The use of transtelephonic loop recorders for the assessment of symptoms and arrhythmia recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) is an effective treatment of arrhythmias. However, patients often remain symptomatic after the procedure. We aimed to assess the arrhythmia recurrence after successful RFA in relation to patients' symptoms using transtelephonic loop recorders. Thirty-six consecutive patients (age 50 +/- 14 years, 17 males/19 females) were enrolled after successful RFA for atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia (n = 21), AV reentrant tachycardia (n = 8), atrial tachycardia (n = 2), atrial fibrillation/flutter (n = 4), and ventricular tachycardia (n = 1). During 23 +/- 6 days of follow-up, 679 events were recorded, 246 of which were true arrhythmic events, mostly (56%) asymptomatic. The vast majority of these true arrhythmic events were due to trivial arrhythmias (extrasystoles or sinus tachycardia), equally distributed among symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes. Arrhythmia relapse was shown in four patients, who had a total of nine episodes, eight of which were symptomatic. No high degree AV block was detected. Overall, symptom recurrence had low sensitivity (44%) and high specificity (95%) for the detection of any arrhythmia, and high sensitivity (89%) but low specificity (58%) for the detection of relapse. In conclusion, transtelephonic monitoring was a useful tool for the assessment of symptoms after RFA and its use may be reserved for the most symptomatic patients to detect a relapse or to reassure them for the benign nature of their symptoms.

Effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibition on right ventricular function in patients with mild essential hypertension.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic hypertension is known to affect both left and right ventricular (RV) function. Little is known about the effect of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition on global RV function in patients with essential hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients (17 male, mean age 47 ± 10 years) with mild hypertension free of cardiovascular disease were assessed by echocardiography at baseline and after nine months of antihypertensive treatment with RAS inhibitors. Tissue Doppler imaging derived myocardial performance index (MPI) of the left and right ventricle was used as an index of global ventricular function. RESULTS: Both left ventricular (LV) and RV MPI were increased at baseline and were reduced after treatment (LV MPI reduced from 0.42 ± 0.06 to 0.39 ± 0.05, p < 0.001 and RV MPI was reduced from 0.34 ± 0.06 to 0.32 ± 0.05, p < 0.005). There was a positive correlation between mitral and tricuspid E/A ratio both at baseline and at month nine after treatment (r = 0.661, p < 0.001 and r = 0.503, p < 0.005 respectively). LV mass index and interventricular septum thickness were decreased after treatment. No correlation was found between MPI improvement and blood pressure reduction. CONCLUSIONS: RAS inhibition in patients with mild hypertension results in an improvement of RV global function which is unrelated to the reduction in blood pressure.

Effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibition on left atrial function of hypertensive patients: an echocardiographic tissue deformation imaging study.

BACKGROUND: Although renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors have beneficial effects on left ventricular myocardium, their effect on left atrial (LA) function remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of treatment with RAS inhibitors on LA function of patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: Forty hypertensive patients (17 males, mean age 47.1 +/- 1.5, mean blood pressure 158.3 +/- 1.8/97.1 +/- 0.7 mm Hg) were studied using LA strain and strain rate (SR) imaging before and after 9 months of treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). RESULTS: Standard echocardiographic parameters of LA function (LA volumes, ejection fraction, active and passive emptying fraction, and ejection force), as well as left ventricular diastolic indexes did not change with RAS-blocking treatment. However, peak systolic LA strain and SR were significantly higher at study end compared to baseline (77.8 +/- 5.2% vs. 63.3 +/- 4.1%, P < 0.001 and 3.9 +/- 0.2 s(-1) vs. 3.1 +/- 0.2 s(-1), P < 0.0001, respectively). No correlation was found between changes in systolic or diastolic blood pressure, and changes in strain or SR change during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: LA strain and SR imaging improved after reduction of blood pressure with RAS inhibitors in hypertensive patients, whereas standard LA echocardiographic parameters remained unchanged. LA strain/SR values may have a role in detecting subclinical myocardial involvement in essential hypertension at an early stage; the association between change in these indexes after antihypertensive treatment and clinical outcome merits further evaluation.