by Western blot and (qRT)-PCR analysis. The in vivo effect of EAEC and its bioactive component was investigated using the HT-29 tumor xenograft model. We identified oleanolic acid (OA) as one of the components of EAEC responsible for its antitumor activity. Both EAEC and OA display cytotoxicity against several human cancer cell lines. Interestingly, EAEC was superior to OA and the chemotherapeutic agent 5-fluorouracil at suppressing growth of colon tumor xenografts. EAEC promoted G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and induced apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner. Treatment with EAEC and OA selectively increased protein expression of p21(WAF1/Cip1) and γ-H2AX and downregulated expression of cell cycle-regulated proteins. Moreover, many of these changes were at the mRNA level, suggesting transcriptional regulation by EAEC treatment. Our results demonstrate that clove extract may represent a novel therapeutic herb for the treatment of colorectal cancer, and OA appears to be one of the bioactive components.

Mechanism-based model characterizing bidirectional interaction between PEGylated liposomal CKD-602 (S-CKD602) and monocytes in cancer patients.

S-CKD602 is a PEGylated liposomal formulation of CKD-602, a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor. The objective of this study was to characterize the bidirectional pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) interaction between S-CKD602 and monocytes. Plasma concentrations of encapsulated CKD-602 and monocytes counts from 45 patients with solid tumors were collected following intravenous administration of S-CKD602 in the phase I study. The PK-PD models were developed and fit simultaneously to the PK-PD data, using NONMEM(®). The monocytopenia after administration of S-CKD602 was described by direct toxicity to monocytes in a mechanism-based model, and by direct toxicity to progenitor cells in bone marrow in a myelosuppression-based model. The nonlinear PK disposition of S-CKD602 was described by linear degradation and irreversible binding to monocytes in the mechanism-based model, and Michaelis-Menten kinetics in the myelosuppression-based model. The mechanism-based PK-PD model characterized the nonlinear PK disposition, and the bidirectional PK-PD interaction between S-CKD602 and monocytes.