Safety of bioelectrical impedance analysis in advanced heart failure patients.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac cachexia and frailty are major complications of advanced heart failure (AHF). Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) may provide valuable information regarding fluid balance, muscle mass and prognosis. The main concerns regarding the use of BIA in AHF patients remain arrhythmias and electromagnetic interferences with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Reliable data regarding patients on continuous-flow ventricular assist device (cf-VAD) remain scarce. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety of BIA in AHF patients on pro-arrhythmogenic therapy with an implanted CIED and/or with a cf-VAD. METHODS: We prospectively performed 217 BIA measurements in 143 AHF patients at risk of severe arrhythmias due to inotropic support/a history of ventricular arrhythmias and/or treated with CIED, including 104 patients with an ICD, CRT or pacemaker and 95 patients with a cf-VAD. All patients were under continuous Electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring and clinical surveillance for 24 hours. RESULTS: No adverse events were observed during the 217 BIA measurements: No rhythm disturbances were documented in the telemetric monitoring during or within 30 minutes after the measurement. CIEDs showed no malfunction, regardless of the location measured or the device manufacturer. In particular, no inappropriate shocks were observed. No alarms, flow disturbances, or malfunctions of the cf-VAD occurred during or after the measurements. CONCLUSION: We consider BIA a safe measurement with major clinical relevance in our cohort of AHF patients, despite an increased arrhythmic potential on inotropic support or the presence of implanted electronic devices (ICD, CRT, pacemaker and cf-VAD).

Septaly Oriented Mild Aortic Regurgitant Jets Negatively Influence Left Ventricular Blood Flow-Insights From 4D Flow MRI Animal Study.

Objectives: Paravalvular leakage (PVL) and eccentric aortic regurgitation remain a major clinical concern in patients receiving transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and regurgitant volume remains the main readout parameter in clinical assessment. In this work we investigate the effect of jet origin and trajectory of mild aortic regurgitation on left ventricular hemodynamics in a porcine model. Methods: A pig model of mild aortic regurgitation/PVL was established by transcatheter piercing and dilating the non-coronary (NCC) or right coronary cusp (RCC) of the aortic valve close to the valve annulus. The interaction between regurgitant blood and LV hemodynamics was assessed by 4D flow cardiovascular MRI. Results: Six RCC, six NCC, and two control animals were included in the study and with one dropout in the NCC group, the success rate of model creation was 93%. Regurgitant jets originating from NCC were directed along the ventricular side of the anterior mitral leaflet and integrated well into the diastolic vortex forming in the left ventricular outflow tract. However, jets from the RCC were orientated along the septum colliding with flow within the vortex, and progressing down to the apex. As a consequence, the presence as well as the area of the vortex was reduced at the site of impact compared to the NCC group. Impairment of vortex formation was localized to the area of impact and not the entire vortex ring. Blood from the NCC jet was largely ejected during the following systole, whereas ejection of large portion of RCC blood was protracted. Conclusions: Even for mild regurgitation, origin and trajectory of the regurgitant jet does cause a different effect on LV hemodynamics. Septaly oriented jets originating from RCC collide with the diastolic vortex, reduce its size, and reach the apical region of the left ventricle where blood resides extendedly. Hence, RCC jets display hemodynamic features which may have a potential negative impact on the long-term burden to the heart.

Impact of Muscle Mass as a Prognostic Factor for Failed Waiting Time Prior to Heart Transplantation.

Objectives: Clinical deterioration during the waiting time impairs the prognosis of patients listed for heart transplantation. Reduced muscle mass increases the risk for mortality after cardiac surgery, but its impact on resilience against deterioration during the waiting time remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 93 patients without a VAD who were listed in Eurotransplant status "high urgent (HU)" for heart transplantation between January 2015 and October 2020. The axial muscle area of the erector spinae muscles at the level of thoracic vertebra 12 indexed to body surface area (TMESA/BSA) measured in the preoperative thoracic computed tomography scan was used to measure muscle mass. Results: Forty patients (43%) underwent emergency VAD implantation during the waiting time and four patients (4%) died during the waiting time. The risk of emergency VAD implantation/death during the waiting time decreased by 10% for every cm2/m2 increase in muscle area [OR 0.901 (95% CI: 0.808-0.996); p = 0.049]. After adjusting for gender [OR 0.318 (95% CI: 0.087-1.073); p = 0.072], mean pulmonary artery pressure [OR 1.061 (95% CI: 0.999-1.131); p = 0.060], C-reactive protein [OR 1.352 (95% CI: 0.986-2.027); p = 0.096], and hemoglobin [OR 0.862 (95% CI: 0.618-1.177); p = 0.360], TMESA/BSA [OR 0.815 (95% CI: 0.698-0.936); p = 0.006] remained an independent risk factor for emergency VAD implantation/death during the HU waiting time. Conclusion: Muscle area of the erector spinae muscle appears to be a potential, easily identifiable risk factor for emergency VAD implantation or death in patients on the HU waiting list for heart transplantation. Identifying patients at risk could help optimize the outcome and the timing of VAD support.